ConFux, WestConMan, BlackTurd

[Nefarious Banana]

The Justin Trudeau Liberals & Jagmeet Singh have damaged Canada.  Many on this site seem ok with that.  Sad.

[Michael Hardner]

32 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

1. Which of the above that Flyer's mocking do you think understand what perspective even means? 

2. I think we can oblige ourselves a bit of shadenfreude after enduring years of their rage-posting and conspiracy theories.  

3. I don't see this as a win for Carney or the Liberals either.  The Liberal Party, especially, didn't earn it or deserve it.  Rather,  I see it as a repudiation in Canada of Donald Trump and Pierre Poilievre, and their cultivation of incoherent populist rage and worthless culture-war bullshit.  

4. I could end up being very wrong, but I think the CPC are fooling themselves if they think that their creep leader has momentum and can ride it into the next election.  The better part of 4 years of Trump are ahead of us, and it's already a debacle and only getting worse.  Poilievre will need a massive rebranding and image overhaul to shake the association, but I'm not sure he's capable of it like Harper was.  

1. I can't see most of the posts you refer to due to the IGNORE function.
2. Go ahead, but it's not a wholesome pleasure IMO...it's back to the tedious back-and-forth that true dialogue should alleviate.
3. Ok
4. He could snipe at every move the government makes, and eventually swoop in and win an election which would rightfully be attributed to external factors.  And then all of the vultures you're currently mocking would lick their chops and have a laugh at YOUR expense.  The wheel in the sky turns forever.... 

[taxme]

5 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

STFU you greasy loser.

A troll is someone who comes to a forum lying, gaslighting, throwing baseless insults around, dodging questions, failing to back up their declarative statements, etc. 

All of you fugging worms who pretended that vax-fascism was ok, it was ok for Trudeau to call the unvaxed racists and misogynists and then ask Canadians if we should even be tolerated, ignored all of Trudeau's scandals, ignored all of carney's lies, ignored all of the blatant bribery of CBC and other MSM outlets, etc, are the actual trolls here.

If I was a troll i wouldn't have been able to put all of you little b1tches in your place here for the least ten years.

Enjoy the ride now, losers. The next few years are really gonna suck for you.  

Indeed, those Corney leftist lieberal supporters do not realize that they are going to suffer also. Corney only used them as useful idi0ts and trolls here. Turdeau did absolutely nothing for Canada except to destroy it. Now Corney is going to finish off Canada for good and all the lieberal lefty's here are cheering it on. 

Myself personally, i have now given up on Canada and i now despise this WEF globalist country that Corney globalist shill has now taken over and who will now work very hard to turn Canada into a third world globalist hell hole. 

Sad to say that the ride is not going to be a great ride but instead it will be a ride over the cliff very soon. The old Canada is phkd and nothing can save it now. Sad to have to say this but I will be supporting Alberta independence and will support them with my dollars. We can thank the lefty lieberal in the Maritimes, Ontario and BC for a Corney win. They will be a bunch of losers also in the end. A bunch of leftist lieberal imbeciles to say the least. Phk awf, losers. 👎

Edited Tuesday at 08:36 PM by taxme

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, Politics1990 said:

i don't really care what you think at the end of the day the party i voted for won.. yours lost so who's really the loser misster west? 🤣 infact your leader couldn't even win his own seat lol now he has to beg one of his mps for there seat

Usually the illiterate is the loser, and in this case it's no different. 

[West]

If this isn't a childish thread title what is?

[Moonbox]

45 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

To suggest that after 8 years of liberal rule, a lot of that rage posting was unjustified is just you making excuses to throw shade....Liberal actions over 8 plus years deserve to be highlighted when they can be...

Yes.  A lot of the criticisms are justified.  The Liberal record does deserve to be highlighted.  I think a plurality of Canadians agreed on what the problems were and how the Liberals mishandled it and in many cases made it worse. 

The problem was that they didn't agree that PP was a serious leader best equipped to deal with it.  Highlighting affordability and how the Liberals have ballooned the public service and the deficit is a compelling message, but that not when it's wrapped in Trumpian packaging and all of the nonsense that comes with.  

Edited Tuesday at 07:28 PM by Moonbox

[TreeBeard]

19 minutes ago, West said:

If this isn't a childish thread title what is?

Here is a selection of childish topics:  

 

Carney vows to bring together all Canadians, Can start by returning the lyrics in O Canada to "in all thy sons command"

Time for Western separation
 

Quebec's push to throw you in the slammer for saying a prayer at your picnic

Shrine to wokeism closed down: 

Edited Tuesday at 07:30 PM by TreeBeard

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Moonbox said:

That's the positive spin on what happened here, which is that they lost the election where they had everything going for them.  They couldn't have asked for more fertile ground than this.  

Well that's just blatantly untrue. You think trump created the most fertile ground that could possibly exist? Or are you pretending he doesn't exist so that you can make some lame point that is no validity?

