Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/26/2024 in Posts

  1. The FBI brought their own classified document sleeves, added them to documents and then took pictures that they leaked to the press. Everything the Democrats do is a lie. Everything. How could they know of the documents were classified? They can't. Even if the document was marked classified, it might have been declassified prior to that day. They added the sleeves to make the case look better. Don't forget that Smith has a history of setting up Republican politicians for prosecution.
    7 points
  2. 1. Strikes me as naive. 2. The reasons for voting AGAINST Poilievre could be numerous, just as the reasons for voting against Trudeau.
    3 points
  3. You do understand that they cannot give photographs of the actual classified information to the media, because it's classified.
    2 points
  4. Whaddya know... The FBI is lying and committing crimes for the DNC again. And make no mistake: if any of those doctored photos were provided as evidence, without disclosing to the judge that the pics were staged, that's yet another FBI crime. This is also the FBI working with the media, just like with the raid at Roger Stone's home.
    2 points
  5. No, that proves the point that the FBI left nonevidentuary objects in with evidence. Not some rando point you decided you wanted me to prove. Contaminated evidence should be thrown out. Jack Smith should get the maximum sentence of 10 years for falsifying evidence.
    2 points
  6. How many ass's have you laughed off? There must be quite a large pile somewhere.
    2 points
  7. The PC's are not going to field any candidates in the coming election. I believe you confused the CPC (the party of Lincoln, Aberhart and Manning) with the Progressive Conservatives (the party of MacDonald.) Any damage to the CPC brand will be the result of the actions of the CPC, not the CBC. Mr. Poilievre's attacks on the CBC, Global and CTV appear to be an attempt avoid accountability. He claims the CBC not only supports the Liberals, but has the power to influence people's voting decisions. So how is it that the CPC is about to win a super majority. Every government needs to be held accountable by a vigorous press. This is particularly vital in the absence of a sizable Parliamentary opposition. Global and CTV news divisions are in trouble, which makes the national broadcaster all the more important.
    2 points
  8. Why was it a shock? Don't even believe the polls you guys have been quoting incessantly? It's was a by-election and the shock is that they barely won it. I was expecting a 10-15% margin at least. By-elections often go against a standing govt over the slightest annoyance at it. Seems a shallow upset with the level of annoyance at Trudeau being reported.
    2 points
  9. Yes, there are better immigrants, or regions to pick from...I think we would all be agree to , no criminals we have enough already(liberal party) , no gang members, no terrorist or terrorist supporters, no racists we already have way to many, no cancel culture no hard leftists extremists, no hard right wingers, no hard core eviromentists, ....... If you fit into any of those categories please report to BC coast where you will be boarded onto ships to take you away to your new paradise..south pole where you'll get to play with penguins, have snowball fights, make snowmen all year round...well most of the year anyways... what we are looking for for is hard working , honest people, that are smart full of initiative, proud of who they are, and where they came from, but also proud to be given a chance to be Canadian. people who are not looking for a hand out but willing to work hard at making a good community. people with good moral values, who loves family, and everything that brings to the table...I'm sure i'm forgetting some other important stuff...but it's a good start.
    2 points
  10. Oh Noes - hes' gone full retarded and can't speak Usually i don't make you cry THAT hard till the evening
    2 points
  11. This will probably 'merge topics' ugh...
    2 points
  12. From The Line "Trudeau is going to leave before the next election, he is rapidly eating up runway for his successor. As a sheer matter of practical logistics, he needs to leave this month — or early July at the latest — to allow the party enough to both run a leadership race, and build enough profile and goodwill for his replacement. It's going to be a slog, and frankly, I can think of only a few individuals who possess the strong professional credentials and total lack of political savvy to volunteer to be as popular as Michael Ignatieff and as doomed as Kim Campbell. It's Mark Carney. That's it. Meanwhile, there's still Trudeau the man to contend with. I stand by my previous assessments. I think Justin Trudeau is both too egotistical and too bunker-bound to cede a fight with a man he viscerally and obviously despises. I also think that, even now, he has a good instinct for political timing. The next election could be a year away. Any number of weird events — including the re-election of Donald Trump — could happen between now and then. Any one of them could tip the odds back in the Liberals' favour. In short, I think Trudeau thinks he's playing rope-a-dope. " In other words Canadian politics to remain boring for at least another year...
