CdnFox

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israel-iran-missile-strikes/ Two U.S. officials confirm to CBS News that an Israeli missile has hit Iran. The strike follows last weekend's retaliatory drone and missile attack against Israel, which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had vowed to respond to. Officials were tightlipped about the location or extent of the Israeli strike. When reached by CBS News, the Israel Defense Forces had no comment on the attack. Iran’s military response will be ‘immediate and at a maximum level’ if Israel attacks, foreign minister says https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/18/middleeast/iran-foreign-minister-israel-warning-intl-hnk/index.html Iran’s response if Israel takes any further military action against it would be “immediate and at a maximum level,” Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian told CNN Thursday, as fears rise of an escalation of the conflict in the Middle East. “In case the Israeli regime embarks on adventurism again and takes action against the interests of Iran, the next response from us will be immediate and at a maximum level,” Amir-Abdollahian told CNN’s Erin Burnett in an exclusive interview in New York. Looks like we may have us a real shootin' war pretty quick. I think I ran wants to avoid a war at all costs. But obviously they will look weak as hell if they don't do something. It'll be interesting to see how Biden reacts if Israel and iran go at it

The us might get involved but nobody else is going to unless it's someone in the immediate area. Russia is ,... kinda busy, china can't get there, europe is going to back Israel. I think world war 2 is off the table.

Hey hey hey now.... he may have been BORN a vic 20 but he self identifies as an atari 2600. Please respect his perferred processor.

You're the only one making crap up kiddo and you still didn't produce that example yet either did you You're hoping if you keep ignoring it long enough the question will go away and you won't look AS stupid Here's the problem - you play children's games. Saying things, pretending you didn't pretending others said things they didn't. ignoring facts and making stuff up... And because i'm not a child it's pretty easy to catch you out. And this seems to infuriate you If you weren't playing games you could have given that example long ago - but you can't. So there you go,

I doubt it. He was overheard telling the drapes that growing up his mother was a venetian blind so he understands what it's like to be disabled.

The evidence now pretty overwhelmingly point to that woudln't have happened. Here ya go - sounds like you need it more than him

Well... i mean you're not wrong... But still, we don't have one at the moment so you're still a little confused

Other than perhaps the yelp of pain when he falls down the stairs.

The Borowitz Report is a satire paper. They're like the onion or the beaverton or the like. The problem here seems to be that robosmith didn't realize it was supposed to be satire and is quoting it as a real article. Unfortunately his creator didn't program him with human emotions like humour.

Uhh - this is Canada bud we don't HAVE a 'second amendment' I think you're a little confused. And by 'little' i mean completely. And wouldn't you do it willingly? the doctors all say it'll save lives. Honest - I've got the receipt!

LOL - wouldn't it just be easier if we came up with something we could jab YOU with that would put you out of our misery?

nancy did it That's how we got the steel dossiers But no it is not even a little bit illegal to 'bribe people' for their silence and claiming it as a business expense is also not illegal. Clinton did the same thing for example. However - what is being claimed is that the hush money was paid out BECAUSE OF THE ELECTION - and that's where you run into a problem. If you spend money for election purposes, be it advertising or paying someone to keep a story quiet and THEN HIDE that expense... you've got a problem. You spent money to influence an election and didn't report it. Now trump will presumably argue he would have spent the money election or not - he wanted the story shut down for all kinds of reasons, not just the election. Didn't want to put the wife through the pain of it, etc etc. In which case it wasn't election spending. The prosecution will try to argue that based on the timing etc etc and what he told other people at the time it was all about the election. But no - it's not illegal to pay someone to shut up or include it in your business expenses if it could have hurt your business.

Sounds like your toddler is smarter than you.

It's literally not As i've noted about a dozen times that has nothing to do with the statement we were discussing, So you didn't clarify your position on what we were discussing - you just randomly disclosed one about something we WEREN'T discussing. You never did clarify the one we were talking about. And you STILL can't give an example of exaggeration And now you're in full hissy fit mode and for some reason barking like a dog LOL - do you have any idea how pathetic this makes you look? Sorry kid - the carbon tax makes things more expensive and it drives up inflation. Claiming it doesn't was stupid on your part.

What, lying about it you mean? I'm ok with remaining unskilled in that respect my life is good enough that i don't have to make crap up like that I'm a little past grade 11 at this point If you ever make it there you're welcome to take it tho. You realize that Clinton is the rapist right? That's what he was covering up. In any case paying hush money isn't illegal as i said. IN fact it's an every day occurrence in the states, it's often part of court settlements.

Nawww - you never did and you could have at any time That was not the position we were talking about. Nice try. Just can't help yourself from lying. You clarified something nobody asked you about. For someone wh likes to squak about arguing with himself, nobody does it more than you. And i addressed that as well. I specifically said if you want to talk about that instead i don't mind - what's an example of someone exaggerating? And you had nothing. Not a thing. You couldn't have provided much more proof than you did that you're completely full of shit You lied about what you said, then you lied about 'clarifying' what you said, then you lied about there being any 'exaggeration' And everyone can see it. And you wonder why nobody respects you. You have comedic value of course but otherwise - you can't think your way out of a paper bag. Although i'm sure it's all my post count's fault

wouldn't you expect that in a time of inflation?

it really isn't. Don't be so petulant. There is a direct and obvious connection and i pointed it out. I get that you don't like someone pointing out you made the same sort of logic leap that you're accusing someone else of but get a grip.

Not at all - watching you squirm and cry is always fun.

I'm so sorry that hearing something you said like 5 minutes ago again is so emotionally traumatic for you Ohhh the memories. You ignored obvious evidence then and you're chewing someone out for ignoring obvious evidence now. Pretty straight forward.

You'd have to be old enough to drink first.

Yeah - it would be as silly as arguing that the president doesn't have any impact on oil prices

talking to your mirror again? Best toy your parents ever bought for you - you use it constantly

I believe they collected a few dozen billion last year so maybe a little more And you call the cops when someone steals your money, not when they let you keep it. Of course for you on the left i suppose you believe people wanting to keep the money they earned is 'stealing' it from the gov't. I'll tell you in about 18 months. says the guy who still blames harper for all of trudeau's crimes

No you're not. You lefties love that stuff No you don't, that would involve working for what you earn. Can't have that! Yep - carbon tax will be gone for example. That's a pretty huge amount of money. Don't worry - if you get lonesome for the old days you can always just take your money and burn it, which is pretty much the same as having trudeau in power.