Leaderboard

https://x.com/MAGAIncWarRoom/status/1796188943743889572/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1796188943743889572&currentTweetUser=MAGAIncWarRoom This just took away the convicted felon attack. Calling Trump a convicted felon indicts you in the conspiracy.

If it came from a lab, why would it not matter? A) would be the a point in a lawsuit against the US government B. would help to limit or prevent future incidences from happening in the future. C. It would vindicate those of us who have been maligned for simply asking questions.

What comes around...goes around. They set the ground rules. Turn them on the Democrats. All of them.

You've seen what 4 years of a Trump presidency actually looks like. You've seen what effect it had on the country and the world in general. Ditto for Biden. Only a total cultist/liar would try to pretend that they don't see things getting much worse in every way under Biden. The world went from "at war" when Trump came in, with the ME becoming more peaceful, to "Europe and the ME in brutal wars" under Biden. Inflation has caused Americans a lot of grief under Biden. Illegal immigration spiked under Biden and he has never done anything to get it under control. Biden has stoked fear and political division like no other leader in American history: Biden's administration openly floated the idea of assuming control of the Supreme Court. Biden's Afghanistan withdrawal was the biggest military debacle for America since Little Bighorn. Gimme a break Michael. In what way are things noticeably better under Biden? In what way has America even broken even? Are you too much of a cultist to see any negative changes under Biden?

I just learned last night that if the Trump organization had designated the payment as a campaign expense, that would have violated campaign finance regulations. To make that clear to the left, if he had done what Bragg claims he should have done, the FEC would have gone after him. So, in the FEC's eyes, the way he categorized it was the only legal way to categorize it. Now, what Cohen did was probably a violation of campaign finance. The $130k is in excess of the maximum contribution. Even though it was repaid, loans are.covered in the FEC rules. But, the FEC didn't consider the loan a campaign expense because it was personal in nature, was related to events before the campaign and likely would have happened if there was no campaign.

The instructions were clear and proper. People who have never read a set of jury instructions in their lives are here to play armchair quarterback. As if Merchan wasn't fully aware that these would be the most scrutinized jury instructions this century.🙄

You literally just used the Uncle Tom insult against Tim Scott and Clarence Thomas and you have the gall to accuse me of implying blacks are stupid to support Democrats? If anyone is clearly racist towards blacks, it's white liberals. How demeaning is this prominent white liberal?

First off there was plenty of evidence. The FBI team that was leading the investigation fully and 100% expected her to be charged and convicted. They were shocked when they were ordered not to. But at the end of the day trump didn't do it. He said that we don't do that kind of thing in this country. Had his followers accepted that and moved on. Now the very thing he was talked out of doing has been done to him by the very people that said we don't do this kind of thing. So of course people are furious. If someone tells you that these are the rules and you have to play by the rules and you then play by the rules, you're going to be pretty pissed off when somebody else breaks those rules and laughs at you. Now the gloves will come off and we'll see what happens when both sides decide they don't want to play by the rules.

I don't know what public officials you're talking about, but 2 US government departments determined it's most likely a lab leak and the medical studies and datasets show all is NOT well. I believe the datasets over public officials who are nothing but bureaucrats. So no. I'm not satisfied. And I trust the doctors and scientists who have been right about everything so far, over the public officials who have lied their faces off.

Nah, Bidenomics is more like $2/gal plus an additional $2/gal = "No inflation".

I dunno I think it's refuted among some of the different government departments. As an example, Mike Pompeo who was the CIA director was all about the lab leak theory.

