Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 09/16/2025 in Posts

  1. Well it's comforting to know you keep @robosmith company in the "Wrong" column. At least it's not all alone.
    3 points
  2. How do you say 'FU, we'll think about investments when he's gone' in South Korean?
    3 points
  3. Not all leftists want to see conservatives dead but just like radical Islam there is enough of them to treat it as a serious threat.
    3 points
  4. Oops? They looked Mexican, maybe? https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/15/trump-foreign-workers-welcome-south-korea-arrests President Donald Trump has said foreign workers sent to the United States are “welcome” and he doesn’t want to “frighten off” investors, 10 days after hundreds of South Koreans were arrested at a work site in Georgia. In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump wrote: “I don’t want to frighten off or disincentivize investment. “I want them to bring their people of expertise for a period of time to teach and train our people how to make these very unique and complex products, as they phase out of our Country, and back into their land,” he wrote.
    2 points
  5. Wouldn't be due to her speaking Ukranian and Russian and being their most skilled in negotiations. The higher status and pay must be a demotion, eh?
    2 points
  6. 75 years ago. Now if only your side could acknowledge the Palestinians are the ones who have been commiting terrorism for the last 75 years.
    2 points
  7. 2 points
  8. Speech in and of itself should not be criminalized BUT if you say violent things then go out and commit something that is a crime, such as murdering someone, this could prove your INTENT.
    2 points
  9. Our SCOTUS has said that free speech ends when you call for violence. So, calling conservatives fascists and nazis is free speech unless they expressly or strongly imply violence. I agree with SCOTUS.
    2 points
  10. Bullshit. They didn't show up at those rallies with concrete milkshakes, gas masks, trash can lids, tire irons and other home made weapons to march peacefully. They went there to be violent.
    2 points
  11. Everything you don't like isn't racist and anti-Alphabet people. Especially when it's you people that are actually the racists and anti-women.
    2 points
  12. 2 points
  13. Irgun didn't "become the IDF", it was absorbed into it. Your false claim gives the impression that it had control over the IDF, which it did not. Irgun was a fringe group whose tactics and ideology were rejected by the mainstream Zionist leadership at the time they existed. Menachem Begin was PM of Israel 30 years after Irgun ceased to exist. Instead of terrorizing Palestinian Arabs with violence he negotiated the Camp David accords, signed a peace treaty with Egypt and normalized their relations, and gave them back the Sinai peninsula, for which he won a Nobel Peace Prize for. For some reason you continually make false claims that exaggerate or lie about the terrorism committed by Zionist Jews and yet stay pretty mum on the terrorism committed by Palestinian Arabs and their allies the last 100 years. Your western guilt won't allow you to not have double-standards.
    2 points
  14. So you swapped out violence for political reasons with people "associated" with what the authors consider a 'radical' group, even if it had nothing to do with the violence. For example based on that the 4 black people who tortured the disabled boy to death spouting BLM propaganda wouldn't count because they weren't actually officially part of BLM. And i bet they didn't include the violence or damages of the george floyd riots either right? Bad science, and i see you still can't address what i posted.
    2 points
  15. No. Your take is just stupid. What Kathy Griffin did was not a joke, and yet liberals pretended that it was. By condoning the sentiments of Kathy Griffin, Madonna, Depp, DeNiro, the cast of Hamilton, etc, the left were grooming their cultists to think of political killings as heroic.
    2 points
  16. I heard hints of this in the days after Kirk passed. This is the wrong reaction. Speech is speech. It does not matter what the adjective is. We cannot become Britain and start imprisoning people for words. If we do that than we are no different than the left.
    1 point
  17. No different here... I've said things that I've had to apologize for and am sure I will again. Maybe even today? My 2 cents though.... It doesn't matter what 'we' are average citizens do to bring civility to our society if the persons who lead our countries have no desire to change the narrative. Most things start at the top and as the saying goes, sh*t flows downhill. If our political leaders want divisiveness then we'll be divisive. If our political leaders have some sort of epiphany where they say enough is enough and regardless of your political stripes we're all the same then we may eventually get closer to a more politically sane society. Sadly, I am not hopeful at all for the latter....
