Leaderboard

If you're still pumping this crap, you're dumber than a rock. Even evil doom goblin Greta has moved on to hating Jews as she knows this scam is dead. Now all that remains is jailing those who benefited from this massive hoax. As soon as possible.

Well, at LEAST the occasional one anyway You think the world is better if democracy is repressed through violence do you. Well.... no shock. no need to pretend. I don't wish people i don't like dead just because i don't agree with them. Have you EVER heard me wish trudeau or carney dead? I think they're 1000 times worse than trump, yet i've never suggested anything close to that. I've never wished any of the leftist numbars dead either, and that includes biden when it was announced he had a fatal illness. Normal, decent people don't do that very often. But the left does. They want trump dead, they want kirk dead, they want executives in the medical insurance industry dead, they want the jews dead and hell you even want me dead. That's just the kind of people you and the left are these days. But that's you, don't project your own mental health issues on us. Not at all. The same could be said of the jews, the corporate execs, the christians and the right wing free speech advocates. If any of them died your kind would be out celebrating the violence and their death. I'm well aware of that. Like i said. It's the kind of monsters you are.

Given Biden's all aliens open house during the 4 years of his fraudulent presidency, this becomes more than just reasonable, it becomes imperative: American citizens — and only American citizens — should decide American elections. The Save America Act is a common sense, bipartisan bill that would simply require — A Valid ID Before Registering to Vote in a Federal Election Proof of Citizenship No Mail-in Ballots (Except for Illness, Disability, Military or Travel https://www.whitehouse.gov/saveamerica/

That's all she has to do, eh? To be clear, I was asking if that was true, I don't know what to believe. Those are incredibly restrictive requirements, far beyond what is needed. When you register to vote, are you not checked then for citizenship? Is your name not put on a roll where it is checked at the polling station? Does the person there not check a photo ID against the roll and cross you off when you're handed a ballot? HTG that's more than sufficient. Passports and birth certificates are absurd requirements, and women do not 'change' a BC. They're not born Mrs Marriedname. It's a restricitve and backwards a requiring voters to be land ownsers, males, white or 'freed' men or pay a poll tax.

Leftists are so unaware of human history that they never heard of the climate scam before. Shaman started saying: "If you don't let me boink your daughters then [the crops will fail, the caribou won't come back, etc] and we will all die" ten thousand years ago, and "if the scam ain't broke, don't fix it." Can you imagine the panic among leftists a few thousand years ago, when the shaman were saying "The ice over Boston is only a mile thick! We're all gonna die if that all melts! I need to boink your daughters faster!"? Don't ask me how they knew about Boston though. It's one of life's great mysteries 🤣

Nobody ever talks about what Trump did with the Trump Accounts - putting $1000 into children's accounts to accrue over their lifetime. It's brilliant. So much so that a couple of big companies, Dell computers for one, also added to the accounts. This is what billionaires should be doing.

Sounds pretty good alright. I'd consider it if we joined as 13 states not just one. Giving Puerto Rico full statehood status with equal representation in Washington would probably help instill some confidence in the sincerity of your invitation to us.

You have posted agreement with everything the Liberals have done in the last 10 years. The fact that you support and cheer for failed policies, tells us you don't give a crap about them. The vast majority of your posts are slamming Poilievre on-camera appearance and stating nobody likes him. when it's pointed out to you that he has good policies, you say it doesn't matter. Because no one likes him. That's it. Oh, and thousands of posts like this: LOLLLL LOLLLL LLOOOOOOSESESRRESERSR LLOL LOL LOL LOOOOOOSSSSEERR LOL LOL LOOOOOOOOLLLLLLL LOOOOSER LOL LOL LOOOOSER LOOOOOOOSSSSSSEEETRTTTT LOL LOOOOOLL LLOOLLLL Sorrynotsorry, but thousands of posts like that - not a sign of intelligence.

No you don't. You've all said many times, you don't care about policies. You care about Poilievres' physical appearance. You state it multiple times every day. Ya, we get it. You're pooping your pants every time Trump tweets. That's your priority. Not the economy, not jobs, not healthcare, not housing, not resource development, not budgeting, not skyrocketing deficits, not 25% of Canadians who can no longer afford to feed themselves. Your only focus is on the US president and not your own country. Trump. That's it. That's all.

