Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/04/2025 in Posts

  1. That’s because you’re not very smart.
    4 points
  2. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-york-judge-sets-trump-sentencing-days-before-inauguration These people are pure evil
    3 points
  3. On the other hand you will repetitively vote for someone who has proven to be corrupt, breaks the law regularly, is dishonest, and has lead Canada to ruin. But he didn't say woke! So he's all good right? People like you are one of the best arguments against democracy
    3 points
  4. I would like to thank "Team Canada" for their good faith arguments based on knowledge and factual information. It certainly has not been easy in 2024, to debate with a bunch of MAGA Hyenas, but you were all up for the task, and I commend you for it. Team Canada is composed of: @Michael Hardner @myata @robosmith @BeaverFever @Hodad @Moonlight Graham @eyeball @Moonbox @Black Dog @Queenmandy85 @Politics1990 @herbie @Radiorum Sorry if I forgot anyone. You made 2024 much better. Thank you for believing in democracy.
    2 points
  5. The interview explains how the cost of living for Canadians has become a major disaster and what PP and the Conservatives will do about it. Home ownership is out of sight for young people which inhibits their ability to have families. The size of the federal bureaucracy has increased by 40% under Trudeau. The cost of homes means it would take 29 years for a young person to save up enough money for the down payment. This means they could not raise a family and own a home. The federal deficit of 62 billion dollars in the past year means a debt of $6,000 for each Canadian. This interview answers what the Conservatives plan to do about it.
    2 points
  6. According to the parliamentary budget officer income inequality grew under Chretien but subsided under Harper due to tax changes the Tories had made. It has been growing under Trudeau, however.
    2 points
  7. Nope. They absolutely did not. No they don't. And when conservative governments do it and the electorate finds out about it conservatives punish the shit out of them. The problem is that those on the left are constantly prepared to reward that behavior. And yet you want to excuse it by pretending somehow it's acceptable to other people. Like your own lack of morals and decency is somehow ok if you can pretend everyone else feels the same way. They don't. We're not talking about a slip up or a misunderstanding or somebody being incompetent and doing something they shouldn't have, we're talking about constant and regular deliberate breaches of ethics and the law that began almost immediately after he took office and has not stopped. Not to mention allowing foreign interference in the form of Chinese money pouring into liberal candidates and taking no action to prevent us because it was beneficial to him. Sorry, you don't get to pass that off as everybody does it. You are supporting a corrupt government because you are a corrupt and moralist individual as are many on the left. Fortunately the ones who are not as a moral and repugnant as yourself have finally realized that they cannot support the scumbag liberals the way they used to and are now turning to Poilievre and are set to give him the largest majority in history. The liberals will have a long walk back from this one and they may even be wiped out, which is what they desperately need. The party has become inherently corrupt and so has its base. They need to be shaken up and think about their actions.
    2 points
  8. News flash....PP does not need your approval or vote it is already a sure thing with a super majority, the liberal and NDP parties are going to be devastated....with a great possibility of the bloc party becoming official opposition, ....so for the next 4 years or so get use to his remarks....on a positive note we will not have to listen to many liberals or NDPers whine from the bench....
    2 points
  9. lol such a great life but you sit on this forum 24/7 year round good job bragging up your fake good life though bud lol
    2 points
  10. Is this better? Would this person do a better job of protecting us... ...from this... ...or maybe this guy... ...can protect us from... from these guys. ⬆️ I think I will take the guy that can cite law, off the top of his head, over the DEI hires that are more concerned about pronouns than results. And so will the majority of Americans. That's why they voted, overwhelmingly, for DJT.
    2 points
  11. The fact that you think that being interviewed by someone make someone fit or unfit is yet another sign that you are not fit to be a voter
    2 points
  12. Once you've described exactly WTF the Biden Crime Syndicate that you made up is and WTF "crimes" it supposedly committed I will be happy to provide you links to the Court documents about the crimes Trump has been convicted of. You seem to be totally unaware of the difference between conspiracy rumours and factual truth, That's a well known side effect of cultism.
    2 points
  13. That doesn't mean your experience with racism was universal. I doubt those. people who were Indigenous, Asian, Black etc who were around back then would tell the same story. And as I pointed out to DumbFux, Canada's immigration policies were quite explicitly racist for the first half of the country's existence, which kinda undermine's PP's point about racism not really being a thing in the past.
    1 point
  14. I am Groot: Canada was literally homogeneous in the 1970s CdnFox: The Chinese had very significant numbers by the 1970s. These MAGA hyenas need to get their ducks in a row, before commenting. Especially if all PP and Jordan Peterson will talk about is how "broken" Canada is, and lie about racism.
