CdnFox

No it hasn't. This is really been primarily a problem in the last 10 years. During the harper years Both the lower and middle classes got improvements and actually did better. Oopsie doodle, I guess you forgot that. This is more of a liberal problem than anything else

I could highlight the section but I've already explained it to you and you weren't able to understand the simple English involved. Let's try an even more simple quote from the article: by offering them taxpayer-funded income for up to 12 months in addition to various other programs. Taxpayer funded. 12 months. In ADDITION to other programs. I've explained all of this to you and if you look up the program indeed that is what happens. The refugee program will provide limited support for "Regular" people and 4 times as much for gays. Lets day it together again. 12 Months, TAXPAYER funded. Sigh. honest to god you're not the dumbest poster on this forum but you better hope that guy doesn't quit.

Oh dear, look who got caught lying again. eyeball . I'm sure everyone is shocked and now once again you have to spend multiple replies trying to dodge your lies Seriously, just learned to tell the truth and you won't have to go through nearly as much effort

Contact the PBO, they'll help you with all the receipts. Looks like the newspaper did But they're not. Over the last 5 years they've been the largest growers of carbon pollution. For much of that time they were adding an entire Canada's worth of pollution about every 15 months. But of course the left wing likes china because they help keep the liberals in power to unlawful donations. So you don't want to talk about china obviously. A shame you don't care as much about Canada

LOL well in fairness yes i suppose it's something he might have said but it's true nonetheless. Gov't taxation, the 200 billion we blew on 'climate change', industrial carbon taxes, out of control immigration, fertilizer rules and other energy regulation, it all adds up. i've done the math for you guys before, it adds huge costs to the price of food (and a large number of other things). If gov't gets out of the way and works with the market instead of against it, things get cheaper. Industry NEVER pays the costs of the taxes etc, the consumer does.

non gays under the program they get 3 months. That's what you're quoting Gays get 12. And yes, we bring real Math instead of whatever hell you guys bring I have won more goddamn arguments on this forum with left-wing lunatic Twats because they can't count without taking their mittens off, If I had a dollar for every time you screwed up your math I could pay for a math lesson and tutor for you As I have said from the beginning and as I pointed out to you before non gays under the program get 3 months. But gays get 12 months in addition to other programs. I understand that reading and comprehension and math are all challenges for you but that's what the article says and if you follow up with the program that's actually what happens No wonder after 12 years of left-wing rule our country is in tatters. You guys can't count

No problem, you point out the ones that are safe and the ones that are dangerous and we'll just worry about the dangerous ones. Otherwise they can all go but thank god we've got you here to tell us which are which.

I most certainly did not, and you're about to demonstrate that yourself Do you see the phrase 100% in there anywhere? Interesting. And in fact the article you mentioned specifically states "in addition to various other programs." , so what I posted is crystal clear that it's not 100% government funded that the government provides 12 months of income and on top of that additional groups provided additional money. You literally just proved yourself a liar LOLOLOLOL Sometimes I think you just like me so much you want to make me laugh

If the government wasn't already attempting to control the free market costs wouldn't be so high.

Yep, they're all available through the government offices and the budgetary Watchdog. Feel free to ask for a set for yourself. Most of it's available publicly from the budgets for each year as well Probably not the ethics commissioner or the RCMP. Thanks to the liberals and their laws it's absolutely not illegal whatsoever to blow 200 billion dollars on a fake scam in order to line your own pockets. Especially not if people keep voting for you Not when the liberals are in power no When the conservatives are in power a $14 glass of orange juice is grounds for immediate termination however

I never posted anything of the kind.I posted that the government now provides one full year of support which they absolutely do You tried to post that the money actually comes from private money but it doesn't. Any private money is on top of what the government provides You are proven to be a liar again and absolutely nobody was surprised. For non gays and lesbians the government will provide 3 months of income. For gays and lesbians they will provide a year, four times as much as they'll provide to hetero people

I don't know that they say the opposite. You may be referring to polls I'm not familiar with but the other polling I've seen certainly says the Carney is in the decline and that the CPC is at the very least at parity. Having said that poilievre still has a perception problem which can push far left voters towards Carney a little bit, and he has to overcome that. But very clearly the CPC are extremely competitive at the moment. And the shine is slowly but surely coming off of Carney

Is there a story or anything? I hadn't heard about this

Doesn't need to be verbatim. Will send to the interview, it's quite clear You guys were full of shit the whole time and by the end most Canadians realized it. No carney has admitted it although he tries to dance around the issue. Steven Guilbeault Also confirmed when he stepped down that there was no chance of meeting the paris targets. We spent $200 billion dollars on nothing and achieved nothing. That's how much you climb at liars cost us.