So-called, Climate Change will crap on the global economy, not the reverse. Ur correct tho, to call it a crisis is arguably a dramatic description - crisis signifying urgency? The global economy is just that - reliance on other Nations .......... for the sake of argument lets focus on domestic food security in terms of import and export. The U.S. is a major player in global food production - huge industry - worth about 200 billion - feeds the world, baby. Agriculture depends on weather patterns and the all important access to fresh water. A recent study found intensifying climatic extremes, combined with disruptive human interventions (groundwater overextractions) are driving alarming water related agricultural costs. The cost of production and the cost to the domestic consumer is a direct relationship - think inflation. Now project this inadequacy of fresh-water -security globally and the effects on those countries food security concerns, their exports and the effect on their economies. Ya think it could affect global food security and if it did, what would be the result - Four Horses of the Apocalypse, maybe? Climate change is not a crisis - but it is insidious. Likely it will not have a dramatic effect on this gen - maybe the next - but def the following. Relax - it don't concern U - old man! haha

What exactly are you trying to say... You're correct that we certainly haven't 'spent' enough on our military and defence. The key word here in case you missed it is 'haven't'. Your complaint this time is about....what?

Geologists overwhelmingly agree with the scientific consensus, but deniers do seem most likely to come from those looking down more than up. I don't think that it's a coincidence that this is the discipline most closely tied to mining and fossil fuel industries.

Say it with me - Robo lives in his mommy's basement

Dow futures tumble 800 points as U.S. oil tops $100 a barrel to begin the week's trading https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2026/03/08/stock-market-today-live-updates.html The Iran War Is Jeopardizing the Entire Global Economy The fallout from conflict in the Gulf will be much bigger than just oil. https://foreignpolicy.com/2026/03/04/iran-war-dubai-saudi-qatar-global-economy-oil-shipping-trade/ War with Iran spreading economic damage far beyond oil and gas markets https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2026/03/08/iran-war-economy-air-freight/ Iran war could make affordability bigger issue in 2026 elections PUBLISHED SAT, MAR 7 2026 8:00 AM ESTUPDATED SAT, MAR 7 2026 12:27 PM EST Garrett Downs@_GARRETTDOWNS@IN/GARRETT-DOWNS-28528513B/ Justin Papp@JUSTINJPAPP1@IN/JUSTIN-PAPP WATCH LIVE KEY POINTS Democrats hoping to flip the House and Senate in the 2026 midterm elections are dialing up their messaging on cost-of-living issues after the United States and Israel launched military strikes against Iran. U.S. crude oil has jumped past $90 per barrel, up from $67 the day before the Iran war broke out. Republicans are projecting confidence, predicting a short conflict and arguing they can continue to work on affordability while the country is at war. The war is unpopular with the American public, at a time that 61% of voters disapprove of President Donald Trump's management of the economy. https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2026/03/07/iran-war-affordability-midterm.html Majority of Americans oppose Trump’s Iran strikes, per new polling https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/02/trump-iran-strikes-polling-00807060 Unpopularity of Iran war 'almost unprecedented' this early on, expert says "even in the most controversial wars, like Iraq, when the war initiates, people tend to rally around the flag [...] this is remarkable that at the very beginning of the war there's overwhelming opposition not only from liberals and the left, but much of Trump's spaces as well". https://www.france24.com/en/unpopularity-of-iran-war-almost-unprecedented-this-early-on-expert-says

No. Pay attention. Counting on the ability of Canada to pull it together when we actually need to. Compared to you arseholes turning your Shiny Beacon into the Flaming Eye of Mordor? LMAO! You forgot where I said we built 4th largest army when we needed it already? What's wrong with you, how did you miss that? Your country will be a failed state in 15 years if not sooner. We'll definitely need to strengthen our border for that.

As a westerner, I have no dog in this fight.

Question, who is smarter (most likely) Person A: creates informative posts that use external links as supportive or contradicting sources Or Person B: Spambot that posts links but cannot form a coherent thought in support or opposition of the link...also never posts a link that opposes his views

You are an objectively stupid person who has nothing of value to contribute. You talk so much with so little to say, and worse, you spam the board with your bullshit. Join a select group of like minded people on my ignore list.

They've done the math. Women are more likely to register. Women are more likely to turn out. And women are more likely to vote Democrat. So the more they can disenfranchise women--particularly urban and poor women--the happier Republicans will be.

I saw PBR saying a cpl weeks ago that the building that the school is in used to be a part of the nearby naval base, and for all I know that's wrong too. I doubt we will ever know who did that, but we do know why: if the US/IDF did that it was a mistake of some sort, because killing girls obviously doesn't advance their agenda It's possible that Iran did it, and if they did, it was intentional, because killing children to be used as props is a mainstay of terrorist propaganda.

It was your "strategic" voting weakness that caused the Liberal "win". All those little NDP "brains" doing exactly what the CBC told them, go vote for the Liberal pansy.

Didn't scare me, I voted Khmer Orange and probably very well prevented a Liberal majority too. If we'd completely lost our silly heads and voted for the Conservative hereabout the Liberal would have won! Voting strategically to achieve the desired outcome that's best for the country takes real acumen. You're welcome.

Trump did not sign a surrender. Afghanistan was not controlled by the Taliban; there was still an Afghan government. The Taliban was not left to run wild. The US was still providing logistical support to the local Afghan government. Advising, equipment, and intelligence. Biden did not leave with any grace at all. The Taliban were not following the terms of the deal and Biden did nothing more than advertise to them we were leaving and it didn't matter which further emboldened them to prepare for the major counter offensive to retake all of Afghanistan the moment we left. That was Biden's doing. Not Trumps.

You should be grateful and deferential to those of us with the good sense to vote strategically to prevent a majority. Our vote clearly mattered every bit as as yours. More in our case - if Dippers even more chicken hearted than the ones who voted Liberal had voted for the Conservative candidate here the Liberal would have won. You're welcome, and I'm being charitable.

Once again, I deal in facts; you deal in baseless rhetoric.

Another lie. Many states already have voter ID laws in place, and voter registration increases. There is no widespread significant issue with women or minorities being able to vote.

Update - Australia changes course thanks to President Trump, and now isn't sending these brave young feminists (actual feminists, not the fake lib-lefty nose-ringed blue-haired white liberal kind) to their deaths after all.

I really hope this goes through. It can't be a coincidence that the Democrats only won the electoral college votes of the states that DON'T require voter ID. Let's see what happens when people in those states have to prove they exist before they can vote, and aren't in the country illegally.

Yes the sky is falling boy who cried wolf cult has had it's way with taxpayer pocket books for decades, and trillions of dollars have been grifted, all in the name of a scam. Finally people are waking up. I've been saying this for years. When you want to steal money from taxpayers but can't quantify how much "climate change" you are going to counter by the theft, then you are eventually going to run out of suckers. As I said, even Greta the doom goblin princess has moved on and is now making a living sucking down money from her Daddy Soros to go hate Jews in "Freedom Flotillas". Time to move on to the next grift guys, this one is dead.

They're both being scammed by Carney. Just like the Canadian people. Under the Liberals, our resources will never be developed. Our taxes will never benefit Canadians at home. We will continue to crumble. Canada is lost.

Taiwan asks Canada to export oil, calls it a “National Security Issue” I guess we would have to clear it with our new 'strategic partner' first. https://www.junonews.com/p/exclusive-taiwan-asks-canada-to-export It's a pity that our own federal government has been the biggest obstacle to more oil and gas development. https://www.canadaaction.ca/foreign-countries-ask-canada-for-lng-2022

Sounds like a lot of could, maybe, might, possibly, potentially..... Yet we've thrown trillions of dollars at this, with no measurable results. And they want that amount of money to go up 5X. Annual finance for climate action surpasses USD 1 trillion, but far from levels needed to avoid devastating future losses - CPI A new study shows that annual climate finance flows surpassed USD 1 trillion for the first time in 2021, six years after the Paris Agreement was adopted in 2015. However, flows must increase by at least five-fold annually by 2030 to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. And you think this has no effect on economies? As Bill Gates emailed to J. Epstein: "How do we get rid of poor people?" This is how. And they know it.

Doesn't have to be a crisis, only needs to be a risk. POTENTIAL impacts aren't certain but they could be huge. Any "crapping on the economy" equals single digit drag on GDP, ie you're being hyperbolic.

So called, anti-scientific beliefs in a flat Earth are promoted by a number of organizations and individuals. The claims of modern flat earth proponents are not based on scientific knowledge and are contrary to over two millennia of scientific consensus base on multiple confirming lines of evidence that the Earth is roughly spherical. Flat Earth beliefs are classified by experts in physics as a form of science denial. Publishing reams of data supporting the belief that the planet is indeed spherical would be pointless. For a political hack, the easiest way to solve a problem is to deny that it exists.

Indefinite and enduring.

