Leaderboard

TBH there's not much difference between "freezing" and "seizing" from a peon's pov. The money's there, then it's gone. Whether you "get your account seized and then get the money back" or you "get your account frozen and then unfrozen" it's the exact same thing, and it doesn't make a lick of difference to the federal gov't if they seize the assets of one Canadian. The main thing is that the government of Canada has started attacking their political enemies using the banking system. That means that the money that you work for isn't yours if you irk the PM.

Socialism is evil for five key reasons: 1. Socialism is Based on a Materialistic Worldview. 2. Socialism punishes virtue. 3. Socialism Endorses Stealing. 4. Socialism Encourages Envy and Class Warfare. 5. Socialism Seeks to Destroy Marriage and Family. From Julie Roys, Christian Post contributor July 12, 2016. For the detailed explanation of each of these five points, please go to: 5 Reasons Socialism Is Not Christian | Opinion News (christianpost.com) Since the federal NDP and Liberals have reached an agreement which includes the governing Liberals enacting more major social programs such as dental care, and pharmacare, in addition to the existing programs, the question of whether it is moral or not should be examined. These programs sound good on the surface or without an in depth examination of what it all means. But the fact is they will cost Canadians tens of billions of dollars on top of the hundreds of billions of dollars of debt we already have. There is no such thing as a free lunch. Somebody has to pay for all these expensive programs and the only people who can pay are the taxpayers. But many Canadians are already stretched beyond the brink and struggling to make end's meet. So how will all this work and is it fair for taxpayers? Gas prices are already beyond reasonable, real estate and rents in cities is getting out of sight, and food is going up. Yet the left wing parties and politicians believe now is the time to really splurge on social programs. They also believe we should not spend on our poverty-stricken Canadian forces, even at a time when the world has changed and we face serious aggressive behavior from adversaries in the world. So it is really a moral issue as well as a political issue.

https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/convoy-organizer-tamara-lich-given-george-jonas-freedom-award The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is presenting Tamara Lich with the George Jonas Freedom Award on June 16th for her role in organizing the Freedom Convoy. Rex Murphy will be the keynote speaker. Has anyone seen Trudeau comment on this?

Why You Should Be a Nationalist It’s undeniable: Around the world, nationalism is on the march, and the media and reigning political elites would have you believe this is a dangerous disaster in the making. So, why is Yoram Hazony, author of The Virtue of Nationalism, unafraid? Watch to understand.

Tucker: Karine Jean-Pierre knows the script cold Fox News host gives his take on the president's new pick for press secretary on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight.' This is an excellent video which perfectly captures the lies and hypocrisy and racism of Democrats and The Left:

The Dems have already predicted a new wave of covid right before the mid-terms. I mean, in the fall. It's called the electionbegon variant - they invented a Greek letter for it.

Canadian infantrymen pick up the slack what the government refuses to pay in treasure our brothers pay in blood at the going down of the sun and in the morning, every day is remembrance day ducimus

Justin must be a genius then, because he has distracted Canadians for 8 years now and not tackled one important issue..... Canadians either don't care about what is important in this nation, or too busy to take the time to understand those issues... Give me a break, It's not about health care, long-term care homes, Education, our security apparatus, getting any resources to market, or climate change Did I miss any important issues? Call Justin a few names may be immature, but keeping Justin in office that's a stretch, Canadians want pray for a government that will take some action on any important issue, and if they put Justin back in office for a 4 th time, so be it, it will be the government we deserve want. Conservatives are not going to attract the liberal center enough to make numbers really matter, that was proven in the last election... Canadians will one day wake up and choose change, is that next election, not looking good right now is it... and stopping name-calling is not going to change any of that..

Smaller donators also had their accounts frozen. You should stop saying this. It was ruled a legal protest. Freedom Convoy Truckers Were Right - Judge Rules Protest Legal - City Of Ottawa To Be Sued - The Washington Standard

So its OK for the government to target my bank account because of a Go Fund Me I donated too? That's a little orwellian.

What kind of an argument is "a few"? How many is "a few"? How many violations is enough for the right to remain only on paper? But of course, as many as they wouldn't care to notice. Putin started with "a few", then only a few more. And look where it got him.

I disagree. I think the frozen accounts were only of big donors who were supporting something illegal such as blockading the border or the illegal occupation of downtown Ottawa. Any small donors who had their accounts frozen were likely unfrozen soon after. The government only took this measure of freezing certain accounts because they had to stop the illegal activities that were going on and restore order. Law and order is a government's main function. As for the Rebel News reporters being assaulted or interfered with, I don't agree with that. If the government did not take action to stop anarchists and illegal blockades, occupations, you would have a downfall of government and end up with a dictatorship like in the many other countries. Special interest groups like the so-called Freedom Convoy are anarchists and cannot be allowed to take over this country.

We are likely on the same page. To me the medical issues would be no different than a paramedic having to choose between who to save when they roll up to a car wreck.

Lol that crazy lady getting an award ?

