Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/14/2024 in Posts
-
Yes, but if you're an MP what's your job? Is it to serve the public, or make sure you and your buddies get a golden pension that will cost Canada 120 million? The idea that we're moving it for Diwali is full-stop retarded.2 points
-
No, it doesn't. You have no understanding of how firearms function, how bump stocks function, or what the terms are to describe a semi-automatic firearm vs a machine gun.2 points
-
Making that claim is something only a liar would say. Contact is everything. It's very clear from the context of what he was saying that he intends not to listen to people's advice or to get other opinions but simply to tell people what to do. This is in contrast to how he feels he behaved last time where he took advice and tried to please everybody and it backfired. Which is exactly how hillary was described by the way by people who work for her. Many leaders are that way in business and in politics. That has absolutely nothing to do with fascism. Like, at all. Not even a little bit. It's a dumb thing to say. But for some reason right at the moment the left appears to be focused on trying to take things he says out of context and pretend it has a different meaning rather than simply pointing out all the dumb things he actually says. There's enough actual stupid to work with without having to invent things he didn't actually say or mean.2 points
-
Maybe that's part of the problem. Too many people only voting for their own interests.2 points
-
We in Canada have had many clains about foreign interference - Fenians, for example. I frankly think that our Canadian federal/provincial/municipal voting systems are honest. People in Canada trust. ==== In 1995, Parizeau lost. To change society, it requires more than 50%.2 points
-
Yes, we know. God forbid he actually learned what was really going on and could speak informed on it. It's much better to just rant about it vaguely. Do you get it now?2 points
-
“The report from the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP), a key Canadian intelligence oversight body, says there were "two specific instances where [People's Republic of China] officials allegedly interfered in the leadership races of the Conservative Party of Canada." Most of the details regarding the allegations in the NSICOP report have been redacted.“ https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.7223518 There are probably a lot of juicy bits in the redacted material. But it’s time for the Canadian media to revisit the 2022 CPC leadership race. Because there should have been more contestants than the official number allowed. 3 applicants were disqualified who had similar platforms to Poilievre, and no doubt would have divided his support. The reasons given for disqualification were nonsense. That race was dirty. Look up G. Abraham. Its said that Poilievre won’t even read the report. Where there is smoke, there usually is fire.1 point
-
Maybe they have no plans to want to get elected anymore. Grab your pension and quit with your nice golden pension. 😇1 point
-
You bet your sweet bippy that is what the Marxist dictator in Ottawa and his sidekick arse hole in the NDP communist party are trying to do. And they will get away with it without a whimper because they know that they can do whatever the hell they want to do. Why, if they want to, they can probably get away with postponing the election date for another date if they want too because those two Marxist party's could careless about democracy. Democracy is a terrifying word to them. Just my opinion. 😇1 point
-
Do you not notice that the things you say people are for are things those people never said or did?1 point
-
I can understand that some people have different opinions as to when someone becomes a human being. At some point they go from being an unfertilized egg to a college grad sweating their loan payments and SOMEWHERE in that process they become a human being. Human beings have rights. You cannot kill them. THat is pretty simple. We all agree you can't kill a 6 month old child just because i'ts an inconvenience on the grounds that it can't survive without assistance and is therefore not 'viable'. There are a number of different reasonable or logical arguments as to when that happens. I have my own. But "passed 3 inches down a tube and popped out' is not a rational argument for what creates a human. The argument that society and men have no right to an opinion about whether or not it's ok to murder children is also not a reasonable argument. Letting the states decide what the people of that state believe is probably the most reasonable choice. I think that'll be more of a winning issue for trump than the dems think.1 point
-
Yes, by force. War is not a matter of mathematics. This is not a game of risk. It it were just a matter of what is on paper, Russia should have already conquered Ukraine. You continue to falsely presume that Russia is committed to this war forever. You have no idea of knowing that or knowing how long they are willing to keep eating these costs. Why... it is almost as if you support Russia winning. No, you can stop the war in many ways; like Nationalist, you just happen to want to stop the war in the way that most benefits Russia by surrendering to them. We are not under Trump, and I am not arguing with Trump. It is your positions and arguments here that are awful.1 point
-
I've Hesitated to Call Donald Trump a Fascist. Until Now It takes some people a while to figure out what the evidence means.1 point
-
So he didn't say anything about suspending parts of the Constitution? What's the "context" there? 😑1 point
-
