Jump to content

Canada's new frigates to cost more than UK's new aircraft carriers


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, I am Groot said:

What replaced them would be most unlikely to look upon the US favorably. It couldn't if it hoped to get elected or re-elected because such an action from the US would turn the Canadian population against the US.

Too much of that and we'll be diverting all our natural resources to China instead of the US and signing free trade deals with them.

Well, if we had a a more robust strict principle about not wheeling and dealing with dictators we'd include sanctions against their networks of support as well.  We shouldn't be looking favorably on anyone who supports a dictator be it directly through outright military aid or indirectly through trade.

Don't forget our grandparents sacrificed some 40% or more of their GDP fighting tyranny. Don't say it can't be done when people have done it

Edited by eyeball
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, herbie said:

Well it's 2022. When was the last time ships battled each other with their guns? Coral Sea 1942? Leyte Gulf 1944?

They're just to drive away pirates.

Norwegian and Danish arctic patrol ships mount 58 and 76mm guns plus secondary machine gun armament and missile and torpedo carrying capability. Our DeWolfes have a 20mm gun and a couple of 50 cal machine guns and no missile or torpedo capability. The Scandinavian ships are real warship's, ours are just there to show the flag.

Edited by Aristides
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, herbie said:

Well it's 2022. When was the last time ships battled each other with their guns? Coral Sea 1942? Leyte Gulf 1944?

They're just to drive away pirates.

well, Vietnam gulf of Tonkin incident seen US naval guns put into action against other enemy naval craft, lately in the gulf naval gun fire has been used to ward of Iranian naval craft, also in the Ukrainian conflict has seen naval gun fire exchanged. The fact that many navies are looking for bigger guns with longer ranges that can be used for bombardment or to engage other naval craft, is another hint that guns are not obsolete as you would think, missiles are very expensive, shells are very cheap.

I think Aristides comments stands, this is a naval ship without any teeth, not a liberal play toy made for parades and dog and pony shows. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, eyeball said:

.

Don't forget our grandparents sacrificed some 40% or more of their GDP fighting tyranny. Don't say it can't be done when people have done it

You're one of the few Canadians concerned about what previous generations contributed to our defense, today actions from government and the people speak louder than words, that ring hollow to most Canadians, as they frankly don't care, they are more interested in themselves than their nation. One must believe in a nation before one can start fighting tyranny around the globe.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

 One must believe in a nation before one can start fighting tyranny around the globe.  

the regiment is my fatherland

Canada is simply the Confederation

fight tyranny at home, before you go tilling a foreign windmills

one cannot believe in a nation which abridges our fundamental rights under a false invocation of Section 1 of the Charter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/27/2022 at 9:49 PM, Dougie93 said:

no, I favour disbanding the entire Canadian Forces

Canada totally relies on America for its national defence

Canada should stop wasting $20 billion a year on the pretense that it actually defends itself

I agree 100 %, Canada is content on sucking on the teats of the US for it's defense, for everything really, our culture, our values, morals, well everything. Like a leach, we have no sense of worth, don't care about sovereignty, what we care is lining our pockets..  We have become a nation of weaklings, with soft underbellies, we don't deserve the sacrifices other Canadians make on our behalf,

When times are good our nation produces soft people, when times are tough, the nation produces tougher people. right now, we are so weak it is pathic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Army Guy said:

I agree 100 %, Canada is content on sucking on the teats of the US for it's defense, for everything really, our culture, our values, morals, well everything. Like a leach, we have no sense of worth, don't care about sovereignty, what we care is lining our pockets..  We have become a nation of weaklings, with soft underbellies, we don't deserve the sacrifices other Canadians make on our behalf,

When times are good our nation produces soft people, when times are tough, the nation produces tougher people. right now, we are so weak it is pathic. 

I just got together with my closest brothers from the 48th, in September

and parents too, whole families together for the weekend

everyone there was fiercely loyal to the regiment, the colours, everything we stand for

you can call us "Militia Maggots" if you want

but every one of us would go over the top for the colours

not just us troops, our parents too

Edited by Dougie93
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

I just got together with my closest brothers from the 48th, in September

and parents too, whole families together for the weekend

everyone there was fiercely loyal to the regiment, the colours, everything we stand for

you can call us "Militia Maggots" if you want

but every one of us would go over the top for the colours

not just us troops, our parents too

Dougie i'm not questioning your loyalty or the loyalty of your brothers, i question that of the average Canadian that is no affiliation in any way with our military. I have already said every militia man or women that i have served with in Afghanistan, has won my respect ten times over. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Army Guy said:

Dougie i'm not questioning your loyalty or the loyalty of your brothers, i question that of the average Canadian that is no affiliation in any way with our military. I have already said every militia man or women that i have served with in Afghanistan, has won my respect ten times over. 

