Leaderboard

Iranian regime member allows Islamic radical free reign in Canada. They'll fit right in with the chaos caused by Carneys inaction on lethal drugs.

Good to see them being "dead named" too.

They conveniently left out that it was the terrorist organization ANTIFA that these low lifes belonged to. Now, the left can't say they are not an organization because these people all claimed to belong to the organization and they were convicted of conspiring and committing an act of terrorism.

fantastic news! These fascist scumsuckers are now behind bars. Perfect.

As we've told you people many many times there's a Nobel prize with millions of dollars just waiting for you to present your proof to the IPCC What do you call it when you could do this but you don't? It's clear evidence of something but what exactly?

I don't think they know what they're for or against. I think that they base their ideology and their personal identity on hatred and bigotry. Trump is bad. We hate trump. We hate people who like trump. Trump is mean to the Ayatollah. Therefore we like the Ayatollah and we hate what trump is doing. I don't think the algorithm gets any more complex than that for them Look at eyeball, he spent like a year insisting that anyone who was serious about solving the middle east problems would take out Iran because they were the source of all of the problems and funding. Now that trump is actually doing that he's big mad that it's happening and doesn't want to even admit he suggested it in the first place 🤣🤣🤣🤣

That's an awful lot of yarn-spinning you're doing there, when you could have just said "but but but it's TOTALLY DIFFERENT"

This explains your fascination with trans....

Its sad really. Too bad people haven't woken up

Yup, a monolithic shit stain...

So, he blew smoke up everyone's ass last year and is blowing it up there again now. Proxy terrorism will be around until the end of time and not even the US military can eradicate that. He picked a fight here that guaranteed he regrets and is only going to continue to bite his ass The difference there is that other presidents had qualified people and an objective. A couple minor details that are clearly missing in this administration....

Yes EV sales have declined as a percentage of vehicles sold, but still account for ~2M units annually in NA. Whether your head can get around it or not EV's will also dominate NA vehicle sales at some point in the not too distant future. Bet on it when Trump is gone that the next administration rescinds his archaic 1960's views of fossil fuels. Maybe Volkswagen and Stellantis should have talked to you before they invested capital into these projects.... not sure what they were thinking.

Hey eyeball: your fellow left4rd ExFlyer doesn't think that you support Hamas. Can you kindly tell him please? Thanks, pal.

Would you like to know what's racist, EF? Britain created TWO sovereign countries that never existed in several centuries before, by partition. The UN ratified the decision to create those countries. The two countries created were Pakistan and Israel: Pakistan was created first, in 1947, and they slaughtered 800,000 to 1.5M Sikhs and Hindus by burning, lynching, hanging, chopping, and shooting, and they drove an estimated 8M people out forever, with no right to return. Pakistan was instantly accepted as a welcome neighbour by most of the countries in the ME. As in, on that very first day, while most of the Pakistanis were still out killing their old neighbours. They committed a second genocide of abut 3M people in 1971, but that didn't affect the amount of love they get from their neighbours either.... Support for Pakistan never faltered. Israel was created in 1948, and on the day they were created, 8 of the countries who LOVED the genocide in Pakistan just 8 months earlier came to attack Israel. You can ask yourself "Were they going to Israel to get in on another ethnic cleansing/genocide?" and the answer is probably yes, but we will never know because they got their bigoted asses kicked. The Israelis killed between 400 and 500 people via firing squads, drove 700,000 people out of Israel, and in total, 30,000 people were killed in that war. If you question any of those facts feel free to google them. In the end you will find that IN ALL OF THE WARS THAT THE MODERN-DAY ITERATION OF ISRAEL HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED IN, THEY HAVE STILL KILLED A SMALL FRACTION OF THE PEOPLE KILLED BY PAKISTAN DURING PARTITION. So, if your side aren't f'ing bigots, then why have they ALWAYS been friends with the country that did almost TWO THOUSAND TIMES AS MUCH KILLING? If you took all of the people that Israel killed in "genocide", and multiplied it by 100, to go from 400 to 40,000, you would still have to kill that number of people 20 times to equal the number of people killed by Pakistan in their first genocide. 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000- loved by islamists for 80 years vs 400 - hated by islamists for 80 years To this day, Pakistan is 97% muslim. They have an ethnically cleansed country and muslims love that. To this day, Israel is 20% muslim. Is that an ethnically cleansed state? Are the Israelis 'all about genocide' like the Pakistanis are? Now tell me, EF, where are the actual bigots in this equation? Is it "the people who love it when their religion kills millions of people but then goes raging-genocidal when 400 of their own are killed", or is it "the person who notices that"?

LOL, the proof is that we are still here arguing about it decades later. You guys have been screaming OMG THE WORLD IS GOING TO END we have to act now before it is too late for decades now. Hell, it was 2018 everyone was pushing the OMG WE ONLY HAVE 12 YEARS LEFT to act now before it is too late! At some point, the screaming is just background noise, as it has been OMG ALMOST TOO LATE to act for decades now. I mean, it is so bad that you have several folks on here that are hiding like cowards from people because they can't defend their positions. OMG THE WORLD IS GOING TO END... as you have people on ignore saying it. ROFL You might as well go write it in your journal to yourself.

Just mailed a small donation to Conservatives. I think a little money speaks louder than a lot of talk on social media.

Ask eyeball yourself whether or not he supports Hamas. He will tell you. He has been unwavering in his support of Hamas. Ask robo yourself whether or not he called the US "terrorists" yesterday. Ask yourself why wouldn't the Dems fund DHS at a time like this when islamic terrorist attacks are occurring more frequently than normal? Ask yourself if the Dems' rhetoric about "an illegal war" is helping to incite terrorist attacks against the US, and if that statement protects the ayatollah or helps the US? Ask yourself "What would happen in 5 years, when Iran has an overwhelming stockpile of ballistic missiles and ICBMs, and nukes"? Or ask yourself how much the US should flirt with that possibility? Ask yourself who was responsible for 150+ attacks against US bases when Biden was president... (I'll save you the trouble) Between October 17, 2023, and early 2024, Iran-backed militias launched over 170 to 180 drone, rocket, and missile attacks against US military bases and personnel in Iraq, Syria, and Jordan. These attacks resulted in dozens of injuries, and a January 2024 drone attack in Jordan resulted in the deaths of three US soldiers. Ask yourself why no leftists here can talk about the fact that Mamdani's wife clicked "like" on a whole bunch of posts about the Oct 7th attack.... On the day that the news of her terrorist-loving came out, Beave started a thread about Trump forgetting to take off his hat while he was saluting, and posted there TWELVE times, but couldn't find it in him to talk about Mamdani's wife's posts. Now try to find a leftist here who can be critical of people like Omar and Tlaib. Look back at clips of Hillary talking about Iran: she was far more hawkish than Trump on Iran, and leftists ADORED her. None of them said words like "illegal", and she wasn't talking about "waiting until Iran launched a strike against the US to attack". EF, you're on one side or the other, whether you like it or not. "Switzerland" is not an option this time. The people on your side of the aisle are all engaging in at least some form of trying to make Iran's path to being a nuclear threat easier.

I'm not representative of anything. I'm just me. But you can't cope with reality so you have to turn everybody that disagrees with you into some sort of monolithic villain figure. That is not a sign of good mental health

Thanks, we would ask you to join but only real people will be asked.

You've learned a lot from kissing Trump's ass! How long 'til Cons do a Dalton Camp and have a "Night of the Knives"?

Sadly this has been the situation in Canada for years. The Liberals have saddled Canada with regulations, red tape, carbon taxes, net zero objectives, and FN negotiation requirements. This has pushed Canada into the mud while the rest of the world is desperate for our natural resources. The BC NDP has done the same sort of thing. This is what John Rustad says on Facebook, MLA and former leader of the B.C. Conservative Party. He has it right. quote As the Iran Crisis Shakes Energy Markets, Canada & B.C. Misses the Moment British Columbia keeps watching investment walk out the door at the exact moment the world is scrambling for reliable energy. The conflict involving Iran has driven oil prices above $90 per barrel as global supply tightens and shipping routes in the Persian Gulf face disruption. Countries everywhere are looking for stable suppliers. Canada should be in a position to meet that demand. Instead, we are squandering the opportunity. First it was Nutrien, the world’s largest potash producer, announcing plans to build a major export terminal in Washington State instead of British Columbia. Now Canadian Natural Resources Limited has delayed an $8.25-billion oil sands expansion because governments still have not clarified the rules around carbon pricing and methane regulations. This pattern is becoming familiar. Major companies look at the regulatory landscape in Canada and choose to wait, scale back, or move their investments somewhere else. Every time that happens, British Columbia loses jobs, economic growth, and revenue that our province desperately needs. The delayed oil sands project would add 150,000 barrels of oil per day to Canada’s energy supply. Projects of this scale generate enormous economic activity across western Canada. They also help solve another problem Canada continues to face: we are forced to sell much of our oil at a discount because we lack sufficient access to global markets. Canadian heavy crude, commonly priced under Western Canadian Select, often sells $10 to $25 per barrel below global benchmarks because our export options remain limited and producers rely heavily on U.S. refineries instead of reaching world markets. That discount alone can cost the Canadian economy $15 to $30 billion per year. In addition to the gracious energy discount we are also seeing jobs left left off the table. A new export pipeline from Alberta to the B.C. coast, combined with expanded oil production, would support 15,000 to 25,000 construction jobs and an additional 30,000 to 60,000 indirect jobs in engineering, manufacturing, trucking, and services. Thousands of those jobs would exist here in British Columbia through pipeline construction, port development, marine shipping, environmental services, and heavy equipment contracting. Just as importantly, expanding export capacity would allow Canadian energy to reach global buyers and reduce the discount that currently drains billions of dollars from our economy every year. Energy exports moving through B.C. ports support longshore workers, tug operators, terminal staff, and countless small businesses that depend on industrial activity. Large energy infrastructure projects can contribute $10 to $20 billion annually to Canada’s GDP once they are operating. British Columbia captures part of that value through employment, port activity, and government revenue. Instead, investment keeps slowing down. The delay announced by Canadian Natural Resources Limited reflects growing uncertainty created by federal policy. Ottawa continues to layer on new requirements for the oil and gas sector, including carbon pricing rules, methane regulations estimated to cost the industry about $15 billion, and a proposed emissions cap that hangs over future investment decisions. Many of these same projects already plan to invest billions in carbon capture and emissions reduction technology. Those investments add enormous costs to development. Companies are being asked to spend billions to capture and reduce emissions while still paying an industrial carbon tax on top of those costs. That raises a simple question: if companies are investing heavily in carbon capture to reduce emissions, why are they still being charged a carbon tax for producing energy? Canada’s competitors face none of these costs. Major producers in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Russia do not