    1 point
  15. No thanks. Go knock on the basement door at Herbie's mom's house.
    1 point
  16. Ya your right why would a nation whos prime GDP earner is oil and gas, why would we invest in anything to do with pipelines, we continue to buy foreign oil to power up the maritimes, and Quebec...same as natural gas plants, no business cases there either... man i'm glad the liberals were such good business people that our economy is booming, people can finally afford their dream homes, put fancy food on the table, don't need for both spouses wages to make do....WTF are we going to do when they are gone...
    1 point
  17. Demand for oil is going up in case you haven't noticed. And you don't think it's the least bit hypocritical of Carney to support shutting down Canadian pipelines while investing in, and profiting from, pipelines in the UAE and Brazil?
    1 point
  18. Summary of the above post.... I don't like Peterson so I scoured the internet to find something that fits my dislike. Amiright?
    1 point
  19. I really dont I enjoy the forums but they're what i do while i'm doing something else for the most part. Most of it is iphone and voice dictation, or while i'm watching tv or while i'm on hold at work etc etc. People like you can only do one thing at a time. Slow brains have to focus to get even simple tasks done. And seeing as you can only type with two fingers i'm sure that it seems like my posting requires some great amount of time. skilled people always seem 'impressive' in their abilities to the dull peasantry Now now don't rush him..... he can only type with two fingers and he needs one of them to work the dictionary as he goes
    1 point
  20. Quick quick quick please hurry and tell us how to lose more, it's become really satisfying. Hurry hurry now.
    1 point
  21. She got confused and thought 'empirical' mean it was written by darth vader
    1 point
  22. 😆 I can't take anyone serious who wants to be pm and uses the word wokeism for everything the more he speaks the more it has convinced me to just go vote for whichever party has the best chance in my riding vs his at this point. Also thinking company's are gonna pass money down in wages to workers is hilarious that has never worked either they will pocket it for themselves. to be honest i was gonna just sit out the next election but him babbling on about wokeism and just being an annoying turd the past couple month has convinced me to go vote instead of staying home so congrats PP 1 more vote against you cause of your big mouth 🤣
    1 point
  23. The claim that there was no racism before Justin Trudeau is utterly ridiculous. So much so that it's a mark against the conservative leader in terms of being a serious candidate. He won't be able to get away with his stuff once he's PM.
    1 point
  24. I am placing you on ignore. You are an old man, and time has passed you by. This is not the early 1970s, when you would spend your nights crying in your room, with Elton John playing in the background, since the high school girls rejected you. It's 2025.
    1 point
  25. Why has Jordan Peterson not filed a defamation case against Trudeau and the Government, like he said he was going to in October? It is because he would lose. Trudeau swore under oath, in regards to the Governments findings of Peterson being paid off by Russia. He will never sue, since he knows it to be true.
    1 point
  26. Jurisprudence artfully convicted and bottled.? Sounds like a jam you would find at your local yuppie emporium. They also sell fructooligosaccharides (FOS) as artificial sweeteners. Robo, you must stay away from those places, the aroma from the scented candles is making you dizzy.
    1 point
  27. I hope it warms you heart. I would not want you to become stressed, and aggravate your heart condition.
    1 point
  28. Buddy you're wasting your precious golden years sitting your fat self in front of youtube watching a benzo addict and a greasy used car salesman suck each other off while posting constantly on a shitty web forum, you're a massive loser. Like, I'm bored and stuck at work late because I'm filling in for one of my reports who is on holidays, wtf are you still posting for?
    1 point
  29. Cite a source. Nobody cares about some random University study, you may or may not have made up. First off, you are talking about "East Asians," a group that was not generally targeted. Why you are being so dishonest, in not addressing the backlash against members of the South Asian and Middle Eastern groups, and instead go on about East Asians, is bizarre, to say the least. "For Muslim Americans, the post-September 11 ramifications of Islamophobia continue as the 21st anniversary of the attacks is solemnly marked on Sunday. According to FBI statistics, hate crimes against Muslims in the United States skyrocketed immediately after September 11, 2001, and are still on an upward trend." source: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/9/11/decades-after-9-11-muslims-battle-islamophobia-in
    1 point
  30. Well he has been convicted, in france which is a western country, with good solid justice system....So how tricky could it be, send him back, or continue to harbor a convicted terrorist...he is not going to be executed so why would Canada not be handing him over...
    1 point
  31. Oh look your obsession with posteriors rears its head again. IDC if it's better than Frost/Nixon or more entertaining than William F. Buckley, Jr vs Gore VidalI, it's almost two hours long. I dunno what kind of pathetic loser you are that you can spare that kind of time to watch these two pinheads on top of posting hundreds of times a week, but normal people have better things to do, loser.
