CdnFox

Might be more than one but this may be what you're talking about Poilievre promises warrior culture for military, not woke | Toronto Sun

The FACT is CNN and NBC and many others also LIED to the tune of millions. Ooopsie! Forgot that fact didn't you.

but you don't. You want to live other people's lives as well. You want to tell them what to say, what to think, You want to tell them what genitals they must look at, you want to take their children away whenever you feel like it. Go live your life. Nobody stopping you. You're welcome to it. But when you step on our lives expect us to step on your neck.

So you know i 'm right and you're dodging the issue. Answer the questons. There's no straw man in there (don't make me explain what a straw man argument is to you, try to be smarter than a grade 5 student). Now you're just blathering like a tard. Fake what? Gave what away? You're so desperate at having someone call your bullshit out that you can't even articulate your own thoughts anymore.

what you quoted me saying doesn't even mention covid. Maybe you should be checking your memory. Or are you trying to claim that trump started covid or something? Honestly wouldn't surprise me. I am one guy. Try to focus. You can if you try, i know it. Put the fidgit spinner down... there you go. Biden caused wars by being weak. Si vis pacem, para belllum. If you show weakness and that you are unprepared for conflict then that's when bad guys take action. Biden tends to drag wars out by slow walking aid to allies. He did that with israel a lot and with ukraine a fair bit. But nether of those wars would have started if the bad guys thought biden would have responded strongly. Under obama you mean. Arguably true, but obama did nothing and the crimea was taken. However it's worth noting obama strongly suggested that would be it and by appeasing putin we could have peace so it wasn't worth conflict. Nope. Nope. Nope. The invasion happened because he thought the US would do nothing. And he was right initially, Biden was 100 percent ready for ukraine to fall within a week and he would do nothing to stop that. it wasn't until after ukraine managed to hold out that he decided he'd help. A little. What us forces? There are none engaged in combat. Which us forces got divided? Hezbollah attacked because they thought israel was weak and that the us wouldn't support them in a war with hezbolla or risk a wider conflict with lebanon. And that was correct. LOLOL they absolutely did LOL The us totally stood aside and allowed russia to invade. Everyone knew for months russia was planning it, did the us rush military aid to the Ukraine in any substainal amounts? Nope. Then they slow walked aid when they did send it. Did the us bomb anyone when israel was attacked? Maybe punish iran? nope. Slow walked aid to israel. Did they do anything when yemen was sinking ships and disrupting trade? Nope. Hezbollah has been shooting at israel for about a year, did the us assist there? Nope. Literally everyone everywhere thinks the us is weak and stepping aside. I'm sure they're thinking trump may not be quite such a push over.

Considering he was speaking in a very general and non technical way to a layperson, what part of that is substantially wrong? No he doesn't. He points out that they have similarities. And there are. He wasn't giving an interview about lobsters, he was pointing out how pervasive hierarchy is in the animal kingdom and that it's genetically hardwired in animals as far removed from us as lobsters. And he's right. But because YOU don't like him, you decide to turn it from "there's a lot of similarity, we're based on the same basic biology" to "we're exactly the same and lobster brains work the same as humans". Human brains don't have "circuits". Neither do lobsters. but he's using the concept to point out that in the end the lobsters are hardwired and so are we and there's no getting around that. So people like you who can't compete with the guy intellectually twist what he says to try to make it sound unreasonable. Fact is that hierarchies are indeed hard wired into most animal life, including humans and including lobsters. And trying to design a societal system that doesn't account for that is doomed to failure because it ignores our biology. Yeash. go clean your room.

Sure, that's why no black people get upset if you call them "muh nigga" 🙄 Labelling people changes the perception of them in the communities they live in. And that can radically affect their lives. If labelling people is no big deal then just call a male who identifies as a women a "Man". I mean, doesn't change who they are right? It's just a label. The reason you want phrases like cis is to dehumanize and objectify people you disagree with. You don't want them to sound 'normal', and you want a pejorative to use. That's it. The terms we had already were perfectly fine.

When you define "way right" as "anything right of castro", that's where you run into a problem

well..... i mean technically that's true i guess. If you wait long enough. I mean I won't obviously but you mortals will most likely .

Here you go, you said you wanted a far right watch right?

Well - almost certainly he'll make a statement before then and either way he'll likely prorogue parliament but it's about 80 percent certain he'll be leaving.... but what is less clear is will he actually step down and try to squeeze in an emergency leadership race? With 7 months to the next election start? Normally it takes longer than that just to have the race, then that person needs time to get ready for the election which usually takes longer than 7 months as well. OR will he just go to an election and see if he can get lucky and find some way to salvage things? That's the question, resign or run himself? I think right now the party is trying to decide if there's a sacrificial lamb they can throw in to the leadership after a very very very short race for appearances who might do better? LIke if Freeland were to be the 'agreed' candidate and they held a sham of a leadership race and elected her and she tried to run on sympathy and 'courage' points, knowing after the election she'd almost certainly be set aside and a real race would be held. But if nobody's willing to do that, then stepping down will probably do the party far more harm than good. Nobody's going to want the job when they know it's a straight up loss almost guaranteed, and that they'll be pushed aside for someone else. So they'll wind up with a crap candidate and could kim campbell the party. In such a case theyd' be wise to say that he should go to an election and let the people decide.

No. This isn't how most canadian governments end. Most Canadian governments end with mild dissatisfaction and a new party taking over. This is something entirely different. We'll have to see how it plays out but the only time we've seen something like this was when Mulroney stepped down and Kim Campbell took over. And even then i don't know if we've ever seen anything quite like this. Even going into that election kim was still polling decently. There has never been this kind of public push to have an early election or so much hatred for the incumbent party ever in our history. I don't ever recall hearing of a time when a majority of Canadians were polling that they wanted an early election. And that's in the middle of xmas! Only 9 months away from a scheduled one! Sorry mike, but this is new.