I never thought that you would

all I am saying is, tho the Militia does not have the support that the Regular Force does

the Militia on the whole cannot meet the standard of 1 RCR at Y-101

but the regimental family, the bound between us, is unto death as necessary,

we are not super soldiers

we are the average Canadians

Edited by Dougie93
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, herbie said:

Well it's 2022. When was the last time ships battled each other with their guns? Coral Sea 1942? Leyte Gulf 1944?

They're just to drive away pirates.

This is the gun carried by the Danish ships

Quote

 

The OTO Melara 76 mm gun is a naval gun built and designed by the Italian defence company Oto Melara. It is based on the Oto Melara 76/62C and evolved toward 76/62 SR and 76/62 Strales.[1]

The system is compact enough to be installed on relatively small warships. Its high rate of fire and the availability of several types of ammunition make it capable for short-range anti-missile point defence, anti-aircraft, anti-surface, and ground support. Ammunition includes armour-piercing, incendiary, directed fragmentation effects, and a guided round marketed as capable of destroying manoeuvring anti-ship missiles. It can be installed in a stealth cupola.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, herbie said:

Well it's 2022. When was the last time ships battled each other with their guns? Coral Sea 1942? Leyte Gulf 1944?

They're just to drive away pirates.

 

Leyte Gulf was the last big fleet vs fleet engagement such that it was. The poor IJN got served. Coral Sea the two fleets never saw each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Army Guy said:

You're one of the few Canadians concerned about what previous generations contributed to our defense, today actions from government and the people speak louder than words, that ring hollow to most Canadians, as they frankly don't care, they are more interested in themselves than their nation. One must believe in a nation before one can start fighting tyranny around the globe.  

I think one has to feel like they belong to a nation to belief in it. Simply being told I belong or should feel like I do misses the point. I sure hope there's more Canadians who are as concerned as me about what principles we bring to what I think is the greatest challenge bar none, facing Canada and humanity - dictators.  The fewer Canadians there are who feel like this the less I believe in it.

I'm not interested in apologizing for being uncompromising about a principle of 'no truck nor trade' when it comes to dictators or anyone who chooses to.  It's as fundamentally a you're-either-with-us or you're-not issue as it gets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, herbie said:

Point was that we're never going to see purely naval engagements again. Aircraft ended that 80 years ago, anti-ship missiles make them obsolete now.

the aircraft engagements have also been rendered obselete

the battle fleets were the arm of decision at the strategic level

that role is now executed by the nuclear powered ballistic missile submarine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bear in mind that the role of the frigate has not changed since its invention in the 17th century

a frigate was never a ship of the line meant to engage with the battle fleets

the frigate is actually a peacetime warship

it's role has always been lightly armed patrol & escort

frigates are not meant for war against other military powers

frigates are scouts for reconnaissance, and counter piracy escorts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Frigates were the backbone of the Royal Navy during the Napoleonic wars.

not as the arm of decision

the Ships of the Line won the war at Trafalgar

Frigates were patrol & escort vessels which did not engage in decisive battle

two frigates make contact on the high seas, engage in a fight, that's not decisive

Frigates will skirmish with other lesser warships, but they were not part of the battle fleet

Edited by Dougie93
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, herbie said:

Sorry, was thinking the IJN night attack during the Guadalcanal landings was the Coral Sea... my bad.

Point was that we're never going to see purely naval engagements again. Aircraft ended that 80 years ago, anti-ship missiles make them obsolete now.

 

 

Savo Island...a bloodbath for the USN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

not as the arm of decision

the Ships of the Line won the war at Trafalgar

Frigates were patrol & escort vessels which did not engage in decisive battle

two frigates make contact on the high seas, engage in a fight, that's not decisive

Frigates will skirmish with other lesser warships, but they were not part of the battle fleet

Fleet actions were very rare during the the Napoleonic Wars. There were really only four over a period of 20 years. St. Vincent, Camperdown, Finistere which was prelude to Trafalgar and Trafalgar itself. Line of battle ships were used mostly to keep French and Spanish fleets blockaded in their ports. Most of the fighting was done by frigates. In the case of the War of 1812 all the major actions were between frigates.

Frigates and then cruisers were the ships of empire. They could go anywhere, do almost anything and carried enough marines to be effective in limited ground operations.

 

Frigate captains such as Cochrane, Hoste, Mundy, Smith, Broke and Pellew were the military rock stars of their day.

Edited by Aristides
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,721
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    paradox34
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • SkyHigh earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • SkyHigh went up a rank
      Proficient
    • gatomontes99 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • gatomontes99 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • gatomontes99 earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...