Leaderboard

https://x.com/MAGAIncWarRoom/status/1796188943743889572/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1796188943743889572&currentTweetUser=MAGAIncWarRoom This just took away the convicted felon attack. Calling Trump a convicted felon indicts you in the conspiracy.

If it came from a lab, why would it not matter? A) would be the a point in a lawsuit against the US government B. would help to limit or prevent future incidences from happening in the future. C. It would vindicate those of us who have been maligned for simply asking questions.

What comes around...goes around. They set the ground rules. Turn them on the Democrats. All of them.

You've seen what 4 years of a Trump presidency actually looks like. You've seen what effect it had on the country and the world in general. Ditto for Biden. Only a total cultist/liar would try to pretend that they don't see things getting much worse in every way under Biden. The world went from "at war" when Trump came in, with the ME becoming more peaceful, to "Europe and the ME in brutal wars" under Biden. Inflation has caused Americans a lot of grief under Biden. Illegal immigration spiked under Biden and he has never done anything to get it under control. Biden has stoked fear and political division like no other leader in American history: Biden's administration openly floated the idea of assuming control of the Supreme Court. Biden's Afghanistan withdrawal was the biggest military debacle for America since Little Bighorn. Gimme a break Michael. In what way are things noticeably better under Biden? In what way has America even broken even? Are you too much of a cultist to see any negative changes under Biden?

I just learned last night that if the Trump organization had designated the payment as a campaign expense, that would have violated campaign finance regulations. To make that clear to the left, if he had done what Bragg claims he should have done, the FEC would have gone after him. So, in the FEC's eyes, the way he categorized it was the only legal way to categorize it. Now, what Cohen did was probably a violation of campaign finance. The $130k is in excess of the maximum contribution. Even though it was repaid, loans are.covered in the FEC rules. But, the FEC didn't consider the loan a campaign expense because it was personal in nature, was related to events before the campaign and likely would have happened if there was no campaign.

The instructions were clear and proper. People who have never read a set of jury instructions in their lives are here to play armchair quarterback. As if Merchan wasn't fully aware that these would be the most scrutinized jury instructions this century.🙄

You literally just used the Uncle Tom insult against Tim Scott and Clarence Thomas and you have the gall to accuse me of implying blacks are stupid to support Democrats? If anyone is clearly racist towards blacks, it's white liberals. How demeaning is this prominent white liberal?

Holding those who allowed this to happen to account is critical to helping prevent it in the future. It's like saying we shouldn't investigate a murder because "what does indentifying the murderer actually change anything"? Your comment is something only a die hard leftist who cared more about his party than people would say. Of COURSE knowing how this happened is important. If that's the case - then the problem is with the ignorance bias and hatred of the listeners, not the messenger.

First off there was plenty of evidence. The FBI team that was leading the investigation fully and 100% expected her to be charged and convicted. They were shocked when they were ordered not to. But at the end of the day trump didn't do it. He said that we don't do that kind of thing in this country. Had his followers accepted that and moved on. Now the very thing he was talked out of doing has been done to him by the very people that said we don't do this kind of thing. So of course people are furious. If someone tells you that these are the rules and you have to play by the rules and you then play by the rules, you're going to be pretty pissed off when somebody else breaks those rules and laughs at you. Now the gloves will come off and we'll see what happens when both sides decide they don't want to play by the rules.

there is nothing illegal per se about writing off an NDA as legal expenses. It only becomes illegal when you do that in order to conceal a greater felony. And here's where we run into trouble. The judge suggested it was done to commit a crime involving the election. But - such a crime would be federal law. he's never been charged with that crime nor is the state judge allowed to charge him or prosecute on that crime. So what the judge said was even though he has never been convicted and even though we can't prove it, as long as you believe that he committed some sort of crime in the election related to this payment then that makes these payments a crime. He went on further to say there are four possible crimes that may have been committed in relation to the election. You don't even have to agree on what crime you think it was he may have committed, you can all think it was a different crime but as long as you all think some sort of crime happened I will consider that to be unanimous. So the only reason this is a crime is because of some other crime which he was never charged with, which was never proven nor was evidence given, nor is this court even allowed to address it, and they couldn't even narrow it down to one the jury just had to believe that it was something. That is the biggest problem with this case.

That's me. I did win a race once.

I don't know what public officials you're talking about, but 2 US government departments determined it's most likely a lab leak and the medical studies and datasets show all is NOT well. I believe the datasets over public officials who are nothing but bureaucrats. So no. I'm not satisfied. And I trust the doctors and scientists who have been right about everything so far, over the public officials who have lied their faces off.

