CdnFox

No they don't. Why would gays need it more than anyone else? Canada is pretty welcoming to gays. If everyone else can get it done in 3 months why can't gays? They don't need it. Your echo chamber just wants it because it suits their ideology and if canadians have to suffer and die from lack of funds as a result that's just fine with you.

This started on October 7 2023 When a group of murderous terrorists slaughtered innocent civilians and raped women and burned children. You have categorized this as being their human right to do.

What HE hears when you say that: SuperDupedfacistlisticEpstienAllydocthief. And he will then claim you've admitted to all that!!!! You need to understand how the left's filters work

Well, I suppose if we're being technical I guess that means he's right..... it's his fault it's crappy but he's still right....

10 percent is NOT a rounding error kiddo:) If your employer cut 10 percent off your paycheque and claimed it was just a rounding errror i doubt you'd accept that 10% is massive.

We pay all refugees 3 months. It gives them time to figure out what to do. I mean if you're going to accept them in the first place you can't just let them wander the streets aimlessly with no money and no jobs. But apparently if they're gay you have to support them for a full year because.... gays can't find jobs?

Exactly. Basically we paid 2.5 billion to cover up the fact that we've become irrelevant. Or perhaps I should say remained irrelevant under Carney despite him flying all over the globe to improve our image and win trade agreements, neither of which actually has happened. We never talked about it then. To be honest I hadn't even heard about it. You don't see much about it in our mainstream media Which says a lot

What do you mean only? Name one other conflict that is based exclusively on things that happened 80 years ago but the wrld considers completely justified today. Can we attack Vietnam today because of the conflict that happened in the 70s? Yemen allowed attacks on American shipping only a couple of years ago, can we start bombing them today For that? It's the kind of excuse that liars use to justify actions they know are terrible. Of course it was. And I think everyone can agree that it would have been better if that wasn't what was going on and if the two sides had learned to live in peace. Just like it would have been better if germany and France/ Britain Had learned to live in peace and we hadn't had two world wars over it. But to bomb germany today using world war II as an excuse would be universally recognized as being insane. Yeah here's this loser trying to suggest that exactly that logic is perfectly acceptable

So was the bombing of pearl harbor, but if the US used that as a reason to attack japan today almost everybody in the world would agree that it was unreasonable. It's stupid to imagine that something that happened almost a century ago has any relevance to anything that's happening today with regards to excusing violence. And 75 years is barely living memory, means that anyone who is actually participating in it it is dead and only people who were children at the time would still remember that it even occurred, and most of those would probably have been unaware of it at the time. You see petty dictators and lunatics using this kind of logic. Putin says his war on Ukraine was completely justified based significantly on part due to history that's a hundred years old. Sorry kid. It is universally accepted that you cannot conduct an attack today and retaliation for something that's nearly a century old

Well that's what you'd expect a bot to say If it was coded by a 14-year-old using chat GPT

There was no such massacre this century. Sorry. Well that's the difference between you and I. I bring up things that are relevant and actually happened and you bring up stuff that didn't happen or is irrelevant. I've never ever made a comment on any past history as to whether I approve or disapprove of it, but you have how to know cheered the death of the 1200 people 2 years ago That's 2 years ago, not 20 not 200 but two. And there was absolutely no justification for it and yet you try and justify it every chance you get It was literally your whole point kid. And once again you left running away from things you've said because you realized how stupid they are what other people point them out.

Yeah he was famous for it. Funny enough he crossed from the conservatives to the libs the first time over tariffs and free trade. The conservative policy was tariffs and the libs at the time favoured free trade and he believed in free trade. 15 or 20 years later he went back to the conservatives to manage the country's finances and get them on track, which he did.

He may be dishonest, he may be a terrorist supporter, he may hate Canada and wish the Israelis were dead, and he may pull every dirty debate trick he can think of to avoid admitting that but by god at least he's consistent!

Ukraine summit snub of Canada likely behind Carney's Kyiv visit: Expert - Yahoo News Canada Ukraine summit snub of Canada likely behind Carney's Kyiv visit: Expert basically all the European countries in America got together but Canada was not invited and not allowed to attend. So carney had to go running off to Ukraine on his own to pretend that he's relevant. Once again our reputation on the world stage is complete shit This guy has utterly failed across the board at literally everything he has tried and if it wasn't for the mainstream media covering for him he'd already be in the negative digits for popularity

Totally believable, right? I think most people would say "who WOULDN"T believe a man who's lied to pretty much everyone and in fact i called a liar last week".

