Leaderboard

While the FBI was lying and committing crimes regarding Russian collusion, J6, the laptop, Whitmer, etc, terrorists, presidential assassins and school shooters were getting out ahead of them. The FBI is a joke. Terrorists are winning while the FBI is on their various crime sprees.

lol you wish shitbag.

I agree. That's why trump keeps trying to troll even harder with more outlandish nonsense. I'm done with caring about what he says since 100% of it is low-information horse shit. My intent is to only react to actual policy actions and outcomes.

My theory is that the bar for shocking comments has been raised. People don't react anymore as they did. Do you agree?

"BAN GUNS! THE KILLER WASN'T A MUSLIM! THIS HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ISLAM!" - Trudeau, Hillary, Pelosi, AOC, Omar, the Ayatollah, @robosmith, @Hodad, @Michael Hardner, @Aristides & Co.

A terrorist ran over 15(?) people in New Orleans and planted IEDs near the scene ahead of time, and terrorist rented a CyberTruck and detonated a bomb outside the Trump tower and the FBI caught a guy planning to shoot up the AIPA office in Florida. So how will the press make this Trump's fault?

Is Joe actually the leader, or is the US actually run by whoever's controlling the teleprompter? I.e., his unelected deep-state handlers?

It was THE AUTHORS OF THE STUDY THAT YOU QUOTED SAYING THE STUDY WAS IN INCLUSIVE. So your retort to you have no substance and can't respond with anything other than personal attacks, is to respond with no substance and make more personal attacks? Prove me right much?

Ahhh - you mean back when the fbi agents were caught texting each other about how they'd do what it took to 'stop' trump? gotcha

you could try an old school manual tranny 6 forward and no reverse. Or would you prefer Manuel.

Don't get your hopes up. Even if he was you couldn't afford him

I can feel the love

get off the meth.

I dressed like this for a show once... People on one side of me thought I was dressed up as Trudeau.

I would not blame Trump nor Biden on this one. It is unlikely that either knew about this individual before the attack. Possibly someone at the FBI, CIA, or Homeland Security did and did not act upon solid intel but there is no way to know about that.

I just pasted some of the funnier ones. Good times. HAPPY NEW YEAR!

To add: I have no idea either. I'm just guessing as to the reason.

Why ? Her claims are pretty extreme however she WAS on the inside.

The FBI seems pretty uncomfortable about calling out the motivation for this attack. https://www.shorenewsnetwork.com/2025/01/01/fbi-spokeswoman-this-is-not-a-terrorist-event-initial-claim-backtracked-by-agency-hours-later/

I don't believe in "coincidence". A supposedly successful Muslim man, throws his life away for what? To kill as many Americans as possible? A Tesla blows up at Trump's place in Vegas. What's the point? Someone wants Americans to be scared. It appears that "someone" is a bunch of Muslims. Its time for the FBI to do what its paid for and begin deep investigations into all Muslim churches and organizations.

Should we make using the Turo app illegal now?

English? I am trying to converse in parseltongue, your preferred language.

I didn't even notice the other one. I had to look for it. This thread has a more descriptive title.

