Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
14 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Libbies cheat. They have a Holier Than Thou attitude and they let it justify their cheating.

Personally I find the practice unprincipled...mostly because it is. But hey...TDS has poisoned the well of common sense. These flaky li'l tweenkies will stop at nothing. They are at war. It's bloody time we responded in kind.

And not just them. It's the whole apparatus.

From Twitter:

"

"Yeah, the FBI lied about Russian collusion, falsified FISA warrants, and staged a kidnapping plot against Gretchen Whitmer that was leaked right before an election, but we really need to wait for the FBI to give us the facts." Unbelievable.

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

As opposed to ... whatever-you-are ... supporting and providing rationalizations for Alex Jones and trolls.

Carry on.

Do the world a favour there Mikey.

Put up or shut up. Post anywhere where I've provided any sort of rationalization for Alex Jones and trolls...or take your li'l ball and go home.

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted

And here's a guy making a good point concerning what some of you are discussing. The comparison between what they did with Hillary and what they're doing with Trump.

"

There is no excuse for what happened. The FBI could have easily waited for the court battle over the documents to play out, and the National Archives isn’t supposed to just be able to order raids. Further, we know from past experience that the FBI would never treat a Democrat politician this way. Hillary Clinton had 33,000 emails, many classified, on her personal server in a bathroom. There was no raid of her home. Instead, they called her and asked her to turn the server over. Why was Trump not given that same courtesy? We all know why, and any “conservative” pretending otherwise is useless."

https://redstate.com/bonchie/2022/08/09/conservatives-rush-to-show-how-gullible-they-are-after-trump-raid-n609298

 
 
Posted

Imagine how much evidence you'd have to submit to get a warrant to search the home of an ex-President.

Imagine how much of an utter lowlife douchebag you'd have to be when you spent years unsuccessfully trying to get the DOJ and FBI to harass your opponents and then claim it was Biden's call they came for you.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

And not just them. It's the whole apparatus.

From Twitter:

"

"Yeah, the FBI lied about Russian collusion, falsified FISA warrants, and staged a kidnapping plot against Gretchen Whitmer that was leaked right before an election, but we really need to wait for the FBI to give us the facts." Unbelievable.

 

Well maybe the last four FBI directors being Republicans had something to do with it.

Posted
2 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

And here's a guy making a good point concerning what some of you are discussing. The comparison between what they did with Hillary and what they're doing with Trump.

"

There is no excuse for what happened. The FBI could have easily waited for the court battle over the documents to play out, and the National Archives isn’t supposed to just be able to order raids. Further, we know from past experience that the FBI would never treat a Democrat politician this way. Hillary Clinton had 33,000 emails, many classified, on her personal server in a bathroom. There was no raid of her home. Instead, they called her and asked her to turn the server over. Why was Trump not given that same courtesy? We all know why, and any “conservative” pretending otherwise is useless."

https://redstate.com/bonchie/2022/08/09/conservatives-rush-to-show-how-gullible-they-are-after-trump-raid-n609298

 
 

Very true.  Just like the old Rolling Stones song, the Dems/deep state are going to find out that you don’t always get what you want.  They will instead get what they need, to lose their jobs and positions come next November.

And when the public finds out what they have been up to, the losers won’t be able to walk down the street in public.

Posted
30 minutes ago, West said:

As predicted the judge who signed off on the raid donated big time to Barry Boy Obama... Democrats are vile

 

Funny, you guys were all foaming at the mouth wanting the FBI to go after Hillary. LOCK HER UP, LOCK HER UP. But when the worm turns.

Posted
2 hours ago, Aristides said:

Well maybe the last four FBI directors being Republicans had something to do with it.

If I had one complaint about Trump's actions during his Presidency it would be questionable hirings.

I blame Kushner.

I've been watching Prog media today. I can't believe the turncoats coming out of the shadows that were Trump (or maybe Kushner) hires.

Posted

Biden's handlers will stop at nothing to get Trump. He can't run on his record even if he was allowed to run for a second term(he won't be allowed).

Weaponizing federal agencies is just peachy with the pathetic woke liberals.

There are more egregious things happening on the Democratic side. No real scrutiny, no big investigations to speak of. 

 

T

  • Thanks 1

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

If I had one complaint about Trump's actions during his Presidency it would be questionable hirings.

I blame Kushner.

I've been watching Prog media today. I can't believe the turncoats coming out of the shadows that were Trump (or maybe Kushner) hires.

Trump fired Comey because he wouldn't swear allegiance to the Great Leader. 

Trump had more appointees prosecuted and convicted than any president in memory. Most of those with any integrity ended up quitting. You want to blame Kushner, that's pathetic. Trump was right, he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and you would still be kissing his ass.

Edited by Aristides
Posted
28 minutes ago, Aristides said:

 

Funny, you guys were all foaming at the mouth wanting the FBI to go after Hillary. LOCK HER UP, LOCK HER UP. But when the worm turns.

Did Trump have the fbi raid Hillarys house as president? What about obarry?

Posted
21 minutes ago, Aristides said:

The emails were on a server, raiding her house would serve what purpose?

Hillary deleted tens of thousands of emails that were under subpoena.

She faced no consequences.

Not to mention all these other Democrats.

Not exactly equal application of the law is it?

  • Like 1

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
1 hour ago, Aristides said:

The emails were on a server, raiding her house would serve what purpose?

So you actually believe this is about "classified documents" and nothing to do with the more likely explanation of trying to win an election in 3 months? 

Amazing how the judge just happens to be an obarry donor and magically a year and a half later they question "classified documents" lol

Posted

Oh Jeez and I thought conservatives were stuck in 1953. Now they've progressed to 2015 an Hillary's e-mails. By 2147 they'll believe in Climate change too!.

My sincerest apologies. [/s]

Posted

And this is worth knowing:

Wait—Those 'Classified’ Docs FBI Sought in Trump Raid Were Already Declassified

Quote

“Trump declassified whole sets of materials in anticipation of leaving government that he thought the American public should have the right to read themselves,” Kash Patel, a former top Trump administration official, told Breitbart News in a phone interview in May. According to Patel, the classification markings just had not been updated.

“The White House counsel failed to generate the paperwork to change the classification markings, but that doesn’t mean the information wasn’t declassified,” Patel added. “I was there with President Trump when he said ‘We are declassifying this information.’”

 

Posted
1 minute ago, herbie said:

Oh Jeez and I thought conservatives were stuck in 1953. Now they've progressed to 2015 an Hillary's e-mails. By 2147 they'll believe in Climate change too!.

My sincerest apologies. [/s]

I thought you climate loons weren't optimistic about there being a 2147.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,912
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...