Children are independent entities. A fetus is not, in any circumstance, but it's rather more obvious earlier in gestation. Terminating a pregnancy is very obviously different from killing a child. That you would claim the two situations are "no different" shows a shocking lack of thought. Meaningful differences include: Children do not compromise the physical sovereignty of the parent Children, as a category, do not take blood and tissue from a host Children can be cared for by any and several caregivers Children can be surrendered to other individuals or civic entities This is not a comprehensive list, but sufficient to demonstrate meaningful differences. In short, if you don't want your kids, you have options. If you don't want to be pregnant, the only option is to terminate the pregnancy. You can't even articulate the distinction between sex and gender, so you really aren't in any position to be the arbiter of "truth" regarding someone's gender. I don't think it's beyond your capacity to learn and understand that distinction, but that's not compatible with your politics, so you've refused. Oh, it's absolutely a silly analogy. A parent CAN get out of child support by terminating parental rights. The legal procedures to do so vary by jurisdiction, but even at a broad level, all 50 states allow for infant surrender under safe haven laws. A parent can simply stop making money. And, conversely, a parent who wishes to keep a child can get help from other sources to care for it. Again, if you can't spot the difference between children and fetuses, refer to the list above. But it all comes back to the fact that children are an independent entity and even those which need help to survive can accept assistance from any other entity.1 point
-
Oh... lets go back a few posts. "Feel free to keep dredging it up. No one is stopping you... especially not me." Do you need this passage explained? If you were not so emotional or confrontational.. you could read this and interpret it for what it is. My contribution to this is hopefully being the voice of the majority who were not emotionally invested like you and so have no ulterior motives. They simply wanted the saga to be over. Is that right or wrong? That is up to them.1 point
-
WRONG. You post activist bullshit written by bullshit activists. You're a propaganda dispenser, nothing more.1 point
-
Indifference will always bite you in the ass no matter what it is. You may not care now but...it may affect you tomorrow or in the future. Yes we do. Have a great day1 point
-
No matter how crazy or not crazy someone is... much like you, I do not interrupt and start telling them how they should feel about a topic. Last summer, took my kids to Yerington, NV and some guy was going on about Bigfoot. I just kept walking by even though I wanted to tell him that there is zero evidence of this creature.1 point
-
Another indication that the world is moving on. The last of the PUA (unemployment insurance for non-covered employees) cases was closed and that puts an end to it. NV was the last state to have one. As for mandates, the current governor effectively ended the possibility of them coming back. His primary issues are diversifying the economy and affordable housing.1 point
-
Yeah, you're right. Doesn't that just make you want to go 2nd Amendment on their asses?1 point
-
“I’ll be a dictator on Day One” is something only a fascist would say.1 point
-
1 point
-
1. This place on the river in front of the Governor General's place cannot be changed. It is a short drive to the parliament. 2. Demolish the building. It has no historical significance. In the snow, I have walked around Trudeau's infamous swimming pool. 3. I have never been to the house of the Australian PM. Years ago, I walked by 10 Downing Street. 4. I have stood in front of Argentina's Pink House. ===== I reckon that we need a place (without asbestos, but with a cat) near our head of state.1 point
-
There were no negotiations with Hitler, and for a good reason: they could not produce a solution that would be acceptable to all sides. No: the polarities are too far apart. They just cannot exist together because one will keep coming until it's defeated utterly or takes all. Because in their miserable, useless imitation of existence they have no other goals, know no other purposes than to invade, rob, and burn. Try negotiating with the alien: same thing. And then, there will be little sucker ups who pretend to not see the obvious and throw up many useless, meaningless words that mean nothing and can bring nothing, obviously. More force, more resolve standing up to brutal evil, fascism of our time. Not giving it more, and hoping against all reality that it could somehow keep it from wanting more and coming for more. So: a liar. If the free world listened to them the last time, we would be living in an entirely different world now. Why would have it stopped in Europe and Asia? Why wouldn't it go on until it takes all, if not stopped?1 point
-
1 point
-
From your article: the decision to move the federal election a few days later, instead of earlier, is a decision that the Canadian Taxpayers Federation says will cost Canadians as much as $120 million, the estimated lifetime pension if all 80 MPs lose their seats. The Libs and NDP are just openly stealing from Canadians.1 point
-
Not when it involves running around 80 years after they immigrated shooting people and women and children. Fine to complain when they showed up but for heaven's sake we're past that. It's one thing to take a stance that some immigrants shouldn't be allowed to come here, it's another to go after them 80 years later and light them on fire. I don't know of any conservatives that are suggesting that that is the appropriate course of action.1 point
-
Texas Court Rules Pregnant 9 Year Old Must Bring Alien To Term If she was impregnated by an alien, that is God’s Will and a pre-born baby is a life, says Supreme Court Judge Luther P. Butticks R. Parents entered the bedroom of their daughter Louly Smithson to discover an alien face-hugger wrapped about her and doctors confirmed she was impregnated and in less than two weeks she will explode as an a pre metamorphic baby alien bursts from her chest. Visiting scientists from the future claim the alien could be removed from the 9 year old’s body using their experimental transporter beam, but were prevented from doing so by a court injunction filed by the Church of Infinite Misery in her home town. (cont’d on Pg 37)1 point
-
Here you go - hyper partisan right winger Tom Mulcair ( ) Explains why he thinks PP is precisely right not to sign the documents and neither would have he when he was leader of the opposition. They get a little off that specific topic in the middle but he addresses it at the beginning and the end. Like i said - hamstringing yourself as leader of the opposition would be a BAD idea. Here's tom:1 point