Operational Excellence, Strategic Incompetence The president and his advisers are in the grip of “victory disease.” Tom NicholsMarch 6, 2026 The president and his advisers are in the grip of “victory disease.” The war in Iran has reaffirmed two truths. One is that the United States is blessed with the most professional and effective military in the world. The men and women of the American armed forces can conduct missions of almost any size with formidable competence, from special operations to seize a rogue-state president to a large-scale war. The other truth is that the Trump administration, when it comes to strategy, is incompetent. Strategy is about matching the instruments of national power—and especially military force—to the goals of national policy. The president and his team, however, have not enunciated an overarching goal for this war—or, more accurately, they have presented multiple goals and chosen among them almost randomly, depending on the day or the hour. This means that highly effective military operations are taking place in a strategic vacuum. Worse, Donald Trump is now pointing to these missions as if the excellence with which they have been conducted somehow constitutes a strategy in itself. He appears so enthralled by the execution of these missions that he has enlarged the goals of this war to include the complete destruction of the Iranian regime, after which he will “Make Iran Great Again.” This kind of thinking is an old problem, and it has a name: “victory disease,” meaning that victory in battle encourages leaders to seek out more battles, and then to believe that winning those battles means that they are winning the larger war or achieving some grand strategic aim—right up until the moment they realize that they have overreached and find themselves facing a military disaster or even total defeat. It is a condition that has afflicted many kinds of regimes over the course of history, one so common that my colleagues and I lectured military officers about it when I was a professor at the Naval War College. The issue is especially important for Americans, because when national leaders have exceptionally capable military forces at their disposal—as the United States does—they are even more likely to be seized by victory disease. …And now Trump seems to have contracted a whopping case of victory disease. He is clearly convinced that previous operations in Venezuela, Nigeria, Somalia, Syria, and, of course, Iran are all evidence that a total victory over the regime in Tehran will be relatively quick. But he has provided no conception of what “victory” would look like. As of yesterday, his goals have expanded to include a demand for “unconditional surrender.” Admiring the performance of the U.S. military is understandable. But it is not the same thing as using that military power to achieve some national purpose. Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth so far seem to be enjoying the fireworks. But the efficient and rapid destruction of buildings and machines, and the killing of some enemy leaders, is not the same thing as a strategy. ….Operational competence, however, cannot answer the question of national purpose. What is the war about, and when will America know it’s done? Trump, when pressed, dodges the issue of war aims by pointing to the excellence of the military. “I hope you are impressed,” Trump said on Thursday to ABC’s Jonathan Karl. “How do you like the performance? I mean, Venezuela is obvious. This might be even better.” Trump then repeated, “How do you like the performance?” Karl noted that no one is questioning the success of military operations, and he asked the president what happens next. “Forget about ‘next,’” Trump answered. “They are decimated for a 10-year period before they could build it back.” …Each time Trump or one of his lieutenants speaks this way, they generate more questions than answers. Yes, military operations are proceeding impressively, with very few casualties among the U.S. and Israeli operators. But what would have constituted a “10” that we can now say that America is at a “15”? Now that Trump, at least for the time being, has issued a call for “unconditional surrender,” perhaps vaporizing every piece of military hardware with an Iranian flag on it is enough. Comments on Thursday by Hegseth and Admiral Brad Cooper of Central Command suggest that this seems to be the plan. But “unconditional surrender” is unlikely to last. To effect such a total defeat, Iran would have to be occupied and administered by the victors. This kind of language is at odds with the reluctance of some in the Trump administration and other Republicans, including Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, to even call Operation Epic Fury a “war.” (I will exercise my prerogative here as someone who has studied and taught national security and international relations and confirm that when you bomb a nation, kill its leaders, and call for its people to rise up, you’re engaged in war, and if you call for “unconditional surrender,” you are definitely at war.) Trump will likely find himself backpedaling from the demand for unconditional surrender. He might also redefine unconditionalto denote more easily achieved aims. (Indeed, hours after Trump’s post, the White House spokesperson Karoline Leavittwas already offering an interpretation of unconditionalthat was far more limited than absolute capitulation.) Soon, the Americans could find themselves retreating to the strategic incoherence that has characterized the administration’s approach since the first hours of the war. Military operations and national purpose will become more and more distanced from each other, because military prowess cannot clarify America’s war aims. As the old saying warns: If you don’t know where you’re going, any road will get you there My colleagues Marie-Rose Sheinerman and Isabel Ruehl have pointed out the severity of this problem by noting that Trump and his aides have offered at least 10 rationales for war over the course of only six days. Rationale No. 1 was “an imminent threat” from Iran, Rationale No. 2 was nuclear weapons, Rationale No. 5 was election interference, Rationale No. 6 was “world peace” writ large, Rationale No. 10 was that America had been dragged into the war by Israel. Some of these reasons might constitute a casus belli—others, such as Rationale No. 9 (“fulfill God’s purpose”), less so—but Trump’s team has thrown them all at the wall to see what sticks, perhaps in part because the war is still unpopular with the American public and Trump has so far seen no “rally ’round the flag” benefit from launching it. But each of these rationales demands a different strategy; eliminating an imminent threat involves a different set of operations than establishing peace in the region (or the world). Instead, the Americans are choosing an “all of the above” approach, employing immense power across Iran. Entranced by the show, Trump, Hegseth, and others assume that because these operations are going well, something good will come of them. This kind of poor strategy, ironically, is an option only because of the excellence of the American and Israeli militaries: If Trump had to make decisions under greater material or military constraints, such as shortages of money, weapons, or talent, he would have to choose an actual war aim and stay with it. If the goal is regime change and “unconditional surrender,” do current U.S. operations support that goal? Again, military prowess and victory disease may be encouraging the White House to avoid thinking about some hard realities. Regimes are not changed by bombing; they are put in place by men and women wearing boots and carrying guns. (These need not be American boots, but they have to be somebody’s boots.) Trump has called for the Iranians to surrender, but to whom? A U.S. occupation force? Or is an internal group of rebels assembling in Iran? In any case, a new regime will have to gain support by rebuilding infrastructure that’s being destroyed. Are the target sets being adjusted accordingly over time? No one can answer these questions, because the civilian leadership of the United States does not seem to have thought them through. Meanwhile, despite the successes of the military overseas, Trump now admits that a regime that was supposed to be eliminated quickly could reach the United States with terrorist attacks. He told Time this week that “we expect some things. Like I said, some people will die. When you go to war, some people will die.” The American people might be willing to tolerate such risks if they knew what their sons and and daughters were fighting for and how long they would be at war. Trump has retreated behind the skill of the U.S. military rather than answer such questions. Perhaps the greatest danger of the current epidemic of victory disease is that it seems to be making Donald Trump think he’s a brilliant strategist: He is already talking about overthrowing the government of Cuba, even as American forces are still fighting in the Middle East, and the threat of terror may well be growing at home now that the United States is at war. At this point, all Americans can do is admire the fortitude and excellence of the U.S. military while hoping for victory—whatever that is, and whenever it comes. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/03/iran-strategy-victory-disease/686275/

