Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/10/2025 in all areas
-
Peaceful protest: Violent insurrection: Recognizing madness when it slaps you in the face:4 points
-
But he did for 3 hrs on Jan 6th, 2021. That's gotta count for something.4 points
-
Didn't you say Trump should be impeached for not deploying the NG on J6, without the DC Mayor's or Pelosi's permission?3 points
-
Another woke degenerate trying to defy the federal government and defend his dear friends, the criminal invaders: "California Attorney General Rob Bonta says the state’s sovereignty was “trampled” by President Donald Trump when he ordered National Guard troops to the immigration protests in Los Angeles." https://apnews.com/live/immigration-protests-los-angeles2 points
-
2 points
-
Marines and Nat Guard only went because the LA Mayor and Cali Governor sided with the illegals, and didn't protect ICE agents.2 points
-
Mike...all of your definition sounds rather similar to communism. In fact it describes the Soviet world to perfection.2 points
-
Ok, then...i can see this is not going anywhere, and i've reached that age where i can't be bother having a conversation with people like you....i mean your own government seems to disagree with you and everything you say....and if your UCLA lawyers are right your government is facing a massive law suit...and yet i've seen nothing about that in the media.... what i have seen is the government doubling down on military support to suppress riots and other illegals' activity so these deportations can continue... My site is not wrong, is english your primary language, i could translate it for you if you want...just trying to be helpful.2 points
-
You hear democrats spewing shit about it constantly, but their definition of it doesn't hold up. According to Conservapedia: Fascism is a big government, totalitarian, economic, political, and statist ideology that arose in early twentieth century Europe and came to dominate the social and political systems of Italy under Mussolini. Under typical Marxist socialism, the workers rise up and seize the means of production. Under a fascist system, a socialist regime allows the means of production to remain in private capitalists and oligarchs' hands - provided that they lend support to the socialist regime. Additionally, the socialist regime can extend monopoly protection to the businesses by guaranteeing government contracts, and regulatory practices designed to drive competitors out of business. "Fascism is an unholy alliance between monopoly capitalist enterprises and government. It is basically a set of economic policy prescriptions, although the word gained somewhat of a twisted meaning during World War II related to racism and prejudice because of its acceptance in Nazi Germany by Adolf Hitler. It stands in contrast to communism, which is outright expropriation of "the means of production", i.e. expropriation of private property, and then the government itself selecting managers and unqualified party bureaucrats to run the businesses. In a fascist regime, large corporations retain their private ownership, their profits, the ability to select their own managers and staff, and even are protected from competition provided that the corporation bends to the government's wishes. Fascism is statist in nature, relying on a public-private partnerships, such as between Big Tech and the NSA for information control and surveillance; while private businesses provide personal data and political profiling on citizens to government without a search warrant, the government grants crony capitalist protection to the businesses in the form of government contracts, and harassment of competitors through arbitrary regulations and licensing." Under the two comparisons, I would say the regular meatheads like robomarx, herpes, and beaverabuser would fall under Marxist socialism. But billionaires like Soros, Sanders, Gates and Oprah belong to the fascist system. the reason for the two categories is that the fascist system doesn't have room for the misguided marxists, so they relegate the marxists to a lesser class making them think they are part of the upperclass of socialism. Yes, I know this is stupidly complex, but that's how it has to be for left-wing radicals to seize control. https://www.conservapedia.com/Fascism1 point
-
Define the totality of what you mean by resistance here. If you refuse, then it is settled that you do in fact consider the attacks on October 7th to be resistance.1 point
-
One of my closest school buddies was a BOSO that became totally disillusioned with his Coast Guard career once he suddenly has to carry a sidearm and spend his days writing tickets rather than teach people about boating safety. Claimed everything fell apart when they removed it's association with the Armed Forces. And then continued being involved in the same damn thing, drug and refugee interceptions, search and rescue, etc. He was one of those guys that really needed the structure, the clear rules and guidelines inherent of military life, and totally fell apart once he was early retired. Excluding the cost of the Coast Guard from 'military expenditures' only made Canada look even worse when most other countries did.1 point
-
1 point
-
Yes you are selective about the laws you want enforced. Real Americans don’t need to obey them as long as they are using illegal immigrants to break them.1 point
-
working illegally, just because you pay taxes does not mean you don't have to follow the laws...apply for citizenship like everyone else...the legal way...1 point
-
You mean the democrats? And Robo Smith? No, no they are not okay1 point
-
Claiming that the Palestinians had the right to October 7th is in fact supporting Hamas and justifying their actions1 point
-
You don't have a problem with either, so why are you crying and stamping your feet?1 point
-
We're in a wait and see situation, dumbass. Stop living in the past. Is it an insurrection? https://www.newsmax.com/us/riots-los-angeles-safety/2025/06/10/id/1214323/1 point
