Leaderboard

I heard that on October 31st she was giving out candy to children to get them to come to her house.

The font is too small. Try using Times New Bullshit second Dipload Edition.

Trump Nominates Pam Bondi for Attorney General After Matt Gaetz Withdrawal https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/11/21/trump-nominates-pam-bondi-for-attorney-general-after-matt-gaetz-withdrawal/

The hate has always been there, and i pretty sure Israel really does not give a rats ass what the other countries say or do... I also very sure nobody really gives a rats ass what the UN has to say about anything...not since UNRWA had members take part in the raid into Israel and took hostages, are responsible for teaching HAMAS propaganda in their schools...Ya i don't think Israel really cares what they say....UN is run by third world dictators...

HUNT: “The province ordered us to destroy our data — I objected!” Dr. Julian Somers, director of the Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addiction at Simon Fraser University, says that despite the thin evidence in support of these experimental programs, the BC government has aggressively expanded them — and retaliated against dissenting researchers. Safer supply programs claim to reduce overdoses and deaths by distributing free addictive drugs — typically 8-milligram tablets of hydromorphone, an opioid as potent as heroin — to dissuade addicts from accessing riskier street substances. Yet, a growing number of doctors say these programs are deeply misguided — and widely defrauded. Ultimately, Somers argues, safer supply is exacerbating the country’s addiction crisis. And if you dare speak out your attacked or canceled. This is more evidence of the ongoing tendency for governments to repress scientific evidence that doesn't suit their ideological agenda while at the same time demanding that people follow the science.

I'm taking the under on Trump getting sick of Elon's shit before inauguration day.

That and stripping away worker and consumer protections, ending environmental regulations, that sort of thing.

It is funny because the election official who made that decision to count the ballots admitted she was breaking the law and didn't care, there was no interpretation of the law she knew exactly what she was doing was illegal.

Wait a minute... if you rearrange pam bondi it spells.... P -DOMAIN! PROOF! PROOF SHE"S TRYING TO TAKE OVER..... (it's a trap!)

I can't help but wonder if there's going to be some kind of rape accusation coming out a month before the election. Our MSM would love nothing more than a chance to slander Poilievre, they just need to find a crisis actress to play the role.

I heard that on Dec 24th she fills her stockings with candy, and then gets kids to just reach in there and grab them.

Well there is going to be lots of happy conservatives on election day....there is that.....and that should last for a least 4 years....and i suppose the left will fill up all the mental health spots left, with all the crying and whining...but hey according to August we all will get along. Me i'm opening up a stand in the mall to give give out hugs to those lefties that just need a few seconds of understanding...at 20 bucks a pop, it could the new thing...at least for the next 4 years...

OMG! One of the Penguin's handpicked henchmen is having second thoughts? He'll have to turn on his TV and pick another!

Part and parcel of getting nominated to any cabinet position or judicial position by the GOP is the left's obligatory rape accusation. "Oh mah Gawd, it was the worstest thing that evah happened to me. It was in about 1992 or '93, sometime between spring and fall, in the early evenin' or mornin', and I was out jogging or walking in the park in either Chicago or Boston or something like that. I was so ashamed that I never told anyone. I have PTSD from it, and to this day I still can't walk or jog in public parks, I have to rollerblade or ride a bike."

Democrats will cook up any ol' bullshit story to get power. What a bunch of f*cking scumbags.

This Sky News page is the bees knees. https://news.sky.com/topic/ukraine-6556 They have minute by minute updates with all the facts and the quotes from foreign leaders, and not much else, and they're all stacked in chronological order. Most other sites have one carefully cultivated article which is mainly just their own narrative, but this has all the US quotes, Zelenski quotes, Putin quotes, and the quotes of other foreign leaders, all in chrono order. There's a flurry of activity since Trump was elected, and it was initially peaceful, but now these countries are all in a rush to meet their current objectives before the Sheriff comes to town. Trump really needs to make a statement soon, to pump the brakes on these warhawk id10ts.

Social media platforms such as Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, X and Snapchat, among others, would be affected. Australia launches bill to ban social media for children under 16 Should it be only with parental consent?

Don't know where you find the patience....

Bottom of the barrel comments like that quickly diminishes any credibility you may have had. I wish you a merry Christmas and a happy time getting the sand out of your ears.

If it's anything like losing a friend to MSNBS, that's gotta be tough. I am sure you did all you could.

No, we often disagree. On the SUBJECT at hand, with actual statements besides dogmatic drivel and nonsense that's sheer belligerent contrariness.

It's a send up of circling AI screw ups and missing the obvious.