    1 point
  18. New? I have been using this with you for a while now. No, your repeated lies and blaming everyone is pathetic.
    1 point
  19. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/defending-the-jury/eradicating-the-bench-trial/E584B1D51691AA3EB84692B101951602 Looks like Cambridge is doing hate speech against trial judges
    1 point
  20. Actually the definition is to "rid of" and I stand by my assertion that folks who abuse the bench for political purposes should be removed. In a judicial context: To "eradicate from the bench" a judge (specifically a federal judge) implies removing them from their judicial role. This process is called impeachment, and it involves the House of Representatives bringing articles of impeachment and the Senate holding a trial and voting on conviction.
    1 point
  21. How come you had nothing to say about the Minnesota senator getting shot? How come you didn’t take issue with the people like Donald Trump Jr who celebrated the attack on Paul Pelosi?
    1 point
  22. It's extremely easy to argue that. He engaged people in debate and discussion. And he gave them every freedom to make their case. That is not a Provocateur or gadfly, that is someone who is out there honestly putting ideas Into The Crucible a public discussion and that is something that is noble and appropriate regardless of your opinions of his opinions His argument and tour wasn't I am right, it was prove me wrong. He challenged young people to think and question their ideas and if they had come to their ideas from the wrong sources and with a lack of intelligence or logic they got chewed up and spit out and learned that they had to actually think about what their position was. Which is a fantastic lesson for them to learn. He allowed them to choose the subject, they had phones to look up any information they needed and have it handy, then he was coming and can prepare in advance, there was no tricks involved. These kids who were at facilities of higher education and learning and presumably know how to do their research were able to directly challenge him and his ideas That is noble. I don't give a crap about what you think about his opinions, what he did was noble and right. People like him from the left and the right should be out doing that regularly but he did it. And you call it being a provocateur. That speaks more about you than it does with him
    1 point
  23. So... you lied, you lied about lying, you tried to justify your lies, and now you try to gaslight, lying again, that I just can't read.
    1 point
  24. The smart money says he doesn't last until 2028. 79 with clear signs of cognitive decline, out of shape with poor eating habits, sedentary lifestyle.... Only a cheeseburger away.
    1 point
  25. But you have to admire her commitment to it
    1 point
  26. You are not relevant, until you accept reality.
    1 point
  27. Not surprising. But it's important to note that it's going forward. I assumed (Correctly) that the US government was apologizing, somewhat behind the scenes but it came out in the media through various statements. Good news for Georgia IMO.
    1 point
  28. I don’t think alliances are taken as seriously as they were by the six European empires which got dragged down together into the abyss in 1914. These days those ropes would snap more quickly.
    1 point
  29. That's literally what temporary foreign workers are suppose to be for. Not working at Tim Horton's and taking jobs away from high school and university students like we do in Canada.
    1 point
  30. This should be done in Canada as well.
    1 point
  31. Black Dog is still really upset over his banning. You get what you pay for a$$ wipe!
    1 point
  32. It seems more confused than confusing.
    1 point
  33. At this rate, you are accusing them of genocide more than anyone is being killed over there...
    1 point
  34. 1 point
  35. Western leftists seek the destruction of western civilization, whether they even realize it or not. Modern leftism contains some terrible morality and some terrible ideas, so bad that modern leftism is likely the biggest threat to western civilization that has ever existed. Not all of their ideas aren't bad though. There's destructive conservative ideas too, some that are cruel to people. However, at the end of the day it's better to be too cruel than be too weak as leftists are. Why? Because cruel people and cruel societies survive and weak people and weak societies don't. This is an iron law of nature and evolution across species and across time, you can't survive if you're unwilling to defend yourself. I'd rather survive and sometimes be called a d*ck than cease to exist.
