CdnFox

Ok - that was funny.

ima just leave this here......... Biden appears to read script instructions out loud in latest teleprompter gaffe: 'Four more years, pause' https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-appears-read-script-instructions-loud-latest-teleprompter-gaffe-four-more-years-pause

Yes by me. Explicitly. But you probably don't remember it well because i didn't use crayons. And canada will be done with that after next year's elections, and ways around it have already been discovered by other countries. Did they harmonize exemptions? no? Hmmmm. Sorry kid, like carbon taxes it's going into the trashcan with all the other utterly failed leftie ideas. Which was inevitable. Your complete failure to look facts in the face is why you always fail.

Maybe he thought it was the right to keep Bear's arms?

And it was explained to you that it wouldn't work. Just as it was explained that the carbon tax wouldn't work. And safe supply wouldn't work. How are you people this consistently wrong?

IF Palestine laid down its weapons they'd have a Palastinian state in short order. If Isreal laid down its weapons it would have a second holocaust tomorrow.

LOL - it really isn't That was a pretty dumb thing to say But you'd expect a bot wouldn't get that now that i think about it

Well we already knew from previous exchanges that you didn't own guns so i suppose it's no shock that you don't know anything about the NRA either.

Are you honestly telling me you think the secret service is something you rent? I realize it has the words "Service" in it but that's not how it works. The president of the united states gets protection afterwards. What this person is doing is trying to place his political rival in danger of death or injury. You need to seriously think about that for a minute - you're going to wind up losing your country the way things are going.

Yes. From the polls. That's what polling companies do, find out people's opinions about things Also from reality - the ndp did in fact lose those seats and has for 2 elections. That's real. So it would seem i know more than you do. Which surprises no one

And this is common. Those who wish to establish an authortarian rule usually claim they're trying to 'free' people - the exact opposite of what they were doing. Remember the russian revolution was about free people from the evil and oppressive rule of the czars etc. China, nazi germany, cuba - they all sing the same story. And the left today has REALLY leaned into that. If they want to behave like nazis they call others nazis. Their facists call themselves anti-facist. They weaponize the courts in the name of freedom. It's an old trick. If you fart, complain about the smell so others think it wasn't you. But really - it's a pretty obvious trick.

That doesn't seem to be what the voters are saying. Unless you mean his REMAINING voters - the polls for some months now have noted that the ndp is bleeding to the cpc amazingly enough. I guess when you try to convince people you represent the "average working person" while wearing a 15 thousand dollar Rolex some get a little disillusioned. It's pretty clear his voters are not excited about him propping up the libs. And they are DEFINITELY not excited about this lib/ndp budget. If Jagmeet goes for it it'll hurt him even further even if he gets a few cosmetic 'add ons'. Jagmeet took the party from a 44 seat win in 2015 to 24 seats in 2019 and only recovered 1 seat in 2021, and based on polling right now he'd likely lose 5 seats if the election were held today. He is NOT impressing his voters AT ALL.

Sure - he cleans a lot but that's no reason to insult him! oh... vacu OUS. right. That's my bad.

it's always 4:20 in your world isn't it

The thought actually did occur to me as i wrote that. Most (not all) of what today's conservatives believe actually was the heart of what used to be "liberal" beliefs 100 and even 50 years ago. Individual freedoms, freedom to choose your own way and not be forced to societal norms, no 'class' society (nowadays called intersectionalism), "all people being treated eqaually under the law", etc. All of that is opposed by the left and the so-called 'liberals' now. Liberalism has become socialism, which is the opposite of being 'liberal'. But the line you quoted referred to conservatives, and by and large it wasn't conservatives who were interested in compelling people to take the jab by force.

Sure - because pointing out that an invasive illness isn't transmitted by battery powered propulsion systems is pretty much the same thing as invoking satan Stupidicus 7 specifically says "Nor shall thou employ aquatic conveyances containing attached locomotion instruments powered by god's own lightning, for they are the devil's windmills!" Put the joint down hippie - you done smoked yourself retarded Nobody would have. And nobody does. That's just you spouting bullshit to try to cover up for your lying. And i'm not a christian. Here's the thing. You make shit up and then get called on it all the time. And people see that. And they know you're not honest, and that when you get called out you go to pieces faster than a hand grenade. And THAT'S why people call you a liar. Just start telling the truth. It really doesn't take much more effort.

They all tend to want to do what the others are doing without question or thought and yes they want to stomp anyone that disagrees into the ground, but i still argue that that's less like a cult and more like a herd of cattle. The branch bovinian if you will And yes conservatives generally aren't like that, we're far more individualistic and more tolerant of other people being individualistic and having different opinions. But that reflects the underlying political beliefs doesn't it. The left believes that for the 'good of society' that the herd should always do the same thing and move together and if one starts to stampede everyone should stampede - otherwise the herd doesn't work. The herd is all, personal rights don't matter. Whereas conservatives believe in personal freedoms and responsibilities. And you can't have that in a herd. So they pick personal freedoms over the needs of "Society". And here we are. We've got the bovines and the cowboys.

Yeah. If anything it's 2000 years of proof that NOT standing up for yourself against your enemies ends badly.

I don't recall citing satan. But i'm sure you'll claim that electric motors can summon him now

Ahhh. Well he's not But all the polls have a margin of error so there's always a little bit of 'vibration' and up and down play even if nothing has actually changed. Sometimes that gets some people a little excited needlessly

We saw some movement in early january and trump took the lead by a nose (but - like a fairly big nose. An "italian" lead if you will), but since then the polls have been largely stagnant - they just bounce around a bit within their margin of error as you'd expect but there's no real movement. In elections there tends to be specific points where the undecided or 'soft' votes tend to move one way or another, and they tend to be fairly stable in between. The first week or so of an election, right after debates, the last 4 days etc. I think right now we've just gone through the 'pre-eleciton' phase and barring something significant happen we're probably not going to see a lot of motion between now and the start of the election, where people start paying attention again. Maybe at the nominations where there's a little media coverage of the 'official' candidates. But obviously the start of the race is going to see trump with a slight advantage over biden. The campaign will decide who wins in the end tho, campaigns always matter but this time more than usual i'd think.

Yeah - even the toss up poll flavors him. But his lead is not decisive yet by any means. The campaign will matter

Then they're still superior to yours

What on earth are you talking about? The israeli tactics don't look like the nazi ones at all. No, freedom fighters such as those we saw in ww2 seeing as that seems to be your example - fought the enemy. Their goal was not terror, it was to disrupt enemy supplies. They didn't target civillians, they targeted enemy troops and support elements. THe terrorists however deliberately target civilians. They are focused on 'terror' and burn women and children and mutilate their bodies and rape and slaughter innocents as a primary goal. That's the difference between 'freedom fighter' and 'terrorist'. You need to read a history book i think.

He want's to do everything he can to support both justin and Jaggers - so this won't split the vote and if the green candidate wins (and they might, he's in bc) then there's a better chance of a lib ndp coalition. I mean, he's dumb - but he's not stupid