Leaderboard

Don't get de-moralised by the polls. Just make sure you go out and vote!

I voted yesterday. It was an hour standing in line to cast my vote. I overheard a few people grunbling about the wait an I thought about the kids who lived in mud that had the consistency and temperature of ice cream and the smeat of things I won't mention. They spent 2 - 3 years in that hell from 1915 to 1918 with other kids trying to kill them. When my Grand Father returner to Canada, he spent a hear in hospital and convalescence. I was able to stand in line for an hour to cast my ballot because of their sacrifice. So, yes, thank you Betsy. Get out and vote. 👍

The political commentators of 24/60 have all insinuated that Mark Carney won the English and French debate and were constantly sending him flowers and the police say that it is caused by the Chinese, but in my opinion it is rather caused by the $150,000,000 bribe that Mark Carney promised to Radio-Canada. The CBC is trying to manipulate the election result in favour of Mark Carney.

Got kids? Want them to grow up with micro-plastics in their blood and brain? Or maybe you just don't give a shit about anything except scoring a few political points. This is beyond short sighted politics.

BWAAHAHAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAAAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHH!!!!!!

All the carney has is fear mongering. His entire platform is based on "Trumpy". The carney is a theif, a liar, and bereft of ideas to actually help Canadians. Bye bye to the carney. GO VOTE CONSERVATIVES. SAVE OUR NATION!

Carney's eyes almost popped out of his head when Pierre said "I already got my top-secret security clearance back when I was a cabinet minister." He also didn't seem to be aware of the reason why Poilievre refused to re-up that clearance to read these docs. How did he not know those things? Didn't he even do his basic homework? He wants to become PM and he didn't even have a clue what answer he was going to get there? Kids fresh out of law school know better than to ask someone who's on the stand a question if they're not sure what the answer will be, and Poilievre has answered that question several times now. Even Thomas Mulcaire answered that question for Poilievre, and Carney should have known that as well. How was Carney so utterly clueless there? He seemed so smug there, I know that he felt like he just asked the ultimate gotcha question... My only guess is that Carney must believe everything that he sees on CBC - apparently he doesn't know how propaganda works 😂. CBC has been probably been telling the story of "No top-secret info for Pierre!!!" for months, as if there's really something to it, in order to keep the brainwash cycle on "heavy", and Carney was sucked in by it as well. Luckily for the Carney, CBC burned that footage from their own reels and buried its ashes with radioactive waste. Mulcaire on CTV:

What a load of cobblers. I'm a lefty and don't like anything vaguely right and my feelings make me call people derogatory names. I really don't have a cogent argument so lets call everything Trumpy.

Now if they could just do something about the woodpeckers......

The CBC journalists all had long faces, and really attacked the REBEL NEWS on tv...............for how they claimed, the REBEL NEWS had hijacked the traditional scrum session that happens after debates, and were able to ask questions! They also attacked the Canada Elections guy for letting it happen. They want blood! Here's the other side. Grab your popcorn! Some of these scenes I have not seen on mainstream media.

When PP answered this the same way the media and the left went Nanners for a week.

Well, if you sum up what pundits on CBC are saying - he won just because he didn't rise up to the bait (apparently he's got a short fuse), and didn't make any serious gaffes. 😁

The only big elephant in the room in that scenario is that, the people behind Carney are the very same elected people behind Trudeau.

🤣

Tells me people want change and imo these are PP voters.

Yes or maybe, oh no, wait a minute, lets bring back the guillotine.

It's not even a study. It's an opinion piece. And it's a very bad opinion piece. It really has no place in an actual scientific publication Worse for his case, it admits that there are scientists who agree 100% that sex is binary. And indeed the definition of sex is binary in the medical journals. Where many of these people are delusioned is the idea that sex is the same as a person. You have a person. That person may be male or female. In some extremely rare cases that person is both male and female. In other extremely rare cases the person is neither male nor female. But in all of those examples, there are only two sexes. The Sexes are binary. The only reason that activists choose to pretend otherwise is that they often want to define a man as being a woman where it's convenient and yet define the man is being a man where that suits them and vice versa. And they want to conflate gender with sex because they want a person's gender to have the same rights as someone sex does which doesn't always flow. This is why you will very often see them conflate gender and sex in one moment and in the next moment insist that they are two separate things. Males or males. Females or females. All males exhibit some traits we associate with females and all females exhibit some traits we associate with males. But they are still females and males. And the very fact that these liberals can't tell the difference is a perfect explanation for why our reproductive rates have dropped to 1.3 births per female. You can't get them pregnant if you can't identify them

Nobody won the debate. Or did you not watch it?