In reality, the US is almost certainly responsible for bombing that school that killed 170 children The U.S. military was targeting an area near bombed Iranian school, sources say Three witnesses and an education official told NBC News that the school was located on a former Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps base that closed 15 years ago. Just Gazan citizens. LMAO It is Israel who was continualy threatening to BOMB Iran and finally did.

this is Canada Mike. But thanks for paying attention

It’s too bad poll numbers don’t fix problems. We wouldn’t be waiting 11 years and counting for solutions.

Breaching conflict of interest laws? Not exactly - these are only administrative fines $100-250 for missing deadlines to file your paperwork. Since enacted in 2006 there have been some 68 fines issued. Mostly to Liberals, 4 cabinet ministers under Harper's watch, twice in Peter McKay's case - and it was Harper's Conservatives who created the Conflict of Interest Act and modern Ethics Commissioner's role and system of fines. These and their Accountability Act were well intended and I'm sure their hearts were in the right place but they're obviously lame in scope and easy to circumvent. Maybe next time, if at first you don't succeed, try try again.

Oh, I'm not off track. Notice these perverts NEVER talk about the Republic piece or even the Constututional piece - it is ALWAYS the democracy piece which could mean anything - majority rule (the two wolves and a sheep idea), mob rule - anything that takes the republic piece out. In essense, "democracy" is code for anything but what it was meant to be.

Yet another invented word by the moronic Left. The fearmongering just never stops.

Your faith in the nobility of the pathological LIAR is misplaced. The Ayatollahs gained power due to the corruption and brutality of the CIA installed government.

Hm... Is that how it went in Venezuela? Did he hand the government over to the opposition party that actually won the last election? Or did he keep the same corrupt government in place and squeeze them for oil? Trump did something that benefitted you. Don't confuse that with thinking that Trump did it to benefit you. He acts out of self interest. He will happily leave some version of the current government in place if he feels he can benefit from it. He simply wants to be involved in picking the next leader so that he can extract concessions and $ from them.

Because you are using your prejudices to make assumptions that don't align with reality.