taxme Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 26 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: More bogeymen, basically blaming Jews and media outlets (like your beloved The Rebel by the way) for the reality that your white pride point of view peaked in the early 1940s... The Rebel has now fallen apart because of associating themselves with the alt-right mob in Charlottesville. They had reporters covering the shining moment of free speech, and the resulting murder and it didn't work out. How does that impact your conspiracy theories on Zionist media ? I am done with The Rebel after the zionist fired Faith Goldy. She was doing a great job on reporting and informing we the people about all the criminal illegal immigration activity that was going on at our Canadian border. Apparently, Goldy was fired because she attended the riots in Charlottesville and said something that her boss did not like. So much for freedom of speech. PressForTruth is now one of my favorite websites among many others. I think that white pride is starting to peak up again. It took a few decades off. The Rebel is falling apart because of Faith Goldy getting canned, and with Brian Lilley now gone it is goodbye The Rebel. But maybe the real reason as to why The Rebel may soon be gone is because rumor has it on Youtube that Ezra was committing some kind of hanky-panky with all the money that was donated by his viewers for some causes that Ezra wanted them to donate money too. Hey, you never know. I should not be talking to you because the boss here gave me chit yesterday. I think that you may have had something to do with it. Just saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OftenWrong Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 The Canadian flag must be removed from display... that white and red symbol of oppression. All national flags are, really... all nations... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 15 minutes ago, taxme said: I think that white pride is starting to peak up again. It took a few decades off. I would have agreed with you two weeks ago. 15 minutes ago, taxme said: Apparently, Goldy was fired because she attended the riots in Charlottesville and said something that her boss did not like. So much for freedom of speech. That clears it up for me. 15 minutes ago, taxme said: I should not be talking to you because the boss here gave me chit yesterday. I think that you may have had something to do with it. Just saying. I imagine it had more to do with engaging with civility, which you have done here thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilber Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 1 hour ago, Cum Laude said: Erasing history results in people like "hot enough". That frightens the piss outta me. It also results in neo nazis. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cum Laude Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 22 minutes ago, Wilber said: It also results in neo nazis. Well, when you guys label GW Bush a Nazi, you water down the real definition of the term. How do you define National Socialist? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cum Laude Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said: Bad assumption - they aren't peaceful. Why are you trying to tell us they're peaceful ? Communist agitators? Your media luvs ' em. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 2 minutes ago, Cum Laude said: Well, when you guys label GW Bush a Nazi, you water down the real definition of the term. How do you define National Socialist? True, but they do it all the time to the point of being less than meaningless. Hence...Godwin's Law. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cum Laude Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 2 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said: True, but they do it all the time to the point of being less than meaningless. Hence...Godwin's Law. They don't realize that Conservatism is the complete opposite of National Socialism (Nazism). Canadians, eh. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 2 minutes ago, Cum Laude said: They don't realize that Conservatism is the complete opposite of National Socialism (Nazism). Canadians, eh. All the while ragging on Israel and supporting the Palestinian Cause...started by an actual Nazi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilber Posted August 25, 2017 Report Share Posted August 25, 2017 27 minutes ago, Cum Laude said: Well, when you guys label GW Bush a Nazi, you water down the real definition of the term. How do you define National Socialist? I've never labelled anyone a nazi who didn't call themselves a nazi. Do you think today's professed nazis approve of murdering millions in death camps or do you think they are just ignoring that little bit of history? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted August 26, 2017 Report Share Posted August 26, 2017 10 minutes ago, Wilber said: I've never labelled anyone a nazi who didn't call themselves a nazi. Do you think today's professed nazis approve of murdering millions in death camps or do you think they are just ignoring that little bit of history? Even the Nazis gathered at Wannsee couldn't agree. It took Heydrich and Eichmann making a few veiled threats to the gathered Nazi luminaries to conclude the meeting in the time the SS allotted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannuck Posted August 26, 2017 Report Share Posted August 26, 2017 (edited) It seems peculiar to me that on a political website, few seem to know what political terms mean and from where they are derived. "Left" vs. "Right" goes back to the French Revolution, when those who sat on the right of the house wanted to maintain the Monarchy, and those who sat to the left wanted to revise the political system. Those who would "conserve" and those who would change. Simple as that. BUT: once the house had been divided in seating, what ideologies and policies each side of the house favoured changed constantly. Now, fast forward another couple centuries, and shift the discussion to other parliaments, and you can really attribute anything to either "leaning", and pretty much choose your own definition. From an earlier part of this thread, for instance, Nazis (the National Socialist Workers' Party) could be labelled either "left" or "right" depending upon which part of Nazi policy one chooses to compare with our rather fluid definition of left and right today. Being both workers and socialist, it had strong elements of ;what we today usually call the left. Being based on the idea of the Herrenvolk, that is nothing but purely racist, but here the new left uses that to try to hang that on the "right". Nazis were totalitarianists, which