SARS-CoV-2 is the only betacoronavirus possessing a furin cleavage site. This unique feature boosts SARS‑CoV‑2’s ability to infect humans, making it capable of causing a global pandemic. In 2018, scientists funded by Dr. Fauci proposed inserting a furin cleavage site into a betacoronavirus at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which reportedly operated with insufficient biosafety protocols. In 2019, the virus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, featuring the aforementioned distinctive furin cleavage site, emerged in Wuhan, the city where the world’s foremost research lab for SARS-like viruses is located. SARS-CoV-2 emerged in Wuhan equipped with this unique furin cleavage site one year after Fauci-funded scientists proposed inserting furin cleavage sites into betacoronaviruses under already known substandard biosafety conditions in Wuhan. In previous coronavirus outbreaks, SARS and MERS, scientists were quickly able to demonstrate natural origin by collecting multiple pieces of evidence linking infected humans to infected animals. For SARS-CoV-2, these same key pieces of evidence are still missing more than four years after the virus emerged. Over the past decade, Dr. Fauci has been a prominent advocate of risky gain-of-function research, funding such experiments and facilitating technology transfers to various questionable laboratories worldwide. Despite a pause in 2014 due to lab leaks in the United States and opposition from hundreds of scientists, Fauci continued such research, moving experiments overseas to labs like the Wuhan Institute of Virology. In summary, the evidence strongly indicates that Dr. Fauci's funding and technology transfers contributed to the risky gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute, ultimately leading to the creation of SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19. If we don't acknowledge the truth, these dangerous experiments will continue.

Because it was gain-of-function research, which is very dangerous. Even the first SARS-CoV was leaked from a lab. Covid was leaked form the Wuhan lab, the gain-of-function research there was funded by Fauci, who then profited from providing the "cure". It's very possible it was released deliberately. It matters because: 1. Gain-of-function research is still going on. and 2. What is to stop the next Fauci/Daszak from releasing a virus from a lab and then profiting from it? Or are you okay with this? Because many of us are not.

You get a much clearer picture of what's gone on when you pull back and look at the macro picture. Fauci is not a medical professional, he's a bureaucrat. He has been for 38 years and he knows how to game the system to get what he wants and concentrate power in himself. The AIDS epidemic in the 80's was when he really honed his manipulative style. AZT was a drug that had proven adverse effects - it shut down liver function (exactly like Remdesivir does). But it was a money-maker for Fauci. He pushed it by funding fraudulent research, silencing and blacklisting other scientists and the media and journalists. He experimented with AZT on babies, children and pregnant women. No one cared about the deaths because they were amongst the gay community and you know how *they* were viewed in the 80's. He's done the same thing over the years with various populations of African countries. Again - no one cared because it was black people in Africa. He's gotten away with it and made a f*ckton of money off it. Like anyone who has gotten away with evil for a long time, he has been emboldened. My gut tells me that the virus was deliberately released in Wuhan, under his direction and in conjunction with the Chinese CCP. It wasn't the "killer" virus it was touted to be, but it was deadly enough to certain populations that panic could be created and it could be sold to the public as a "pandemic". Science-proven hospital protocols for dealing with respiratory viruses were ordered by top-level bureaucrats to be changed into protocols that would hasten death and front-line docs and nurses who protested, were fired. Did you know they weren't even allowed to give Tylenol to alleviate fever? I believe this was done to make it "look" like more people were dying from this novel virus than actually were. Remember the initial videos that came out of China, people dropping dead on the streets, twitching and writhing? Did we ever see that here in N. America? No, we did not. I think it was staged to frighten people here. The vaccine was not brought in for the virus. The virus was brought in for the vaccine. I haven't touched on it here because it's a very involved topic, but now that it has come out in the media that it was actually the US Department of Defense in charge of the whole thing, well......I'll leave it at that. It was the US DoD in charge of the whole thing. The FDA and CDC were only rubber-stampers to get the jabs out. There was no real testing or trials, only shams. People who were in the trials who had adverse events - were not even tracked. They were ignored. It was all just a show for the public. The jabs were going to get EUA approval no matter how they performed. I'm not sure how that information fits in now, other than the US military has a very long history of experimenting on troops. Maybe they viewed this as a live-action drill for pandemic management, I really don't know. Our own Canadian Military used the pandemic to try out psy-op techniques on the public - how much can you scare them into compliance? How to control the media. How to deal with non-compliance. They're gathering information for next time.

