CdnFox

And rocks. Old as rocks too. (throws a rock at Fluffypants)

Are you claiming they are less credible? Explain to me why Joe Rogan would be an uncredible source for an interview? And may I point out that many mainstream also have podcasts. For example vassy kapelos, probably one of the closest things to an unbias journalist and interviewer that you're going to find these days, does a podcast. Soooo why is she credible when she's on your tv and not when she's on your iphone? You can't refute his point so you create something he never said and argue with that. Are there absolutely NO intelligent people on the left?

That's not true. In fact we know that it did happen absolutely. There's no rumor about it, the facts are clear and the timelines are public record. There is no contesting that Hillary oversaw the arms deals. That is a matter of record. There is no contesting the donations from the saudis. That is a matter of record. There is no disputing that they applied, they were not granted the weapons sale and it dragged a bit, they donated and the approval came through. That time line is public record. What CAN"T be proven beyond a reasonable doubt is that this is the reason the sale went through. They cant' PROVE in a court of law a crime was committed. But the evidence EASILY passes the burden of proof for 'clear and convincing" or "balance of probabilities' (preponderance of the evidence in the states). These are lower civil evidence levels and far more suitable for the discussion. Yet you utterly dismiss even the possibility. Same with biden. While the evidence does not yet reach teh 'beyond reasonable doubt' stage there's more than enough for the lesser legal proofs. Yet even tho trump has been convicted of no crime in this and we cannot PROVE that attending these events will produce ANY undue influence (there's no criminal level evidence they will), you're prepared to condemn it. Which makes you a lying hypocrite who's willing to completely ignore the truth to promote his echo chamber. What he's doing is no different. And he's innocent if you use the same burden of proof for all, and they're ALL guilty if you use the same burden of proof for all that allows for that conclusion. So why on earth would anyone pay attention to you? You can't even be a tiny bit honest about it, and you're entirely fine with the corruption as long as people you like do it.

LOL That is so obvious to anybody who has even the remotest basics of reason or logic. Somebody else did something without explaining why therefore the only possible explanation is my biased motivational analysis. Like how dumb do you have to be to make that connection. In fact it's infinitely more likely that it was removed because they couldn't get a hold of the author which means he probably couldn't renew his agreement for the sale of it and they wouldn't have anywhere to send the money. If they lose touch with somebody they cancel the agreement with them But no, it could only possibly be my incredibly biased conclusion that the books were completely trash and none of it was true. I could not fit enough crayons up my nose to damage my brain to the point where I would arrive at this conclusion and yet, here we are with this guy

They can host entire yodeling competitions in your head couldn't they? The Acoustics must be amazing.

AR McCheese "ma'am, please get your smart car out from under my lifted Dodge. The sign is RIGHT there.... "

LOL, well in fairness gatomontes you DID ask Herbie's problem is that if you ACTUALLY solve the problem of creating energy without global warming then he won't have anything to cry about as he rends his garments Canada is about to bring its very first SMRs online. This is a truly next generation tech and canada is in the lead when it comes to design. We also have a lot of the nuclear material necessary to build reactors. So this is good news for us. The new tech solves almost all the problems of older tech. It CANNOT have a runway meltdown (where as the old tech needed lots of safety systems to prevent it), you have small clusters so ite easy to take one offline for repairs while the others continue to produce power, it's easy to add to the cluster if necessary over time. It's cheaper (still expensive but no where near as bad) and it produces almost no nuclear waste compared to older systems. It's clean and doesn't require a lake to cool it. It can be deployed anywhere. And yet... despite being almost the perfect renewable environmentally safe power source.... the left is going to hate it. Because the LAST thing they need is to actually SOLVE a problem.

I don't even know what the op was rambling about but i still know this is right

Okay, so what's the larger picture. And why are you making me ask instead of just saying it?

Well they both did that too. Clinton refused to agree to weapons sales under obama until those people just happened to make a huge donation to the charity the clintons control and bill draws pay from Then magically... approval! And we know biden's kid was selling influence. The evidence is pretty strong. And to be honest, i don't really see the difference you claim between political donations and this. Personal gain is personal gain. Now i happen to think all THREE examples are in the wrong. I think what trump is doing is wrong i think what the clinton's and bidens did is wrong. But the thing is if you're going to let the first two get away with it without a murmur it's really hard at this point to say trump shouldn't be doing that. Either we all decide that kind of thing is wrong and treat it as such, OR we accept that anyone in power is going to do it, and that's precisely what the people in power will do as well I mean why on earth would you expect someone to watch the dems do it scott free and then NOT do it when they get into power? Fair for one fair for all, firm for one firm for all. That's just the way it works.