Yes a good example. Liberal, Conservative I lost count of his transitions who cares you can change them like gloves, the important part is: to rule. Without any checks, accountability or indeed, responsibility. And that never changes.

Pledging to mandate COVID vaccines for students is likely a bridge too far for many parents. The Liberals are in trouble.

Yet you have no problem with Trudeau's actions. Roll over much?

But this no laughing matter. Pointless quasi-election game that changes nothing whoever "wins" (because the whole point of the system is to allow no meaningful change) is the only token left separating you from them, now true, factual and patent. I would be worried (if I were you). P.S. and even that is not a given: should a real genuine opponent emerge you could keep them away from fair competition via system barriers, outlandish claims and "charges" in a hand-run justice" system. I can have no confidence that you wouldn't because you have shown preparedness to do pretty much anything, if the right label (as defined by you) is assigned. And that would be already complete Putin, 100%. Congrats: you're almost there.

Yes Mike. And you're in the throughs of said malaise.

All of the leadership candidates should have Cabinet portfolios if the Conservatives form government, I think. I’d be happy to see either Polievre or Lewis as PM. Charest should have a key role working with foreign leaders because he is known, seasoned, and has run a government, which is why I see him in Foreign Affairs or perhaps Defence. Polievre has to be more conciliatory. He can be abrasive.

Excellent post. Well said. You're an imbecile.

Yes, but thats nothing new is it? The truth will prevail.

Translation: You got your ass beat down and all you can do is spew out lame insults. Buh bye.

On the other hand, some women need to be ‘ruled’, and those are just the facts. Whining about men making the laws, that really is a slave mentality. Time to grow yourself up.

There is something plaintive in Mozart. In McCartney, there is something joyful.

If men make laws that only impact women, they are trying to rule women. I'm tired of idiots who say a woman who is financially, physically or emotionally not able to look after a child properly, aborting a 12 week old foetus is the same as murdering her next door neighbour who has a wife and four kids.

I watched part of the debate. I am a member of the federal Conservative Party. At present, I plan to vote for Charest. ----- The perfect is the enemy of the good. a) If Poilievre wins, he'll want nothing to do with Charest. b) If Charest wins, he'll keep Poilievre on his team.

That is a very poor, amateurish attempt to discredit the Bible. First of all the Old Testament, King James Version, is based on the Hebrew Bible called the Tanakh. The New Testament is based on over 5,000 copies of Greek manuscripts or part of manuscripts from over 1,000 years ago. The Old Testament was originally written over a period of 1,500 years and completed over 2,000 years ago. The original New Testament books were written in the first 100 years after Christ and copies were made repeatedly through the centuries. There is no connection to ancient Egyptians. Anyone who studied the Old Testament would know a large part of it includes the history of the Jewish nation from the time of the father of the Jews, Abraham as recorded in Genesis. Nothing to do with the Egyptians other than the 400 years the Jews were in captivity in Egypt. If the Old Testament had come from Egypt, why would it be a history of the Jewish nation where they lived in ancient Israel? That Egypt claim doesn't make sense at all. Exodus describes how they were rescued and escaped captivity miraculously. The Jews made and kept very careful copies of the Old Testament Scriptures which were passed down through the ages. There is some information at this website although I have not really studied it as I don't have time at the moment. It does say in one part: Quote The archaeological record evidences the existence of the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah as centers of commerce geographically located where Genesis indicates. A trade list from Ebla, a thriving commercial center at the time the Bible specifies for the existence of the five Cities of the Plain mentioned in Genesis 14, records the names of the cities, spelled exactly as they are found in the Hebrew Bible. Furthermore, evidence points to their destruction through earthquake activity in which layers of earth were hurled into the air, accompanied by intense heat that molded together layers of sedimentary rock and severe burning, probably when a basin of oil beneath the Dead Sea ignited and erupted. Brimstone (bituminous pitch) is also found plentifully in the area, along with abundant salt, sulfur, and natural gas deposits.[6] An explosion of the natural gas and oil lifted the salts and sulfur and bitumen high into the air, causing them to rain upon the city, destroying it. One portion of the falling deposits fell upon Lot’s wife, who had stopped fleeing to look back longingly upon the city, turning her into a pillar of salt (Genesis 19:26).[7] Careful stratigraphic excavation of houses in the Cities of the Plain evidences that they were destroyed by fire that started on the roof and spread to the interior when the roof collapsed, supporting Genesis 19:24: “Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven.”[8] The Biblical record of the existence and destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah is accurate. Unquote That is particularly interesting because it goes a long way back, several thousand years before Christ and the account is recorded in Genesis. Archaeological Evidence the Old Testament / Hebrew Bible is God's Word (faithsaves.net) As I have not had time to study this article right now, I cannot say I would agree with everything in it. It is not infallible, but may have useful information. Only the Bible is infallible, the King James Version of 1611. If you are going to comment on it, it might be wise to study is and learn something about what you are talking about.