Actually is the story points out trump was a regular donor. The fact that one of the donations happened to come at a time when a decision favorable to him was made it's hardly evidence of wrongdoing. But it was the only time he'd ever made a donation to her then sure that's kind of sus but that's not the case so you have absolutely no evidence that this was in association with anything. Has the story notes, when you compare that for example to Hillary Clinton's green lighting the Saudi Arabia weapons deal and immediately the Clinton Foundation receives a huge donation which Bill profits from directly and they only ever did it once at that specific time it is far far less suspect, and democrats insisted that that was perfectly normal

Your lack of position does not survive my understanding This isn't a question about your position this is a question about facts. You claim your argument was one thing when it very clearly wasn't and you're very clearly doing it to change the channel from the fact that you were wrong. And now you can't address that so you are trying desperately to make it my fault that you behaved in a stupid and childish fashion, which is entirely common on the left. We see it all the time. You're wrong and stupid therefore it's somebody else's fault. Do better next time. This level of stupid isn't even entertaining it's just boring. It's like watching a puppy pee itself.

BONDI is related to BUNDY! She changed her name to hide that fact! She helped murder all those people and now she's taking over the DOJ to kill illegal aliens and women that have abortions! Oh, and Muslims!

Trump didn’t just fire some people. He lost A LOT of people many of whom quit in protest while others were forced to resign in disgrace for being crooks, wife-beaters and/or Russian stooges Some were fired because they wouldn’t violate their ethics by kissing his ring and offering a pledge of loyalty to him personally 1) Not the same as cabinet members hand-picked to run the country at its highest level 2) None came out to berate Kamala and become outspoken “anti-Kamala” critics the way so many of Trump’s former staff publicly turned on him 3) Kamala didn’t publicly berate, abuse and blame them on Twitter whenever she wanted to deflect criticism from herself 4) the reasons given for leaving Harris were: a) The lack of prominence given to the VP office in the Biden administration and promising opportunities elsewhere in DC and the private sector b) Harris managed her office “like a prosecutor” as reported “which included pointed questions about footnotes in their reports or the reasons behind why certain items had been added to her schedule. “It’s stressful to brief her, because she’s read all the materials, has annotated it and is prepared to talk through it,” said one former aide. “You can’t come to the vice president and just ask her to do something,” said another staffer. “You need to have a why.” So in other words, she was the opposite of Trump who knew nothing, read nothing, spouted off random half-baked non-sequitur nonsense and staff would get their recommendations approved by flattery and tricking him into thinking it was his great idea 5) Its noted that more than 20 of the people who left her VP staff came back to work on her presidential campaign 6) Unlike Trump’s chaotic administration, Kamala’s staff eventually stabilized after they recruited people more accustomed to her “demanding” management style. No sorry. Don’t try to normalize what is extremely abnormal. NO president has had so many ex-staffers come out to denounce them or has been denounced so extensively, if they had any denounce them at all. And these ex-staffers didn’t simply share their views because they”CNN shoved a microphone in their face”. They made the special effort to seek out the media and speak publicly to denounce trump. Trump is absolutely unique, not only for the extreme level of criticism that his ex-staff have for him but also in the sheer number of staff to come out with it. For any other president the number of staff who become critics is usually between 0 and 1 , most of whom keep their opinions to themselves and maintain an appearance of civility. MeanwhileTrump has dozens of critics who go out of their way to tell the world what an awful human being and terrible president he was. Both the degree to which he is despised and the number of staffers who so despise him is absolutely without any historical precedent. Sorry Republican political rhetoric has been hateful for years But of course you’re biased you think it’s not hateful to call Obama a n*gger or Hillary a c*nt but it’s hateful to call someone “deplorable” You don’t think it’s hateful when Republicans heckled Obama and Biden during their SOTU speeches but you think it’s hateful if anyone dares publicly criticize a Republican.

So...no. You can't prove it. Too bad, so sad. Do enjoy the next 4 years Pup.

I never could have imagined this is how it would all turn out. This is truly an amazing finish. Congratulations to one and all. Thank you @DUI_Offender for hosting this event. Can't wait to do it all again next year.

Sorry but that's not what that study says. For example from your own link: The study found that undocumented immigrants are arrested at less than half the rate of native-born U.S. citizens for violent and drug crimes and a quarter the rate of native-born citizens for property crimes.[1] The fact they are arrested less does not mean that they commit less crimes. So that could easily mean undocumented aliens Take greater care to make sure that they don't get arrested, and because they are not in the system there may not be such things as fingerprints or other identifying factors to help track them down. I guess if I was an illegal I might go out of my way to make sure that any crimes I committed weren't ones I was likely to get caught from either. Worse the information is only applicable to Texas. There's every reason to believe that another state may be a more common point of entry for criminal illegal aliens or that one's entering Texas soon move elsewhere. Arizona and New Mexico for example are common points of entry for illegals. So unfortunately your information does not accurately give us any real indication of what the crime rate is for illegal migrants. It gives us some sort of indication that can't be really trusted for Texas and that's it

John Wayne Gacy was a Democrat soooooo.