    1 point
  32. Actually, that is your source quoting another paper. Your source came to the conclusion: "First, homophobia was associated with increased odds of straight identification in all groups." Your source says homophobia is associated with identifying as heterosexual. As a man that identifies as a woman and demands everyone else believe that, how can you claim that homophobic people that identify as straight are anything other than straight? Unless....you are a hypocrite?
    1 point
  33. Giggle. Poilievre will be our next PM. He will usher in common sense and prosperity. These Libbies know that and this on top of the Trump win is driving them even more crazy. And I'm enjoying every minute of it.
    1 point
  34. Like Pinochet or is the Shah's methods more to your liking? Anyone else notice how often right wing times are also good times for dictators?
    1 point
  35. lol as if you'd say this if this guy was a Muslim or Democrat, you f*cking dirty weasel.
    1 point
  36. Wrong. I've posted two empirical studies (one from 2009) that supports my contention. You attempted to debunk empirical studies with a blog/opinion piece. What a halfwitted buffoon you are. I think you'd be much happier if you'd crawl out of the closet you're hiding in and visit your local "bath house". Get your freak on, so to speak.
    1 point
  37. This is a pretty interesting channel called Forgotten History. There is a series called Most Corrupt, and he did name certain Democrats and Republicans.
    1 point
  38. Well...mostly because, unless you hadn't noticed, Canada is already colonized. Trump's not about to even try to make Canada a state. Its just a jab at the spinless little twerp we have as PM right now.
    1 point
  39. Perhaps it was a cry for help, trying to draw Trump's attention to a pressing problem: the monstrosity that is the Cybertruck.
    1 point
  40. I don't blame you for sticking up for Jordan Peterson. Both of you are compromised by Russia.
    1 point
  41. How can there be any sort of "insider knowledge"? What's in a beach ball, robo? Do you really need me to tell you? It's just air, robo. Just air. I don't need insider info to know that Joe's not performing all the duties of the president any more than I need insider info to know that Joy Behar isn't doing the Ironman this year. Wanna know why? Because they're both utterly incapable. Is the 75-yr-old crossing guard at the school over by your house marrying beautiful 28-yr-old twins? Nope. And I can say that without insider information too. I have skills that are way beyond your ken, sonny.
    1 point
  42. 4,732. Unfortunately tho even completing the requirement won't change the fact you have no idea what a duck looks like. To you in this case a 'duck ' or neo nazi is anyone who disagrees with you or is right of castro. We have one nazi on the board, he doesn't try to hide it, and he's pretty left wing. The rest is your imagination.
    1 point
  43. I agree. That's why trump keeps trying to troll even harder with more outlandish nonsense. I'm done with caring about what he says since 100% of it is low-information horse shit. My intent is to only react to actual policy actions and outcomes.
    1 point
  44. I'm not 'fabricating' court cases, or Wikipedia articles detailing the new uses for terms like gender. You have an amazing inability to actually respond to what is said. I did not say you were fabricating court cases or Wikipedia articles. I respond to what you say, you just don't like my responses. True, you did not say I was fabricating court cases or Wikipedia articles. You -did- say that I was fabricating a problem, though. I'm just trying to point out to you that the new gender terms are not something I invented, and they are being used in court cases and Wikipedia articles. You can try to deny these new definitions exist all you like, but Wikipedia and court decisions aren't going to just go away because you don't like the fact that they're there.
    1 point
  45. Happy new year to you too ?
    1 point
  46. 1 point
  47. 1. Well, the thing is: -You call me a liar when I state my OPINIONS sometimes. Which is like me saying "I like chocolate" and you saying "No you don't" -You state that you only respond to me to call out my lies but you also add to my points and in fact don't always call me out. So am I a liar or not ? -You seem to think that it's ok to disparage my character and that I should be unbothered by that and just go on posting as though I have some obligation to you or the forum to put up with it. 2. "You should" means you're prescribing what this forum is and should be. I would counter that with saying "you SHOULD" engage in substantial arguments and not name-call. Furthermore my version of how this forum should operate is substantiated in the Guidelines: https://repolitics.com/forums/guidelines/ Be Polite and Respect Others Repolitics.com operates these forums in the hopes that they will promote intelligent, honest and responsible discussion. We encourage you to speak your mind on relevant issues in a thoughtful way. Please respect others using this board and treat them with respect and dignity. 3. I'm glad that you're unhappy with this. Given that you don't like how the forum works, I recommend the best thing is for you to leave immediately and never come back. I think that would be best.
    1 point
  48. Read the quote twice... it contains a clue as to why that debate is troublesome for you and less so for some of the others mentioned.
    1 point
  49. Production caps, no pipelines and endless regulation by Ottawa means that who owns the oil industry is completely irrelevant. The US doesn't need invasion, how about applying the same tariff on Canadian made EV's and parts as Trump will put on China? How about renegotiating USMCA? How about tightening the border? Trump can think of something. Just wait and it might become more clear.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...