CdnFox

For sure. It'll be a new drinking game. Which means nobody is talking about trump's record and everybody is talking about how useless Biden is. Even if his people don't switch sides they're not going to get out and vote for him. I suspect he's in negotiations right now for a 'buy out', and he's holding them hostage to get what he wants before he steps down.

AHHHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAH!!!!!! LOL yeah good luck with that

Oh and is that the year kamloops closed? Nope, it closed in 78. And the claims of buried children go back to 1893. So utter fail there blackie The residential school issues that the media has been talking about are from much much earlier than that. So if we shouldn't be paying attention to this becuase its' "Old news".... why are we paying attention to that? Most of it's 100 years or more in the past. A report is not a news article. Sorry kid - that was YOUR claim. You searched and found 2 . Now you're trying to backtrack. Were you lying then or now? I'm correctly pointing out that victims are treated VERY differently based on their race. Couple hundred kids suffer years of abuse and hardship in living memory - meh. We'll look into it. I guess. National coverage and media concer about 1 out of 100. Couple hundred kids who died 100 years ago, probably from natural causes? NATIONAL PRESS - OUTRAGE- A NEW HOLIDAY COMMISSIONED ACROSS THE LAND!!!! GENOCIDE!! CANADA IS EVIL!!!!!! So what's the difference? One is first nations and the other was white kids for the most part. Sorry if it's inconvenient but that is in fact the truth. My original comment was intended to be slightly tongue in cheek but the more you try to say it's wrong, the more obvious it is that it's correct.

Ummm - from the section you quoted..... Social ownership may refer to forms of public, collective or cooperative ownership, or to citizen ownership of equity[11] in which surplus value goes to the working class and hence society as a whole.[12] There are many varieties of socialism and no single definition encapsulates all of them, LOL - I guess if you'd have read TWO sentences you'd have been twice as smart As it continues to say later, there is market socialism where there's private ownership of the means of production but it's regulated by the state to move it in specific directions and for 'social' rather than individual purposes. Which is exactly what the south was about. They wanted a class system and believed in certain social values and norms and wanted to leverage the exceptional financial power of their agriculture to preserve that. Which required slavery. Holy shit kid - if you're going to quote stuff don't quote stuff that proves me RIGHT As to the rest, your entire rebuttal to the facts presented is "ummmm.... nuh uhhh". Brilliant. Kid, there are many socialist models that absolutely include a market and private ownership. Simple fact. Sorry you got tired and fell asleep after the first line. The dems in the past were very socialistic and were very much on the left, believing in the 'greater good' of their society and the use of violence to whip others into accepting their vision of a 'utopian society'. The republicans in the past were VERY much right wingers, believing primarily in personal freedoms and rights. The only way the two were different from what we'd expect now is the republicans were federalists while the democrats in teh south were strong believers in state rights over the feds. ANd your quote proved it nicely If you thought socialism was just the state owning the factories and fields you were grossly uneducated. It's about control. And the dems were all about control Still are.

And? IF we're being honest we could say the same of the Napoleonic wars and such. Hell, lets go back a thousand years or so and talk about the mongol's and all of eastern and much of western europe. Or shall we look at the roman era? How about the wars between britain and spain? that wound up affecting everyone from russia to the aztecs. Yeah, the guns have gotten bigger and the cavalry is faster and made of steel, and we can fly now, but in the end nothing really changes and hasn't for 2200 years. At best you can cherry pick little moments when the wars died down to be small enough that not everyone was impacted. So what is your point exactly? Are you not able to say what your point is? Do you have one?

all you'd be doing is leaving the entire control of the gov't in the hands of the bureaucrats and what some more dramatic people call the 'deep state' You've probably never seen the british tv series "yes minister" which was followed by "yes prime minister", but it's a fantastic glimpse into that world in a comedy setting - and actually true to life enough that the show was almost banned becasue it was seen as disrespectful to the gov't. It's one thing to mock the gov't, or satire the gov't, or parody it but you're not supposed to actually point out it's real flaws But at the end of the day you see very clearly that until they get experienced newer politicians are very easy to lead around by the nose by the public servants and beurocracy who control information and advise them. What you want is a career politician who is afraid of the public and recognizes that doing the right thing is to their advantage. And to get that you need a public willing to punish harshly those who step out of line eithically, vote out those who fail to deliver real results and who are clear in what they want and what the gov't should be trying to achieve.

Ohhh yeaahhh - i forgot you wound up looking stupid in one of our discussions recently and would be following me around butthurt Never change moonpie Stay classy

No, i just stopped speaking to you. That's it. That seemed to be what you wanted, you needed my permission for some reason to stop your weird childish posts. So fine. but that doesn't mean i'm going to stop discussing you at all if someone else posts something to me about you - something that YOU YOURSELF replied to. Look kid -you don't need my permission. If you think this is some sort of weird game then you're playing it by yourself. There isn't a 'cease fire', there isn't some sort of bizarre peace agreement. You said you wanted to stop doing the weird little 'angry kindergartener' post and you wanted me to stop replying to them so i said fine, whatever you need. That's it. Did you think i'd never reply to you again anywhere? or someone else if they brought you up? Are you in preschool? Do what you want kid. I'll reply to whatever i like. I find your childishness mildly amusing so it's really no skin off my bones what you do. I get that you're very disruptive to threads so out of respect for others i gave you what you said you needed to stop your sillyness but somehow that's not enough now and there's some ineffible set of rules somewhere that only you know that you're playing by. Do what you like, You claim to be a grown ass man, which is looking more doubtful by the minute. So if you don't like what other people are saying just ignore it and move on. You don't need my permission and i have NO way of knowing what insane twisted rules you've got in that pre-pubescent brain of yours so it's not likely i'm gong to be able to follow them. Is it.