is as far from what I believe we mean today by "right" OR "left", as conservatives on the right tend to believe in and wish to maintain democratic institutions. Communism - which I think we can all agree is "the LEFT" is usually a totalitarian state of government, even though most have some kind of shadow of representative body shoved up front. Over the years, the terms right and left have been offered up under this very flexible system of inclusion based on the political expedience of creating an "us vs. them" over-simplification of any issue. Reality is that the truth lies somewhere in the middle with an array of detail within policy that makes actual programmes acceptable to modern standards. Edited August 26, 2017 by cannuck 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted August 26, 2017 Report Share Posted August 26, 2017 7 hours ago, DogOnPorch said: The US Civil War... The Confederates...guilty of supporting the continuation of slavery. The Union...guilty of some far worse crimes while zealously stamping out the former. What far worse crimes? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted August 26, 2017 Report Share Posted August 26, 2017 Atlanta, Nashville, Memphis...etc. It wasn't just a scene from Gone With The Wind. The Union conducted Total War in the South. That means civilians were the targets as well as the military. The Confederates needed to make friends in the North. Their two Reb "invasions" of the Union were for the express purpose of winning a battle on Union soil so Great Britain would recognize the CSA...possibly intervene on the South's side for great cotton deals in the future...which Britain needed bad. The two major battles that resulted, Antietam and Gettysburg...neither a Confederate victory. While in the North, Lee's Army had to forage for food...usually apples and such...there's a story about that (heh). Everything they looted, they were ordered to pay with Confederate currency so as to eliminate/lessen looting charges. Civilians were to be treated with courtesy. Lincoln's twin addresses ended the fantasy of an intervention by the UK...as the UK had ended slavery in the Commonwealth a generation earlier. They couldn't support a war with the apparent sole purpose of getting cheap cotton via a Rebel slave state. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted August 26, 2017 Report Share Posted August 26, 2017 6 hours ago, eyeball said: What far worse crimes? Yes....numerous "crimes" against native tribes...before, during, and after the Civil War (e.g. Long Walk of the Navajo). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted August 26, 2017 Report Share Posted August 26, 2017 (edited) 13 hours ago, Cum Laude said: Communist agitators? Your media luvs ' em. My media ? You're attributing opinions to me based on assumption. This is the second post in a row. If you have a point, then go ahead and make it, but I am not here to discuss with you on request. Edited August 26, 2017 by Michael Hardner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drummindiver Posted August 26, 2017 Report Share Posted August 26, 2017 15 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: More bogeymen, basically blaming Jews and media outlets (like your beloved The Rebel by the way) for the reality that your white pride point of view peaked in the early 1940s... The Rebel has now fallen apart because of associating themselves with the alt-right mob in Charlottesville. They had reporters covering the shining moment of free speech, and the resulting murder and it didn't work out. How does that impact your conspiracy theories on Zionist media ? Lots of media covered it. Goldy went too far and was fired. Of course, blame the entire crew because of what she did. That's called bigotry Michael.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted August 26, 2017 Report Share Posted August 26, 2017 2 minutes ago, drummindiver said: . Of course, blame the entire crew because of what she did. That's called bigotry Michael.... ? You do realize that the co-founder and others have left because of this incident? Are they bigoted too? People usually assign responsibility for decisions to those at the top, sorry to inform you on this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drummindiver Posted August 26, 2017 Report Share Posted August 26, 2017 3 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said: ? You do realize that the co-founder and others have left because of this incident? Are they bigoted too? People usually assign responsibility for decisions to those at the top, sorry to inform you on this. Yes, I'm aware Mr Lilley left. She was expressly told not to do something. She did it and was fired. The top taking action. You want to brand all Rebel watchers/contributors with the same brush Bigotry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted August 26, 2017 Report Share Posted August 26, 2017 2 hours ago, bush_cheney2004 said: Yes....numerous "crimes" against native tribes...before, during, and after the Civil War (e.g. Long Walk of the Navajo). So quit complaining and do something about it. There's no time like the present and it'll make you feel better about yourself. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilber Posted August 26, 2017 Report Share Posted August 26, 2017 14 hours ago, DogOnPorch said: Even the Nazis gathered at Wannsee couldn't agree. It took Heydrich and Eichmann making a few veiled threats to the gathered Nazi luminaries to conclude the meeting in the time the SS allotted. Are you trying to make a point here or just making an observation? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted August 26, 2017 Report Share Posted August 26, 2017 1 minute ago, eyeball said: So quit complaining and do something about it. There's no time like the present and it'll make you feel better about yourself. One might say BOTH sides were behaving poorly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogOnPorch Posted August 26, 2017 Report Share Posted August 26, 2017 Just now, Wilber said: Are you trying to make a point here or just making an observation? The Wannsee Conference was a real event. We possess the minutes of the meeting, even. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilber Posted August 26, 2017 Report Share Posted August 26, 2017 Just now, DogOnPorch said: The Wannsee Conference was a real event. We possess the minutes of the meeting, even. Yes it was, so what's your point. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyeball Posted August 26, 2017 Report Share Posted August 26, 2017 Just now, DogOnPorch said: One might say BOTH sides were behaving poorly. I'd say one side was behaving appropriately...power to it too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts