Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/10/2026 in all areas
-
ANTIFA are disgusting evil domestic terrorist thugs. Full stop.3 points
-
So, this muslim from a $2.5 million suburban home decided to blow up peaceful protestors. This was Mamdani's response: Those stupid white people deserved it. Yeah, that went over well. At the press conference, he was asked about his wife's deeply radical and hate filled statements by a placating "journalist": Is it just me, or was that the political version of "bìtches be crazy, 'm'i'ight?"2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
Calling people CHUDS who don't agree with him, loudly announcing various posters as being "ignored" and demanding others leave the forum.......YUP. The covid years will go down in history as the widescale rejection of science in favour of industry bureaucrats, most of whom hadn't touched a patient or written a paper in decades.2 points
-
Robo might have actually learned something today, so I'm not gonna rain on his parade too hard. I just want a simple thank you from him. Beave got his ace whooped again, and I'm just rubbing it in lol. I love humiliating him because him and MH are probably the two "smartest" leftists here.2 points
-
And once again you can't defend your position or make a rational argument so you simply switch to insults. Why don't you just answer his question?2 points
-
@BeaverFeverand @robosmith, you've been called out, dummied even, and I eagerly await your responses.2 points
-
Yes, I do support financially backing Ukraine. Why don't you?2 points
-
Like I said, you didn't get it. Scientific fact deniers, otherwise known as id!ots!2 points
-
L Democrat policies made NYC unaffordable. Sky high taxes and regulations keep NYC prices high.2 points
-
yup we saw the same thing with those genocidal scumbag Hamas f-wads. They deliberately hide under schools and use kids as human shields. These Hamas and IRGC scum are the worst of the worst when it comes to humanity in 2026.2 points
-
So you're saying that the people taking jobs should be able to properly speak the language of the population they're meant to service? You should tell the CRA. I call the french line so that I don't have to deal with the brown person on the other line that can barely speak english.2 points
-
Trump Officials Attended a Summit of Election Deniers Who Want the President to Take Over the Midterms Several high-ranking federal election officials attended a summit last week at which prominent figures who worked to overturn Donald Trump’s loss in the 2020 election pressed the president to declare a national emergency to take over this year’s midterms. According to videos, photos and social media posts reviewed by ProPublica, the meeting’s participants included Kurt Olsen, a White House lawyer charged with reinvestigating the 2020 election, and Heather Honey, the Department of Homeland Security official in charge of election integrity. The event was convened by Michael Flynn, Trump’s former national security adviser, and attended by Cleta Mitchell, who directs the Election Integrity Network, a group that has spread false claims about election fraud and noncitizen voting. Election experts say that the meeting reflects an intensifying push to persuade Trump to take unprecedented actions to affect the vote in November. Courts have largely blocked his efforts to reshape elections through an executive order, and legislation has stalled in Congress that would mandate strict voter ID requirements across the country. The Washington Post reported Thursday that activists associated with those at the summit have been circulating a draft of an executive order that would ban mail-in ballots and get rid of voting machines as part of a federal takeover. Peter Ticktin, a lawyer who worked on the executive order and had a client at the summit, told ProPublica these actions were “all part of the same effort.” The summit followed other meetings and discussions between administration officials and activists — many not previously reported — stretching back to at least last fall, according to emails and recordings obtained by ProPublica. The coordination between those inside and outside the government represents a breakdown of crucial guardrails, experts on U.S. elections said. “The meeting shows that the same people who tried to overturn the 2020 election have only grown better organized and are now embedded in the machinery of government,” said Brendan Fischer, a director at the Campaign Legal Center, a nonpartisan pro-democracy organization. “This creates substantial risk that the administration is laying the groundwork to improperly reshape elections ahead of the midterms or even go against the will of the voters.” … https://www.propublica.org/article/election-denier-summit-trump-midterms More Republican phoney emergencies are in the works for President Reichstag Fire.1 point
-
I will back West up on this. You did it repeatedly. The cite was given to you every time you denied it. At least 4 or 5 times. You'd disappear for a few weeks and then come back again repeating that Justin never said that. I remember it because I had always thought of you as a fair person, but you were being willfully ignorant by denying something that had been repeatedly shown to you as true. I remember when you finally let it go, you didn't really "retract " it. You just said it didn't really matter to you and we were all making a big deal about nothing.1 point
-
Absolutely!! DON'T VOTE AND PROVE YOUR POINT! Also, DON'T BREED! That's impotant too! "Take a stance! Keep your zucchini in your pants!" Also don't drive, it just encourages police to jump out in front of you and get hit which gives them an excuse to shoot! Actually if you could just stay in your basement and not bother anybody, that would be great You're totally winning big guy! WAY TO SHOW 'EM!!!!1 point
-
Keep him talking. Every minute he spends here means one minute less in the girls' bathroom.1 point
-
I think one could say immigration is needed and for decades we had a very reasonable immigration policy....and if one traces the origins of our immigration woes, it starts in 2016 once liberals introduced new immigration numbers in an attempt to jump start our economy...and some of it has done that ...but as you explain to the determinate of working Canadians, but also the government did not have the insight to handle all the problems it creates such as lack of investment into proper infra structure, lack of investment into upgraded services, and today we are where we are because of the lack of the government thinking the problem all the way though... we know what needs to be done, and yet somehow we as a country decided to invest in other areas....like our military, foreign hand outs, making sure we look good, when we are bleeding a good portion of those immigrants to other countries because we can not control the other issues that are part of the issue....like health care, education ,housing, other services....the solution would be to return to those past immigration levels...that worked for decades, invest in our infra structure, and services, or we can pretend mass immigration is not the problem along with all the other issues it has brought to the table. and continue to increase this problem from massive to out of control which is where we are headed right now...1 point
-
Except you were wrong He never attended that University. And the ecology went to which was a Polytechnic was essentially a college not a university, nor did he get a degree there he got a diploma in teaching And no my original claim was that he did not attend University, he didn't earn a degree there. He was given a degree when he wrote a particularly good thesis but he didn't attend. And being a professor at a different University is not the same as being a student You were wrong and now you're trying to pout about it. He didn't go to university, he didn't achieve a degree by attending University, you don't have to go to university to be smart. In fact the fact that he was able to write a successful thesis despite not attending the university kind of proves the point. You can gain knowledge and become educated outside of it. All you've done is proven that you were wrong and I was correct. And now you'll have an emotional breakdown about it which will also prove my point about lefties having slightly more mental health issues 🤣🤣🤣🤣1 point
-
ANTIFA blocks traffic and sets cars on fire. Oh, and they make great doormats for illegal aliens. What's not to like?1 point
-
Buddy, that's Chinese propaganda. While we are closing 100% RELIABLE coal-fired plants and replacing them with unreliable green tech and unsafe LNG, the Chinese are buying up all of our coal on the cheap and laughing as they burn it. Left4rd "logic": We can't burn Alberta coal in Alberta because burning fossil fuels will kill us all by 2023 it has to be loaded on trains and shipped to the west coast of BC by burning fossil fuels then it has to be shipped across the Pacific Ocean by burning more fossil fuels then it has to be shipped by rail again, this time across China, burning even more fossil fuels only after we have burned fossil fuels to ship the coal all the way from from Alberta to China can it be burned, because the pollution-control standards are so much lower over there I know that this is over your head, don't worry about it. It's just here for other people.1 point
-
It's so ignorant. How can you logically deny the fact that if you bring in millions of people in a short amount of time, but make no changes to hospital capacity, school capacity, housing, jobs, etc. - things are not going to go well, resources are going to run out? If a house has a max capacity of 10 people and you force 60 people to live in it.....what do you think is going to happen? And what if of those 60 people you bring in - 20 of them think women are garbage and that shi!ting on the sidewalk is perfectly acceptable. What do you think life is going to be like for the owners of that house that have poured their life savings into it? How pleased are they going to be to also have to financially support say, half of these people? It's astonishing to me that the Liberal Party and their supporters just cannot grasp this intellectually. And they all want it to continue. Just this one issue illustrates the level of "don't care" the Liberal party has for Canadians.1 point
-
Tell that to the parents of all the dead school children. But I suppose Trump has only wishes the best for young girls and women.1 point
-
No, he's only aware that Justin Trudeau was PM for 10 years and Carney is PM now. Otherwise, he's not aware of much at all...1 point
-
Poilievre is losing votes every time he talks...which is hard to do considering not many vote for him anyway....unless of course you have to go to a riding 3 provinces over to secure a seat. He'll never change..... can't answer simple questions other than....'look what the liberals did the last 10 years'...'Mark Carney promised this'...'it's the liberals fault'. Great, answer the questions clown... He's a year behind in everything he wants to talk about because looking in the rear view mirror is all he has and his only schtick. Why conservative members would vote to keep someone in the leadership role that continually polls below the party is mind boggling. Small wonder we've had a liberal gov the last 11 years and why we'll have one for most likely another 11 years. Find something better Con's....1 point
-
Liberals hire new PBO to replace the outgoing Jason Jaques who was very good at his job. Too good in fact. The position will now be taken over by one Annette Ryan...who Carney knows because they went to Oxford together. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5e8F1flHrY Don't be surprised if the PBO reports get a lot 'friendlier' from now on.1 point
-
1 point
-
Sure you're not. LMAO! I had more important things to do than stare at the bleedingly obvious.1 point
-
What BS. California has very lax voter ID laws. So what is required to open a bank account in California? If it's 'voter suppression' to ask for ID in order to vote, why isn't there any similar outrage against banking requirements? Government-issued Photo ID: This could be a California driver's license, California identification card, U.S. passport, or any other valid photo ID issued by a government entity. Secondary Identification: Often, a secondary form of ID is required, which could include: A Social Security card A birth certificate Utility bills or other documents with your name and address Additional Information Proof of Address: Banks may also ask for proof of residence, such as a utility bill, lease agreement, or similar document that shows your current address. Minimum Deposit: Some banks require a minimum deposit to open the account, so having cash or another funding method available is also essential.1 point
-
Carney works towards (finally)reaching a deal with the US? Or does he stay the course with the Trump as the boogeyman which helps Carney's polling numbers? My guess is the latter.1 point
-
Once again, the abject stupid dishonesty of this argument is exposed as you and the other leftists run away like cowards when is it pointed out: Gun ownership is also a right articulated in the Bill of Rights, yet, we have to show ID to purchase a firearm from a dealer and all you leftists want that. Right?1 point
-
usually get your quotes from the Orange Overlord while he's getting a handbjob from a 13 year old...1 point
-
Maybe they're concerned the Conservatives will wise up. Seems pretty remote to me. I'm pretty sure it's open source.1 point
-
1 point
-
LOL seriously dude, this forum is a microcosm of a handful of people, not representative of entire political leanings to generalize about. Also, it is full of just as many emotional posts from those on the left. Even now, you can't contain yourself as you are crying about Hegseth's tone about the war. Cry more. This is exactly why we need people like him leading this effort, not a bunch of left wing cry babies who are more concerned over the rhetoric used. Hegseth has outlined the objective many times now. Just another leftwing dishonest talking point you are pushing.1 point
-
They're cheap in China mostly because they don't give a crap about their environment. Thankfully that's not something Canadians are prepared to accept and we have 13 chances to say thanks but no thanks. I suspect we'll be seeing most rare earths being mined out of sight and mind from the bottom of the deep seas before long.1 point
-
Umm. You didn’t look anything up until I corrected you YET AGAIN. And now that you’ve been busted you’re making hilarious claims calling a world-leading university a community college and pretending his degree in physics was a teacher’s diploma. Your original claim was that he didn’t have a degree not that he didn’t physically attend campus for his PHD.1 point
-
to a degree I think it's even simpler than that. I think they caved in that site and said we have successfully stopped them from being able to build bombs essentially. And then they said to them if you start to dig this out or try and repair the facility there's going to be a problem. If you leave it as it is that's fine we're satisfied And they started to try and dig it out and get back to refining material nor the warning. I mean no matter what the US bombed or how successful it was I ran can rebuild what was blown up. They were told not to and according to reports they were going ahead anyway and rather then enter into yet another round of negotiations or attempts to dissuade them the us and israel agreed they'd had enough. The initial strike could have been very successful and iran could still be looking at rebuilding. The two are not mutually exclusive.1 point
-
It's looking like a wrecking ball aimed at Republicans. From where I'm sitting, much like it has since I started voting over 45 years ago.1 point
-
*sigh* No, Dummy! Here is straight from Chat GPT Undergraduate Degree – In 1896, he enrolled at the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School in Zürich (later ETH Zurich) to become a teacher in physics and mathematics. He graduated in 1900 with a diploma in teaching in these subjects, which is roughly equivalent to a Bachelor’s degree in Physics and Mathematics today. He eventually earned his Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in 1905 from the University of Zürich with a dissertation titled “A New Determination of Molecular Dimensions”, which was awarded the same year he published his groundbreaking papers on special relativity. So in summary: Diploma in Physics/Mathematics Teaching from ETH Zurich (1900) PhD in Physics from University of Zürich (1905) Also: the Swiss Federal Polytechnic School (today called ETH Zurich) was not a community college at all. It was — and still is — one of the top science and engineering universities in the world. …. Look I get why you uneducated folk really want to cling to this narrative it makes you feel like you’re not dumb when the world is constantly telling you otherwise. You want to believe that you too might be able to win a Nobel Prize someday. Unfortunately it’s not true. But don’t worry, a Nobel prize is definitely beyond your reach but if you can’t steal one then there’s always a FIFA prize easily within anyone’s grasp.1 point
