Leaderboard

What’s happening in BC with the court’s disregard for land titles AND the BC government’s implementation of an international declaration on Indigenous rights (UNDRIP) illustrates exactly why Canadians should question the views driving their various levels of government. Ontario is coming under similar pressure in court rulings in places like Saugeen Beach. Our Constitution has no protection of property thanks to a bad deal made with the NDP in the Pierre Trudeau era. This lack of property protection is one of the factors that makes Canadian sovereignty vulnerable. If arguments brought forward by people today regarding land that belonged to ancestors centuries ago is enough to overturn private property title, Canadians will embrace citizenship in a country that will protect their property title, namely the United States. The truth that Canadians are grudgingly realizing is that mamby pamby government that sells out Canadian culture in order to avoid confrontation with radical activists or politically correct internationalists is destroying Canada. J.D. Vance was right on Canada and Europe: Governments in these jurisdictions are undermining the rights, cultures, and interests of taxpaying citizens. Canadian French and English cultures, the founding cultures of Canada, have been de facto labeled colonial by the government and replaced with international mandates and multiculturalism. Questionable claims by Indigenous groups, many of whose ancestors kept slaves, warred against other tribes, and were largely nomadic or lived only a few years in one place, are suddenly able to overturn property title because of recent implementation of international rules that Canadians never agreed to. Rather than affirming Canadian identity and making it affordable and respected to have kids, the government simply opens the floodgates to mass migration from countries with very different values from these Judeo-Christian founding cultures. This is the story in Canada and Europe This is why Western Christendom and Western culture is disappearing. For whatever else Trump is doing that I might disagree with, he is the only Western world leader of a major power pushing back against “civilizational erasure.”

The motion was to support a pipeline to the pacific. Regardless, no, it's Canada that loses, and has lost over the last decade with terrible Liberal policies that have made Canada much worse. I don't know why you think that policies that make Canada worse is good for Canada, it's very odd. You and your ilk have ruined the country, yet you clap for the Liberals like trained seals.

Well, those Republicans have vastly underestimated Jasmine Crockett. She is vastly more intelligent than a whole group of Republicans put together. Trump is scared of her. I love the ad she put out:

Will the real Jasmine Crockett please stand up?

The global civil society alliance Civicus – an influential network of organizations at the local, national, regional and international levels – has updated their country ratings and global assessment on civic freedoms. Click on this link to go to a map showing the ratings of different countries around the world. Canada is classified as an “open” society, with a score of 82/100 The USA has had its rating downgraded from “narrowed” to “obstructed” – with a score of 56/100 Some of the reasons leading to the downslide in the US score are: · Laws rewritten to punish dissent · Agencies militarized · Public media dismantled · Civil liberties weakened · Surveillance normalized · Propaganda institutionalized The American public is being suppressed rather than served.

Like what? So far he's delivered precisely what he said he would during his campaign. For better or worse. What's the false pretense? Again, how? Sounds like something you'd hear in an echo chamber, i don't see any indication that anyone's 'enthralled' by manipulation. People just seem to like him or his ideas so far. And where did he rob the country? And how would that make him a 'con artist'? Again, not really a 'con man' activity. And at least he didn't call them human garbage like biden or deplorables like clinton. So far he's delivering what he said he would. A person who sells you something then delivers exactly what he sold you isn't a con man Again your entire argument seems to be 'Me no like him" and that's fine, but it's not being a 'con man'. I think trump really believes what he's doing is the best thing for people. Which doesn't mean he's not a narcissistic borderline sociopath. But it does rule out 'con man'. It's like you pick whatever insult you think sounds bad and run with that, then your reason for it is 'orange man bad". There's enough legit reasons to criticize trump without making stuff up isn't there? And if there isn't then why don't you like him?

@User - my dear User, I have posted all kinds of information with specifics, and I am just not inclined to repost it. Sorry.

It is a weird way to do it, but i guess you at least admitted you were wrong. Thanks.

