Leaderboard

Many of us have read the New Testament, and I think it is fair to say that Jesus Christ would never vote for Trump. Jesus cared about the sick, the poor, and the vulnerable. Jesus also preached forgiveness, and loving thy neighbour. All of which are foreign to trump. Harris is certainly not perfect, but if Jesus was resurrected, he would guide his followers to vote Democratic..

A town hall, kamelface style.

I think that the worst aspect of government treatment of Indigenous is demonstrated by views like yours. That’s what’s really holding them back.

Nope. He knows Trudeau is in deep and wants to be able to call it out. Trudeau is trying to gag him.

Wrong. She was filibustering, not speaking. They had a very limited time frame to work with (less than 1 hour), she showed up over 15 minutes late, then she completely dodged the first question multiple times, just like she did with ABC. FYI when an interviewer asks a question, that's not an opportunity to babble about something else. If she can't just answer a question about her level of success truthfully, that tells people that the honest answer is an embarrassment for her. She could have been honourable and admitted that she failed, but instead she weaselled, then got angry and rude. She's a terrible candidate, and it's entirely her fault that she's losing so badly right now. The MSM couldn't possibly have done any more for her.

Enjoy your next heart attack fatty.

I love you dispshits pretending a coinflip is a sure thing lol.

You are trying really hard to ignore the pathetic sleezebag's behaviour. Sad.

It will be much harder for you Libbies to cheat.

Have you received the 22 camels yet?

No, you signed a petition supporting the constitution. Theoretically Democrats could support the constitution but not likely I will admit

Harris is now losing in most swing states. If the election were held today, Trump would won. This is very interesting, considering there is absolutely no way Trump's cognitive abilities are strong enough to last until 2029. At what point will Trump be forced to step down? Get used to your new President, America: The Democrats blew it again. All they had to do was not elect a weak candidate. However, just like 2016, they chose a loser.

Ah, the dance of shadows and light, where ambition weaves through the tapestry of time. Echoes of past choices ripple through the fabric of existence, while the whispers of the unseen guide the restless. What is power, if not a fleeting wisp, obscured by the clouds of intention? The cycle spins, and within the whirlwind, we ponder the essence of the unwritten path. Will clarity emerge, or shall we remain adrift in the sea of what could be?

Lizzo singing at Kamala's rally this weekend was the perfect metaphor for Kamala's campaign. The fat lady has sung. This election is over.

Gawd she's a plank!

Jesus said "But whoso shall cause one of these little ones who believe in Me to fall, it were better for him that a millstone were hung about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea." Certainly wouldn't be in favor of Kamala's pro abortion position of children with Down Syndrome that's for sure. It's also a heresy to believe in abortion because you would be denying Jesus' humanity while in the womb and the immaculate conception is a core Christian belief

That is not where the one person one vote principle is applied though. It is at the state level, where each persons vote is equal to the others. We are a federal republic of a united states. There is no rule by anyone. That is the entire point. It is a system of checks and balances which is why we have a Senate and House to comprise the Congress, a Judiciary, and an Executive. Yes, the people elected the President. The electors are chosen to represent them.

1. There's only one cult in this country and it's the democrat party. 2. And you're such a pain slut that you actually buy into that 3% bullshit. Go find a rabid wokejob forum and get your gimp on over there.

"As of 3 p.m. Eastern on Oct. 18, our model gives Trump a 52-in-100 chance of winning the majority of Electoral College votes. The model gives Harris a 48-in-100 chance" https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2024-election-forecast/?origin=serp_auto Enjoy the election.

Nobody even brought that up I would have been happier had you appreciated the original post rather than waiting two more posts after it and then asking me to repost the same post You can see why it's not really the appreciation that's the problem here

Can someone rational explain a real reason that this is a concern again, which means not including crass political gamesmanship. Ignored Posters need not apply, ie. Don't post your fake violent horror stories meant to bleed hearts. Thanks.

Giggle...even limp Libbie boys need to make dick jokes.

And this is why you Libbies lose. You demean half of your own people constantly.

Lol...the desperation is so satisfying. You thought you could impeach Trump. You failed. You thought you could put Trump in jail. You failed. You thought you could hide Brandon. You failed. You thought you could stick a twit in as your candidate and you're failing. The last 4 years have been one epic failure after the other. Enjoy the election.