-
L. Wayne Matheson: The Bureaucratic Deep Freeze: Are We Talking Ourselves to Death? Running a modern government sometimes feels like watching five people hold a meeting about a shovel while the snow keeps piling up outside. Everyone agrees the driveway needs clearing. Nobody actually picks up the shovel. Look at the gridlock creeping through modern Canadian institutions. Our institutions no longer reward solving problems. They reward managing the process around the problem. The old approach to a problem was blunt and direct. See a fire, grab a hose. The newer institutional approach looks very different. See a fire, schedule a meeting. Draft a report on the social drivers of combustion. Commission a consultant to examine the emotional effects of flames on the community. Release a statement acknowledging people’s concerns about heat. For a process-driven institution, the discussion itself becomes the accomplishment. The meeting counts as the work. Look around Canada and ask yourself if that description feels uncomfortably familiar. This used to be a country that built things. Railways. Dams. Energy projects. Entire cities carved out of forest and prairie. Today we hold consultations about the possibility of maybe building something later, provided the environmental assessment, regulatory review, indigenous consultation, climate alignment report, and equity audit all land perfectly on the same square inch of bureaucratic paper. The ArriveCan app is the perfect little parable of this mindset. In a sane world it should have been a simple coding job. A small team builds it in a weekend. Done. Instead it turned into a $60-million bureaucratic circus. A tiny firm received the contract, subcontracted it to others, who subcontracted it again, until the whole thing looked like a bureaucratic version of Russian nesting dolls. No one owned the result. Everyone owned a piece of the process. Money disappeared. Responsibility disappeared. The paperwork thrived. Helen Andrews argues that when institutions drift toward heavy process culture, empathy and safety become the dominant currencies. Risk becomes taboo. Decision becomes dangerous. So the system replaces action with consultation and courage with compliance. You could see this clearly during the pandemic. The task should have been straightforward: protect the vulnerable, keep the country functioning, and manage risk like adults. Instead we pursued the fantasy of zero risk. Whole sectors of society were frozen while officials held press conferences filled with soothing language and carefully calibrated concern. Safety theatre replaced problem solving. Watch a federal press conference today and you can almost feel the language doing gymnastics to avoid decisive statements. Everything becomes a study, a framework, a consultation, a dialogue. Meanwhile real problems sit outside the meeting room waiting for someone to act. Homeless encampments grow. Infrastructure projects stall. Housing shortages intensify. Yet the policy response often looks like another working group, another task force, another carefully moderated conversation about “lived experience.” Talking expands. Solutions shrink. It feels a bit like sitting at a red light in Winnipeg in February. Engine running. Gas burning. Wheels not moving. The radio cheerfully announces that officials are launching a new study into traffic congestion. The uncomfortable question here is not whether Adam Carolla’s terminology offends polite society. The real question is whether the diagnosis contains a grain of truth. Have our institutions drifted so far into consensus-seeking, risk-avoiding process that we have forgotten how to simply do the job?1 point
-
yes - it will consequently reduce voter participation of people who aren't allowed to vote - and that hurts the Democrats, which is why they are against this bill. And those carrying water for them either KNOW that, or are actually dumb enough to drink the "THIS WILL REDUCE VOTER PARTICIPATION" kool-aid, which is just so horribly racist, and extremely stupid. So now women are also too dumb to be able to get ID. Amazing - there is no end to the misogyny and racism of the stupid Left. Just disgusting.1 point
-
A lot of the restrictions on resource projects is provincial (like the NB natural gas moratorium you highlighted previously). While I agree with the sentiment around Canada not doing enough to develop its resources (or to obstruct that altogether), the reasons why we don't do certain things aren't always as simple as "the guberment". Things like rare earths are a good example. Rare earths aren't rare. They're everywhere. They're just expensive to extract and process, and the initial investment is prohibitive when there are cheaper and larger-scaled operations in China. These are strategic resources and we SHOULD be self-sufficient on them, but in this would probably be something the government would have to subsidize to remain independent of China.1 point
-
Lol...I got the quote from Google.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
You pin the blame for the sad state of the country on the opposition party? Isn't it more sensible to put that on...the one's that were actually in charge?1 point
