Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/01/2025 in Posts
-
3 points
-
They closed it down! The migrants were shipped back to the USA. How is that a step in the right direction?2 points
-
2 points
-
Conservatives used to love this label. Now they flipped and love that PP is a career politician since he was a little boy and hate Carney’s private sector experience and economic expertise. How did that happen?2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
With the search function disabled on this forum some of you seem to know your old posts won’t be brought to light We are talking about what Trump said, nobody cares what you said. Oath Keepers trial highlights the right's obsession with finding cheat codes for real life https://www.salon.com/2022/10/05/oath-keepers-trial-highlights-the-rights-obsession-with-finding-cheat-codes-for-real-life/ But the MAGA movement has a cultural obsession with it. That’s because a significant percentage of them are chronic underachievers: 40 yr old virgins, high school dropouts, and so on….people who constantly look for shortcuts in life and blame others for their lack of success. Look at Trump’s cabinet, never in history has a presidential administration had so many unqualified hacks in it. Usually the people who walk those halls come from the highest levels of the private and public sector with impressive education and experience. Trump’s group is all kooks and dingbats of little to no accomplishments other than kissing Trumps ass. Cheat code! No, nobody has tried to run for a third term. Don’t confuse policies you personally don’t agree with a president trying to undermine the constitution to remain in power. Seriously student loans is what you come back with? As for this things you think Biden and Obama did that were overreach Trump is on track done far more and far worse in just the 2 months he’s been in office. For all the chest-beating and clothes tearing you did whenever Obama or Biden issued an executive order just remember Trump issued the most and his second term only just started amd of course suddenly republicans are quiet again Donald J. Trump signed 103 Executive orders in 2025. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., signed 162 Executive orders between 2021 and 2025. Donald J. Trump signed 220 Executive orders between 2017 and 2021. Barack Obama signed 277 Executive orders between 2009 and 2017. George W. Bush signed 291 Executive orders between 2001 and 2009.2 points
-
If he would've just gotten rid of Chiang, this would be over now. But it's just getting started. If I had been an undecided voter up til now, this situation would be the line in the sand for me. The Liberal Party is standing behind their candidate who called for his political rival to be turned into the China Consulate for the bounty. Carney claims it was "just a lapse in judgment." This is on the heels of Sam Cooper's revelations of Liberal Party involvement in the fentanyl crisis in Canada, the revealing of Carney's financial obligations to a Chinese bank worth billions of dollars, China being caught meddling in Freeland's leadership bid, and China executing 4 Canadian citizens recently. The reason for the bounty is that the man is accused by the CCP of having publicly criticized the regime. Now, I'm reminded of the Bills the Liberals brought in regarding jail sentences for online "misinformation". And the way they brought in riot police, tear gas, Stompy the horse and froze bank accounts and years-long lawfare against those citizens who challenged their political decisions. The Liberal agenda for Canada matches up perfectly with the Chinese agenda for their citizens. This is why they won't do anything about this disgusting situation.2 points
-
They just ensured 2 more Greens went Liberal. Daughter saw the latest CPC election ad and blew her stack at how they sunk into utter propaganda levels. He hubby agrees. No dummy, because there are more important issues than 100% party ideology at stake. They'll all vote NDP again but this time it's ABC. Better to get some of your policy followed than most of it retracted. Or is that too hard to understand?2 points
-
I've seen a few rumours on FB today that Carney has already decided to step down due to his litany of conflicts of interest. Even the CBC's Rosemary Barton couldn't ignore it, and she's a shoo-in for a Liberal senate seat the day she retires. "[As someone] who spent most of his life in the private sector, there's no possible conflict of interest in your assets?" Barton asked. "That's very difficult to believe." For someone like Barton, whose entire career stems her shameless hagiography of liberal candidates, that about-face makes Brute's back-stabbing look like a vote of confidence. I don't think it will make much of a difference to this election, the CBC will just pimp the next LPOC candidate that much harder. If he is really dropping out, I think it has more to do with his ability to keep his head above water in a debate than any conflicts of interest that he has... The RCMP and CBC can keep all of that under wraps for him.1 point
-
I'm more concerned about the harm PP will do pandering to the freak show that makes up so much of the base of his support.1 point
-
You’d be extolling the virtues of his business and economic experience and claiming he’s a great Conservative and not a career politician like the other bums. I would still be saying that he’s too conservative for my liking, just like now.1 point
-
1 point
-
And they WASTED a LOT of money using unnecessary MILITARY TRANSPORT for a POLITICAL SHOW. Too bad Muskrat wasn't on the JOB finding that waste and fraud.1 point
-
Then produce real proof that "the sky is falling". Real proof. Not "could be"..."appears to". And of course...you can't...because they don't know conclusively. Bullsh1t.1 point
-
Dogma of the left is that gov't should run everything Then they get mad when you bring up venezuela or cuba.1 point
-
Funny how a traitor, a supporter of the criminal rapist in the White House is lecturing on what is considered criminal. The main gripe seems to be that the carbon tax that was designed to reduce THEIR carbon emissions 'didn't work' because they purposely went out of their way not to and simply complained that it cost them more, just as the tax was designed to.1 point
-
Dogma of the right says govt can't run a popsicle stand. So if you're gullible enough to begin with that as a fact, you always reach the conclusion it fails at everything. Add in the govt is inherently corrupt dogma of populism, you don't need AI, just a simple flowchart to predict what sheeple of the right will claim.1 point
-
Another politically clueless press conference by Danielle Smith. In the event of a Grit win she should pen a memoir along these lines: Pierre Poilievre My Part in His Downfall.1 point
-
1 point
-
Lots of so called constitutional republics have dictators. Both Cuba and North Korea are constitutional republics. You aren’t special. BTW both Russia and China fit the definition of constitutional republics.1 point