Selective assimilation, yes that’s the word. Immigration does not mean blanket immigration from every p!ss poor third world. Nor does it mean America has to assimilate every culture. Diversity of culture isn’t a strength, it’s a recipe for balkanization and ethnic cleansing. Diversity of ideas is a strength, don’t conflate the two, don’t be a leftist.

According to NOTUS’s Reese Gorman, “Republicans’ Senate campaign arm has actively worked behind the scenes to encourage Rep. Jasmine Crockett to jump into the Senate Democratic primary in Texas, believing she will be the easiest opponent to beat.” The GOP, per Gorman, viewed both declared Democrats already competing for their party’s nomination, Colin Allred and James Talarico, as “formidable.” Republican insiders don’t share the same view of Crockett. Lmao...she is so dumb that she believed all the fake calls and polls the Republicans sent her way.

Who did not believe that BLM was a scam? Anyone. Of course it was a scam and these grifters made millions off the donations of white guilt liberals.

Carney caught meeting Brookfield execs despite ethics warnings He has millions and millions of dollars in share futures with Brooksfield, he's almost certain to go back to working for Brooksfield when he leaves politics, and now we find out he's still meeting with executives from brookfields While he still has the ability to pass laws which will directly impact their success All of which was against the ethics Commissioners warnings Just like Trudeau he didn't manage to go 6 months without breaking the ethics rules and displaying corruption

Except, you didn’t make that point. You are illogical concluding because some of what he does overlaps with Project 2025 that proves he lied. It doesn’t. You are also exaggerating and you are wrong, when you claim “everything” he does overlaps with it.

I agree. However....what better argument does Jazzy Crocket have? I think her only chance is to play the victim card. She's got no plans that I am aware of. The only thing that will hit the floor is what's left of his brains as they ooze out of his ears. He is in complete melt down mode.

That's objectively false. You should listen to Crockett instead of that liar Trump.

Do you think it's better than the ad that Senator Mack, the Democrat Senator from Rhode Island, put on Tik Tock? "Vote Senator Mack!" 🤣

Hence no point...

I wouldn't call her "dumb"...exactly. From what I have seen, she was raised in a very affluent family, went to exclusive schools, and I've seen clips where she speaks English properly. No...not "dumb". An "opportunistic liar" is what I call her. Jasmine Crockett didn't speak "ghetto" before she entered politics and she came on strong with the whole shtick after The Donald became POTUS...again. Now she sounds like an angry, fatherless product of Harlem. The Harlot from Harlem. The whole get-up is an act...a lie. I'd bet her mom and dad would rather she be herself when visiting. But once again, we see the power of rage-based, faux outrage. TDS for profit. Seriously insidious.

Then why vote against a non-binding agreement?

“Pandemics” do not care about anything. They are not sentient beings. The people in charge of government and in control responding to a pandemic do care about pandering, do have motives, and do not act perfectly according to science.

Yep. The point is that we would prefer that NOT to happen here because all cultures are not equal and it is OK to value your own culture and not want it erased or replaced.

No. Read the whole post.

It's not an agreement, it's a memorandum of understanding. You really do fall for all of their symbolism huh? What a rube! LOL

Why should taxpayers pay for vaccines that are not mandatory? Why should taxpayers pay billions for making unnecessary vaccines mandatory? If you want a vaccine, go get it. On your own dime.

And that is just it, no one is saying it’s not great to have a local taco shop flavor, but that doesn’t mean we are not bothered if the whole town speaks Spanish and there is little more than tacos… all because the government decided to allow in 100,000 refugees that swamped an existing small town community and completely changed everything. it’s ok to care about that and not like it.

Roots are fine. My family still speak Hungarian and Czech as well as English. I happen to love Chicken Paprikas. So what? My ALLEGIANCE is to Canada...where I was born and raised. What allegiance does the Tim Horton's manager have when he will only hire East Indians?