I dunno I think it's refuted among some of the different government departments. As an example, Mike Pompeo who was the CIA director was all about the lab leak theory.

Trust is earned.

No, it's not. It's about public safety. I posted the evidence in the Trickle thread that proved it came from Daszak's research - it's the same evidence that 2 US Departments used to determine the lab leak was very likely. Daszak was working on the very virus that leaked or was deliberately released. Here it is in basic form: The funky furin cleavage site and the ACE receptors are just part of the smoking gun.

^ Comment of the day.

Nothing Israel has done has harmed Egypt except insofar as Egypt making war on Israel and failing. Repeatedly. If the Arabs in the region hadn't been so relentless in hating and despising Jews that little country could have had a wonderfully beneficial effect on the barbarism and backwardness of the surrounding states. Not to mention helping to uplift their economies.

Every successful endeavor this Liberal government has achieved can be written on the back of a dime in foot high letters.

You get a much clearer picture of what's gone on when you pull back and look at the macro picture. Fauci is not a medical professional, he's a bureaucrat. He has been for 38 years and he knows how to game the system to get what he wants and concentrate power in himself. The AIDS epidemic in the 80's was when he really honed his manipulative style. AZT was a drug that had proven adverse effects - it shut down liver function (exactly like Remdesivir does). But it was a money-maker for Fauci. He pushed it by funding fraudulent research, silencing and blacklisting other scientists and the media and journalists. He experimented with AZT on babies, children and pregnant women. No one cared about the deaths because they were amongst the gay community and you know how *they* were viewed in the 80's. He's done the same thing over the years with various populations of African countries. Again - no one cared because it was black people in Africa. He's gotten away with it and made a f*ckton of money off it. Like anyone who has gotten away with evil for a long time, he has been emboldened. My gut tells me that the virus was deliberately released in Wuhan, under his direction and in conjunction with the Chinese CCP. It wasn't the "killer" virus it was touted to be, but it was deadly enough to certain populations that panic could be created and it could be sold to the public as a "pandemic". Science-proven hospital protocols for dealing with respiratory viruses were ordered by top-level bureaucrats to be changed into protocols that would hasten death and front-line docs and nurses who protested, were fired. Did you know they weren't even allowed to give Tylenol to alleviate fever? I believe this was done to make it "look" like more people were dying from this novel virus than actually were. Remember the initial videos that came out of China, people dropping dead on the streets, twitching and writhing? Did we ever see that here in N. America? No, we did not. I think it was staged to frighten people here. The vaccine was not brought in for the virus. The virus was brought in for the vaccine. I haven't touched on it here because it's a very involved topic, but now that it has come out in the media that it was actually the US Department of Defense in charge of the whole thing, well......I'll leave it at that. It was the US DoD in charge of the whole thing. The FDA and CDC were only rubber-stampers to get the jabs out. There was no real testing or trials, only shams. People who were in the trials who had adverse events - were not even tracked. They were ignored. It was all just a show for the public. The jabs were going to get EUA approval no matter how they performed. I'm not sure how that information fits in now, other than the US military has a very long history of experimenting on troops. Maybe they viewed this as a live-action drill for pandemic management, I really don't know. Our own Canadian Military used the pandemic to try out psy-op techniques on the public - how much can you scare them into compliance? How to control the media. How to deal with non-compliance. They're gathering information for next time.

The majority of Palestinians support Hamas, i mean during the election there were multiply groups most were terrorist groups but not all of them were and yet they did not get elected....Hamas made it very clear what their intentions were when they got voted in...and they still end up with winning the election...So not all palestinians voted for Hamas, but if you look at the election results you'll find a vast vast majority did vote for terrorist groups...that has to tell you something about the people and what they were looking for in their government ... these are the people you support...someone once said actions speak louder than words,have you seen any attempt to remove Hamas by palestinians , even when they are almost destroyed, or even speak out against the movement... see any protest across the globe for the removal of hamas by palestinians, why is that..... the palestinian people actions speak loud and clear...They are not going to be satisfied with anything other than the destruction of Israel....Thats what you support... The line in the sand has been drawn a long time ago...which side are you on?

