Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/24/2024 in Posts
-
You have mass shooter vibes.3 points
-
John Kelly was fired by Trump in December of 2018. Now he tries to drop a bomb on Trump. Go figure...3 points
-
I suppose it's a matter of opinion. To be blunt I would consider them to be a terrorist organization considering they have directly aligned themselves with hamas Which is why I sleep till noon and go to bed at midnight, There is always a possibility for change. If a masses survivors came out tomorrow, surrendered, and later all decided to work hard for peace and prosperity for all peoples then what the hell. History is replete of examples where people perceived as bad guys at one point in history turn things around and were later perceived as good guys. George Washington for example, the rebel scum who helped lead a revolution and killed many innocent soldiers in pursuit of his political agenda. History is without a doubt a matter of perspective But there is little doubt that in the here and now The actions of Hamas and Hezbollah and all of the associated palestinian militant groups are what we would consider to be terrorists, or at the very very least enemy combatants3 points
-
OMG thinks he's qualified to judge on her heritage based on what skin colour he sees. And that being a woman she must have slept her way to where she is. It's not just DonOld that's a despicable waste of skin, his backers are the dregs of humanity too.2 points
-
He was found by a jury of his peers, each of whom he could have rejected, to be liable for sexual assault. His wife said he raped her. He has admitted to committing sexual assault ("grab them by the pusy"). Everyone knows it's true. Even you. You just can't admit it because you lack character.2 points
-
It is the internet. Garek: Why Doctor, it is all true. Bashir: Even the lies? Garek: Especially the lies2 points
-
What's most amusing is that you guys haven't even offered the actual conservative argument for the electoral college and instead have opted to try to deny facts and try to redefine them, which has gotten you nowhere. Its such an artifact of our time that the right wing is now so inept at making intellectually robust and honest conservative arguments and instead relies entirely on lies and disinformation.2 points
-
Funny about land. I live near a place called Bishop Landing but never see any Bishops landing.2 points
-
Plan for what? As for butt sniffing, you are so far up the Democrats ass they've had to order pregnancy tests.2 points
-
This guy bases truth on what he hears from CNN and then calls other people liars. Unreal2 points
-
Her father is Jamaican and her mom is from India and you are a fool. We all do know Trump is orange. What's your point.2 points
-
You guys are always accusing the other side of doing what they never did in the first place2 points
-
You guys are always accusing the other guys of planning to do what you already tried to do.2 points
-
Kermit quipped . . . "It ain't easy being green." Forty years . . . one seat. Be green . . . wipe yer' ass with a leaf! What a joke that party is . . .2 points
-
He's been kicking Harris's ass in the swing states since October 1st but now we're seeing big dips nationally And trump has essentially caught up with harris. I guess the christian thing didn't go over so well This pole snip from real clear polling starts about mid-september The harris campaign is coming apart. Expect the desperate hail mary moves to start shortly1 point
-
Again you claimed I said Jews were a race, but of course you have no proof. But onto the bold, as I said and all my sources how, you cannot separate the living space angle from the belief in German racial superiority. It's baked in. lmao So not an actual government policy of Imperial Germany. Meanwhile, your same link says this about the application of this philosophy by the Nazis: Once again, your own source undermines your point. You absolutely f*cking suck at this. Every source I've provided has shown that the racial aspect was a central component of the Nazi's philosophy. Every source you've provided has shown that the racial aspect was a central component of the Nazi's philosophy. The Nazis themselves said that the racial aspect was a central component of the Nazi's philosophy. And yet here you sit insisting that the racial aspect was merely tangential and not because you believe it, but because admitting you were wrong about something you've argued for for such a long time (to the point of engaging in a little light Holocaust denial) would be too much for your sad, fragile little ego to handle. You are truly one of the saddest characters I've ever encountered online. Pitiful stuff.1 point
-
You cry about Trumps morals but you want people you don't agree with dead. Typical example of the tolerant left.1 point
-
1 point
-
The desperation comes from their Lord and Saviour becoming more unhinged, more insane as election day approaches. Can't answer the simplest questions, spots even more blatant lies, babbles on about penis sizes, dances in front of the camera like a car lot balloon on a windless day, minimal effort applying make up, more wrinkles daily, eyes sunken.... he's given up he know's he's lost and is off to prison.1 point
-
Oh I've p!ssed a lot of people off, you'd know that as well as any, but I never did anything ti make those two that angry. I'm 56 now, and in all I was only single for about 4-5 years as an adult, so I'm a veteran of probably 32 yrs x 12 periods = well over 350 periods. I'm not comparing it Viet Nam, but you need to have a plan to get through that worst day of it when it comes.1 point
-
Since the left is posting random sh1t with no evidence, here: https://x.com/jkbolden85/status/1841511726828998993?t=1YvlMThv9Aom0o8LNc2ptQ&s=191 point
-
He was found guilty by a jury of his peers after he outright admitted to it.1 point
-
I don't support Trump but I also don't care if he raped 30 women. If women don't want to get raped, maybe they should work on making it illegal.1 point
-
1 point
-
Thanks for helping to support my point about the lack of rational thought among current conservatives.1 point
-