-
You are the one who wants an Emperor, that’s why you won’t address any of his points.1 point
-
This remains my favourite deselection story which may say more about me than I care to think about: https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/jerry-bance-marketplace-1.32177971 point
-
1 point
-
Oh, eyeball, you poor little sap. Do you see how I correctly identified the story as "rumour" instead of saying something stupid like "I SAW THIS ON CBC, SO IT'S 100% TRUE!!!", just to end up looking like some left4rd loser again and again and again...?1 point
-
you see @Nationalist ? The fact he has no answers and is being dishonest in his discussions was YOUR fault all along Sigh. Ohhhh the left. Well at least they're consistent.1 point
-
I think one can convey unaffordability without referring to women's reproductive abilities. If incomes had kept up with the price of real estate things might not be so dire. I will say that the Liberal government help in daycare has actually made having a child more affordable. It's a small step but a helpful one.1 point
-
Like anyone who challenges his position you would be relegated to ignore status. Its's a rather large club.1 point
-
1 point
-
PP says that the big problem with unaffordable housing is that women can't buy a home before their "biological clock" runs out. Yuck. They would have been better bringing Andrew Scheer back.1 point
-
It's really quite simple: Anyone caught harboring illegal aliens needs to be charged with aiding and abetting. Any state governor that actively supports illegal immigration should be removed from office (Kathy Hochul, for example). Any federal judge that actively supports illegal immigration should be removed from his seat. Any politician that supports illegal immigration should be removed from office. There needs to be zero tolerance while Trump cleanses our streets of criminal invasion.1 point
-
Napoleon said, "Never interrupt your enemy when he's making a mistake". Up until a couple days ago, PP was still spending millions on pamphlets and advertisements squawking juvenile three-word slogans in a political environment deeply and negatively focused against the master of juvenile three-word slogans. This sort of self-inflicted injury is a gift to his opponents, and they're wise to just step back and let him hurt himself as long as it lasts.1 point
-
I would too, if not for the fact that he posts 40+ times a day and is at all times derailing at least a half a dozen threads with his belligerent stupidity. 🙃1 point
-
Sure but the level of command at which this stupidity happened is not down where Pvts come into the loop. You also seem to have a real issue with the journalist that was invited into the loop. What if it had been another talk show host from Fox?1 point
-
No he is not, when has any conservative candidate supported turning another canadian into the china to collect a reward....only liberals do that ...because they have no moral values...1 point
-
Once again, we already have a meme thread for this stupid crap.1 point
-
With complete ignorance and indifference because it would have never been reported.1 point
-
The Vances went to Greenland but no one wanted to see them. They spent 4 hours at the US base at Pituffik, made a speech to US service people and flew home. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3y3vdvdggo1 point
-
1 point
-
Always funning seeing people share "news" off Twatter.1 point
-
So, despite all your complaints, you really LIKE having a liberal PM. LMAO1 point
-
1 point
-
Interpretation is ALWAYS open to further discussion. Facts DO NOT point to the same conclusions for everyone, and in fact the most common interpretation of the facts in science have very often proven to be wrong later. Newton was WAY off base but we believed his stuff for years. So it is 100 percent reasonable that two people would say "I interpret it this way" and another would say "i interpret it that way" and for those parties to discuss and debate and 'negotiate' on what they both can agree on and what actions would be wise to take that make sense in both scenarios. It displays your complete lack of understanding of science that you think that somehow a conclusion is absolute1 point
-
We told you specifically and explicitly he would try to seek a third term. You responded explicitly and specifically that would never happen because the constitution forbids it. Now you’re shifting to falsely claim there’s a “lawful” way to do it. To be clear: There is no way to lawfully serve a third term. He will just make up some silly claims and lie and say it’s perfectly constitutional when it’s clearly not and you gullible suckers will go along with it.1 point
-
FDR probably only confuses you. He served 4 terms BTW. But since his time, in fact BECAUSE of his time the constitution has been amended to limit presidents to 2 terms. But thanks for proving my point. You fascists don’t give a damn about the constitution you will support anything that keeps your people in power Thanks for proving you’re still a batshit conspiracy crank.1 point
-
This is a really good idea. Very original and something a lot of people can get on board with. It’s too bad the Conservative Party didn’t think of recommending that… repeatedly… for the last two years… in the House of Commons… so the Liberals could unanimously oppose it… repeatedly… in the House of Commons.1 point
-
Obviously carney gave him something. I suspect it was basically "I can give you what you want if you reduce the pressure a little and make me look good during the election. after i win we can sort out the details. Is that ok with you Mr Trump? Sounds exactly like he always does when someone flatters him relentlessly and strokes his ego and promises to give him what he wants. Which means one of two things. Either carney intends to sell us out and give trump a bunch of concessions which will slowly cripple our economy but will allow him to personally benefit financially, or he has lied to trump and will not deliver when he becomes prime minister in which case you can bet trump is going to become furious and will retaliate against Canada. Kearney will pretend that he's shocked that trump who was behaving himself has suddenly for no reason whatsoever turned on Canada yet again but you know, that's trump. The election it's going to make a big difference in Canada's future for quite some time. Elections matter and this one is going to matter a great deal. Hopefully carney won't win. I myself still have trouble believing the polls are 100% accurate the way that they're presented and believe a Poilievre majority is still completely possible. But when you look at everything that's just happened in week one and remember that we've got four more to go with tariffs supposedly starting next week but who knows and trump is the wild card, there is just no way to predict how this is going to end1 point
-
Another good story or should i say warning about Mark Carney, and where his priorities lay... NP View: Mark Carney is a mirage1 point