Straws are a big issue for you, huh? You didn't know most, if not all, sell cans and bottles of drinks as well. And of course, you don't have to drive while you're eating. And they sell metal straws now.... I wish!

He looked very pleased with himself while asking it though. His whole demeanor quickly changed when Pierre began answering.

Well we do know you bumbles have hissy fits when its's used against.

"Apple-man wants to end the ban on single-use plastics! WE CHOOSE MORE POVERTY!" Fixed. Now leftists can say: "Orinj man bad" and "Apple man bad".

This is an odd question to ask. It backfired.

Is that what we are saying? There is an edit function to these posts.

well they kind of lost the whole "didn't get his security clearance" thing when it cooked off in Carney's face (Btw - i think you mean "poilievre wants to end the ban " )

Ah, the "nuh-uh" rebuttal. I didn't realize I was dealing with a level 7 Laser Lotus. Indeed, you don't need to say it.

It's fairly obvious from your description of that that you mean basically liberals. This is A variation on the I would vote for conservatives if they'd elected Mike Chong as leader protein that we hear constantly from the left. By any reasonable measure poilievre and his version of the conservatives are comfortably center right. They believe in slowly balancing the budget, not radically doing so. They have no interest in messing with gay or women's rights in the slightest. Smaller more effective government and power to the provinces which is a very center right way to think. And their economic plans are very much a right of center series of proposals But according to you there are some sort of hard right group. Nothing could be further from the truth. So obviously your idea of center right is actually what most people would consider to be either center left or perhaps fully left. The left wing frequently suggests that anyone right of Castro is alt right extremist types. The only reason you don't see the CPC as center right is that the left has moved so FAR left.

The citizens don't want these rules, they don't care one way or another, sure they talk a good game but as soon as they have to pay our of pocket their done...most of the liberal rules set around getting our resources to market are designed to keep all of that in the ground....And when they do get approved every man, women and dog along it's route needs to be paid off....Carney has no intentions of freeing up all these resources, unless they are green....He has already promised to spend 500 bil in the next 5 years, the old liberal money tree is already pretty bare, where is all this new money coming from....

You need a straw to drink soda?

Did you not get the overall Tory message that they want to end or reverse every f*cking environmental regulation. Because as you're supposed to believe that the extra 5¢ and hour you'll get from companies being freed of them will be worth living your life neck deep in shit and industrial waste. Progress bad, going backwards good.

the problem is there trying to become the gop lite. they need to go back to being the old PC Party and not the reform party under a fake name lol.. erin otoole had potential but they stabbed him in the back and based on the leaders to choose from this time if he was still leader i think i would of actually voted for the cons.

UNM Researchers Find Alarmingly High Levels of Microplastics in Human Brains – and Concentrations are Growing Over Time https://hscnews.unm.edu/news/hsc-newsroom-post-microplastics-human-brains#:~:text=“We start thinking that maybe,of proteins involved in dementia.

Do you do understand we're talking about numbers right? If the debt is 2 trillion... Should you be worried about 1 million or 1 trillion? Should you be worried about payments only? Or revenues? Why do you believe that foreign aid is what we need to focus on? Who told you that? If it's 1% of expenditure or even 2%, most of that money goes to domestic companies that provide goods overseas. Like Farmers. Pardon me, but it seems that you are falling for some old tropes that aren't true. What about taxes? Shouldn't they go up on the highest orders if we have a deficit? Trump cut taxes in his first term, the deficit went up in good times. And deficit Hawks like Paul Ryan were powerless and eventually he quit the party. Let's talk about facts here.

No one's getting out alive.

*mic drop*

Hey man if it means the end to the anti sematic a holes harassing Jewish people on campuses then great

Ending racial quotas is long overdue and was settled back in the 60s

It is amazing how you folks on the left will hang on to these lies. No shame. No integrity. No care at all.

You love to say how we agree, yet disagree with the things the things that make us like that. You want provinces with populations smaller than some suburbs to entirely fund itself? Halifax to have fewer or lesser quality services than Toronto?

The whole point of federal programs like this and even the so-hated-by-extreme right transfer funds is so we don't have rich and poor provinces with totally different standards of living. If you're opposed to that idea, you don't belong here.

PEI has about the same population as Abbotsford BC.