Sure they do. You just admitted it, the CBC wouldn't cave to an external source without political reason. Your whole story hinges on the idea that the federal liberals have strong influence over the CBC. Otherwise your story makes no sense And you realize the public organization providing the funding is..... the federal gov't Sorry kid without realizing it you've Substantiated what conservatives have been claiming all along, that the CBC is a political entity and not a news entity. I was kind of thinking you didn't think that through the whole way before you opened your mouth this time 😆😆😆🤣🤣🤣 I mean hey, I'm not going to disagree with you. I'm just pretty sure that you would disagree with you if you thought it through

I accept your surrender It would probably go better for you if you kept yourself to a one lie per thread policy but I realize that would be a lot of work Sure, because that makes sense Your surrender was enough, you didn't have to demonstrate your stupidity for me to on top of it

Hey @Radiorum , you realize your entire argument for this thread is based on the idea that carney corruptly controls the CBC and can dictate that they drop a story if they're worried trump might react badly, right? Your argument isn't strong, but i appreciate you're at least owning the fact that the cbc is corruptly controlled by the libs and makes decisions based on their politics and not objective journalism.

No. Once again you're lying You started this off with a lie if you'll remember, pretending that the government didn't actually pay out any money. And now again you're back to it, what you just said is absolutely not true. What people are freaking out about is that the idea of the refugee program is that someone who has been displaced and is fleeing circumstances they can't live in is provided help by our government, but if they're a boy that happens to like penises or a girl that likes vaginas then for note particular other reason despite the fact that their level of oppression is arguably no different than any other refugee we give them three times the money. Someone fleeing the horrors of the Ukrainian War, who have watched their family killed and slaughtered and their Homeland destroyed and are forced to flee to safety to a country where they don't speak the language and where they are still living in fear and uncertainty of what will happen to them is apparently far less deserving then someone who happens to be gay. You're just an inhuman scum that doesn't really give a crap about anybody as long as your ideology is met. If women and children and straight people need to die in order for you to have the groups you support get what they want you're fine with it

Nobody anywhere thought that. Yet another lie that you can talk without evidence to try and prop up your narrative And again calling people you disagree with chuds in order to dehumanize them. You are a terrible person mike. You should be deeply ashamed

That's a very real possibility. Carney achieves his goals by staying in power, he doesn't need Canada to be successful in order to achieve that. As long as he avoids complete collapse for the next six or seven years he can borrow what he needs and funnel it out of the country into corporations and Charities which will repay the favor later. Look at Justin. He left Canada in a complete financial dumpster fire having borrowed more money than all previous prime ministers in our history combined and now is boating around the world in jeans with Katy Perry making tens of millions a year doing nothing. I think Carney is looking for hundreds of millions a year but he'll have that set up in 3 or 4 years, he doesn't need canada to survive beyond that

Carney says Trudeau blew $200 billion on a failed climate strategy | Toronto Sun Prime Minister Mark Carney acknowledged in year-end interviews with CBC that “Canada is not going to reach our 2030 and 2035 climate targets” under former PM Justin Trudeau’s climate change plan. Article content He said it had “too much regulation, not enough action” with a lot of talk “and then nothing happens,” thus admitting the failure of Trudeau’s taxpayer-financed, $200-billion-plus strategy. And he would have known that for some time. He was Trudeau's closest advisor financially, and he's had access to the books for a while. So when he stood up and told lizzie may the lie she wanted to hear over the budget,, he KNEW he was out and out lying to her and that they were NOT committed to those targets and had already realized they'd never reach them, despite having spent 200 billion on it. "Climate Change" as a threat is a lie and a scam, and it cost canadians 200 billion for NOTHING. All it did was line the pockets of the liberals and their friends. Its clear that politicians on the left don't believe in it and they're the ones with most access to the data.

Sorry kid. They're wrong and so are you. And the rest of the world knows it european countries discontinue transgender treatment children - Google Search Canada too quick to treat gender dysphoria in minors with hormones, surgery: critics | National Post And many more . The problem is that doctors are more inclined than ever to be activists despite medical evidence. And public groups are more interested in funding research that starts with the right answers and try to justify that. It's just the way it is.

I think generally overall though we can see quite clearly that the person running in the riding plays a huge role. If people just voted for the party then you could run literally anyone and the party would win. But we see that that isn't true There's no doubt in my mind that the party plays a significant role for many voters though. I'm not sure you can easily separate the two. I think that people make assumptions about the person based on the party they belong to. It creates a kind of a baseline of expected policy support and position. At the same time I don't think that conservative supporters will just support any old person regardless I would support the idea that a person leaving their party has to citizen independent and then run for the other party if they wish but honestly it doesn't make as much of a difference as you might think considering that they can still vote with the other party anyway. It would just limit the number of things that the other party could promise them to lure them over

Ma is a special case and he deserves to be spat on like the disingenuous lying opportunistic tard he is. No wonder you like him

Well.... there's a few problems with that..... Although it'd be pretty funny to put it in palestine given their support of the palestinian cause and see if they do any better with the neighbours than the jews did Sure. Or we could just assume that they're equal to everyone else and treat them exactly the same way. Crazy thought though that is