There are 2 Kamalas: Kamala #1 reads from a teleprompter for 70 days at a time without answering to any reporters at all, no doubt that teleprompter is controlled by the same people who run the country through Joe's lips Kamala #2 is an angry, scatterbrained, and dull person who always has to learn from her mistakes, and she laughs about that (as seen in her recent AC360 interview), as if making mistakes that harm millions of people are ever funny. She seems to think that she's in the "try" league, but being POTUS is definitely a big league job. Why would anyone expect Kamala #1's teleprompter to yield a different outcome, regarding global peace, than it did when it was Joe's lips that were moved by it? Who in their right mind would trust Kamala #2, aka Kamala "Well I tried, hawhawhawhawhawhaw" Harris to try to stumble and bumble her way to global peace? Sorry Kamala, but Americans aren't your friends anymore, they'd need you to be their leader, and no one thinks it's funny when their leader makes a huge mistake that costs them all dearly. Trump has already proven himself to be an architect of peace through strength. I don't think that Kamala's peace through stupidity and shrieking at people is worth a shot.1 point
-
I likely have already, you just ignored it like you do most of anything else that is not convenient for you.1 point
-
1 point
-
Roosevelt and Churchill's wars on innocent cute Nazis are anathema! Let's run to hug with Hitlers to avoid WWXX!! Liars will lie. Traitors will betray. And we know the consequences. This time around, we knew everything.1 point
-
1 point
-
The desperation is all left, all of the time, and it's come full circle: the poor stupid bastards are back to calling Trump Hitler again. lol1 point
-
1 point
-
I've seen this person's posts. They claim to be Ukrainian in many posts (and set their location to Ukraine), but always go out of their way to defend Russia, and attack Ukraine. In other words, the person is just trolling.1 point
-
1 point
-
They were told they had to bow at the feet of Joe to get their black card, so they are used to it. They don't like it. But they are used to it.1 point
-
Dude he has previously shot almost all of that down. You have utterly failed to make any kind of argument as to why making adjustments for representation based on area is somehow wrong. Your girl's going to lose. Make peace with it and stop being such a bitter little twat1 point
-
Your point was that room full of black Trump supporters don't think she's black, as if they hold the license on blackness LOL1 point
-
Oh ok. So you find it acceptable if they just kill people in red hats?1 point
-
1 point
-
Aside from the fact that it appears to be an unsubstantiated claim from a tabloid magazine, It only addresses the issue of her receiving questions. It doesn't address the many other complaints or claims made which were equally as bad Oops indeed Swing and a miss there little guy1 point
-
Between the first world war and the second world war, the US gov't unleashed the army on their own WWI veterans. They even had tanks. It's a pretty humiliating event for the US. Patton and MacArthur were among the generals that attacked them. Maybe Eisenhower as well, I'm not sure.1 point
-
1 point
-
The removal of JT will solve nothing. He is after all merely a figurehead. The destruction of Canada and Western society will only continue and accelerate unless liberal ideology is rejected and destroyed. Greatness is achieved through commonality in vision and effort. Woke DEI is destructive, exclusion and indoctrination.1 point
-
Poiliever won't get a clearance because then he can't make shit up. He doesn't care if his party has been compromised. You can't repeat classified stuff because it is classified. People could get hurt and investigations compromised. How would he know what "egregious facts" are when he isn't interested in finding out? What egregious facts has he disclosed other than what comes out of his ass? The guy is a pure political animal. Full stop.1 point
-
We've been trying to tell you that for ages1 point
-
Right. Show me where a tax cut ever in history lead to deflation. Please - go ahead. One example. There's been lots of tax cuts in Canada and the us, which one lead to deflation? None? Not one? ever? You can't becase it's not deflationary in and of itself. There's reasons for that but the fact it never happens is proof enough. Gosh, i'ts almost as if i know what i'm talking about and you don't. 🙄 That's literally exactly how it works. You claim that tax cuts create inflation (which is weird because 1 paragraph before you were arguing they were deflationary. But for all the tax cuts that have been made there's no inflation. So you're wrong. The us still hasn't hit target, so it absolutely is inflationary. . And biden has reduced his spending somewhat in the last year. But - the thing is (And i know i've explained this to you specifically), inflation and interest rates are interlinked. They're two sides of the same coin. So what biden/trudeau have done is raised interest/inflation to high levels and they're still there. That's slowly going away because they've both been deliberately hurting their economies and radically slowing growth in order to reduce demand on the markets. So it's not that their spending isn't causing infaltion, we still have inflation, it's that it's being offset by the harm done to the economy because of their interest. Spending puts inflationary money into the market, higher interest rates are one of the ways they hoover it back out. But if interest rates remained the same, inflation would be MUCH higher and would still be horrific brecasue "dun dun duuuuun" gov't spending increases inflationary pressure. Look - you obviously don't get this stuff. Which is fine, not everybody makes a point of learning it. And i dont' mind explaining to you so you can go look it up yourself and educate yourself . But i know from long experience by you're tone you're at the point where you're just angry i'm right and saying any old stupid thing just to disagree. And then you'll get mad and then we'll go through the usual "take a word out of context / pretend you never said what you said/ try to focus on some meaningless minuiae thing to avoid the fact you were wrong routine. Followed by a hissy fit where it will be revealed your mistakes are due to my post count and the length of my posts, and then you'll freak out, pee on yourself and spend the next week following me around trying to start fights and looking worse and worse. So rather than that - why don't we try something different and we can just talk about how this kind of spending works and you can go look up what we talked about later and the pros and cons of various approaches when you're calm.1 point