-
That is absolutely not true. He said it was necessary to remove ALL illegal aliens because many of them were bad people, not that he would just remove bad people, He promised mass deportations How would Trump’s promise of mass deportations of migrants work? If you go back and look that's what trump campaigned on As he has sought to return to the White House, Trump has pledged to expel “maybe as many as 20 million” people from the US If Trump wins the election, mass deportations could wreak havoc on immigrants | US elections 2024 | The Guardian Chances are texas wouldn't put up with that crap and would sort it out before he got a chance. But if necessary, yup , ANd so far the only lives impacted are those guilty of being in the country illegally. Again we can argue about whether or not this is good policy or bad policy, but he did campaign on it and was very clear about it and once again the situation is created by the people that chose to be in the country illegally. Given the policies of the former governments I might have some sympathy if they were being punished or harmed considering that previous governments all but told them it was okay, but they're not. They're simply being returned to where they should have been in the first place. If you come home and find out someone's broken into your house and is attempting to live in it, it is not unreasonable for you to ask them to leave. Even if that leaves them homeless it's still not their right to break into your house and take what you own1 point
-
You Libbies are amazingly hypocritical. Summer of love...peaceful protests. Jan. 6. Insurrection. LA Riots...peaceful protests. You people have spent your credibility and then some. Now...you're nothing but a bunch of traitorous hypocrites.1 point
-
This was you: "No it doesn't, no more than Oct 7 justifies the response to it."1 point
-
Wikipedia is a hub for left-wing revisionists. Only a fool would take that site seriously. Conservapedia goes after the truth.1 point
-
@Libbies...we've all seen this "peaceful protest". Today in comes the military. If your heros throw peaceful fireworks at them, the military will defend itself. Have a nice day...traitors.1 point
-
It is what you said and he's telling the truth. And oh look, once again you've got to go back and try to rewrite what you've said because you got called out for your bullshit You blame israel for the october attack, you've blamed Canada (somehow) and a bunch of other players but you constantly give hamas a free ride. (They're just RESISTING i tell ya! Theyve got the right!) And people point it out and you're like 'NONONONONO!!!! I didn't mean they were RESISTING.... I just meant that it's entirely israel's fault that they had to resist!!! Yeash. There's probably some youtube videos on basic logic if that'll help....1 point
-
Light a horse on fire, that one was a bit of a shocker.1 point
-
No one is depriving Americans of their right to protest. What they don't have a right to do is block traffic, attack ICE and federal officers, try to block ICE and federal officers, vandalize federal property, loot, burn cars, etc... You wouldn't know the first thing about any oath to the Constitution since you can't even be honest about what is happening here.1 point
-
1 point
-
Of course not, but depriving American citizens of their right to protest is another story. When I said all the protesters were illegal aliens I was being sarcastic, which zoomed over the heads of our resident fascists. Now Donnie Dictator has doubles down called in the Marines. Maybe a few of them will remember their oath to the Constitution not to the Fanta Fuhrer.1 point
-
Aren't most of these immigrants these days more from countries like Honduras or Guatemala rather than Mexico?1 point
-
It is not victimless, look at those that lost their lives risking everything to get into the US... not to mention economic losses like jobs taken by illegal immigrants, health care costs they incur, other resources they consume while in the country illegally...if it was as harmless as you suggest why is it illegal....why not let them stay...1 point
-
The law? You have zero respect for any law here right now.1 point
-
Well, when all you is DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRR hItLeR DURRRRRRRRRRRRR1 point
-
1 point
-
And here you go again with your BS excuses and apologies for a conflict that Zionists started a century ago, and now you'll run away again.1 point
-
1 point
-
What a bunch of pathetic clowns.1 point
-
Burnaby North grad here, when almost everyone's parents were connected to the refineries. But we'd no nothing about any benefits of using our resources ourselves, would we? Ship it out as fast as we can, dig, dig, cut, pump... a dime right now's better than a dollar tomorrow! Good of the country and all that, eh? Nobody's offering to build and pay for any pipelines, not even Danielle. So give up with the "pipe" dreams.1 point
-
My point, like a rubber ducky, has cleary drifted way over your head. So why can't they go fix a simple weather buoy or put out lighthouse reports in a timely manner? You figure mariners and traffic managers and such just have the experience and knowledge to guess what's happening? No doubt the poobahs in Ottawa do.1 point
-
"Since March, the Trump administration has deported a total of 271 Salvadoran and Venezuelan migrants from the US to the CECOT megaprison in El Salvador. The deportees are claimed to belong to criminal organizations, but no evidence has been provided." Obviously the reason the administration claimed sending Kilmar Garcia to CECOT was an "administration error" was because of the court cases that ruled against sending him in the first place. The court rulings against the administration were the reason he was transferred to another prison and finally brought back. What about the other 270 migrants who were sent to CECOT and had their human rights violated? Let's face it, you don't believe in human rights or due process.1 point