One of his biggest cons was insisting before the election he had nothing to do with Project 2025. In the video clip below, he is saying it: "I have nothing to do with Project 2025" But since his inauguration, Project 2025 has become the guiding light of his administration. Some of his executive orders use the very language of Project 2025. According to the Project 2025 Tracker, the Trump Administration has implemented 319 objectives laid out in Project 2025, affecting 34 different agencies. For example, here are the last three objectives completed: Eliminate the Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations. Eliminate the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy or reduce its funding. Eliminate the Office of Grid Deployment.

It is where I am today. 10 years of arguing about results Vs. morality lectures from Tweenkies who use morality like Silly-Putty.

Make do as best we can with work-arounds and commercial systems. New rifles on the way for Canada's soldiers as defence spending ramps up A program intended to replace the entire stock of the Canadian military’s aging assault rifles is being sped up, CBC News has learned. An internal Department of National Defence presentation references a move to quickly order the first tranche of weapons under the Canadian Modular Assault Rifle program. The commander of the Canadian Army, Lt.-Gen. Mike Wright, confirmed in an interview with CBC News that the program, which has languished on the books for years, will now proceed with speedy delivery expected from a Canadian manufacturer. "We're on the cusp of signing a contract that will see those rifles start to be delivered to the Canadian Army as of next year," Wright said. Lt.-Gen. Mike Wright, the commander of the Canadian Army, says the rifle program that has languished on the books for years will soon have a contract in place.(Murray Brewster/CBC) That would be almost two years ahead of the last published schedule and is being made possible by the injection of more than $9 billion into the military as part of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s drive to reach NATO’s two per cent defence spending benchmark. A Defence Department equipment briefing, dated July 2025, says the plan is to order up to 65,401 modern rifles with the possibility being left open to increase the delivery up to 300,000 should the government proceed with a plan to drastically scale up the size of the military supplementary reserve. The internal presentation doesn’t contain a price tag, nor a precise delivery time, but the department’s defence capabilities website said the program could be worth between $500 million and $1 billion. The Canadian Modular Assault Rifle is intended to replace the current stock of C7 and C8 rifles, which date from the Afghan war almost two decades ago. Wright sees both the rifles and new day-to-day CADPAT camouflage pattern uniforms as important morale-boosters. Wright didn't reveal who the contract might go to. But Colt Canada, located in Kitchener, Ont., is in the running and has a long-standing relationship with the army. Buying Canadian would help the Liberal government's pitch to rebuild the country’s defence industrial base. Such an order would also provide a bit of political cover fire as the defence department pushes forward with the army’s demand for U.S.-manufactured rocket-propelled artillery, known as HIMARS. In October, the U.S. Defense Security Cooperation Agency, an arm of the State Department, gave Canada permission to buy up to 26 of the M142 rocket systems. A letter of offer needs to be extended before the contract can be signed. The army isn’t expected to take delivery until 2029, but the $2.7-billion program is politically uncomfortable because of the federal government’s stated aim of diversifying military equipment purchases away from the United States. "We're saying the HIMARS system is the long-range precision strike system that we need for land operations," Wright said. "It's a capability that's been proven on the battlefield in Ukraine. More importantly, of the systems that are available right now, it's the system that we can put onto the back of a Royal Canadian Air Force strategic airlift, the C-17, and deploy anywhere The other priority capabilities, according to Wright, are drones and BV 206 tracked carriers, an all-terrain transport vehicle specifically designed for the Arctic. The current stock of those vehicles is decades old. Rifles, uniforms, drones and the rocket-propelled artillery are elements in the broader overhaul of the army. A strategy, released earlier this year, said the aim is to prepare land forces to fight large-scale warfare, similar to what we’ve seen in Ukraine, rather than the guerilla-type wars of the early 2000s. Intersecting with the overhaul is a recently acknowledged mobilization plan which aims to create a pool of up to 300,000 supplemental reserves — or citizen soldiers. Wright said his focus, at the moment, is getting both the regular army and reserve units up to full strength and more troops into a deployable state. The Canadian Army currently has a field strength of approximately 22,500 regular force members and 21,500 primary reserve members. "I'm focused on fixing the house that we have," rather than building an addition, Wright said. The proposed larger, mobilized force is still in the military's future. But "it’s not tomorrow or next year that they're arriving," Wright said. Members of the Canadian military are getting a pay raise of up to 20 per cent, as the federal government looks to boost recruitment and retention in the ranks. The $2-billion spending package also includes new allowances for certain deployments and operations. Over the long term, Wright said he could see some armouries in major urban centres — many of them built a century ago, either reconfigured or relocated to the suburbs or bedroom communities, where most Canadians now live. The army is being reorganized to cut down on administration in order to provide one division to respond to domestic crises in Canada and one for deployment overseas. The Canadian Army currently has four main regional divisions — the 2nd (Quebec), 3rd (Western Canada), 4th (Ontario) and 5th (Atlantic Canada), which are responsible for providing troops and training within their regions. The division concept lends itself to rapid scaling up in a crisis and Wright said army planners are looking at the challenges. They conducted a planning exercise in September, known as war game, to test and think through some of the challenges of building an army quickly. When asked what the army learned, he suggested it was a lot, but didn’t go into detail. "Most importantly, it got people into the mindset," he said. https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/colt-modular-assault-rifles-army-9.7011113