    1 point
  13. Again, equality is not some 100% or nothing proposition.
    1 point
  14. What do you mean by commercials you say is taken over by black people?
    1 point
  15. You know who built Boulder Dam? Democrats. Then Republicans named it after a Republican. Democrats have championed far more American infrastructure projects than Republicans. But none of that has anything to do with the fact that the Republican Party is being lead by a stark raving lunatic who can’t speak in complete sentences, or coherently, and who thinks that water is an infinite resource. It is not an infinite resource and flow restrictors don’t stop people from washing their hands, hair, or taking a dump. He’s just a lunatic.
    1 point
  16. I don't have to prove it. It was widely reported. But here: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/newly-released-photos-from-fbis-mar-a-lago-search-show-trump-boxes/ar-BB1oSzdP It was revealed some time ago that the FBI team left placeholders.
    1 point
  17. He's a classic narcissist. The WHY for him is always someone else's fault. Listen to all the interviews with Liberals since after this election - They really think the problem is that Canadians want them to do MORE of what they have already been doing and that they want it done FASTER. They think the problem is that Canadians are too stupid to understand their "vision" for Canada and that they need to be clearer on the "messaging."
    1 point
  18. Maybe you should go back for another hug. Teddy is waiting for you.
    1 point
  19. The possibility is real, but not directly. Most of them are relatively simplistic devices. The concern has always been that back doors could be built that only the Chinese know about which would allow people's security to be broken in the future. But to be honest that's something they watch for and if it was exploited a lot of people would tend to notice fairly quickly. But it is one of the reasons why most military chips don't come from china
    1 point
  20. You racists are such dumbasses. lol
    1 point
  21. Then you won't be voting for Trump. That is good news. LMAO
    1 point
  22. "Evidence" presented to the press means NOTHING. Except that your "gotcha" failed, because an exhibit that accurately represents REALITY for show, is not even misleading let alone a lie. LMAO Just like the documents being misordered when put back in the boxes means NOTHING. Desperation REVEALED.
    1 point
  23. This is not a Tango. It is a street fight, where the Palestinians keep pushing, punching, and kicking Isreal and Israel keeps fending them off, until one day the Palestinians pushed too hard and now Israel is saying enough. Yet again, you draw some false moral equivalency here between the two... and then you wonder why we say you support Hamas. Killing people is not a war crime, it is literally the by product of war. The fact that Isreal can do it better is a good thing. You have to do it better to be able to win. Israel captures people as part of criminal investigations under Military detention who were in the act of stabbing and trying to kill Israelis... it is no where near the same thing as Hamas rolling into neighborhoods and just grabbing people at random to hold as hostages. Israel keeps their prisoners according to standards that can be observed in actual prison locations... Hamas hides their hostages... because they are hostages. Yet again... this is why we say you support Hamas as you sit here saying Israel is worse. Since day one the Palestinians have gone to war against Israel. If they didn't do that and did not continue to do that with other Arab countries... this is on them.
    1 point
  24. Yaaaasssss! Same for cabinet members - No more wedding buddies & family friends & journalists masquerading as Finance ministers. We entrust elected officials with our hard-earned money, billions of dollars.
    1 point
  25. If you mean public money being spent either directly or in the form of credit then the exact opposite is true. That is precisely how the democrats caused the housing bubble and crashed the us economy. Gov't spending raises inflation, always. I can explain how if you need it but it's not terribly complicated. There are more programs now than there have ever been and were even under trump and spending is at an all time high. That part is a little more accurate. Deficit spending has gotten out of control under both parties and it needs to be addressed. It's important to remember that just increasing taxes doesn't' mean more revenues beyond the very short term. That money comes out of the economy and that puts the brakes on economy and slows tax revenue growth. So it must be done very sparingly. You say the tax rates are low but i would guess you can't show any math or solid arguments as to why that's the wrong number other than "we make more if we increase it!", which as i note is often untrue. In the end it's usually a number of different things. Gov'ts make more money if wages go up (more to tax) so looking at creating more jobs and providing training for more high pay positions helps. Incentivising business to improve productivity helps. Making it easier to operate a small business (several ways to do that) can help a lot as well in some cases. AND you also have to keep spending under control. Biden is wasting insane amounts of money. Trump was better but not exactly 'great' either. It's not easy. But that's why they get paid the big bucks. Unfortunately both sides are more concerned with winning the next election than doing the right thing for the US.
    1 point
  26. It does not. All it takes is one belligerent and hostile group to start a war. And all it takes is one belligerent and hostile group to prevent peace. If Gaza laid down its arms tomorrow within a short period of time they would have freedom and peace. If Israel laid down its arms tomorrow it would have a new genocide.
