Leaderboard

So now that we proved your source is completely bullshit, lets go back to the issue. The claim was made that forcing people to get vaxxed was 'not worht it', and your reply was that "MILLIONS' would die otherwise. And you claim there's no evidence that's untrue. So. lets start with your own failed 'research'. They took a model that assumed everyone in canada who was vaccine hesitant or adverse did not get the vaccine. that's not accurate - many hesitant did after being forced but THEY assume nobody did. It's grossly unrealistically high. And they put the number of people dead by that gross exagerration at 2800 people. 2800. Not "Millions". That's in a grossly exaggerated model that doesn't even take into account age. That's a "Worst possible case" kind of thing. So your own post shows that it was NO WHERE NEAR 'millions". It wasn't even hundreds of thousands. It wasn't evne tens of thousands. How stupid are you to post the proof you're worng? There are plenty of other sources too. For example - consider the graph below. From January to about june vaccinations were slowly rolling out - remembering it was a month beteween first jab and second jab when you were actually immunized so the people getting thier first jab in april for example wouldn't have been immunized till somewhere in may or june. So lets look at the impact in deaths over that time. the vaccine SHOULD have meant deaths would go down as more and more people got vaccinated if it worked as you say. Whopsie doodle - they don't. The increase stays in pretty much a flat line all the way along, regardless of what percent of the population is vaccinated. Next up - the point of immunization was to get 'herd immunity' - that magic point where we have enough people immune that the disease won't spread rapidly. The world health org put that at 70 percent. ( https://www.who.int/news/item/23-12-2021-achieving-70-covid-19-immunization-coverage-by-mid-2022_) But - while they note that getting there with vaccines is better than just letting people get infected - the infected are just as immune. A large percent of the people who did not get vaxxed got covid and lived. They are the 'naturally vaxxed'. A high percent of at risk people would have been vaccinated by choice. The people who didn't would mostly have been low risk. And they would have caught the illness (and did) and would have been no different than a vaccinated person. Look at the number of cases over time - those people are all 'vaccinated' wether they got a shot or not, So the evidence is clear. there would NOT have been 'millions of deaths" as you claimed if we had allowed people to choose. You were completely full of shit - i'm right again and you once again posted your own proof that i'm right with your 'report'. Gotcha Oh - and finally, A Johns Hopkins study says 'ill-founded' COVID lockdowns did more harm than good https://health.wusf.usf.edu/health-news-florida/2022-02-02/a-johns-hopkins-study-says-ill-founded-lockdowns-did-little-to-limit-covid-deaths LOL -have a nice day

ALL innocent people should try to stave off banana courts until they can find suitable recourse. Trump is doing the right thing.

Well not without overheating his processor, no.. And you have to take into account the very small 'hard drive'.

...he said wistfully.

Why does this bother you? Half of the Libbies are Jew haters.

Exactly. The better conclusion is that the things you're attributing to vaccine have nothing at all to do with protein spikes. You might as well be blaming fluoride, chemtrails or whatever you had for breakfast that day.

Major advertisers have abandoned X in droves.

It is interesting how they (the most passionate of internet forum posters) truly do think that they are making widespread, tangible impact. When you point out that the forum is very small and very obscure they go apoplectic about how they will not bow down to the man and that I (or you) have my head in the sand. Nothing stated on here ever is read by true decision makers so no matter how well reasoned, passionate, etc. it may be.. it is for nothing.

So you read a 260 page report overnight and found a bunch of errors did you? LMAO!

Keep in mind that the majority of people who are reading/loving Hitler's screed are muslims. Mein Kampf was never banned in the ME and has always been popular there. Hitler is old news, anyways. There's a new breed of hate-mongers who are just as bad:

But that isnt true: Joe Biden believes that his uncle may have been eaten by cannibals after his plane was “shot down” over Papua New Guinea during the Second World War. The US president’s theory is, however, contradicted by official war records of 2nd Lieut Ambrose J Finnegan’s death, which suggest that his aircraft suffered engine failure over the Pacific in 1944 and that he did not survive the crash. This is his personality, though. Joe has to make everything about him. When he walks into the room, he grew up with people just like the people in the room. Remember when he grew up on the black church, loved with Puerto Ricans, was jealous of all the people with Polish names, almost lost his house to fire as he told the Maui residents. It is always about him. Watch the video to see how out of touch with reality he is:

You're just pissed off because woke fascists aren't running Twitter anymore. Get over it, Adolph.