But in the end isn't that about the user? The systems are set up just fine for information and education, i very frequently spend hours learning about all kinds of different issues from particle physics to cooking at a very high level for free. But i think most people and even myself to degree as evidenced by the time i spend here (which is probably less than people think but it's not nothing ) prefer to be entertained and distracted a lot of the time. And for the average person that's probably all of the time. The systems are adaptive - they configure themselves to naturally deliver what people want. I don't think you can fix the 'system' - i think it boils down to changing what people want and the systems would follow

well the problem is you missed a bit. IT's "joe is old and a liar. Especially about all the things trump is. But sorry, senile can't run the country. Trump can and has. It really is a no brainer, you vote for the person who isn't mentally incompetent.

Believe all women, right?

Did myata hack your account, or did they have a sale on nyquil again?

What the hell did you do to him? Leftie brain go Bbbrrzzzzzzzzzzzzzzt.

Talking to your mirror or your mother?

They're not using their own children as human shields. That's a simple truth. It's 100 percent their fault to begin with. That's like saying if someone stabs themselves in the leg it's understandable they'd blame the knifemaker for it. So... apparently you havne't heard about ww2. It was a big deal. Sure. That's not a fact, that's an opinion.

Sure , But they don't actually use them as human shields. That's not a thing that's happening right now. And as we know hamas kills civvies too and even as we speak is still firing rockets at civvie targets in israel. That's your opinion but none of that is actually fact. And you're starting to babble again. Sounds like you're lying

It was not behind your back and you replied to him as well So was it doing it behind my back when you did it? Kid - don't blame me for you breaking your own word. I stopped replying to you and that should have been more than enough.

In the actual court yes, but in the court of the public people tend to accept a lower burden of proof. And that's where we run into trouble. Things have to be redone in such a way that it's not just a matter of there being no proof, but rather that it's implausible for it to happen without proof and that's not the case now

I never promised not to speak about you at all. Liar.

ummmm... the res school stuff happend a lot further back than that LOLOL THAT was a swing and a miss Wow - two whole stories in 35 years. Gad when will the media circus on this issue stop?!?! LOL - i think you're proving my point nicely Me? I never went to that school. What i want to know is why are people like you so eager to treat two different groups that had the exact same thing happen to them (probably worse for these boys based on this account) so differently? Looks like you don't have an answer. Would you like to insult me instead?

............ I mean you're not wrong. BUT STILL !!!!!!!

I don't think we do. I think he's just struggling to let it go. Blaming a reply to you for his continuing isn't a real thing. I'll confess that it's a little childish - like i said, making the cat dance to the laser pointer is kind of a childish pleasure. But honestly this probably goes on no matter what i do. He's like this every single time.

Sigh. Types of socialism - Wikipedia Oh look at that, you were wrong. Yawn. Read a book kid. Resolved, That we regard this as a distinctive feature of our political creed, which we are proud to maintain before the world, as the great moral element in a form of government springing from and upheld by the popular will; and we contrast it with the creed and practice of Federalism, under whatever name or form, which seeks to palsy the will of the constituent, and which conceives no imposture too monstrous for the popular credulity. Bunch of other places as well. Other examples are out there for other years. They seek the benefit of the 'society' and 'popular will' vs the feds in the north who aren't interested in that. Their big issue however was that the feds shoudln't have power over the states becuase while they did believe in the common state they did not believe in the feds having a say in it. Sorry kid - they believed that the state should exercise controls on teh state in banking, slavery, and everything else pretty much for the benefit of the state. The republican slogans at the time were 'free labour, free men", meaning workers should be free and people should be free and the state shoudl'nt have controls over htem. Strike two Oh look another admission that you're wrong and have no argument so you'll attack me instead in a childish fashion. Yawn. They do. As previously proven you're entirely wrong. Sorry kiddo. That's strike three. Yer stupid.

Wasn't responding to you, Looks like you're the one who's having trouble in that department. You literally just broke it. You're now quoting me talking to someone else in response to one of their comments - a comment you yourself replied to -- and pretending i was continuing our conversation? Nope. You broke your word. big surprise. So the pr ick here would be you. But people saw that a long time ago.

Well ... more like Mi dad.... Ok. Yes he is Fine. - really weird you keep going on about it... I"m telling you he is! Ok LOL - i just like making him react. I know - it's a little silly but it takes no effort and his replies are always amusing It's like playing with the cat with a laser pointer