Celia Farber's book is one the best, describing what Fauci did regarding HIV. On April 23, 1984, in a packed press conference room in Washington, DC, the secretary of health and human services declared, “The probable cause of AIDS has been found.” By the next day, “probable” had fallen away, and the novel retrovirus later named HIV became forever lodged in global consciousness as “the AIDS virus.” Celia Farber, then an intrepid young reporter for SPIN magazine, was the only journalist to question the official narrative and dig into the science of AIDS. She reported on the “evidence” that was being continually cited and repeated by health officials and the press, the deadliness of AZT, and Dr. Fauci’s trials on children, infants, and pregnant mothers. Throughout, Faber’s reportage was largely ignored. She was maligned, maliciously attacked, and ultimately canceled. Now, forty years after her original reporting, Farber’s Serious Adverse Events: An Uncensored History of AIDS is reissued with a new foreword by Mark Crispin Miller, shining much-needed light on her groundbreaking work once again. More relevant than ever, this book serves as an essential foundation to understanding its catastrophic sequel: COVID-19. Serious Adverse Events makes clear that the tactics employed at the height of HIV/AIDS—the fearmongering, cancel culture, and “woke” takeover of science, medicine, and journalism—persist today. The response to COVID-19 isn’t new: it is a well-trod and dangerous path in the social landscape. Devil in a labcoat, indeed. Notice he experimented on "children, infants and pregnant women" - same as with the covid injections. This is morally and ethically WRONG. @eyeball staunch defense of it, is immoral. The fact that eyeball looks up to this man and thinks he's the "expert" we should follow and agrees with experimenting on children and pregnant women......pure evil. He's done the same thing to Africans - killed many children and young women with dangerous experimentation.

Clearly you don't understand basic "bidenomics" math. Also, 2+2= 22 -joe biden, probably

2+2=4, you stunted pervert. Burn your African lesbian studies diploma and go back to school.

well he won't make that mistake again

You can't say that his answer was wrong when he says 13 until you know 13 WHAT. -democrat apologists, probably

This has been discussed. It's worth remembering that he has never been charged with election financing crimes. But you can't just say that any old thing is an election expense. Their argument is that because repressing the story may have helped the election it's an election expense. So if you go get a haircut is that an election expense? Looking better helps you win the election right? How about your gym membership? Looking fit and healthy is important to an election campaign right? You can't just write off all of the food you eat during the election, presumably under the argument that you'll die if you don't eat and that would affect the election (tho it didn't for biden ) So there has been a real question as to whether or not this actually constitutes an election expense. Certainly paying for advertising would, but does paying not to advertise constitute such an expense? Most experts seem to suggest that it is unlikely that it should have been considered an election expense.

Covid was not Fauci's first rodeo, but certainly the biggest. Read some of the books about his actions with regard to HIV/AIDS. He did the same thing with HIV that he did with covid. For AIDS, he dusted off a dangerous, but money-making drug that was sitting on the shelf - AZT - which ended up killing massive numbers of people. And he suppressed treatments that worked, like Bactrim. He got away with it then because nobody really cared about gays, so he used the same playbook for covid. Suppressed early treatments and drugs that worked at saving lives, in favour of expensive, money-making experimental injections.

Hand them a molsen Canadian bottle and if they take more than 3 seconds to figure out how to open it - BACK OF THE LINE! It is not even remotely our fault. You're far too eager to take up the white man's burden.

The polling indicates that the middle voters and many of the dem voters also feel this was politically motivated. The polls put that into the 70's as i recall (early polling so we'll see if that changes). The only real difference was that dem voters were much more likely to be ok with that. But still at least about 50 percent of the population give or take a point or two has already got serious concerns with it and doesn't feel it was the right thing. So already half the population has lost faith in the political process and the courts, and most of the rest think there was political motivation which means when a democrat gets treated the same way those people will have no problem believing the courts and the politicians are corrupt. Many already expressed that with the abortion decision. Al capone wasn't running for office, and the charges against trump weren't "Being a garbage human". As i said before if the charges had been legit, like the ones for his document handling, and he got convicted it wouldn't be an issue. But these are not legitimate charges, they've been cobbled together in a very questionable way that's never been proposed before. For these charges to be legit there has to be a larger felony crime and nobody's said what that is supposed to be, they just said 'well as long as you believe there is one SOMEWHERE...." . Al capone got nailed for tax evasion which is a real crime that lots of people got nailed for. Imagine if they'd arrested him for jaywalking and claimed it was a felony as long as the jury thought he MIGHT have been crossing the street to commit some sort of crime. Partisan bullcrap aside - if trump loses the election do you think ANY of his supporters will think the election was fair? You think j6 was bad? You think that it's been a divided country so far? People will lose their goddamned minds and the next person in office will make trump look like an angel. This is bad. Don't kid yourself.