Also from Goddess: For instance, right from the beginning - the science said these jabs would not stop transmission. Conspiracy theorists said they would. The science said these jabs would not be safe. Conspiracy theorists said they were 100% safe. That was straight from Albert Bourla's mouth - CEO of Pfizer. I posted his tweet saying it. The science said vaccinated people would experience waning immunity very quickly. Conspiracy theorists said, 2 jabs and you're good. No, wait - 3 jabs. Oooopsy-doodle, we meant 4. Okay, 5. Probably more. Like for the rest of your life. The science said vaccinated people would experience recurring bouts of covid because the jabs are leaky and non-sterilizing. Conspiracy theorists said if you got jabbed, "The virus STOPS at you." The science said the jabs would cause heart attacks and myocarditis. Conspiracy theorists try to cover up the heart attacks and myocarditis. The science said healthy children had no risk of covid. Conspiracy theorists said children need to get jabbed. The science said the elderly and obese were at risk. Conspiracy theorists said we were ALL at grave risk. The science said lockdowns would be ineffective and ruin lives. Conspiracy theorists said lockdowns were great. The science said masks were ineffective and would ruin children's development and education. Conspiracy theorists said masks would have no effect on children. I also believe in common sense. Common sense tells me to question an experimental medical procedure, using a method that had not been perfected, manufactured by companies with billion dollar fines for medical fraud and forced on everyone by holding their careers and livelihoods and civil liberties hostage. Maybe if you trusted in science more, you wouldn't have followed the conspiracy theorists. Yeah, post-bumping... Sorta. Some posts warrant a re-read though.

If you answer one question, the buzz will throw ten more. It's not the answers they are seeking: only the buzz, the wider and louder the better.

In other news, the sun rose in the east this morning.... that trudeau breaks the rules to give money contracts to his 'friends' is simply not news. The scum has to go, and anyone who supported him in the last election is basically a piece of crap who should have known better.

well he won't make that mistake again

Did Biden honestly say that? I'm surprised his handlers let him try to answer a math question, but I'll give the devil his due credit: that wasn't a bad guess for ol' kid sniffer. At least his answer was number. He only had a 50% chance of getting it 'right'.

@ExFlyer something like this sheds light on situations if framed right. Questions asked - questions answered. It's on the record. All you need to do is package this so that people understand that the questions have been responded to. If people aren't satisfied with an open process (of some kind) then they will never been satisfied.

Can one have a trial for alleged offenses in New York in Arizona or Kentucky? How? The buzz crowd not interested. One living brain cell would have sufficed to see it but no. Throw up as much dirt as possible add some more and see what happens. Maybe some would stick. Don't feed it.

Statue honouring Royal Regina Rifles to be unveiled at Juno Beach to mark D-Day’s 80th year The names of 458 soldiers from the infantry unit who died during that conflict are etched in the statue's base The Canadian Press Jeremy Simes Published Jun 03, 2024 A soldier stands next to the Royal Regina Rifles statue during a preview ceremony at the Saskatchewan War Memorial in Regina, April 6, 2024. It's to be unveiled Wednesday at Juno Beach at la place des Canadiens in France. The names of 488 soldiers from the infantry unit who died during the Second World War are etched into the statue's base. Photo by Brandt Industries Media Team /THE CANADIAN PRESS REGINA — A statue depicting the Canadians who fought Nazi Germany 80 years ago will have a permanent home near the beaches they stormed on D-Day The Royal Regina Rifles statue is to be unveiled Wednesday at Juno Beach in France, a day ahead of the milestone anniversary of the invasion that launched the beginning of the end of the Second World War. The names of 458 soldiers from the infantry unit who died during that conflict are etched in the statue’s base. The Regina Rifles were among the first Canadians to storm Juno Beach on June 6, 1944, also known as D-Day. The soldiers battled alongside troops from the United States and United Kingdom to dislodge Nazis from northern France, marking the decisive turning point in the conflict. Alberta artist Don Begg sculpted the two-metre bronze statue of a soldier on the move, weapon raised. It’s meant to depict the Everyman from Saskatchewan, said Kelsey Lonie, a military historian and spokesperson for the project. https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/statue-royal-regina-rifles-unveiled-juno-beach

He'll have to pay in the rest home. No more Thursday jello nights for that pedophile. No he isn't, you closeted communist. lol

Perception is a matter of perspective. In the MAGA cult's case, the perspective is the reality. You say any sane or rational observer sees this as a political hit job, but anyone not subscribing to the cult sees it as a garbage human being finally getting held to some sort of account. Al Capone didn't go down for murder, racketeering and bootlegging. He went down for tax crimes. Trump isn't being persecuted. He's reaping the rewards of all his hard work. It's cosmic irony to hear him try to spin and lie about this stuff now that he's been convicted. He's claiming now he never said "Lock her Up" when he was campaigning against Hilary. Like...Jesus Christ. How dumb are the rubes following him to believe that?