I doubt it. He was overheard telling the drapes that growing up his mother was a venetian blind so he understands what it's like to be disabled.

She needs to go. But what can you expect from her? She was an activist, and that's the only reason she was made governor general. Well, and being a native.

In 2019, 89% of agencies covering 97% of the population submitted data, but by 2021, that coverage plummeted to less than 63% of departments overseeing just 65% of the population. Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York City all failed to submit crime data. To increase participation, the FBI relaxed the NIBRS requirement in 2022, allowing agencies to report via the legacy system.    But many other cities, such as St. Louis, which had transitioned to the new method, still struggle to comply and submit partial or faulty data. The FBI compensates by relying more heavily on “estimation,” or informed guesswork, to fill in the gaps and produce aggregated data. What we are seeing is a system in transition, so data is incomplete. However, Joe's handlers, knowing the data is wrong, are trying to use it to convince you Joe did something positive. He didn't. It is a lie.

I'm still waiting for your rebuttal to this. Looks like a pile of dead horses to me.

You're turning yourself inside out over this. Free speech has nothing to do with the market. It refers to the government regulation of speech. Always has. You are free to say (almost) anything you want without the government limiting your expression of opinion. But, as the old saying goes, free speech does not mean speech free of consequences. There have always been social and economic consequences to free speech. If you say the wrong things, people may not want to do business with you or to be associated with you. If companies were intolerant of "free speech" they would exit jurisdictions with free speech provisions. Instead, companies like mine, pulled our ad dollars out of X when placing our ads on X became a risk to our brand equity. That decision has nothing at all to do with free speech.

Yes, that was my point - there is much newer research on this. Seems it's you it's stuck in the past. Why are you against doing studies on these jabs?

No. Your position is anti-life. Leaving decisions to the states is counter to the nation's interest. Last great cry of states rights was about slavery. Now it's about enslaving women.

I knew you'd resort to this, especially after you countered it with a study that was done in the US and Europe. You knew that but you're such a shameless hypocritical troll you simply don't care.

First, I know you have problems with sources and citations in general, but an MS word doc from some random unpublished source is about as bad as they come. Opening MS Word docs on random websites is like digital Darwinism.

But Obama wore a tan suit.

That's already been determined by YOU, comrade. I'm just here to acknowledge your devotion to woke leftism.

You don't get to make up your own definition of "woke," shithead Musk is running the show at X not "lefts" Duh

You clowns always have an excuse. “There’s no evidence” is always retorted with, “Uh…. Uh… uh… it’s right over here!” Or “We’re going to produce it any second!” You’re obviously lying.

Donald Trump committed fraud when he listed the payoff to Stormy Daniels as a tax-deductible legal expense.

free speech does not mean free from consequences. Fine... tell the world that you think Hitler was correct. If the world does not agree with you then you have to deal with that. A lot of folks confuse being accepted with free speech. Just because the world does not agree with what you said does not mean that you were barred from voicing that unpopular opinion.

Wrong again. A picture's worth a thousand words. That was no accident.

Even if data is incomplete.. that does not tell you that crime is up or down. I am ok with incomplete. I am not one to fill in the blanks.

That's right. If you recall it was a world wide pandemic so millions is not an exaggeration at all. Just letting it rip and shrugging it off as a flu that was only killing old farts would have been the worst case scenario.

Nobody is "demanding" that X do anything to anyone. Brands are simply voting with their advertising dollars. Welcome to the free market! If X wants those dollars they need to create a platform that is brand-friendly, and that means reinstating the content moderation that Musk foolishly gutted.

A good way to expose these wokeaholics is YouTubers. They are regularly documenting the decline in their cities.

