Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/18/2024 in all areas
-
The CPC is about 20% ahead of the Liberals. Obviously Canadians think PP is a far better choice. He has obviously convinced many Canadians. That is his job. .1 point
-
How would you know? In any case I'm quite certain it would take a generation or two to even agree what the notion means. That said I bet you know precisely what God's oversight entails.1 point
-
Who whined like a little b1tch, and said "Make young people take the jab, make your kids take the jab, just to keep me safe!" Then who said "Forcing young people to take the jab - even though it injured thousands and even killed a bunch of them - was worth it, because I'm still here"? And we're "whining" about unnecessary injuries to kids? Go to hell. Straight to hell.1 point
-
Yes - all thanks to your failed woke policies. And coming soon - climate change apathy, intolerance of immigrants, and homeless cities. well done Yeah. Imagine being upset that you've caused permanent harm to the poor, wiped out the middle class, reduced the quality of life of an entire generation, trashed the environment and made canada a laughing stock. Pffft - what a nothing burger. when conservaties win - everyone wins. When you guys win - everyone suffers. Except the rich who can move their assets. Like trudeau.1 point
-
Amongst my jabbed friends, very few are still getting the jabbers. Reasons expressed to me: the jabs did not do what was promised they still got covid, some multiple times they know people who have been injured by them or just "haven't felt good" since getting them they realize covid was never the threat it was made out to be they resented being forced to get them in the first place to keep jobs and won't get further ones if not forced to many have woken up to the fact that "coivd" was a fire drill for further control No one has expressed that they are just "too lazy" to go get further jabs.1 point
-
That would still be a change in opinoin This has been explained to you. We didn't "win". We lost - and you got your chances to do things your way. It failed. You failed. Wokeism has failed. And now people see that your ideas lead to poverty and sickness. So they're joining our side in buckets. We didn't win - you just failed and failed hard. There's a difference1 point
-
As for why fewer are getting the vaccine.. simple recency bias. It is no longer the first story on the news.. not even close. Those who were going to get it.. have already done so. There is no data to suggest that we are going to see an uptick in the number of cases (especially as we hit the summer) so there is no urgency. Technically, both my wife and I could get boosters but we are not going to. Why? There is no urgency. It is not a matter of anyone doubting its efficacy. Simple do not need it.1 point
-
Nope. That's not my claim at all. My claim is that it's possible to believe something is a good idea, but that people still might not do them for all sorts of reasons. You probably believe that exercise is a good idea, but you still spend 16 hours a day glued to your chair arguing on the internet. Get it? 🤡 Once again, you're just arguing with yourself.1 point
-
Hence why I never was on either bandwagon. Full of folks that I should listen to because they were talking. Supposed to trust them because they are adamant, outspoken, and passionate. Honestly, the louder someone barks.. the less I trust them. As for choice.. we did have it in the US. The mandate at my job was not absolute. If I had opted to not get the vax.. all that would have happened is that i would have to get tested once every friday (or about 22 times in total). Even then, I could have said no to the whole thing and just filled out some paperwork which would have eventually became obsolete.1 point
-
This is an entirely disingenuous reply--and you know it. Anyone who knows what "fair use doctrine" is surely knows that quoting lines or passages from an article as supporting evidence is in no way a quotation of "entire articles" nor are there any copyright implications. 🙄 Blatantly false. Domestic violence and gang violence were both accepted conditions for asylum prior to Trump. The Trump administration changed that policy. The Biden administration just changed it back. They didn't "expand the definition" they just put it back where it was before Trump changed the policy. It's fine for you to hold the opinion that asylum should only be for political refugees, but that is not the law. The reason that these things are being decided on a policy basis by each administration is because the law as written is not explicit, and when that is the case the executive branch is empowered to make those decisions. So, again, the idea that Mayorkas isn't enforcing the law is pure political nonsense.1 point
-
Well truth be told most people just assume politicians make up stupid lies. What he'll be judged on is his performance. Whcih makes the aforementioned bullshit story seem pretty good by comparison1 point
-
How can anyone vote for this mess? Brandon always was a liar but this...this is just stupid.1 point
-
That stark reality is something worth avoiding I think. Hence my point. Rolling the dice can be costly and there are better options than signing a waiver and stepping onto the mats IMO. It's not just chud-like whining over covid either, covid is a symptom of wider malaise. Over time, backlash usually happens and it usually goes too far. It's the appetite for such things that always surprises me though, too many foreign vacations maybe, I keep hoping for a different outcome.1 point
-
If the job you're referring to is "Boat anchor" then sure. She's way too tainted. If she's got a brain she won't even try. So she'll probably try.1 point
-
1 point
-
1. No, the real evidence is Biden's f*ckups and complete uselessness. Don't be a dumbf*ck. 2. It's FOX you braindead cultist. Fox News. Learn it, Love it, Live it. 3. You'd be voting in a corpse, but that doesn't mean shit in the liberal hivemind.1 point
-
Most leftoids don't, and it's sad that this kind of person has overrun much of society.1 point
-
1 point
-
For sure - but the problem they run into is that they pretend they're lilly white clean. And when you wear a white shirt and get mud all over you it's pretty obvious. Trump makes no such claims. And people expect him to be a bit of a muddy person. So when he gets mud on him everyone's like 'meh.' the dems think they can win throwing mud at trump - but they just get themselves dirty and it doesn't make trump look worse.1 point
-
Yes. But that's not illegal. Writing off actual hookers like hunter biden did is over the top but hush money is a legit expense. He was. Does our commie loving resident hypocrite think he can convince anyone by deflecting ? From a point of view of moral behavior the clintons were worse by a hair - both of them knew about it and participated in the hush money - but it's not illegal. So yes - it does address the issue of the dems claiming it's a moral issue. From a legal issue point of view if they can show that he woudlnt' have done it if it weren't for the election then he may get slapped for campaign finance violations. Just like hillary did when she tried to hide the money that was used to buy the steel dossier LOL1 point
-
No he didn't. You're understating it. We didn't win anything. So you're completely wrong - as usual. We didn't even try really - we simply told you what would happen and then let you do as you wished because you said you had this. You failed. This isn't "wining' or "losing" - you decided that rather than be serious about the issue you'd play stupid woke games and run social eperiments and they failed. As predicted. There was no way it COULD work without making everyone broke. Anyone with a brain realized this early on - its only people who are woke or wish to be seen as woke who said otherwise. You had the chance to do something about it. You failed. You failed knowing that what you were doing was simply a joke. If the climate becomes disasterous - it was your fault. You had the freedoms to do whatever you wanted. You chose carbon tax and fuel surcharges as your be all solution and freaked when anyone said otherwise. This is on you. Personally you as well. Something to keep in mind next time you look at your grandkids. And something to keep in mind next time we tell you something won't work.1 point
-
The red flags, that no one wants to talk about, in this month's job report are that the big gains were not in areas that indicate economic growth. Three of top gainers were health care, government and social services. Health care is growing because the baby boomers are aging and needing more care. Government and social services growth were mandated. Combined, that was 165,000 of the 303,000 jobs added. The growth sectors like retail and manufacturing remained flat after losing last month. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm All this great economic news is a house of cards that will collapse soon.1 point
-
I didn't say no scientists believe in creation, I said there's no such thing as a creation scientist. Lots of people believe in lots of ridiculous things Show me anyone with a degree in young earth creation. You can't1 point
-
I don't find myself on the left side, no. Conservatives welcome opinions, and value debate. They don't talk about mindsets as filth, that's a fascist idea.1 point