Well...guess I'll have to strike Cuba from the vacation list for this winter.

Why? My goal is saving western civilization from extinction. I think that's a worthy and noble goal. Some immigration is no threat to that. If you put zero value on your own culture, traditions, ethnicity etc that's your prerogative. What would you say to an indigenous tribe in Canada trying to save itself, it's culture, it's people, from literal extinction? "Oh well. We're all earthlings. Get over it". It's not racist for them to try to conserve their culture, traditions etc, so why is it for us?

Yes, we know the Democrats are an openly anti-White cult. Keep normalizing this ratchet's behavior. Between her and Jennifer Welch, there's no better avatars for what the Democratic party truly is.

Run away!

But, it's not. I've never made up anything. This is just not true. I have brought up many specific things. This is your mantra: "You run away." I don't. Please educate yourself on what Trump is doing.

I honestly want to understand why you won't accept the truth of what is going on? I want to understand why there is no room in your brain for anything other than "illegal immigration." There is such a great amount of evidence indicating that Trump is harming the USA in so many ways, but you blithely refute it all, as if whatever problem illegal immigration poses can only be solved by Trump's corruption. Your massive denial of what Trump is doing to the USA indicates a sort of cowardice - afraid to face the truth.

I have to assume you do not understand the words of the following list

You know what I care about? Actions. Policy. What is actually being done. I am not being duped at all when I watch illegal border crossings plummet to all-time record lows because Trump is actually protecting the border. I am not duped as I watch for the first time in my life as net illegal immigration is at record lows as ICE is actually deporting people like they should be doing. I am not duped as I watch Trump dismantle wasteful government programs, as Hegseth transforms the military back into warfighters instead of woke policy enforcers... You see, these are all things I cheer on and support.

Bud Light? That's not beer. Velke Popovicske Kozel is Beer.

1. Yes, I admit this. But perception rules The day. I will even admit that most of the time I'm on the other side of the line, arguing reality over perception. And your points against me on this are 100% valid. But I also see what somebody like.. @Moonlight Graham means when he talks about everything falling apart in the last hundred years or so.

1. It has a very clear meaning in economics: it means that the poor pay a higher percentage of their income than the wealthy. It's pretty disingenuous for you to claim that it's meaningless, or that it's an opinion. 2. 3. Even though I disagree with the first paragraph that I quoted above, I will ask you politely for a cite for points 2 and 3. You are right about bureaucracy and building taxes though. Government needs to be run more quickly with less bureaucracy, but the politics of that itself is pretty tricky. The person who solves it will be a hero for all.