If this election had happened last november  THEN you have everything going for you and you have a fertile ground. 

But then trump and tariffs happened, justin quit and carney sold people on the idea that some how he was the candidate of change despite it being teh same party with the same people. 

2 hours ago, Moonbox said:

A decent number of those seats went to the conservatives, but either way, the transfer of NDP/Bloc/Green vote to the Liberals wasn't a fluke.  It was because of Poilievre.

It was because of trump, don't be stupid

Before trump even the liberal and NDP voters wanted to vote for Poilievre instead of Trudeau. Then trump came and things changed overnight. Even trump acknowledged it

We know you have endless trouble with math but honestly, even this should be within your grasp

[suds]

Right about now I'm hoping the Liberals can either pick up the seats they need to form a majority government, or come to some working arrangement with the Conservatives to put this country back on track. If not, we're going to go through another 4 years of hell. Of course Liberals working with Conservatives could only happen in a perfect world.

[Moonbox]

37 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

2. Go ahead, but it's not a wholesome pleasure IMO...it's back to the tedious back-and-forth that true dialogue should alleviate.

I'm not sure who you suppose considers shadenfreude a wholesome pleasure, or when/where exactly you were expecting "true dialogue" from the hysterical manbabies in question. 

Also, if you were to tell me that you didn't spare yourself a chuckle at the thought of them seething in their basements, wondering how it all went wrong, I wouldn't buy it.  You don't have to admit though.  😆

I can appreciate not rubbing salt in the dejection of regular conservative voters, but that's not who we're talking about.  

46 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

4. He could snipe at every move the government makes, and eventually swoop in and win an election which would rightfully be attributed to external factors. 

Maybe, but those "external factors" are likely to be the next 4 years of Trump and the chaos and failure that brings.  I don't think Poilievre is going to have a lot of luck blaming "Trump pooping all over the place (and himself)" on the Liberals.  The cause and effect in this case is a lot easier to digest for the average voter than the esoteric economics of inflation and money supply.   

56 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

And then all of the vultures you're currently mocking would lick their chops and have a laugh at YOUR expense.  The wheel in the sky turns forever.... 

Something I would worry about in the future, if I actually cared.  One of the benefits of not being a hysterical ideological zealot is that your ego and identity aren't shaped by politics or what people are saying on an interweb forum.  🤷‍♂️

[Moonbox]

23 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Well that's just blatantly untrue. You think trump created the most fertile ground that could possibly exist? Or are you pretending he doesn't exist so that you can make some lame point that is no validity?

I think the fertile ground was laid before Trump started pooping everywhere.  The question you need to consider is why didn't the threat of Trump benefit Poilievre?  Why couldn't he capitalize on that, given how disgruntled Canadians were with the Liberal Party?  

[Michael Hardner]

11 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

1. I'm not sure who you suppose considers shadenfreude a wholesome pleasure, or when/where exactly you were expecting "true dialogue" from the hysterical manbabies in question. 

2. Also, if you were to tell me that you didn't spare yourself a chuckle at the thought of them seething in their basements, wondering how it all went wrong, I wouldn't buy it.  You don't have to admit though.  😆

3. I can appreciate not rubbing salt in the dejection of regular conservative voters, but that's not who we're talking about.  

4. Maybe, but those "external factors" are likely to be the next 4 years of Trump and the chaos and failure that brings.  I don't think Poilievre is going to have a lot of luck blaming "Trump pooping all over the place (and himself)" on the Liberals.  The cause and effect in this case is a lot easier to digest for the average voter than the esoteric economics of inflation and money supply.   

5. Something I would worry about in the future, if I actually cared.  One of the benefits of not being a hysterical ideological zealot is that your ego and identity aren't shaped by politics or what people are saying on an interweb forum.  🤷‍♂️

1. If you value dialogue you should engage in it at the highest levels.
2. I didn't feel good about leagues of disgruntled people, who have been failed by our economy, not getting their wish, no.  That's regardless about how I felt about their candidate.  I have friends who are hardcore CPC too.
3. If you feel they are chuds, you really should ignore.  It's not kharmically sound to copulate with swine, as Ghandi said.
4. Ok.
5.  I firmly believe you should try to step aside, even if you fail to do so occaisonally.

Anyway, I do appreciate your posts.

[CdnFox]

5 minutes ago, Moonbox said:

I think the fertile ground was laid before Trump started pooping everywhere. 

Sure, but then trump started pooping everywhere. Then the ground became toxic. Like I said you'd have had a point if we were talking about an election that happened in November 2024

Quote

 The question you need to consider is why didn't the threat of Trump benefit Poilievre?  Why couldn't he capitalize on that, given how disgruntled Canadians were with the Liberal Party?  