How many times do I have to remind you that I am not a Christian? As I said...if some guy wants to LARP as a woman...I'm fine with that. But when these warped people insist on playing dress-up for elementary school kids...I got a problem with that. When they insist on participating in womens' sports, I got a problem with that.

Women can get pregnant. Men can't. It's just that simple.

Oh, January 6 happened, it just didn't happen the way you liars say it did.

This is taken from the New York Times. It shows how the Biden administration has used the full force of government against Elon Musk. Would he recieve such treatment if he supported Biden and the Democrats? Not likely..

Hello. I have an article here that's relevant to Americans. It's from a Canadian news website but it mentions the CDC. I will include an excerpt below, to raise awareness and maybe to get a discussion going. I will also provide a link to the full article below. Kindly read it over and let me know what you think. ......... Educated parents can either get their children out of harm’s way or continue living inside one of the largest most evil lies in history, that vaccines — full of heavy metals, viral diseases, mycoplasma, fecal material, DNA fragments from other species, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80 (a sterilizing agent) — are a miracle of modern medicine. A FOIA request filed in the US with the CDC, by a doctor with an autistic son, seeking information on what the CDC knows about the dangers of vaccines, had, by law, to be responded to in 20 days. Nearly 7 years later, the doctor went to court and the CDC argued it does not have to turn over documents. A judge ordered the CDC to turn over the documents on September 30, 2011. On October 26, 2011, a Denver Post editorial expressed shock that the Obama administration, after promising to be especially transparent, was proposing changes to the Freedom of Information Act that would allow it to go beyond declaring some documents secret and to actually allow government agencies (such as the CDC) to declare some documents “non-existent.” <> The CDC is obviously acting against the health of the American people. But the threat to the lives of the American people posed by the CDC’s behavior does not stop there. It participated in designing pandemic laws that are on the books in every state in the US, which arrange for the government to use the military to force unknown, untested, vaccines, drugs, chemicals, and “medical” treatments on the entire country if it declares a pandemic emergency. The CDC’s credibility in declaring such a pandemic emergency is non-existent, again based on the Freedom of Information Act. In 2009, after the CDC had declared the H1N1 “pandemic,” the CDC refused to respond to a Freedom of Information Act request filed by CBS News and the CDC also attempted to block their investigation. What the CDC was hiding was its part in one of the largest medical scandals in history, putting out wildly exaggerated data on what it claimed were H1N1 cases, and by doing so, created the false impression of a “pandemic” in the US. The CDC was also covering up a financial scandal to rival the bailout since the vaccines for the false pandemic cost the US billions. And worse, the CDC put pregnant women first in line for an untested vaccine with a sterilizing agent, polysorbate 80, in it. Thanks to the CDC, “the number of vaccine-related “fetal demise” reports increased by 2,440% in 2009 compared to previous years, which is even more shocking than the miscarriage statistic [700% increase]. ..... The article goes into greater detail than what I posted above. See it here for yourself: https://druthers.ca/the-vaccine-hoax-is-over/ If the link doesn't work, go to Druthers.ca. At the top, select Read. Then select By subject. Then select the Adverse Event tag. Then search for the article titled, "The vaccine hoax is over". It's on the 4th page. Let me know what you think!

Do you mean anti-vaxer in the traditional sense, where he's against getting his own children the vaccines that actually work and save people's lives, or by the vaxtard definition, where he's just opposed to forcing people to take a dangerous pseudo-vax that they don't need? If you look at the laundry list of MSM pranks that sucked leftard cultists in over the pat ten years, just being flat-earthers would be an improvement.

It's a video of Trump working at McDonald's when he was 17. They used to say that he looked a lot older than he should, but now he looks about normal for his age.

Indeed, no one should make excuses for Trudeau. Peterson isn't a villain, he's a pompous egoist.

No need to speculate. Trump was in office and signed a $2.3 Trillion COVID stimulus package. Indeed, his COVID stimulus was even larger than Biden's. But the inflation is all Biden's fault and the fact that we staved off economic collapse and navigated a soft landing is just happenstance.

These are red herrings. You stated we should keep to living memory. Your argument is that after the Arabs whose homes they left from the 1947-48 war are dead then Arabs don't have any more land/property claims in Israel proper and that indigenous people in Canada can't make land claims based on things that happened prior to "living memory" (with signed treaties being an exception?) Yes this is the argument you're making. No, international law via UN General Assembly vote created the 1947 UN Partition Plan as a compromise to the situation in British Mandate Palestine. Muslims there didn't like the decision so they started violence. After this started, a of couple of Zionist paramilitary groups also caused violence as you stated. I never stated that Zionists or Israel have always followed international law. But you only mention the times Israel and Zionist groups break the law and never seem to mentioned when Muslims do. The UN Partition Plan created a reasonable compromise and a 2-state solution and gave Muslim Arabs there tons of land including everything surrounding Jerusalem, but they still rejected it. Arab leadership were unwilling to accept any plan that resulted in Israeli state. Palestinians will never get this much land in any potential 2-state deal going forward. The public land in black was owned by the British via the mandate with most of it being arid desert and/or desert mountains/hills and therefore unused.

Stating that some percentage of the total is baked into the pie because everyone gets 2 additional electors based on everyone having 2 senators doesn't make it false. It means, as I already conceded to, that it is more precise to say that States are allocated votes based on Congressional Representation which is based on population and every state having 2 Senators in addition to that. Still based on population. Do you really not know that census data is used to determine state populations and to determine how many Representatives each state has and that determines the electors each state is awarded? Read the Constitution: "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress" Yes, Americans are the ones voting. It certainly is not Iranians. Well, at least for now. Democrats would certainly welcome Illegal Aliens voting from other countries... That aside, as it has been pointed out to you over and over again now, those Americans are in fact voting for President, the Electors go carry out their wishes. That is the very concept of a democratic system. I have already refuted your one vote principle nonsense as well. A person in each state, no matter where they live, has their vote counted the same as someone else in that state = one vote principle.

Those are not comments, they are misguided assertions.

Your claim was that "A State gets the number of Electors based on its congressional representation, which is based on its population." So you now understand this is false, correct? 18.6% of the Electoral College is not based on the population of the states. What's your proof of this? I showed you specifically how different they are. A Californians vote for president is about 25% worth the vote of a Wyomingian. Since you're struggling on this point, here are visual aids of the electoral vote per capita: Americans are not the ones voting for president, and the people who are voting in our place do not proportionally represent the American people. It is therefore not a democratic system and it subverts the one person one vote principle.

I didn't even know he met your mother. But the sexual assaults weren't his only crimes. They're not even the only crimes he was convicted of. Not to mention the crimes the Supreme Court has been trying to overrule, like leaving classified documents in the bathroom at Maralago for his Saudi friends to "accidentally" discover.

I am a cat. Meow.

Name a Dem or a Dem-owned company that hasn't done that, Black Dummy... The Dems have done that with non-Americans ffs. Everywhere you look they're giving non-Americans money and trying to help them vote.

Is Elon really crazy? The guy isn't just an astronaut, or a NASA employee, HE OWNS HIS OWN SPACE EXPLORATION COMPANY ffs. He has made billions in the fields of finance, automobile manufacturing, global communications, and space exploration. How many people are that successful in such wildly different fields? Was the billionaire-president just really lucky, or were there good reasons why peace and prosperity grew around the world like wildfire when he was potus, and why the border was secure? Biden bragged about how different everything was going to be, and to his credit, he at least told the truth about that, but America and the world somehow got intensely unlucky when he changed everything. Now Elon and the successful former president want to partner up to lead the free world, but you want to put little Kamala Harris in that role, and what has she ever accomplished compared to those two? It's a matter of fact that the only things that she has done on the same magnitude as Trump and Musk all have negative numbers in front of them: Trump and Musk made the world better, +++++, Kamala made everything that she touched far worse. If you rated her as the border czar, she gets a -1,000,000,000. Elon got to where he is on the shoulders of monumental accomplishments, Kamala Harris blew Willie Brown. Trump has a head start in life, but look at what he has accomplished compared to other people who started off in similar positions... Kamala: "I'm the only person on this stage who prosecuted trans-national cartels!" Wow Kamala!, Like, which ones? And how successfully? And why did all of the knowledge that you acquired in that job just help you to make America's southern border way worse?