The actual source is the committee meetings. I watched this exchange yesterday. What you should be asking is why CBC never reports news that comes out of the committee meetings.

Some don't understand that Trump giving 3 different answers to the same question in a week makes him a CONMAN. Just this week Trump tried to tell a reporter that he never said he was OK with releasing the 2nd "tap" video of the Sept 2nd boat strike and then tried to tell the reporter it was her who said that. When she objected he just started calling her names. So PATHETIC. LMAO

Ah! More "Not angry" from you So no argument, or any kind of rebuttal, just "No You Dumb". Make an argument then. I would say that trump is not so much of a con man as he is a great performer. He has a way of charming people and getting people on board with his ideas and they believe in him. That's not a con man, that's just being charismatic and possibly populist. In many ways Justin Trudeau was very similar So you would have to make an argument as to why trump is a con man rather than just a populist or popular figure. I would argue that carney is more of a con man and trump is more of a circus performer or personality

This was from Nanos on April 13th. The advantage in the younger demographic wasn't huge and wasn't sweeping, whereas for the older demo it was a blowout. Regardless, we still recent polling to show what the younger generations actually think of PP: Imagine what the Conservatives could do if they didn't have an unlikeable, buffoonish shrill as their leader.

Oh no...Chatgpt thinks my view is reductive and judgmental, or that my (maybe) 1-2 posts per day makes me "deeply invested". If that's the case, how does that compare to 37-40 per day? Maybe ask Chatgpt again?! Your timing here is perfect though. I wonder if the fact you've crawled out of nowhere on the 34th page of a garbage thread has anything to do with the fact that I've spent the last week on this forum highlighting your comical levels of braindead MAGA devotion and Trumpy apologism...hmmm Either way, it's pretty solid evidence that (despite the overwhelming number of diarrhea posts he dumps on this forum), I am not nearly as devoted to responding to Fox as he fantasizes. Thanks for backing me up! 🤣👌

As you said, the AI has to rely on you for the question and the inputted information. I asked it a neutral question and fed it objective, verifiable facts about your post count: "What does posting 37000 times on a single political forum in 34 months say about a person?" Answer: In short: 37,000 posts in 34 months on one political board almost always means the forum isn’t a hobby; it is their primary social universe, and their life outside it is likely very empty or dysfunctional. It’s the online equivalent of someone who sits at the same bar arguing politics from open to close every single day for three years. You, on the other hand, fed your emotionality and projection into Grok and asked it to validate your feelings. It's exactly the sort of thing a dysfunctional loser with an empty social universe would do! 🤣

No, it's 7.58 hours consuming media, which includes listening to music/podcasts while at work or driving, walking the dog, going to the gym, making dinner etc. etc etc. We're not talking about that. We're talking about how much you waste emotionally ranting on a SINGLE FORUM. Chatgpt was given objective data and a question. If you don't like its answer, check Grok: https://grok.com/c/2397b03e-fba6-45d2-b701-0f8f2e959743?rid=64dc20c7-9e3d-4255-bedc-3b67cd1ccc48 Question: What does posting 37000 times on a single political forum in 34 months say about a person? Answer: In short: 37,000 posts in 34 months on one political board almost always means the forum isn’t a hobby; it is their primary social universe, and their life outside it is likely very empty or dysfunctional. It’s the online equivalent of someone who sits at the same bar arguing politics from open to close every single day for three years.

It wasn't my math. It was chatgpt's. Take it up with them. 🤡 Even if we believed you on the above (which nobody does): If they spend 2 hours/day on one forum… ➡️ Most of their free time goes to the forum. Interpretation Spending 50–80% of free time on a single online forum is: Not inherently pathological (many people spend that much on Netflix, games, Reddit, TikTok, etc.) But it does indicate a strong attachment to that forum specifically. Combined with hostility and frequent arguments, it could suggest the forum meets emotional or social needs that aren’t being met elsewhere. 🤡🤡🤡 Even Chatgpt thinks you're a loser, buddy boy!