-
No, those "special privileges" were to move any criminal cases to the Federal courts. How is that above the law? Do you question the legitimacy of the federal justice system now?!1 point
-
Abortion is not "killing babies." If you want to discuss it like an adult you can use the proper terminology. And regardless of what you call it, the pregnant person should not be enslaved by the government and deprived of her blood, tissue, autonomy and health in service to the government or to the fetus. If the pregnant person chooses to give, that's fine, but it's absolutely wrong to force them. As wrong as the government cornering you in a dark alley to drain your blood against your will.1 point
-
1 point
-
"... first Canadians... " More tolerant? We in Canada get along. We have never had a civil war.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Didn't even begin to address the question. At all. Which is not surprising, an answer given a week before the question was asked isn't likely to address the question very well So you have no answer to give. Gotcha. So then you agree there's no reason to think of this as anything other than a sham, you just don't like that so you're avoiding answering my straight forward question from earlier. No wonder you always wind up looking stupid. You have to lie and twist SOOO much to try to make your point. Whereas i can say my points straight up, like a defense lawyer is the lawyer that presents a defendants defense1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
A country bigger than his in geography but not in useful land. Canada has 38,259,000 hectares of arable land. The US has 157,736,800 hectares Much of Canada is frozen desert unfit for human habitation, or just barely fit. When the Liberals came to power they floated the idea of expanding our population and the trial balloons were shot down in a near-unanimous hail of contempt. So being the great lovers of democracy they are they set out to do it anyway, with their eager lapdops in the NDP helping them along. The result is millions of people from the third world who barely speak English, often have no job skills, contribute little to the economy and don't earn enough to pay income tax while occupying much of our public housing and emergency shelters. Huge housing cost increases and diminishing access to healthcare are the results of deliberate policy on the part of the Left to show how virtuous and anti-racist they are by inviting all the world's brown people to come to Canada.1 point
-
Well I do my best but apparently I can't out stupid you! I have to admit defeat, when it comes to stupid you've got me beat1 point
-
I'm trying to think of anything you could have said to make yourself look less politically educated. I'm coming up empty.1 point
-
I never really found Bill Maher funny, but this is actually a pretty good analysis. I've said it lots of times on this forum, but when you take political correctness to militant extremes, the militant counter-reaction is going to be equally extreme, if not more so. At some point, the outrage politics need to end. "TOO BAD" needs to thrown in a lot of people's faces, and regularly. Your marginal problems and feelings are not always society's to solve. "You are offended that I called someone retarded? Too bad, buttercup." "You are offended that I won't refer to someone as zhey, or that you can't wear clown sized fake breasts to teach students? Too bad, buttercup." "You're waving your Bible around and calling women murderers for getting abortions? Too bad, buttercup." "You want restaurants and small businesses to spend tens of thousands of dollars to remodel their bathrooms to service the handicap customer who only comes by once every few months? Too bad, buttercup."1 point
-
Three experienced hikers are lost not far from Vancouver in GArabaldi park. For over a week, with everyone searching for them. You only need to walk out of your favourite night club or restaurant and walk over the top of the nearest North Shore mountain and you're in the middle of nowhere. Fly over north or central BC at night and you'll see the odd light of a mining or lumber camp here and there in the darkness.1 point
-
Also from Goddess: For instance, right from the beginning - the science said these jabs would not stop transmission. Conspiracy theorists said they would. The science said these jabs would not be safe. Conspiracy theorists said they were 100% safe. That was straight from Albert Bourla's mouth - CEO of Pfizer. I posted his tweet saying it. The science said vaccinated people would experience waning immunity very quickly. Conspiracy theorists said, 2 jabs and you're good. No, wait - 3 jabs. Oooopsy-doodle, we meant 4. Okay, 5. Probably more. Like for the rest of your life. The science said vaccinated people would experience recurring bouts of covid because the jabs are leaky and non-sterilizing. Conspiracy theorists said if you got jabbed, "The virus STOPS at you." The science said the jabs would cause heart attacks and myocarditis. Conspiracy theorists try to cover up the heart attacks and myocarditis. The science said healthy children had no risk of covid. Conspiracy theorists said children need to get jabbed. The science said the elderly and obese were at risk. Conspiracy theorists said we were ALL at grave risk. The science said lockdowns would be ineffective and ruin lives. Conspiracy theorists said lockdowns were great. The science said masks were ineffective and would ruin children's development and education. Conspiracy theorists said masks would have no effect on children. I also believe in common sense. Common sense tells me to question an experimental medical procedure, using a method that had not been perfected, manufactured by companies with billion dollar fines for medical fraud and forced on everyone by holding their careers and livelihoods and civil liberties hostage. Maybe if you trusted in science more, you wouldn't have followed the conspiracy theorists. Yeah, post-bumping... Sorta. Some posts warrant a re-read though.1 point