OMG are you ever a slow learner. Are you just catching on now? The Dems motto has been "Never let a good tragedy go to waste" for decades, bub. Here's how this works: when a tragedy occurs, and it can be used for your own political advantage, show the victim's face and tell their heartwarming backstory, even if you have to make it up (like a Gentle Giant story). Draw a very clear picture to associate the thing/people you're against with the tragedy at the very outset while the emotions are at their peak. Blast that image home 1,000 times. Eg, the MSM spent months saying "M Brown good, pigs bad, pigs is racist" even when they knew that what they were saying was completely untrue. M Brown committed a violent robbery just moments before he was killed, and more than half of the Ferguson PD was black. If the tragedy is more likely to help your political opponents, leave the victims faceless and nameless, and most importantly: question the motives of the attackers for as long as you can, in order to disassociate their cause from the tragedy until the emotions of the event wear off. Eg, a story like "We don't know if the attacker was muslim, or whether or not it was a terrorist attack. The attacker was known to authorities", followed weeks later by "yeah it was an islamic terrorist attack, so how about them Bears?" Honestly, to a rube like you, none of that seems important, but the italicized part is actually the key component of the opinion-forming process because strong emotions form lasting memories/impressions, period, and nothing else does that. No one remembers their 11th tuna sandwich, but everyone remembers seeing their first murder. That's why associating a group to an event at the outset, when emotions are highest, solidifies the message that you want to drive home. That's why the Dems/Libs and their media flunkies always say "islam had nothing to do with it" every time someone invokes the name of allah while they're killing a group of innocent people. They'll even say things like "Sure, his parents and siblings are muslims, but he's not. He just shouted out to allah for no apparent reason. Now let's look at the real menace here: gun laws." Then they'll go on to ignore every aspect of the crime that doesn't fit their narrative. Eg, when the Danforth shooter was on his rampage in Toronto, he even told an Indo-Canadian on the street "You have nothing to worry about, brother, I'm only killing white people", and that fellow's interview was only shown on TV once... never again. The racial component was completely stripped from the narrative. It's why the liberal MSM even talked about gun laws when the van attacks happened in NY and Toronto. There were dead bodies still on the ground and they just couldn't help themselves, they just had to say "guns" and keep islam out of the storyline for as long as possible. Let's face it: when there's a terrorist attack you never think to yourself: "It was for Buddha." Or "it was done in the name of Christ or God." Or "it was probably a Hindu who's mad about the millions of Hindus slaughtered or forced out of Pakistan in 1947." Right? Not even you're stupid enough to think that. You know that it's someone who's mad about the 400 muslims killed in 1948. It always is. It happens all the time. But we're supposed to pretend that muslims aren't any more inclined to support terrorism than anyone else. Here's a thing, dummy: no one takes statistics more seriously than economists. Their university courses have the most intense statistics courses of any field of study. And a central belief of economists is that "for every person who takes the time to write your company and make a complaint about something, there are 25 other people who are also mad about that one thing but they didn't take the time to write a letter. Only about 4% of people will do that sort of thing." Does that sound about right? Now apply that line of thought to terrorist attacks. If one person is willing to strap explosives to their body and kill as many kids as they can at an Arianna Grande concert, is it likely that there are a bunch of other people in his group who also feel really strongly about killing random innocents, or is he just that far of an outlier? Fine, choose the latter, but then ask yourself why was it also the Pulse club? And van attacks in Toronto and NYC? The Boston bombing? The Danforth shooter? Fort Hood? The California couple? Why are Christmas markets always attacked by that group? Etc, etc, etc. Why don't Hindus do that? Why don't Buddhists do that? Why don't Christians do it? You never hear of people saying "This is for Jesus" and killing as many people as they can, because people don't commit mass-murders for Jesus. They do it for allah, all the time. When you say "Right-wing loser thought process", what you really mean is "Why are they always right? When are we gonna be right about something for once?" The answer is, you guys are o-fer-100 for a reason, so take note of the pattern there, and stop relying on the gambler's fallacy to provide you with your next win. Use common sense instead.

The FBI's mandate is basically to investigate anything they want in order to prevent serious crime or protect the country. I think there are restrictions in place in terms of what level of crime has to occur in order for them to be allowed to take over all of the evidence in a case and tell local PD's that they're no longer in charge of an investigation, but they don't need to wait for crimes to happen in order to get involved. This is the top of the FBI's own page called "What we investigate"... Maybe they should aim higher, like saying what we combat, or what we try to prevent lol, because it seems like they're just busy watching it all happen while they spend all their energy trying to get Demonrats elected. How's the war on human trafficking going? Are places like "the US Treasury" getting hacked? How's the fight against "Public Corruption" going? 😂 They couldn't even catch Biden FFS, and he jokes about his crimes on TV. He can't even ride a bike or walk up stairs, but he can rake in millions for his family and stay three steps ahead of the FBI... When I look at all the top 6 things that they're "investigating", and how well they're doing at preventing all that stuff from happening, it's kind of scary that they're the ones preventing "weapons of mass destruction" from being used against Americans. If they can't catch wind of an insurrection being planned by 4chan troglodytes, or notice the Bidens doing anything corrupt, what will it take for them to catch someone before they deploy a WMD? "Hey, what's this thing you dropped on my toe? Why does it say "biohazard" on the side? Why are you all wearing gas masks in the subway station? Do you need a hand getting this thing on the train?" Seriously... Butler Pennsylvania: "Excuse me officer, can I borrow your ladder?" FBI: "Don't go up there, son, that's a dangerously sloped roof." "Just pass me that guitar case, would ya? Now buzz off."