That's a ridiculous QAnon wacky conspiracy. The same group that claims Sandy Hook never occurred, and Oprah has a sex trafficking ring. The same group that spread weird lies about a fandom pizza place in a strip mall being a "front" for child prostitution. With all due respect, gato. Can you read English? It took me two whole minutes to read that USA Today article, and it clearly states that the Tom Hanks rumour was just the latest wacky QAnon conspiracy theory, that had no basis with reality.

We saw similar media attacks this time out, and frankly biden hardly showed his face in the public. The polling also did not suggest that there was radical enthusiasm to vote for him. There was far more energy for Obama. And considering the media hype for Kamala which was absolutely through the roof she should have been a lot closer if that was the motivation. What we do know is that there were a number of rules which were relaxed for covid and would have made it easy to do significant ballot harvesting without detection. There were other flaws as well that were deemed to be necessary because of the covid crisis. If suddenly a bunch more people had voted for trump and it looked like a bunch of the previous democrats had moved over and it explained most of the difference that I could understand, but that's not the case. For the most part it says if about 7 million democrat voters, or approximately 10% of the democrat supporters, just vanished off the face of the earth after suddenly appearing out of nowhere the election before. Well that is not proof that election fraud happened it is a very very powerful suggestion that something went awry. Numbers like that just don't happen. It's not every US president that gets blamed for the deaths of 1M Americans or whatever it was. Plus they mass-mailed millions of unsolicited ballots in 2020, and it's possible that a lot of them legitimately came back from the people they were intended for, but I doubt anyone really knows who voted with those. And it appeared that they all showed up to vote as near as I can tell

Just for you, I will use "Little Timmy's Preschool guide to American Politics" children's book, since you seem to have as much knowledge of the American political system as a small toddler.

I do not know. He seemed like an ok selection but maybe he resurfaces later on in some other capacity.

I could pull a list that long just from Trump and his cabinet picks alone. Christ, you guys had a pedophile as Speaker for almost a decade. LOL i like how you lot have to expand that list to include "celebs" to pad the numbers.

What are you talking about? During his first administration so many of his top people he selected quit or got fired it was a joke. He couldn’t keep anyone in office. No US administration has had so many people come and go in a single term That sure doesn’t sound like he’s amazing at hiring too talent And Most of the senior people Trump selected for his first administration absolutely despise him and say he is a disaster No president has had so many of his own staff hate him on every level A 2-term president might be at polite odds with 2 or 3 former staffers. But Trump is unique in having dozens who just loathe him and personally attest to hi incompetence: “unfit to be president” “ a despicable human being” a “fascist to the core” “prefers the dictator approach to government” “hasn’t got the brains” “pretty undisciplined – doesn’t like to read, doesn’t read briefing reports” “His understanding of global events [and] his understanding of US history was really limited.” “should never be president again.” Those are just a small sample of direct quotes from those advisors you say he chose “very well”

Good thing there are plenty of other pedophiles in the Republican ranks for Trump to choose from.

Millions and millions of democratic voters don't just disappear. I've never been a big believer in the election was stolen in 2020 theory, I assume that the higher vote was just an increase in population combined with particularly motivated voters but when you look at all the variables there's no way that those numbers make sense. Something happened in 2020 that was definitely not normal and it benefited the democrats exclusively.

I'll stop there. Why?

Again...nice try. But swing and another miss. Are you gonna call Trump a Russian asset once he imposes a peace deal?

Lol...you keep trying to make me out to be some sort of Russian. Unfortunately I am Canadian. If the USA and NATO had any strategic concern for Ukraine, they'd have accepted the Ukrainian application. They did not. Brandon has now tried to eliminate any peace deal Trump has in mind. But that's not gonna work. All it's gonna do is give Russia a reason to level Kiev. Trump will bring peace. I'm sure you understand what that will mean. So enjoy your little war. It's got a limited shelf life now, and then you can call Trump a Russian asset. Enjoy that.

So, I am trying to understand the OP’s concepts of good and evil. What are they? Are they forces? Are they entities with agency? Are they nouns or adjectives? Are they convenient – and subjective - judging labels?