Did Biden honestly say that? I'm surprised his handlers let him try to answer a math question, but I'll give the devil his due credit: that wasn't a bad guess for ol' kid sniffer. At least his answer was number. He only had a 50% chance of getting it 'right'.

Look, to me, it is just one pissed of neurologist that got cut off of his cash cow. I have beaten this dead horse. Have a good day.

Brandon obviously directed this rape of the justice and legal systems in order th "get Trump". He will pay for his abuses.

Since you brought them up, Egypt's concerns here are a case in point... they're right next door, they need only unlock the fence and yet they won't do it. Any sage advice for them? Right now they're worried about importing extremists and having those extremists launch attacks against Israel from the Sinai. They know Israel will have to respond to the attacks and that would mean incursions on Egyptian territory... they have a lot invested in peace and don't want to jeopardize their investment. Are you suggesting that their concerns are groundless? That their thinking is flawed? That their threat assessment is unrealistic? That it simply wouldn't happen? Or, is their reluctance to help their "Arab brothers" simply based on racism that's supported by manufactured reasons and weak justifications as you suggest below: One things for sure, somebody has this wrong... meaning BIG TIME WRONG. Given the very real possibility that Israel will indeed block the right of return for Palestinians who leave (that's what I would do) and the fact that Egypt (or others) would have to keep these folks in perpetuity, is their hesitancy based on mindless racism or are there some potential long term problems they're trying to avoid? Instead of staggering all over the map and making me dizzy in the process, perhaps you could simply provide a convincing argument that suggests those Egyptian concerns are groundless. If you can do that, Canadian objections would be a whole lot easier to address. Simply screaming racist, or asking "Oh ya, well what about this?" type questions reminds me of in-laws digging up long dead relatives during Christmas dinner. Unless you enjoy this sort of unproductive banter for its own sake you are going to have to move beyond it and address the underlying concerns. If Egypt has this wrong then maybe others do too, convincing them of it will now take more than shouting racist. Those days are over IMO. In fact, I think you have your work cut out for you and not just on this issue. The epidemic of madness on a litany of issues no longer resonates with people. It seems to me that progressives have traded on the good nature and tolerance of Canadiens in a way that now has consequences for them. One of those is that name calling no longer works. If that's all ya got then get a full length mirror and shout at yourself. Apparently I'm not alone... https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/agar-conservatives-appear-to-be-steaming-toward-victory If you think about it, all progressives had to do was not be crazy, they couldn't do it though. I suspect the backlash here will run deeper and last longer than some expect, even if it doesn't, I think the days of getting results through screaming and intimidation are over... they sure are with me.

Not every foreign culture or religion fits into Canadian society. What you claim is false. There is nothing racist about wanting a country made up of people that share the same values and culture. Some of these immigrants are only interested in fighting for their causes in the places they came from. How is that assimilation in any way?

There were already tens of thousands of Jews in those countries in the time frame you are referring to. Additionally, Jews did not bring their wars into any country they immigrated to, like the Palestinians. It's like the blind leading the stupid here. People who support Palestinians coming to Canada, need to stop posting, since they lack brain cells.