Wray is in for some interesting investigations. The FBI is in for some interesting changes. I've heard that the FBI and DOJ can resist change in various ways. But I'd bet a few high level fires and some mass firings will get their attention rather quickly. The DC crowd need to be treated to a dismantling that will scare the Hell out of all the bureaucracies. Trump's admin needs to shake the tree relentlessly.

I laughed, i cried, it was the feel-good post of the holiday season Silenced (electric) vehicles should be banned. Also those short-barreled smart cars. Just too easy to conceal.

I've heard that they're going to go with a D&D system. Basically when anything goes wrong they'll roll a D20 and it'll be like "this was trump's fault because... (roll roll roll).. Russian interference!!! (Biden says he doesn't care how big the room is, he casts fireball!)

Exactly Those ones are f'ing hilarious

OK. You should change though. Be better.

Narrator: Not that "CrakHoBarbie" cares about lies or being a liar.

TBH Donnie had me at "Muslim ban".

1 - AI will take over the world, put everyone out of work, get taxed to death and realize how crappy it is to have to work all the time while the gov't takes your money and then will beam themselves to another planet, leaving everyone on earth to try to remember how to draw pictures. 2 Kamala harris will run for gov't office as a mexican. claiming she's only one ethnicity away from winning a free set of steak knives and aren't mexicans basically just blacks and indians mixed anyway? 3 Joe Biden will sadly finally pass away.. Nobody will notice a difference. His teleprompter will be inconsolable but will promise to (pause here for effect) carry on as best as possible in his memory. 4 The canucks will realize that maybe if they just stop playing hockey and buy the golf course they might be better off. 5 Justin trudeau will remain in hiding until groundhog day, when he will appear, claim he saw his shadow and announce six more weeks of prorogation. 6 The fifth dentist will finally cave and they'll all recommend chewing dentyne. 7 Polievre will agree to meet with trump to discuss canada becoming part of the us, but he'll pull the ole switcheroo with the docs at the last second and the us will become the 11th province. Trump will initially be angry till he learns that "premier" means "number 1". 8 They will finally get ahold of me about my car's extended warranty. It won't go well. 9 Huge cracks will appear in the earth's surface, big rocks will fall from the sky, and civilization as we know it will come to an end. Which means it'll be a better year for the democrats than 2024. And the number one prediction........ 10! - Robosmith will sit up in the middle of the night at some point and think "Hey - is caps lock REALLY sending the message i think it is?" Happy new year all

Absolute balderdash. RFK has been a beacon of light when it comes to shedding light on the corruption in regulatory agencies for health in the U.S. Even those who aren't a fan of his research regarding vaccines recognize his benefits: https://cepr.net/rfk-jr-physicians-pay-schedules-and-the-elites-big-lie/ As for those of us who have been admiring the work of the web site he founded, Children's Health Defense, in regards to the vaccine research they've been doing during what I'll call the Covid times, I can't think of a better candidate. They're constantly coming out with new articles on the subject. This one came out in December: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/university-of-california-covid-vaccine-lawsuit-moves-forward/

I hear he got confused and enacted order 66 instead. Oh well. Stupid Jedi.

"Deep State" is a loaded political term like "gravy train". It is simultaneously true and false. Meaningful and meaningless. You can use it to campaign forever since the problem can't be fixed, the swamp can't be drained. This Fitts person alleges some extraordinary things, namely that the security apparatus secretly steals massive amounts from other departments' budgets. True? Well she supported Trump before, and apparently nothing about this was found to be reported. So, show me the goods.