Um…no. There are too many unanswered questions. Here are just a few little gems: Why were Chinese scientists working on gain of function viruses at a Canadian bio lab, bringing the research and viruses to Wuhan, and sharing information with members of the Communist Party of China? Why was countervailing evidence on vaccines actively suppressed by media at government behest? When the counter evidence seemed to be true, the language government and media used to describe it changed from misinformation to malinformation, basically information they didn’t like or that disagreed with official narratives. Why were vaccines mandated, especially during the Omicron spread when it was clear that getting Omicron was about as safe and effective against getting further Covid as getting the vaccine? Why are governments able to redact information from being shared with the public when it’s clear that it was government actions that were the greatest threat to national security? Why was the bio lab Covid leak origin of Covid-19 idea actively suppressed? What exactly was being created in our bio labs? Clearly it’s not a secret to our foreign adversaries, so Canadians deserve to know. Why weren’t the non-Covid impacts of lockdowns, mandates and restrictions taken into greater account? Why was the Emergencies Act imposed on peaceful protests? Why were bank accounts frozen? Why does Canada sign onto pandemic and other treaties with international bodies without parliamentary debate or accountability? Damn right we have questions. I don’t want to re-live that nightmare. It wouldn’t take long to come up with a lot more questions, but if even these ones could be satisfactorily answered I would take my bat home.

Good point. Fox. May I add 1 more thing? "You don't fight nazi or ANY RACIAL SUPREMACIST ideas by burying them."

You don't. You didn't just now either. LOL - well you're a m0ron but you're a consistent one I posted several data sources and a study on TOP of posting the study that eyeball referenced but didn't actually provide - which proved him wrong in any case And once again - in the face of solid evidence all you can do is have a hissy fit i mean we both know you didn't actually read any of the data - anything more than two sentences and you start crying and holding your head Sorry kiddo , If we had not forced vaccinations and allowed people to choose there would not have been 'Millions more deaths". I doubt there would have been any. Well you called it

A strong conventional NATO will make that less likely because it will deter Russia from attacking with conventional forces and make it less likely that NATO would have to use them. Being weak in any area does not make you more secure. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wayne-eyre-bill-blair-armed-forces-recruitment-1.7177911 We might end up with a bunch of new equipment and no one to operate it.

The problem with free speech is that someone might say something you don't like, Accepting that free speech is necessary and desirable in a free and democratic society means accepting that and not looking at it as a bad thing. The commies in 1920's used violence and intimidation to attempt to deplatform and repress nazi speech. But that only made the nazi's stronger. "A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still". You don't fight nazi or white supremicist ideas by burying them, You do it by exposing them to sunlight. Then you can present your own thoughts.

Oh i'm aware - i mean he posted proof that HE was wrong without realizing it, clearly there's a comprehension problem at work there And As we know - moonbox's brains start melting with anything more than 2 sentances. But i know. And you know. And intelligent people who come along and read it will know. Those two are just the comic relief so it doesn't really matter - if i let their stupidity be a reason not to post i'd never post anything here

You might as well yell that at clouds. He didn't take in 1% of what you wrote.

Yes. The measures seemed like a great test of just how far governments could go to control human behaviour on a mass scale. That aspect of the pandemic was more worrying to me than getting Covid. I always knew that it had to go through the population and the vulnerable had to be extra cautious. The vaccines provided hope and extra protection, but that protection proved to be minor later in the pandemic, and there were side effects for some people. We didn’t know the long term effects.

That picture is so perfect that it feels intentional. Everyone knows that democrats are just bursting inside to unleash their true selves on society.

These people are f*cking delusional.

If robo is a bot, he's inside of a Commodore Vic 20.

The Borowitz Report is a satire paper. They're like the onion or the beaverton or the like. The problem here seems to be that robosmith didn't realize it was supposed to be satire and is quoting it as a real article. Unfortunately his creator didn't program him with human emotions like humour.

Not by scientists. There isn't a reputable scientific/medical institute or university anywhere on the planet that references that hooey. And I doubt real Nazis will be any more pleased that you're associating them with retards than when they're being associated with Trudeau.

That'll be the day, you people have been shooting your silly mouths off about 2nd Amendment folks for years and notwithstanding the odd fed up mass shooter...it's been like crickets.

Someone should tell Herbie that his hero Carl Marx was pro-gun and a racist.

Yeah...no one was talking about small areas. The atmosphere is the whole thing. Not some little subsect. But I see who you are now. You are someone that doesn't have a grip on reality and will do or say anything to hold onto this liberal fantasy world you "live" in.

Good ol' part-time jobs and public-sector jobs to the rescue. Somehow the Dems just haven't gotten the recipe for 'spending their way to wealth' right just yet.

Ooh ee ooh ah ah Foxy say bwana's medicine is evil. Cut off that arm.