Never happened. Sorry. The 1200 did. But your whole point was that they do. I do appreciate you admitting you were wrong tho, although i'm pretty sure you did it by accident LOL every now and then when you're not paying attention the truth slips out

The fact that it wasn't any day so far proves that you're wrong Let's just keep it real, you're a severe jew-hater and you support the Palestinian efforts to wipe the Jews out and anything they do is justified in your eyes as a result. Your position is pretty clear

Oh look! You've learned to parrot your betters! I believe parrots have about the intellect of a 3 year old, so that tracks "Palestine" wasn't "defending" itself when it slaughered over 1000 innocent civilians many of which were women and children, no matter how much you want to pretend otherwise.

Almost every accusation you make is actually an admission on your part. You accuse others of what you do to hide the fact that you do it

Exactly. We might be less broke if we were giving them that money based on their credentials, or they're possible value to our economy, or something like that. But instead we're literally paying people for being gay. And not just any people, people that didn't belong here in the first place but we went out into the world and offered them to come here with the promise of free money for a year because they're gay Meanwhile people regularly die in Canada because there's not enough funding to keep ER's open. But most of those a straight and some are even men (icky!!) so that's no loss.

Nobody ever made that claim. I see you've gotten caught in your lies again In fact that's what makes this even more egregious. The government funds 12 months of income for these people because 'gay'. In addition to that income Private groups may add additional money on top of it. That was said right at the very beginning so you just lied about what was claimed My very first reply to you: The Government of Canada, under the Liberal Party, is encouraging “LGBTQI+” refugees to move to Canada by offering them taxpayer-funded income for up to 12 months in addition to various other programs. Nobody anywhere said all the money they every get came from the gov't and the story itself notes that other groups give them money ON TOP of the gov't income. But they do get 12 months of income. LOLOL,once again you've made yourself look stupid and painted yourself into a corner It was never my argument. From the first post i was quite clear, they get 12 months of income from the gov't and get support ON TOP of that from other groups or programs. LOL you just got caught lying again little guy

The taxpayers ARE footing the WHOLE COST of the money the gov't gives gays for 12 months. Every nickel On TOP of that allowance, they are ALSO receiving money from OTHER people and OTHER gov't programs. So once again..... by 'implant the impression' you mean 'telling the truth'. The gov't website posted DID say the same thing. Here's more if you like The GAR Program for LGBTQI+ Refugees The Government of Canada has a long-standing commitment to providing a safe haven for LGBTQI+ people who face violence and persecution in their home countries. Identification and Referral: The key component is the partnership with trusted non-governmental organizations, primarily Rainbow Railroad and the Rainbow Refugee Society. These organizations are responsible for identifying at-risk LGBTQI+ individuals and referring them directly to the Canadian government for resettlement. Support Services: Refugees resettled through the GAR program receive comprehensive support for their first 12 months in Canada through the Resettlement Assistance Program (RAP). This support includes: Direct financial assistance, including a one-time start-up payment and monthly income support. Immediate and essential services like temporary and permanent housing assistance. Orientation to life in Canada, language training, and help with job searches. Connection with local community services, including those specifically for the 2SLGBTQI+ community. gar program lesbians and gays - Google Search Rap is 100 percent taxpayer funded. 100 percent. LOL You lose again little guy. Is there EVER a time when you're not lying.?

But i don't pretend to have you on 'ignore'. Every now and then you'll decide it's 'safe" to quit pretending and comment on something. The rest of the time 'ignore' (which you don't as you've noted ) is just a convenient little lie for you to tell to justify why you can't respond to points raised. It's just dishonesty mike. And the fact i call you out on that behavior is why you have me on pretend 'ignore' so you feel less badly about yourself. That's UNPOSSIBLE!!! You're on ignore!

Honestly, i don't think that particular floor crossing is going as well for the liberals as they thought. It feels oily and scummy, far more so than the previous crossing where there was a history of dissent and unhappyness, although that still felt 'opportunistic'. But this one looks like a complete scam and political shenannigans, and Canadians often react badly to that. His explanation didn't help either - "I was 100 percent conservative the night before and had no idea i'd be crossing, but then i had a 20 minute conversation with the PM the next day and it completely changed my fundimental values and belief system so i had to cross". Uh huh. Was the conversation "what if i were to offer you...."? They've got a lot of negative press about it, even though it's legal a lot of Canadians are concerned and not happy about the idea of obtaining a majority through shady means and scams and I think if anything it's actually hurt his brand more than it hurt Pierre. The circumstances may very well impact anyone else thinking about floor crossing and may cause the liberals to think twice about being aggressive and trying to talk people into it. The fact is having a majority of one person is not actually all that great

So ..... wouldn't that require him to cheer when a liberal crosses the floor? And has one crossed recently that he cheered about? LOLOLOL - one of the funniest things about you is how often you provide your own proof that you're wrong, and not just wrong but usually stupidly so You realize the governor in council is not the conservatives right?