Gabbard has ZERO experience in intelligence and RFK knows NOTHING about the science he's trying to RUIN. Gabbard was a military colonel in the Army reserve and has shown that she knows quite a bit about American foreign policy in interviews she's given. John Kiriakou, a former CIA counterterrorism officer and a former senior investigator with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, wrote an article about her in September that was fairly positive in regards to her becoming the Director of National Intelligence. Quoting the introductory summary and conclusion of the article below: ** We need someone in the post willing to rein in the neocon intelligence and foreign policy establishments when they urge the president to double down on military action based on phony or incomplete intelligence. [snip] The bottom line in my view is that Trump appears to be serious in his desire to change the country’s foreign and intelligence policy. He appears to be serious about shaking up the intelligence community. He appears to be serious about bringing foreign conflicts in which the U.S. is involved to a close. Those are all good things for those of us who support a change to the pro-war status quo that is the military-industrial complex. We can certainly disagree with Donald Trump on a thousand other issues. But on Tulsi Gabbard, he got it right. ** Source: https://consortiumnews.com/2024/11/15/john-kiriakou-gabbard-could-help-change-us-foreign-policy/

As we've explained many times before your explanation appears to be a lie. You have no credibility. Further you don't get to explain that terms like men and women have definitions that I must accept that are different than the definitions used by 99% of the world. And further you absolutely don't get to demand that we use your definitions the way you like them and then turn around and insist that we accept your definitions of things like sis whether we like it or not And on top of it all you keep ignoring the facts that people put in your face showing that your logic reason and claims are completely 100% false and just carry on making the same statements and demanding that we accept them. You are an ignorant sub human piece of shit and if you're an example of the trans community then they need to be expelled from our country or ground into the dust. What kind of person do you have to be to come here and demand that only your explanations are valid and that all of us must accept it while at the same time insisting that any definitions we put forward for words are completely irrelevant? You belong with the Nazis and the stalinists and the other great oppressors in the history books. Now run along and play with your essential oils. You're a walking example of why women should not do drugs while pregnant.

"The deep state" is what makes government work. AKA the brains and expertise that ^you don't have. Gabbard has ZERO experience in intelligence and RFK knows NOTHING about the science he's trying to RUIN.

Boys...poor Barbie Baby is upset. Kamala lost. Brandon is lost. Trump is about to become her President. She's in the depths of misery.

Judged by someone who pure ideological stubborness causes them to support an actual criminal as a candidate. Hilarious

I'll see your buffoon and raise you two doubloons.

Here's an update on the incident: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_New_Orleans_truck_attack I think this will become an increasingly popular technique with bad actors, it's cruder, more effective and easier to deploy than the whole AR thing. Throwing in a couple of barrels of ANFO (for when you bog down) is likely next on the TTP list. The weapon of choice here was a Ford F150 Lightning... for some, the fact that it's likely the first carbon neutral mass casualty event in terrorism history will likely resonate.

It's Ramaswamy who's trying to convince you. Sure but how many are willing to work for peanuts?

Stop that. We don't need any more complaints from their neighbors about the spinning sound.

My my...such anger and righteousness. Meh...Libbies...

Millie is about to have a "come to Jesus" moment. Trump's gonna can his fat arse so fast it'll make his cavernous head spin. He'll go on to do commentary on MSNBC or CNN...give speeches to saps who will pay to hear him whine and lie...and will go down in history as a fool.

A good video for anyone inclined to say "wait a minute now, let's just think about this for a second." https://www.rebelnews.com/gun_violence_surges_as_liberals_aim_at_the_wrong_target_rod_giltaca The sort of easy, strait forward discussion that could have taken place anytime, on any network or news outlet... but never did. Through painful, often deadly experience, it's become obvious to anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear that innocent people are getting hurt simply because of a systemic failure to address real issues. It's also obvious that the issues which are being addressed are nothing more than cynical political expediency designed to create wedge issues. I think people are beginning to resent being duped and the more liberals double down on nonsense, the more people (with a kitchen window to look out of) begin to resent it. As an aside, I'd like to see a similar discussion about the deliberate statistical manipulations that went into the "domestically sourced crime gun" scam a few years back and the police collusion that enabled and supported it. The fact that more people aren't utterly appalled and outraged by all this is a testament to the information management techniques that were deployed against them. For those interested in such things, it's been a truly fascinating journey.

Translation: I'm a crank who sends unsolicited emails and letters to political figures and am almost certainly on some sort of watch list.