operate under carbon taxes or emissions caps. They sell their oil and gas into global markets at full price because they don't have to use other counties energy corridors. Provincial policy also plays a role. Regulatory timelines in British Columbia remain long and unpredictable, and major projects face constant legal and political challenges even after years of review. A clear example is the proposed propane export expansion at the Ridley Island Propane Export Terminal near Prince Rupert. The project would expand Canada’s ability to export propane to global markets and support jobs in northern British Columbia, yet it now faces legal challenges and delays from several Indigenous groups despite already operating and providing economic benefits to the region. Investors watch these situations closely. When projects that have already gone through approvals still face years of uncertainty, companies conclude that British Columbia is too risky for major investment and move their capital to jurisdictions where governments provide clear rules and predictable timelines. Indigenous Nations must be part of development in British Columbia. Consultation matters and partnership matters. Many Indigenous communities across western Canada already participate directly in energy projects, pipelines, and infrastructure developments. Those partnerships create jobs, generate revenue for communities, and provide long-term economic stability. That model works when governments focus on agreements and practical outcomes. Unfortunately, Premier David Eby has done more damage to Indigenous negotiations than any government I have witnessed. His handling of issues such as the Cowichan Tribes v. Canada claims and the ongoing uncertainty around the Musqueam Indian Band new water rights deal that his government wasn't consulted on creates instability, and endless legal battles. Instead of resolving disputes and creating certainty, this government has pushed more decisions into the courts and allowed negotiations to spiral into conflict. That approach fuels division and delays investment. At a time when British Columbia faces a $13.3-billion deficit, the public has very little patience for endless legal uncertainty and court challenges that stall projects for years. The Supreme Court of Canada has been clear on this issue. Indigenous communities have the right to consultation and accommodation. They do not have a veto over development. Major infrastructure projects that serve the broader public interest cannot be permanently blocked through endless litigation. British Columbians deserve a government that welcomes investment instead of pushing it away. Instead, we have an NDP government that has become politically incapacitated when it comes to economic development. Premier David Eby built his career as a protest activist. He seems to carry that same mindset into government. That approach might work on a university campus. It does not work when you are responsible for running a provincial economy. The reality is simple. The private sector funds the public sector. Businesses create the wealth that pays for hospitals, schools, roads, and public services. The economy does not run on government press releases or policy announcements. It certainly does not run on Starbucks coffee and press conferences in downtown Vancouver. Yet the government behaves as if investment will appear regardless of the policies they impose. Their latest budget proves the point. British Columbia now faces a $13.3-billion deficit, the largest in our history. That deficit stands as a direct indictment of how this government thinks the economy works. The NDP continues to treat the private sector as an afterthought while layering regulations, taxes, and uncertainty onto the industries that actually generate revenue. This is not economic leadership. It is champagne socialism, the belief that government spending somehow creates wealth while the businesses that fund that spending are pushed further out of the province. British Columbia needs a government that understands a basic fact: if investment leaves, the jobs leave with it. When billions of dollars in projects move to the United States or sit idle because companies no longer trust our regulatory environment, the cost appears in lost opportunities, weaker growth, and deficits that future generations will be forced to carry. unquote