Brandon obviously directed this rape of the justice and legal systems in order th "get Trump". He will pay for his abuses.

ROFLMAO! You're a chickensh1t. You won't address my post because you know who's kicking the dog and want to paint the dog as rabid, before it bites you in self defense. The people know lawfare and they know who's imposing it. Oh BTW...Trump it still leading in the polls.

Anyone who can't eat Canadian Bacon should be denied.

Since you brought them up, Egypt's concerns here are a case in point... they're right next door, they need only unlock the fence and yet they won't do it. Any sage advice for them? Right now they're worried about importing extremists and having those extremists launch attacks against Israel from the Sinai. They know Israel will have to respond to the attacks and that would mean incursions on Egyptian territory... they have a lot invested in peace and don't want to jeopardize their investment. Are you suggesting that their concerns are groundless? That their thinking is flawed? That their threat assessment is unrealistic? That it simply wouldn't happen? Or, is their reluctance to help their "Arab brothers" simply based on racism that's supported by manufactured reasons and weak justifications as you suggest below: One things for sure, somebody has this wrong... meaning BIG TIME WRONG. Given the very real possibility that Israel will indeed block the right of return for Palestinians who leave (that's what I would do) and the fact that Egypt (or others) would have to keep these folks in perpetuity, is their hesitancy based on mindless racism or are there some potential long term problems they're trying to avoid? Instead of staggering all over the map and making me dizzy in the process, perhaps you could simply provide a convincing argument that suggests those Egyptian concerns are groundless. If you can do that, Canadian objections would be a whole lot easier to address. Simply screaming racist, or asking "Oh ya, well what about this?" type questions reminds me of in-laws digging up long dead relatives during Christmas dinner. Unless you enjoy this sort of unproductive banter for its own sake you are going to have to move beyond it and address the underlying concerns. If Egypt has this wrong then maybe others do too, convincing them of it will now take more than shouting racist. Those days are over IMO. In fact, I think you have your work cut out for you and not just on this issue. The epidemic of madness on a litany of issues no longer resonates with people. It seems to me that progressives have traded on the good nature and tolerance of Canadiens in a way that now has consequences for them. One of those is that name calling no longer works. If that's all ya got then get a full length mirror and shout at yourself. Apparently I'm not alone... https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/agar-conservatives-appear-to-be-steaming-toward-victory If you think about it, all progressives had to do was not be crazy, they couldn't do it though. I suspect the backlash here will run deeper and last longer than some expect, even if it doesn't, I think the days of getting results through screaming and intimidation are over... they sure are with me.

First, eastern European isn't a race. So on the face of it what you just said is stupid. Secondly, it is neither prejudicial nor racist to suggest that people who are raised in a culture very similar to our own will have an easier time assimilating then people who are raised in a culture very different than our own. That's just a simple truth. It's just like language, someone who speaks English fluently will be much more successful as an immigrant to Canada then someone who doesn't speak English well. That's been documented a million times over. So what appears to be happening here is you know you're wrong and that he's right and understand why and that it's valid. But that annoys you and therefore you are trying to pull the race card in order to distract the debate and present a reason why you can just ignore what he says rather than address it. For @blackbird To be wrong, you would have to demonstrate that the differences between our culture and Eastern European culture and the difference between our culture and Palestinian culture is about the same. You have not made that argument. Good luck with that.

There were already tens of thousands of Jews in those countries in the time frame you are referring to. Additionally, Jews did not bring their wars into any country they immigrated to, like the Palestinians. It's like the blind leading the stupid here. People who support Palestinians coming to Canada, need to stop posting, since they lack brain cells.

