Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
28 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

Let's see...the Democrats when not frothing at the mouth are jumping up-and-down stamping their feet in a child-like rage.

I bet if baby got its bottle there'd be quiet...

:)

Your the only one here I see jumping up and down frothing at the mouth about a candidate who lost. What would you froth about if you didn't have Hillary I wonder?

  • Like 1

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted
52 minutes ago, Wilber said:

Your the only one here I see jumping up and down frothing at the mouth about a candidate who lost. What would you froth about if you didn't have Hillary I wonder?

 

I'm here specifically against Islam rather than for anything. Hillary is a pro-Islamic threat and needed to be dealt with. Justin is next. You're free to join me...or not.

Hillary...we haven't seen the last of this Soros stooge.

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted
54 minutes ago, Wilber said:

Your the only one here I see jumping up and down frothing at the mouth about a candidate who lost. What would you froth about if you didn't have Hillary I wonder?

The Mufti.

1 minute ago, DogOnPorch said:

I'm here specifically against Islam rather than for anything.

See what I mean?

  • Like 2
  • Downvote 1

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
1 minute ago, DogOnPorch said:

You're free to support Islam in its drive for dominance.

You've got enemies of Western civilization all around you - you're free to support Islam by doing nothing about their fifth column.

Imagine if you were a Muslim talking about your enemies on the internet while advertising an interest in propane and propane accessories.

How would you connect those dots?

  • Like 2
  • Downvote 1

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted (edited)
45 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

You're free to support Islam in its drive for dominance.

Do all the threads have to discuss your pro-jihad agenda?

Edited by BubberMiley
  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
"I think it's fun watching the waldick get all excited/knickers in a knot over something." -scribblet
Posted
20 hours ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

Are we now saying Obama did or didn't "tap phones"?

Surly he has a few odd "taps" under yea olde belt...heh.

But Trump...he be crazy for making such talk.

The idea that obama tapped phones is paranoid lunacy. That doesn't mean that an agency of the US government could not have engaged in a legal surveillance of someone in Trump tower because of contacts they were having with a foreign government. Note that they would have to demonstrate these contacts were happening and were harmful or had the potential to be damaging to the US to justify a warrant.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, eyeball said:

The Mufti.

See what I mean?

Not to mention his affiliation to 13th SS in Bosnia. It tells alot...

i am actually enjoying reading the commentaries on this forum and the way they are evolving.

Edited by kactus
Posted

Former campaign manager for Clinton said on Fox and Friends that he KNEW that wiretapping was going on and if he knew Hillary knew. I think he could have signed his death sentence down the road, Clinton's always get even.

  • Downvote 1
Posted
5 hours ago, BubberMiley said:

Do all the threads have to discuss your pro-jihad agenda?

I think you are right, he just might be pro-jihad. However I would not want to be that much of an asshole and project things that I cannot prove.

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted
On 3/8/2017 at 2:06 PM, Topaz said:

Former campaign manager for Clinton said on Fox and Friends that he KNEW that wiretapping was going on and if he knew Hillary knew. I think he could have signed his death sentence down the road, Clinton's always get even.

You do realize Clinton wasn't even IN the government for the past several years, right?

  • Like 1

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
1 hour ago, Argus said:

You do realize Clinton wasn't even IN the government for the past several years, right?

Doesn't matter, the Clintons are everywhere and responsible for everything.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted

Then head of the EPA doesn't know how science works and the head of Congress doesn't know how insurance works. They're on a roll.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted

Yup, regular bunch of intellectual giants they got there. I was going to say brain surgeons but ever since seeing Carson in action, I will never think of them in the same way again.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted
On 3/9/2017 at 4:02 PM, Argus said:

You do realize Clinton wasn't even IN the government for the past several years, right?

Was she not Secretary of State before she made the POTUS jump? A mere two years ago?

Posted
7 hours ago, GostHacked said:

Was she not Secretary of State before she made the POTUS jump? A mere two years ago?

She quit when Obama was inaugurated for his second term.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted
On 2017-03-08 at 1:06 PM, Argus said:

The idea that obama tapped phones is paranoid lunacy. That doesn't mean that an agency of the US government could not have engaged in a legal surveillance of someone in Trump tower because of contacts they were having with a foreign government. Note that they would have to demonstrate these contacts were happening and were harmful or had the potential to be damaging to the US to justify a warrant.

The president can probably use his supreme executive powers to have anyone surveilled, regardless of warrant.

Posted

It is extremely likely that individuals with high-level Russian connections-- like Mike Flynn, Paul Manafort, and Carter Page-- were under lawfully-authorized surveillance long before Donald Trump brought them into his campaign or (in Flynn's case) into his administration.  The intelligence services simply wouldn't be doing their job if they weren't keeping an eye on these guys.

And it's a dead certainty that Sergey Kislyak's whereabouts were under watch, so I can't imagine why anybody would be surprised that they knew Jeff Sessions met with him.

I think that if you hang out with guys like Flynn, Manafort, and Page, and then wonder why the intelligence services know things, you can't be all that bright.  It's like if your friends are mostly Hell's Angels you can't be too surprised when you start noticing unmarked RCMP cars hanging around your neighborhood.

Obama didn't need to order anybody to spy on Trump.  Trump practically begged them to spy on him by choosing to bring these individuals into his circle.

 -k

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ノ(° -°ノ)

Posted

TrumpCare takes health insurance away from 14 million Americans by 2018, growing to 24 million uninsured by 2024.

Premiums go down for younger Americans, and up up up for seniors.

 

End effect, less for fewer.

Posted
50 minutes ago, ?Impact said:

Premiums go down for younger Americans, and up up up for seniors.

 

Premiums should go down for healthier young people and up for sicker old people.   It's health insurance, not social welfare.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
16 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

Premiums should go down for healthier young people and up for sicker old people.   It's health insurance, not social welfare.

So healthcare is regarded as social welfare in the great US of A.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted
12 minutes ago, Wilber said:

So healthcare is regarded as social welfare in the great US of A.

 

No, healthcare is just another service provided by doctors, practitioners, nurses, and specialists.     Same as getting your car fixed, but much more expensive.

Paying for healthcare is regarded by some as social welfare, but it shouldn't be IMHO.    There is no right to health care, not even in the Great Canada.

Billions are wasted each year on dying seniors....why should the young be disproportionately burdened with these costs ?

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,899
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Shemul Ray
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...