If you're going to put him back on something, please make it his meds. 🙏

Bill split after the world turned on him for foisting VISTA on us. 😎

A mine owner friend told me recently that the average length of time between applying for permits to mine and approval time in BC is 17 years, and approvals for Vancouver Island are non-existent now. There'd be no logging either if the provincial NDP had their way. The only logging now is from private land holders. BC is mired down by years of incompetent NDP governments. Saddle every industry with a mountain of regulations and ever changing goal posts, and then the NDP wonder why there's no investment / jobs, and everyone's taxes are rising with f'k all to show for it. The Provincial/Federal NDP are the 'athletes foot' of a once strong running country. Canada has toe-nail fungus, it's called NDP.

"Here the real detailed & verified information with links provided that Pierre Poilievre doesn't ever tell the Canadian people for it doesn't fit his narrative. As of early 2026, all provinces and territories have signed the foundational Canadian Free Trade Agreement (CFTA), but some, notably Quebec, have lagged in fully implementing changes, receiving lower ratings for reducing specific, often protectionist, internal barriers, notes this Public Policy Forum report. While Alberta and Saskatchewan have utilized Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) rather than new, fully binding, comprehensive legislation in some cases, the core issue remains a decentralized system allowing significant local regulatory control. * Lagging Jurisdictions: Quebec was identified as having the most restrictive, or "last place," policies regarding interprovincial trade in 2024–2025. * Voluntary Mechanisms: Alberta and Saskatchewan, while active in the New West Partnership Trade Agreement (NWPTA), have relied on MoUs with other provinces, such as Ontario, to address specific barriers, which are not always as binding as formal legislative changes, notes TD Economics. * Reasons for Slow Progress: The Canadian constitution and a decentralized federal system allow provinces significant autonomy to regulate trade within their borders, often leading to protectionist policies that favour local, or provincial, interests." " Some provinces have gone further than others, with Ontario, Nova Scotia and Manitoba arguably pushing the furthest. However, PEI and B.C. have recently signed legislation aimed at enhancing trade. On the opposite end, New Brunswick and Newfoundland and Labrador have been more cautious. Quebec also stands out in that it’s the one government yet to sign an MoU with any province, but has introduced legislation to make interprovincial trading freer, subject to criteria. While gains from interprovincial trade should manifest from these actions, their magnitude will be restricted by several factors, including the fact that not all provinces have trade agreements. Moreover, geographic trade barriers remain, as do others (such as having to navigate complex tax systems). Finally, most firms that trade interprovincially already report doing so obstacle-free. " https://economics.td.com/ca-interprovincial-trade?fbclid=IwY2xjawQiSDJleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETE0dGNXMXlaQWVIbkVvb001c3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHrxqcFU7Bo1gBra7keEtU35B_nzf7VOBI3s5mp3eS89L3-Rr616WabqXOo9m_aem_D9L3UVyrxozMLvDqVsY0CQ#:~:text=Some provinces have gone further,trading freer%2C subject to criteria

The U.S. did not intentionally target that school However, the lack of Intel before that attack is glaring. Investigate that? Political disaster.

Occupy Kharg Island - not destroying it - destroying it is madness. Occupy Kharg Island and you achieve two objectives - retain Iran's economic base and .......... use the occupation as a bargaining chip - u control supply. Of course that's assuming Iran doesn't destroy it themselves - possible!

Ur assuming a democracy will replace the current communist regime - that is quite likely Trump's stalking horse. So-called 'experts' believe the president's tactics are likely more about creating business opportunities for American companies - exploitation, than about toppling the communist regime of Miguel Diaz-Canel. ala' Batista 'Until Castro, the U.S. was so overwhelmingly influential in Cuba that the American ambassador was the second most important man, sometimes even more important than the Cuban president" / Smith-former U.S. ambassador to Cuba. Trump's game plan for Cuba would likely resemble Venezuela - regime remains, sock puppet as President. Cuba is likely heading back to what it was before Castro, under Batista. Russia today is RULED by oligarchs - not politburo.

I don't think we will see large U.S. expeditionary troops in Iran, but smaller special forces missions are likely already underway. With total air dominance secured, Israel and the U.S. can insert teams for specific tasks. The U.S. has so called Tier 1 teams that train specifically for such missions and are directly controlled by the WH/SecWar with total deniability until years later. Think Delta Force, DEVGRU Seal Team, STS, etc. and equivalent Israeli counterparts. Example: It was Delta Force under JSOC command that executed the capture of President Maduro in Venezuela back in January. Supporting elements include the usual suspects, including CIA assets. President Trump knows, like all presidents, that public support for ground troops and "body bags" for an Iran invasion would be a political disaster.

Not much if this is the worst you can come up with. Your article even mentioned a well known secret that the Conservatives had banned their MP's from appearing on CBC. Did you even read the title of your thread before you posted it?

A synagogue in Bloomfield Michigan was attacked and bombed by a Muslim man from Dearborn Heights MI. The same Dearborn Heights MI where Muslims said christians, Americans and Jews are not welcome and prayed for the deaths of that triad. And an ISIS supporter that the Trump DOJ sentenced to 11 years in 2017.was released.in 2024 as Joe was on his way out. He should still be in jail. Just more proof that the right is not the solution to all your problems, but the left is definitely the cause.

yes love the whataboutism here - "we don't care about all the women raped and murdered by illegals, but because others do, they must not care about women raped and murdered by legal immigrants too." What a load.