    1 point
  27. I have often found people who hold strong anti-religion or atheistic beliefs are hard to discuss it with. But I am still hopeful they will listen to reason and logic and perhaps over time, change their thinking. This article goes to the heart of the issue. quote How I Know Christianity is True Article contributed by Probe Ministries Visit Probe's website Probe's Patrick Zukeran offers 5 lines of evidence that Christianity is true: Christianity teaches the correct worldview, the Bible is God's Word, Jesus confirmed His claims, Christ's resurrection, and personal experience. Because Christianity Teaches the Correct Worldview Among all the religions and philosophies, how do we know Christianity is true? While there are many ways to address the question, let's begin by saying that Christianity makes sense of the world around us. In other words, it presents the most correct worldview based on the world in which we live. There are three worldviews that lie at the foundation of all religions and philosophies: theism, naturalism, and pantheism. Theism teaches there is a personal God who created the universe. Naturalism teaches there is no divine being and that the universe is the result of time and chance. Pantheism teaches that the universe is eternal and that the divine is an impersonal force made up of all things. All three worldviews cannot be true at the same time and if one of them is true, the other two must be false. The evidence from our study of the universe points to theism. Unfortunately, time will allow me to go over only three lines of evidence. The first is the argument from first cause or the cosmological argument, which states if something exists, it must have either come from something else, come from nothing, or have always existed. What is the most reasonable conclusion of the three for the existence of the universe? Scientists confirm that the universe has a beginning. Many call this the "big bang." Since the universe assuredly has a beginning, the worldview of pantheism bears the burden of proof. Second, to say the universe comes from nothing goes against responsible scientific inquiry and human logic. For example, any invention in human history is not brought about from nothing. It comes from materials and ingenuity that existed before its inception. Therefore, the naturalist worldview has no logical ground to stand on. The best conclusion is that the universe is the result of a cause greater than itself. That cause is God. unquote This is only part of the article. For the whole article: How I Know Christianity is True | Bible.org
    1 point
  28. He's a witch!!! Burn him!!!! BUUUUUURRRNN THE WITCH!!!!!!!
    1 point
  29. Based on what? His public comments after indicate otherwise. “The demonstrators who infiltrated the Capitol have defiled the seat of American democracy,” he said. “To those that engage in the acts of violence and disruption, you do not represent our country. To those that broke the law, you will pay.” https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/07/politics/trump-biden-us-capitol-electoral-college-insurrection/index.html
    1 point
  30. You don't know the difference between a God and a prophet... Are you kidding? Iran and half a dozen other countries tried to commit genocide against Israel twice, and they supplied Palestinians with weapons and bomb/rocket supplies for 75 years, dipshit. If we didn't give Israel arms then 10M people would be slaughtered, dishit.
    1 point
  31. On your weekly visits to a witches coven for one of their potions, the witches (schemers as they are) always leave out two extremely important ingredients Eye of Toad and Ear of Bat. Seeing and hearing have become two of your biggest failures.
    1 point
  32. https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-happened-to-the-economy-under-trump-before-covid-and-after-11602713077 Yes...they did.
    1 point
  33. No, it doesn't. We can buy from anyone. It makes sense in many respects to buy NATO Standard equipment but we are not required to. Most of the other countries in NATO make their own equipment. And we can certainly buy for many of them. We could buy german aA guns, british tanks and french fighters if we wanted. Right now we cannot defend our own nation. That's unacceptable. As a result we absolutely do need to be part of NATO. Wars happen and nature of whores a vacuum, so if there is an absence of power something will move to fill it. Si vis paceum, para bellum. It's as true today as it was then.
    1 point
  34. FORMER GOV. ANDREW CUOMO (D-NY): That case, the Attorney General's case in New York, frankly should have never been brought. And if his name was not Donald Trump, and if he wasn't running for president from the former AG in New York, I'm telling you that case would have never been brought. And that's what is offensive to people. And it should be. Because if there's anything left, it's belief in the justice system. It would not have been brought if his name wasn't Trump? AKA banana republic tactics.
    1 point
  35. I don't see the point of Prime Minister Trudeau stepping down. It won't change the result because he is still more popular than the potential replacements. For him personally, he should be working to at least get enough seats to form the official opposition. That way, he can watch Mr. Polievre come to grips with being PM and make the new Prime Minister's life "interesting." Remember MacMillain's response, "Events, dear boy, events." Leader of the opposition is a lot better job than Prime Minister. No stress, no accountability. And who knows what the next election will bring. MacDonald lost and then came back. MacKenzie King lost and came back. It is amazing how the most hated politicians become respected statesmen with the passage of time. Diefenbaker, Mulroney, and a few people are even saying a few nice things about Harper. My disclaimer will not come as a surprise. I do not believe my scenario will have any relation to reality, aside from the probability that whether the Prime Minister steps down or not, the electoral result will be the same. Why shouldn't he stay in office until the election?
    1 point
  36. Perhaps. That was also true back in the 40s, 50s, and 60s when taxes were far higher. Those decades had a transformative impact on investing in our society and making it better. The same cannot be said of the last 40 years of right wing austerity politics.
    1 point
  37. Ok ok.. your appeal to authority fallacy is noted. But if the grand jury is hyperpartisan as well, does your statement hold water?
    1 point
  38. Great. Now that the children are down for their naps (hopefully), the adults can have a conversation on the topic. 🙄 News on Australia's investigation into the contamination of the jabs: A select group of Australian Senators and MPs, who launched their own investigation into it, have published their findings: (Note: This is again, Canadian Dr. Speicher, who confirmed the contamination in Canada's supply) who did the testing.) Part of the correspondence was as follows: A part of the GMO proceedings is the allegation the Pfizer and Moderna products contain excessive synthetic DNA contamination, which contamination forms another much more insidious form of GMO. After many Australian labs refused to conduct testing, we organised for Australian vials to be tested in Canada, by David Speicher PhD, the first author on the paper confirming excessive DNA contamination of Canadian vials (509 x above limits). Dr Speicher has provided an initial report to us which is attachment 6 for your consideration. Dr Speicher has confirmed excessive synthetic DNA contamination in Pfizer was over 350 times above per dose limits set by the TGA (34,900% above), and over 200 times above per dose limits for Moderna (19,900% above). We distinguish old TGA limits because the TGA limits for DNA did not contemplate synthetic DNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) which is the vehicle that efficiently delivers the synthetic DNA within cells for transit to the nucleus, to in turn affect natural human DNA. The former Research Director for the Human Genome Project, Kevin McKernan, and expert in the GMO case, has confirmed the LNPs are encapsulating the synthetic DNA for transit throughout human bodies and into cells. See article here. Recent preliminary findings by McKernan (and associates) has confirmed the DNA contamination from the Pfizer product integrates with human DNA, and this synthetic DNA has the capacity to replicate. See article here. The report by Dr Speicher of vials supplied from Australia underlines yet another reason why it may be supposed powerful and vested interests do not want the GMO proceedings to be heard. Take the word of Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel, co-author and co-owner of patent US10077439B2, titled: Removal of DNA fragments in mRNA production process: (Oncogenic = cancers) In another patent, Stephane owns and co-authored titled Modified polynucleotides for the production of membrane proteins, he and his fellow authors tell everyone the science straight-up: ‘insertional mutagenesis’ = integration with our natural DNA ‘activation of oncogenes’ = once integrated, the synthetic DNA activates genes that cause cancers ‘inhibition of tumour suppressor genes’ = the synthetic DNA interferes with our genes that protect us from cancers And do you know what competitors like Pfizer and Moderna do? They read each others patents very closely. So everything about DNA contamination and its cancerous effects Moderna knew and knows..... .....Pfizer has known equally too. And they knew all of the above and much much more well before rolling out their Covid-19 crap. And this will be the basis of being able to sue them - despite governments having signed contracts agreeing to NOT sue in the event the whole thing went...south.
    1 point
  39. No, i pointed out three times you were wrong. And you' know you're lying. Or you'd address the main point as i said See, this is what i mean. i never have to tell you that you're wrong, it's easy to tell you know from your behavior But i'm sure it's my post count's fault ROFLMAO!!!
    1 point
  40. There's about 4 pages now of you whining and posting nonsense. I'm asking you politely to stop derailing the thread.
    1 point
  41. It is the nature of internet forum posters (with very few exceptions).. if they answer you directly then they have no wiggle room in the future. If they keep skirting the question.. then they stay alive proverbially speaking. They can countering you and when pressed.. they can state (and rightfully so) that they never explicitly stated whatever.
    1 point
  42. It's not "anti-immigrant". It's "anti-immigration system as it is currently not working."
    1 point
  43. 1 point
×
×
  • Create New...