That is absolutely false. I clearly demonstrated the HE has no evidence for uis claims. Are you seriously claiming that I need to present evidence that he didn’t present evidence for his accusation ? You don’t understand how burden of proof works I clearly articulated how his arguments and claims are false and provided links. For example he claims he has footage of “mules” stuffing ballot boxes and dropping votes in boxes more than once but for 2 years hasn’t shown it, so you absurdly claim that I am the one who needs to present evidence he doesn’t actually have this footage otherwise we must assume his no-evidence claim is true??? Same for the addresses of the so-called Democrat “stash houses”, the names of the Democrat groups supposedly linked to them or any proof of their existence. I could go on and repeat myself for the third time but there’s no point No I think you’re just being a troll because you’re not this dense I think you don’t even know what ad hominem means Another absolute lie on your part. LOL no it is not the definition! Being convicted of felony election fraud for Republican candidates is directly relevant to his attempt to discredit the 2020 election for a Republican candidate….the one who pardoned him no less. What are you suddenly soft on convicted criminals now too? How do you not understand that being exposed as a fraud destroys your ability to credibly speak on the same subject where you committed your fraud? That’s absolutely false! One of them even says it has “gaping holes” right in the title! You didn’t read's cites. Trump’s AG Bill Barr’s criticism was then only one that pulled punches because he’s also a Republican and he was testifying before Congress, but I included it just to show you that even HE doesn’t buy it. He has also called Trump’s stolen election claims “bullshit” Absolutely false! The sources say the things he claims to be evidence aren’t really evidence at all. One headline has the words “debunked” and two have the words “no evidence” right there in the title. Another uses the words “gaping holes” and they don’t mean it in the way you’re hoping. 😝 Again CLAIMING you have video footage of someone visiting a drop box multiple times but only showing them visiting one time is NO evidence, it’s not half the evidence. Claiming cellphones can be geolocated within 18 inches when NO expert agrees that is possible is NO evidence. And that is exactly what the links I posted say. NOWHERE DO ANY OF THE ARTICLES SAY IT IS PLAUSIBLE You clearly skimmed the articles with your MAGA dementia lenses on and saw what you wanted to see False. The sources I posted systematically dismantle his claims and clearly state that what D’Souza claimed to be “evidence” was nothing of the sort. As I said, the sources say the things he claims to be evidence aren’t actually evidence at all. One headline has the words “debunked” and two have the words “no evidence” right there in the title. Another uses the words “gaping holes”. Seriously you can’t possibly be this deranged. You admit that you don’t even know anything about what is claimed in 2000 mules and you shamelessly completely misrepresent the criticism of him that totally dismantled his claims, in an effort to suggest the jury is still out or that he has most but not all of the evidence You know sometimes you come off as one of the more reasonable conservatives on here but sometimes you are in an alternate reality.

And looking back, some might say they had a point. It does seem to have caused some trouble in the region. But at the end of the day the Jews weren't our people per se. The Palestinians are the people of Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. If they won't take their own people then why would we?

You post woke propaganda. You're the biggest shill on this forum.

Well, Trump is a native New Yorker and New Yorkers know Trump better than anyone. That's why they don't belong to his cult.

You sure like saying 100% a lot. I doubt you could find a single post where I do. This one doesn't count.

It is an annoying debate tactic for those on the left. Constantly demand that you repost the same information and data again and again. And if you refuse to play that game they'll insist you've never posted it. And if you dare repeat anything they say they want you to repost that 15 times as well and then they'll still demand that they never said it. It's frustrating trying to have a conversation with that going on. But I guess that's the point, they pull it out when they want to derail the conversation because it's not going the way they wanted

He said ,while belching out kernels of truth and serious content.

Oh look, you've risen to the intellectual level of robosmith and myata Well done Joking aside the perception of many regarding this is going to be a problem moving forward. Any sane or rational observer aware of the facts of the trial will almost certainly see it as a political hit job. And in fact the initial polls would seem to support that. Whether or not it was is irrelevant, it will be seen that way. A lack of faith in the gov't and the courts is the beginning of the end of a society.

It's their fault, and they're paying the price right now for that. This really is that simple. If they wanted peace there would be peace.

About as bizarre as reposting it and then defending why you did. I doubt you're a silver-spoon-born guy but you're obviously not above setting the new standard for stooping.

How many books would describe a country as a democracy when its federal police force runs a 3-yr show trial against an incumbent politician, and commits crimes to get that show trial started and keep it going, only to be covered up by the MSM? How many books would describe a country as a democracy when its federal police force controls social media disinformation campaigns to influence elections? How many books would describe a country as a democracy when the PM slanders a large group of people and the MSM doesn't even say anything about it? How many books would describe a country as a democracy after they force millions of people to take a dangerous experimental drug that they don't need or want? How many books would describe a country as a democracy when they exclude people from society for refusing to take a dangerous, experimental drug that they don't need? No one gives a sh1t about your cheaply bought definition of a democracy myata. You wouldn't know authoritarianism if it was forcing minorities into the gas chamber.