-
If you are here illegally, you are a criminal. ICE was not merely at Home Depot trying to snag some day laborers, they had lawfully executed warrants to apprehend certain people. It doesn't matter if it is about a quota or not, it is a federal law that is being enforced lawfully against criminals here illegally. You can be appalled all you want, I don't care. What you can't do is engage in violence and your arguments trying to support violence and riots will be called out for being wrong as well.1 point
-
Why was he and many others knowingly sent to a known human rights violation country and torture / death prison in the first place? The Trump administration knew exactly what they were doing. They even paid that country six million dollars to take them.1 point
-
Tapper and that B1tch can go f*ck themselves, they lied for YEARS about Biden's health and covered for him and they DARE write books about his dementia to cash in. They have 0 morals and proved all they are is the propaganda arm for the DNC. Tapper should be fired and never work as a journalist again and it looks like Raggedy Anne is persona non grata everywhere now so don't have worry about her getting a job.1 point
-
It's the way Trump and ICE are going about it. They don't respect due process at all and human rights. They don't care about any legal process and have no conscience about taking kids away from their parents and locking anybody up.1 point
-
Sorry not correct. First I don’t know where you get your numbers the minimum income to be part of the 1% is $579k and secondly it’s gone up from $80k in 1982 and $283k in 2010.1 point
-
Yes LOL that’s what your whole right wing populist movement has finally come to accept although the left has been saying it for 40 years. Why do you think the right all screaming about Davos WEF elite? Do you not remember the Occupy Wall Street movement from the last decade? Yep. And while I know you’re just pulling the “tons of exceptions” claim out your ass, do you honestly not think there are tons of exceptions and exemptions now that didn’t even exist a few decades ago? Have you not heard of the Panama papers and the Paradise Papers? Were you unaware that the wealthiest American corporations pay virtually no tax thanks to countless loopholes and exclusions? Were you sleeping all those times when Warren Buffet famously talked about how he has a lower tax rate than his personal assistant? Have you not heard of the Panama Papers? Did you and I not have an argument over the 50% capital gains tax exclusion rate, which was a tax break only invented by Paul Martin in the 1990s? It is not a lie and once again you’re outnof your depth. Like seriously the issue of income inequality has been talked about so much, especially after the economic meltdown of 2008 its shocking to me that you know nothing about it. 1) the top 20% is not “the rich”. You only need TOTAL HOUSEHOLD income of ~136k to be in this group. I am in this group and buddy I ain’t “rich”. 2)The rich are the top 1% and even the top 0.1%. The top one percent now own a third of rhe country’s wealth, compared to just 13% in 1999 3) Since 1979, the top 1% has seen their income grow by ~150% whole the top 0.1% grew by up to 300% relative to inflation. Meanwhile the bottom 50% had flat income over these decades These statistics and more have been topics of public debate for a long time, rhis is nothing new No she’s not. Nobody has said that you’re inventing that claim so you can argue against a straw man. If the “working wealthy” class is shrinking its because it’s become harder for working people to become wealthy in the first place. The mega rich don’t work for a salary, they own businesses and enterprises and get paid in dividends, shares, capital gains, etc hoard their money in offshore accounts.1 point
-
The middle class has been getting wiped out for 40 years and it’s a fact that the rich have only gotten richer during that time. Nope. The top marginal income tax rate was more than 90% after ww2 In the 1970s it was still over 60% and that’s just federal tax alone. Well the last 4-5 years is covid and post-covid inflation so pretty exceptional. Again that has been a multi-decade trend unde both Liberals and Conservatives that actually accelerated after NAFTA and increased US economic integration. The “branch-plantification” of the Canadian economy as our businesses were bought by US and foreign investors or captured by a US “customer monopoly” (monopsony). Stupid industrial policy that gave away priceless Canadian IP for increasingly shitty and short-lived ”factory jobs” at a foreign owned company. We’re strutting our stuff over making pennies while everywhere else they’re locking up billions at our expense through patents, royalties and terms of use that pay them in perpetuity You’re losing focus on rhe original comment which is about taxing the rich. It’s not a lie that the rich have gotten insanely richer even as those other problems have plagued the economy for the past several decades. In fact in can be argued that precisely BECAUSE they have become so wealthy so powerful and have come to own and control so much of the economy that it is operating so inefficiently. Economies work better when it is the result of a large number of diverse and competing players, rather than the just 5 guys who own everything and have more money than god and are just playing around with it out of boredom.1 point
-
There ARE pipelines all over BC liar. Alberta can already triple oil exports through TMX. No one's opposing connecting to or expanding existing LNG pipes. We rejected Northern Gateway oil, get over it. BC is not obligated to risk the Inside Passage for zero benefit out of 'obligation to' or demands from Danielle Smith and the oil companies. So f^ck off with your BS claims that either you or I would gain anything and maybe demand that Danielle STFU and get to negotiating other routes. The people say, not the oil barons.1 point