Now there's two parts to that problem. The first challenge is that Canadians weren't that upset with the liberals, they were upset with Justin Trudeau. Unfortunately and this was a genuine mistake that he made poilievre focused all of his energies on blaming Justin and not the liberals. All of people's frustrations were focused on the leader and not the party which is of course crazy. The leader does not operate in a vacuum. But it is what happened, that's what Poilievre did.

So when Justin left a huge amount of that anger went with him and he basically was the scapegoat for all of the ills that the liberals had done

Kearney had the good fortune to become Prime Minister without a vote. With a little help from the media and having the ability to actually address trump himself he wound up being able to create an impression that he was the best choice to deal with trump. The incumbent almost always enjoys that kind of a luxury in a crisis. It would have been grossly inappropriate for Poilievre to step on his toes and try and deal with trump or address trump directly in those circumstances so he had no opportunity to do the same

Again this isn't rocket science or even disputed. Trump created a crisis and because carney was the incumbent he was able to capitalize on that

But again, the popular vote between the two of them is only a pointer to apart. This is not some sort of landslide victory for the liberals, they were held to a minority and it's not a particularly huge minority

So a lot of the people, a lot of them, did think that Poilievre was the best choice. You absolutely can't just discount that

[cougar]

5 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Enjoy the ride now, losers. The next few years are really gonna suck for you.  

They should suck even more for Blackbird, CdnFox and you.   

Wonder if any of you is considering moving to greener pastures.

[cougar]

5 hours ago, Nefarious Banana said:

Begs the question:  Are the voting Canadian public just stupid?

There was no better option.

You don't want to have a rabid-dog type premier foaming at the mouth.

[cougar]

1 hour ago, West said:

If this isn't a childish thread title what is?

No.  It is Jimmy Kimmel style

[Barquentine]

13 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

they were held to a minority and it's not a particularly huge minority

169 when a majority is 172? Sounds like a huge minority to me (and an oxymoron to boot)

Edited Tuesday at 08:43 PM by Barquentine
adding text

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, Barquentine said:

169 when a majority is 172? Sounds like a huge minority to me (and an oxymoron to boot)

And a minority the issue is how close the other parties are to you, not how close you are to the finish line.

If you miss becoming a majority by 25 votes, It requires three of the other parties to wipe you out then that's not so bad.

If you miss becoming a majority by 1 vote but any two parties can take you out that's not so good. 

 now the seats are still being counted and we don't know exactly where it's going to settle but it is not a massive minority

[herbie]

6 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

when Carney told him Trudeau was not running, did he stop with Trudeau

No, he just reverted to calling Carney 'another Trudeau' and stuck to his same song of fear and negativism about Canada. Even our new Tory MP in his first interview this morning kept it up by saying 'Canada is weak'.

But hey equal opportunity here. The usual gloom-sayers can gloat how the evil Singh is gone and they'll not see his pink turban ever again and the rest of us can gloat over Milhouse Poilievre losing his seat.

Now we wait and see if the Tories can offer cooperation on what's good for all Canada or continue on the path of utter obstructionism.

[CdnFox]

Just now, herbie said:

No, he just reverted to calling Carney 'another Trudeau' and stuck to his same song of fear and negativism about Canada. Even our new Tory MP in his first interview this morning kept it up by saying 'Canada is weak'.

But hey equal opportunity here. The usual gloom-sayers can gloat how the evil Singh is gone and they'll not see his pink turban ever again and the rest of us can gloat over Milhouse Poilievre losing his seat.

Now we wait and see if the Tories can offer cooperation on what's good for all Canada or continue on the path of utter obstructionism.

Voting Carney out and removing the liberals would be what's in best interest of Canada  But I suspect they'll want to see a new NDP leader come into power first

[WestCanMan]

18 minutes ago, cougar said:

They should suck even more for Blackbird, CdnFox and you.   

Wonder if any of you is considering moving to greener pastures.

I wonder if Canada can keep becoming more and more divided without something major happening. 

[suds]

19 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

So when Justin left a huge amount of that anger went with him and he basically was the scapegoat for all of the ills that the liberals had done

That just about sums up everything in a nutshell. Instead of focusing on Trudeau, Conservatives should have spent their energy focusing on the Liberal party. Otherwise, when Trudeau's replaced.... problem disappears.

[ExFlyer]

6 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Voting Carney out and removing the liberals would be what's in best interest of Canada  But I suspect they'll want to see a new NDP leader come into power first

Yeah but you gotta wait.. It ain't happening soon

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, TreeBeard said:

Here is a selection of childish topics:  

 

Carney vows to bring together all Canadians, Can start by returning the lyrics in O Canada to "in all thy sons command"

Time for Western separation
 

Quebec's push to throw you in the slammer for saying a prayer at your picnic

Shrine to wokeism closed down: 

Here is a collection of childish posts:

https://repolitics.com/forums/profile/117613-treebeard/

[CdnFox]

14 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Yeah but you gotta wait.. It ain't happening soon

I got to wait. But I'm an adult so I can do that. It's not like when you're waiting for Christmas morning and can't cope