They've cheated on debates, had the FBI commit crimes and run show trials for them, had activist judges run kangaroo courts to persecute their political opponents, used the National Guard and razor wire at Capitol Hill for fear mongering photo ops, pushed false narratives to cause racial division & incite mass rioting and bloodshed, and then after 4 years of them pretending that the 2016 election was illegitimate they won a dodgy election with truckloads of midnight ballots and then declared election skepticism to be a crime. Still, after all that, they don't appear to be on track to win the 2024 election. Do they have another trick up their sleeves? How much deeper into the role of banana republic governance can they possibly go, without openly going into full-authoritarian mode? TBH, a lot of their cultists are ready for it. The Dems could run every Republican congressman and senator into prison and the cultist dolts here would march along in lock step with all of their excuses for it. "They were gonna do some more insurrection stuff! They were gonna get some more seditious mobs to attack the capitol!" What do you think the Dems will do if they're still losing come October?

@Venandi Here is some info on the p53 - the tumor suppressor protein that may lead to increased incidences of aggressive cancers: 1. S2 subunit of SARS-nCoV-2 interacts with tumor suppressor protein p53 and BRCA: an in silico study - ScienceDirect 2. SARS-CoV-2 spike S2 subunit inhibits p53 activation of p21(WAF1), TRAIL Death Receptor DR5 and MDM2 proteins in cancer cells | bioRxiv The scientists set out to determine if the S2 component of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein interacts with a tumor suppressor protein called p53. This particular protein is called the ‘guardian of the genome’ for its important role in DNA damage response and repair. The authors found that S2 had a suppressive effect on p53, which suggests that “the SARS-CoV-2 spike causes an altered DNA damage sensing and repair response in cancer cells.” This finding “provides a potential molecular mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 infection may impact tumorigenesis, tumor progression and chemotherapy sensitivity.” In other words, a component of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein can lead to the development of tumors and may inhibit positive effects of cancer therapeutics. 3. Rubio_Casillas_Methylpseudouridine_Promotes_Cancer_Wow_2024.pdf The above study was behind a paywall, but I found it in PDF. The authors were pressured to retract it, but it does agree with the findings from the other papers. 4. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro - PubMed (nih.gov) This may have been the right scientific conclusion to draw at the wrong time. The paper was retracted in May 2022 under strange circumstances, a move that appeared to be politically motivated. Arkmedic covered this paper and the scandal surrounding its retraction in a post: (17) Welcome to Gilead - by Dr Ah Kahn Syed - Arkmedic's blog Here are 3 discussions on the subject of p53 activation: Dr. Jessica Rose: S2 of SARS-2 spike buggers up p53 - by Jessica Rose (substack.com) Dr. Peter McCullough: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-new-manuscript-concludes?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email Professor of Oncology, Dr. Angus Dalgleish: The covid booster cancer time bomb - The Conservative Woman

Please remind him to bring his cue cards, steel walker and lots of adrenaline needles. 5 months is a very long time for a decrepit old pervert to be on the campaign trail.

No, you just promote their agenda and spend years arguing on behalf of their closest allies. The fact that you're too stupid to know what you're doing is irrelevant. More comedy. In a thread where you're defending the criminal behavior of a twice-divorced, orange sleazebag who raw-dogs pornstars while his young wife is recovering from child birth, you are questioning other people's moral compass. 🤡🤡🤡

OMG you have tunnel vision. Allow me to introduce you to The West...where the name Trudeau is spoken and followed by spitting on the ground. Where do you get the nonsense you spout?

In the caldera, I presume. Good spot. If you smell sulfur, grab your camera. It probably means that some of Hillary's cousins are coming to the surface.

Considering I have an MS degree and you obviously don't, you must be talking about yourself. Have you EVER even read a peer review climate science journal? I have read several.

Normally I'd want a guy who's more libertarian in his views, However, the woke are becoming increasingly hostile to freedom and democracy so I wouldn't be too upset with a fighter to start going after these people