Another male chauvinist who thinks he has the right to rule women. I was just pointing out that the US was over two years late to the party. I had nothing to do with what my dad did, I wasn't even born and neither was that American idiot who made that ignorant post.

K.

so, what you are feeling are the effects of monarchy Section 1 is the power of the Queen being used against you and that is Canada, that is the true nature of Canada Canada itself is repressing you Canadians you meet on the street will often say that they "love Canada" but that's probably because they don't actually know Canada. they don't know what Canada is they fill that void with a benign Canadian People's Republic of the mind, even tho no such country actually exists

Mark Levin's books do get very positive reviews on Amazon. Given the amount of censorship going on these days I'm a bit surprised that his books haven't been banned there yet. I do watch his show sometimes and I enjoy it mainly because I tend to agree with his viewpoint and the fact that his guest's actually get to talk. It's a real conversation and not the usual quick sound bite kind of appearance seen on most other shows.

"Justified" is growing ever closer to "regurgitating the LPOC narratives & disinformation".

You are correct that the media fools many Americans in voting against their own interests. Interesting what Newt had to say. I just hope there is enough of a margin to account for the cheating.

America really has some of the worst pieces of excrement for politicians. I recall Harris asking Kavanaugh when he lost his virginity. I just couldn't believe it. I mean these are evil and truly sick individuals.

everyone could be equal before the law perhaps but not everyone is equal in the face of the Lord atheist Communist traitors will burn in a lake of fire, of their own making

In order to be called a peaceful protest by the media you need to loot some stores, assault some innocent civilians & some cops, burn down some low-income housing, tear down some statues, chant about murdering police officers, and block roads & bridges. Our Freedom Convoy only checked 1 of the 6 main boxes (There are no part-marks for just hanging a sign off of a statue). I'm really glad that Tamara is being rewarded fo her hard work and her decency. Canadians should be really proud of what the convoy achieved. It is probably one of the largest & longest peaceful protests ever, over an extremely contentious issue.

"We will send our most supercilious imbecile to lead them..." - LPOC And yet they will garner followers, not because they are smart or well-spoken, but because my arse is smarter than the average Torontonian. "There's not enuf uhh mayunnaise in my soks." - Justin Trudeau

She and others REFUSE to answer the basic question as to when does abortion become murder? They resort to insulting men as a gender.

there is a poison pill written into the Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms in Canada, the first amendment is called Section 1 1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. this section was meant to be used only in the most extreme circumstances, think World War Two level of emergency but since that is not written into the clause the governments in Canada use Section 1 promiscuously, as a catch all anytime the governments here want to nullify your rights for any reason, they invoke Section 1 your right is deemed to be "unreasonable", cannot be "justified in a free & democratic society" so it turns out the Canadian bill of rights ain't worth paper it is written on, as it is nullified without restraint thus, Canada is not actually a free country by the standards of American freedom as in Canada, freedom is subject to whatever the government in power subjectively decides to be "reasonable"

I was just watching Biden addressing the media on TV this morning. Apparently the economy is wonderful. Might be a bit of an inflation problem but Trump did that and sniffy Joe has it under control. He's got a crackerjack team in the Fed working on it. Putin is driving up the price of oil, but Joe released the oil reserve. He's going to raise taxes on oil producers and take their leases away. Good thinking Joe. That'll fix em'. Cheap gas is right around the corner now. You're such a wizard, Joe. It's the same with the Democrats in general though. BS, diversion and finger pointing is all they've got but I worry that it might be enough.

By multiple entities including various payment platforms that they were the users of. Given the complaints I read online that truckers weren't getting paid, it's pretty understandable that they needed to verify IDs, and such. Also banks are very aware that money laundering is very easy via charities like this. It plays this way: I have a bunch of $$$ that I need laundered but fast. I contact someone on the inside who holds the codes to the GoFundMe account and say - if I donate $100K, you cash it out and keep $10K for yourself and give $90K back to me. Nobody needs to be the wiser - tell everyone it was an accounting error. Hickety boo, patriotism wins again...

You do realize that ectopic pregnancies are not viable, right? The only thing that would be accomplished by denying a woman an abortion in that case is the death of the woman. Because no exceptions means....NO exceptions. How is that "the stuff of saints and heroes"? More like the stuff of religious fanatics and idiots. (Also, you seem unaware that the US was not involved in the war against the Nazis "from the beginning". They had to be dragged into it.)

More of your hilarious crackpot opposite of reality nonsense. Why don’t you go immigrate to Russia and tell us what a great life you have there

Tchaikovski, he was "blue" - some people are left-handed. ===== WTF? Neither Paul McCartney nor John Lennon are Confucious. (McCartney, maybe, because he borrowed on his dad's tunes.)

Because sooner or later you run out of other people's money.

To my knowledge, there has not been a war in the last 500 years that reduced the population. Governments and religions have never used war to reduce the population. Wars are fought for many reasons, but that is not one of them. Usually, governments encourage population growth in times of war. A future nuclear war is the one example of a war that would reduce the population, but that would be a redution to extinction. Not much point to that.

Trucknocracy?