White liberal women are the dumbest people on earth.

OOPs just some of them then

No, they are not.

We signed a free trade deal with the UK several years ago, in case you haven't heard.

First off he doesn't live in BC so do try not to be dumber than a dead squirrel if you can avoid it Secondly we absolutely do have conservative governments. Just because they're not called conservative doesn't mean they're not conservative. The social credit was very conservative Read a book

Actually you know that's true. It's telling that you have to try and lie about it David Emerson was perhaps the most Stark example of a floor crossing for relatively noble reasons He was not a politician. He ran for office because the liberals told them that they were going to win and he could do the softwood lumber deal if he was elected. His whole reason to get into politics was to do the softwood lumber deal and get the best deal for Canada. He was a software lumber guy, he was not a politician. And he was universally regarded as the best person to negotiate that deal Well the liberals lost. And harper went to him up front and honest and said everyone agrees you are still the best guy, will you come over to us if I let you handle those negotiations He said yes. That was the only reason he ever got into politics. He handled the negotiations and then left politics He literally got into politics and agreed to cross the floor strictly for the benefit of Canada to negotiate one specific deal and then he never entered politics again or even tried That is very different than the people that cross today. That NDP girl was saying just two weeks ago how terrible carney was and how she couldn't possibly represent her people if she was part of the Liberal party. Just a few days ago she was saying how heavy Lewis was the best choice to be PM in Canada And how she had total faith in him and stood up and got her picture taken then turn around and ran across to the liberals a couple days later Those two things are not the same thing and pretending they are as childish

Microsoft is, not Bill Gates, You have this common thread concept that people formerly involved with, or shareholders even at arm's length continue to be the company itself and not separate entities. Gates himself is not and has not been for a while involved in MSoft's corporate decision making. He doesn't need to be.

For Conservatives: Why are we engaging the left in any debate? You'd have to learn how to first.

They're stealing right in front of us now because they know you won't do anything about it. And soon, when they have a majority, you won't be able to. MPs Seek Secret Gov’t Audit | Blacklock's Reporter Opposition MPs last evening called for disclosure of a secret audit on millions in cost overruns for one of cabinet’s signature programs, the Canada Dental Care Plan. A summary referred to soaring administration charges: ‘Just so we’re clear, this is to produce information that has been hidden from Canadians.’

Some damage at a corner of the base where a couple Canadians are, Tories pretend it's Canada's airbase in order to join the shitshow.

Leftist Support for the Ayatollah Some people let their imagination overwhelm their brain. Or they too stupid to know they're politically ignorant.

"We are aware of reports of strikes in the vicinity of Ali Al Salem Air Base. For operational security reasons, we do not discuss assessments of damage or impacts to military facilities," DND spokesperson Lt. Pamela Hogan said in an email Thursday.

Just one. They hate America. Trump loves America. So they must hate Trump.

ha ha - dude, ur the reason they put instructions on a toothpaste tube.

Some people continue to claim the Earth is flat. For them scientific proof to the contrary is a lie – doctored. It isn’t simply the shape of the spaceship tho; it is about distrusting anything/everything, official – the scientific community, the medical community ………. indeed any government institution. Politically, it is about grooming the distrust and exploiting it. Flat earth, measles, vax, climate change, 9/11, Germans bombing Pearl, Elvis alive on Mars, elections, all follow the game plan; groom distrust. …………. the ethernet is the global leverage. A disingenuous political hack (all to a more or less degree) objective is to destroy societal norms. Oh yeah, climate change is real, vax saves lives and Elvis is not alive on Mars.

** waiting for the usual suspects to show up and explain how this has nothing at all to do with the Liberals and is solely the fault of Trump **

Was a logger - 43 yrs. I could start your saw for you . . . The hordes of herbies couldn't tell the difference between a hemlock and a ham sandwich. Point being . . . what/who would spend a dime of investment money in BC with the present wishy-wash NDP ?