    1 point
  36. Kirk's murder is very disturbing but the comparison to MLK Jr is ridiculous. I wouldn't be naming any streets after someone who helped Trump lay the groundwork for his coup attempt by spreading the false conspiracy theory that the 2020 election was stolen.
    1 point
  37. 1 point
  38. So, at least 25% of Canadians want one thing and voted for the exact opposite lol. That's a really sad proof of how dumb left4rd cultists are.
    1 point
  39. You understand That's a lie don't you? Those figures exclude a lot of politically motivated left-wing violence and include a lot of violence where there doesn't appear to be a political motive . As always the left provides false information But here's something that is actual science. Here's a scientifically conducted Poll looking at which side is more likely to be violent for political reasons. As you can see the left is three to five times more likely to be accepting of political violence Now run away and hide like the little fembot you are
    1 point
  40. STFU, dummy. Leftist leaders and their media outlets incited/committed/supported hundreds of thousands of violent acts since 2014. The only groups who committed more violent acts than violent American leftists since 2014 are entire countries that are at war, and no one else even comes close.
    1 point
  41. Virtually everyone thinks immigration is excessive. It's especially excessive in that it's mainly bringing to Canada people who will never integrate into our society and values, people who have no job skills, no language skills, and will always be a drag on the economy and the social welfare budgets of every government under which they reside.
    1 point
  42. Okay, I'm tapping out.... You can't get around your political bias of the left and continue to think his name is being dragged through the mud even when data showing right extremists are far more active in political violence than the left. I'm not sure how that correlates in any way but I leave that to you.... And how do you rationalize 'The leftists are radical, period end of story' and then in the next paragraph say 'In the end, We are all Canadians or Americans or what ever, there is enough evil out there that we don't need to take it out on each other....This should be a red flag for everyone, this is how divided our nation has become....we wonder why we can not get anything done in this nation, how can we , we are so divided we Can't even have a simple conversation....' ? I can only interpret that as you're suggesting we all take on right leaning ideals so we can have a simple conversation....not likely.
    1 point
  43. See the above thread. At this point it’s not clear if the advice is ongoing or was for a limited period
    1 point
  44. No, it was just happy as long as there was a Jewish state. And I think he and the Jews would have been happy with the bilateral state but the Palestinians didn't want that. So instead of getting along with the Jews they kept starting and losing wars one after another so they had nothing left I'm sure even Einstein couldn't have figured out why they were that messed up as a people why they want their children dead and their homes and families destroyed, but that's what they want. Who are the Israelis to say no? But you're lying as always. This is what he had to say: “Zionist cause is very close to my heart…. I am very confident of the happy development of the Jewish colony and am glad that there should be a tiny speck on this earth in which the members of our tribe should not be aliens,” -Einstein
    1 point
  45. I'll bet he can.... "I have a very, very radical view on this, but I can defend it, and I've thought about it," Kirk said. "We made a huge mistake when we passed the Civil Rights Act in the 1960s." "Young women, they don't value having children," he told Fox News host Laura Ingraham. "Trump voters, young men, they want family, children and legacy. Young women who voted for Kamala Harris, they want careerism, consumerism and loneliness." When pop star Taylor Swift and NFL player Travis Kelce announced their engagement on Aug. 26, Kirk was quick to discuss it on his podcast, suggesting that getting married and having "a ton of children" would "stop this kind of liberal endorsing Joe Biden nonsense." He said he hoped marriage would make Swift more conservative and encouraged her to "Reject feminism. Submit to your husband, Taylor. You're not in charge." In March 2020, he posted about the "China virus" — a phrase that was quickly adopted by U.S. President Donald Trump, then in his first term. In December that year, the year-end gala for Kirk's Turning Point USA group went ahead in Florida despite the state's COVID-19 mitigation efforts. https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/charlie-kirk-controversies-1.7630859 Totally agree with Barquentine. He didn't deserve to be shot and killed, but the m0ron was certainly worthy of being ignored.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...