It's like they just make crap up at random. "you noticed that we noticed that you noticed that hiring people based on skin colour is racist so that means you're ... (rolls d20)... Homophobic as well. No dex save.

Jebus dude, these days MATH is racist. Being called racist for noticing DEI involves hiring people based on skin colour is way in the rear view mirror at this point

LOL Looks like @ExFlyer is a little emotionally damaged by the truth yet again Still posting down arrows when you're too afraid to admit you're wrong? Awwww

demanding dei programs be in place... NOT racist referring to the DEI programs YOU demanded be in place.... totally racist.

Clinton did and so did Biden. I don't recall you being outrageously outraged at that point

DEI Doo.

It absolutely will discourage people from entering the united states. If they know that they'll be thrown out and then that might impact their ability to apply to live in the united states they won't cross anywhere near the same numbers. If there is no consequence for violating the law then people are going to violate the law. Seeing as you support violating the law without punishment, I assume you support trump If he breaks the law and sends them back when the court says he shouldn't? I mean if we're just ignoring laws anymore it applies to everyone right? Punishing trump for breaking a law like that will just discourage him from trying to keep the law later on. This is your argument right?

read a book.in fact for fun go look up the government's role in the last postal strike. "After it dragged on for a month with no progress, the labour minister at the time, Steven MacKinnon, told the Canada Industrial Relations Board to order those employees back to work. That happened on Dec. 17. The expired collective agreement was extended until May, with a five per cent wage increase." Why can't you educate yourself for a change? Why is that so hard? Why do you have to constantly derail threads with your lack of knowledge? The gov't has mechanisms to involve itself in ANY strike if it wants to, if it can claim it's essential or critical or that the strike results in unreasonable hardship. The gov't gave the direction to end this last time.

That's racist. Probably.

The government can still impose a settlement and has in many similar cases. There is a mechanism. However it looks like the union has decided to take a step back and is simply going to a root work to rule model for the time being. Probably a hell of a lot smarter than a strike

I mean that does make sense to me. If you're not part of that country then you have to "ask to come in". I think in canada (and i could be wrong or it may have changed) once you apply there comes a point where they're willing to grant you short term residency to come to canada while the rest of the process plays out, but that's a little different. Thats after theyv'e verified it's at least a prima facia valid claim and that you're serious and PROBABLY meet the qualifications etc. So basically if i understand you they break into the country illegally, then once there they file for permanent residency using one mechanism or another (immigration request, refugee claim etc) and then they stay in the US while their claim is processed which can take up to 2 years. And trump's take on that is it's akin to someone breaking into an apartment and then filling out a rental form while they squat there. So ice is basically catching them and tossing them back before their claim is processed under the premise that while their claim may EVENTUALLY play out, at the moment they're not in the country legally and they should continue from outside the country, I can really see pros and cons with both of the sides here. But at the end of the day i do believe that you can't behave within the law if you're breaking the law. Seems to me like the laws need to be tightend up to be clear not just for those coming in but for americans watching this play out, and that it should be clear that you can ONLY claim from outside the us, unless you're making an absolute emergency request for refugee status and there should be a board who can assess if you really are urgently about to die if you aren't given it this minute or the like.

Carney is still a left wing ideologue. He talked like a red tory during the election to trick people into voting for him but at the end of the day he's still a woke social justice loser. Of course he's going to side with the terrorists, just like ilhan omar and the crew. And the palestinians in canada will actually attack him, while the jews will not. Jews don't have violent protests so why would he side with them? Isreal needs to wrap this up one way or another. These tards will make life more and more difficult for them over time.

Honestly i don't quite understand what's going on or which laws are involved. I get that this paper is presenting one side of the story and not the whole picture, but it kind of sounds like these people are in the country legally and are complying with the requirements to report to a judge or authority and are being kicked out anyway? They mention being in the country for 2 years, is there some law that says if you make it 2 years you're not an illegal anymore or the like? It would be nice if they'd provided a little more context

Robo, how does it feel? to be the dumbest person on this forum i mean? You seem to be at peace with it but i've always wondered if it bugged you.

And often infertility. Those are some pretty serious changes