No I spelled out in detail the flaws/ errors in his argument. But like all conservatives in this forum when you hear something that’s inconvenient to your ideology you just make a blanket statement that it’s somehow not relevant. That is entirely false and none of it is wrong D’Souza is a convicted felon having previously convicted of election fraud, which is completely relevant to a “documentary” he’s made to discredit the 2020 election and demanding that we take him at his word. He is absolutely and in no uncertain terms arguing what I said he’s arguing the flaws in his claims and logic are so wide you can drive a truck between them and I described in detail what those flaws are. Ironically you’re not even able to describe how any of MY arguments are inadequate. Again typical for a conservative on this forum: you complain that detailed and specific criticism was detailed and sepecif enough, while refusing to provide ANY details or specifics yourself. But of course shameless hypocrisy has become the Republican brand. It’s not ad-hominem to state the fact that this man RECENTLY went to jail for trying to undermine free and fair elections considering this conversation is about his attempt to under the 2020 election. which statement is that? LMAO clearly you don’t understand how evidence works You are the only DERP here if you think anyone is supposed to believe his grandiose and outrageous claims and overturn the election based on secret evidence he has but won’t show anyone, even 2 years later And you admit you don’t even know if he’s provided any evidence or not but you don’t seem to even care. What would a legitimate reason be? Again more of your hypocrisy that when the accusations come from a Republican, even a convicted felon who pleaded guilty to election fraud NO EVIDENCE IS REQUIRED to believe his claims, you tak him at his word. But yet when the accusations are against any Republican suddenly your criteria for evidence is an impossibly high standard that nobody could ever realistically meet. That’s a lie it was a factual critique that you don’t want to accept so you pretend it was as you wish it was. RECAP OF FACTS: he hasn’t shown how he can locate a phone that close despite industry experts disputing his claim, he hasn’t shown how he ruled out the device of people who routinely pass by boxes located near where they live and work particularly since drop boxes are deliberately located in high traffic areas like malls and libraries, he hasn’t provided the addresses of supposed Democrat “safe houses” or even described how he knows the locations to be such, he hasn’t shown footage of anyone stuffing a box or visiting a box lore than once despite claiming 2 years ago that he has it And fact: claiming to have secret evidence that you refuse to show anyone means that for all intents and purposes you have NO evidence. Otherwise that kind of defeats the whole point of evidence in the first place. If I call the cops and say I have secret evidence that you’re a criminal but I refuse to show them or anyone, should they or anyone else believe me and come arrest you? I don’t think the technology has been invented that could help find you a friend 😝 We all have mobile phones. We’ve all experienced where it shows the device is in the backyard or the neighbours yard when in fact it is in the house and I’m not certain find my phone is even the same tech as the geolocation data anyway. And D’Souza absurdly claimed his cell phone location is accurate to 18 INCHES not 18 feet. In fact he said “12 to 18 inches” which is hilariously false. Experts said accuracy is 2-10 METRES at best under ideal lab conditions never mind real world environments Also geolocation can’t tell the difference between a moving object and a stationary object, it’s just the approximate location of the phone in the split second it was pinged. So there’s no way to tell if someone who was pinged was standing still directly at a box or speeding past the box at 100 mph on a nearby road Debunking links here: Does ‘2000 Mules’ provide evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. presidential election? https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL2N2XJ0OQ/ FACT FOCUS: Gaping holes in the claim of 2K ballot ‘mules’ https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-covid-technology-health-arizona-e1b49d2311bf900f44fa5c6dac406762 Conservative group tells judge it has no evidence to back its claims of Georgia ballot stuffing https://apnews.com/article/georgia-elections-true-vote-ballot-stuffing-199113b47bc2df79c63fdf007cd23115 Group featured in debunked ‘2000 Mules’ election doc admits it has no evidence https://www.nydailynews.com/2024/02/15/true-the-vote-2000-mules-no-evidence-debunked/ Former AG Bill Barr discredited the ‘2,000 Mules’ voter fraud film in a Jan. 6 hearing https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2022/attorney-general-bill-barr-trump-2000-mules-voter-fraud/

Lol. If that's the case, he was REALLY bad at pursuing that mission for decades. Biden famously spent most of his career with very little money. He didn't start to command big speaking and book fees until he added VP to his resume.

It is an annoying debate tactic for those on the left. Constantly demand that you repost the same information and data again and again. And if you refuse to play that game they'll insist you've never posted it. And if you dare repeat anything they say they want you to repost that 15 times as well and then they'll still demand that they never said it. It's frustrating trying to have a conversation with that going on. But I guess that's the point, they pull it out when they want to derail the conversation because it's not going the way they wanted

He said ,while belching out kernels of truth and serious content.

What's your argument for that based on?

Of course you are. It's probably tucked away in some laptop or dossier somewhere.

It's their fault, and they're paying the price right now for that. This really is that simple. If they wanted peace there would be peace.

About as bizarre as reposting it and then defending why you did. I doubt you're a silver-spoon-born guy but you're obviously not above setting the new standard for stooping.

That doesn't count bullshit banana courts, dumbass. Trump is right, and It's going to take a lot work to remove all those fake DA's. Anyone with a working brain no longer votes democrat; they can't without being infected with the woke mind virus.

No, you just promote their agenda and spend years arguing on behalf of their closest allies. The fact that you're too stupid to know what you're doing is irrelevant. More comedy. In a thread where you're defending the criminal behavior of a twice-divorced, orange sleazebag who raw-dogs pornstars while his young wife is recovering from child birth, you are questioning other people's moral compass. 🤡🤡🤡

In the caldera, I presume. Good spot. If you smell sulfur, grab your camera. It probably means that some of Hillary's cousins are coming to the surface.

I know the difference between science and BS, and you never will.

Mainstream? There's more moisture in a damp rag.

Normally I'd want a guy who's more libertarian in his views, However, the woke are becoming increasingly hostile to freedom and democracy so I wouldn't be too upset with a fighter to start going after these people