Sure. But as he was quoted as saying once they only have to be 5% usure if you'll do it or not. So he's only got to follow thru once.

Oh look, a woke leftie shows up to pretend nobody knows what woke means again because he can't address the points. Yawn.

He says he's a conservative Are we defining 'far right' as 'anyone right of mao'? Kid, you are fueled and driven entirely by spite and hatred and nonfactual ideology. You need to step back and think.

Yeah absolutely did not The only reason they started those wars is because Biden was weak and they felt that he would not respond. And indeed that is pretty close to what happened. Anyone with any sense of history is aware that something will rush to fill a vacuum of power. If the united states steps aside and gives the message that they will not interfere with an act of evil, the act of evil will happen.

Is that because it takes them 6 months to reply to a post, you belated french dork? We don't get along and you know that but feel the need to lie about it. I sure wish you guys would just separate. And I would point out that Trump is currently not only threatening his enemies but also attacking his allies and isn't getting along with anybody. And that the Americans actually invented the term gunboat diplomacy. They don't even get along with themselves, never mind anyone else.

Right, because there's been a western Christian tradition for 3,000 years. There's nothing narrow about it. And it's as old as man and woman itself. What you are doing is as questionable as claiming that calling a 65-year-old 65 years old is a narrow-minded restrictive western christian tradition. No, it is an accurate description. Trying to claim that people define what time means on a personal basis (shut up einstein, i'll deal with you later) or that 65 years can be 53 years if someone identifies that way is patently insane. Saying that you personally identify that the sun comes up in the west and set in the east because that's how you prefer to see it would be nuts. Saying your black when you're white because you identify as black will get your ass kicked by black people. And you have utterly ignored and failed to deal with that point in ANY of your replies. In any of your accounts either. So let's get real. What we're talking about is not restrictive tradition. What we're talking about here is you attempting to rationalize the irrational. Here's what you CAN say if you like and still have it be true. 1) some people feel more comfortable relating to a gender that does not match the sex their body is. That's fine. 2) to live a happier life some of those people choose to live in such a way that they mimick the sex that matches the gender they associate with. That's true. 3) in most cases this improves their quality of life which is reason enough for compassionate people to tolerate and even participate in the lie TO A POINT. And in some cases this is a medical necessity and failing to do so puts people at risk and we should consider "accommodating the to the point of hardship", which is a legal term that is nornally applied to those with illness or disability being accommodated by things like wheelchair ramps and such, up to the point where it imposes significant cost or violates other 's rights significantly. You can say all that with a perfectly straight face and pass any lie detector test in the world. What you can't say is that gender is sex, or that man is woman. Nor can you say that it 's reasonable or just to pretend that a trans woman who is biologically male is the same thing as a bio woman. They're not. Nor is it reasonable to let them compete in womens' sports, or to allow children to make final and permanent decisions about altering themselves physically etc etc. And it is beyond stupid to demand that people refer to a man as a woman while you're unwilling and agressively insistant on calling straight people "cis" because that's what YOU believe to be true. So take the rest of your crap and shove it up your ideology

It's the internet buddy. You never know how things get around. For example, someone could be posting your comments somewhere else as an example of how crazy democrats are Not saying i KNOW anyone who would do that or anything. Y'know. Just saying. They COULD. Apparently.

well it's called gunboat diplomacy, and trump overuses that way too much. He does need to settle down, the fact is it's not wise to give 3/4 of the world a reason to stab you in the back if they get a chance. But at the end of the day he was elected to worry about America first and he is doing that so it's hard to find a lot of criticism for him. But America does need to build allies and you don't build allies by threatening everybody even if you don't intend to carry it through.

Honestly when i saw the title i thought "oh no! Herbie's prostate is acting up!"

Trump returns to all kinds of advisors. Theoretically anybody who talks to a leader is influencing them but at the end of the day the leader makes the final decisions. Trump has also told him no as well. Well that's just plain silly. Franklin either of them are terribly good at it and tons of people are way better. Which doesn't mean they can't spin a story but they're certainly not top of the league I know the democrats lie to themselves about it For over a year republicans and myself as well have been screaming that if the democrats continue with weaponizing the courts, the ridiculously over the top propaganda, The lies (Trump promised to be a dictator!!!! REEEEEEEEE!!!!) and so on that it would a) blow up in their face and cost them the election (which it did) and b) would be repaid in kind when trump got the power to do so because that's what trump does. Ya didn't listen You need to pay attention. The democrats were on the wrong side of history there for several reasons and it's all come out and people can see it. You need to stop blaming everyone else or pretending that it's the REST of the herd who's crazy you need to take a sharp look at why the democrats were wrong, why they were rejected, and what the truth is and get rid of the hypocrisy and get dead honest or you'll be losing next time as well. Hint, it WASN'T the rest of the herd.

From the people that brought you "it's society's fault they commit crimes" and "the residential schools may have closed 60 years ago but if your grandfather went to one then it's generational damage. "

I'm sure it feels that way to you. Here's what the rest of us see when you're "fighting" on the forum.

Mike, you've been told how forms work. If you still can't figure out why somebody would respond to a comment on a discussion for him then maybe see if you can find someone in grade three who can explain it to you. Plenty of people read the replies You always say you're the victim. Oh poor you, somebody said something you didn't like so you had to put them on ignore what else could you possibly do!?!?!? Not to mention how you're constantly be set by chuds, And for some reason nobody wants to have! a polite conversation /with you!?!? Not to mention how everybody somehow keeps thinking you're on the left when clearly you are as right wing as it gets! You make harper look like Castro! And yet nobody believes you!!!! Sorry kiddo. You reap what you sow