Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/05/2024 in all areas

  1. Today you have an election where if one candidate wins she will assuredly put the other guy and his supporters in a federal prison. South Africa in the 1960s was heavily influenced by the Nazis who fled Germany to escape prosecution for crimes. Today, Kamala Harris is backed by a few of the most wicked people on the planet who've destabilized other countries and stole a bunch of their wealth. I truly believe that Today is a fork in America's road. If Harris happens to pull this off, the middle class will be further decimated and the nation itself will further their decay as started under Obama. America as a prosperous nation will no longer exist instead being run by sick people looking only out for their own interests. Here's hoping America doesn't go down the same road as so many other places have gone. Reject communo-fascism, America
    3 points
  2. The issue is folks like you defending this madness. My day will be just fine. The lives of the kids you are screwing with, not so much. The little girls and young women who are losing out to men in sports, not so much. All the stuff you are here defending.
    2 points
  3. LMAO...typical lib. Can't and won't accept reality.
    2 points
  4. I believe you're scheduled for gender reassignment surgery during Thanksgiving weekend. Good luck with that, f*ckface.
    2 points
  5. Here is my map for President. I favored Atlas Intel because they had the most accurate polls last season. The Senate is going to be interesting. RCP has 50 seats as a lock for R and 43 as a lock for D. TX is the easy toss up. Atlas has Ted up 7 and increasing. That should be a lock for R. D43/R51 WI is going to be a nail biter. The last three polls were R+1, tie, D+1. I'm leaning D here because the last poll did. I wouldn't be surprised either way. If Trump wins the state, though, advantage goes to R. D44/R51 PA is close, but D+2 was the last poll by Atlas and Casey is an incumbent. D45/R51 OH has had a R lead in every poll. Last Atlas poll had R+3. D45/R52 NV is voting for Harris and just about every recent poll has D by 3 or more. D46/R52 AZ is anyone's guess. The last two polls have a tie. Trump wins AZ so his party gets the edge. D45/R53 MI will split their vote. Trump wins the state but the D wins the senate. D46/R54 I'm not confident with my AZ best guess. So I could see this being D47/R53 or even D48/R52 pretty easy. But there is a possibility it could be D45/R55 if things go very well and absolutely worst case, D49/R51. https://www.realclearpolling.com/maps/senate/2024/toss-up The House is far too big for me to predict. I'm hearing it will probably be a narrow R majority again. That would track with the Senate and Presidential outcomes.
    2 points
  6. The Libbies have been picking on Caucasian America for 20 years...give or take. This has been suicide. Now they've targeted men as well. This "woke" ideology gave the Libbies temporary power. But it's faded and is now a bad joke. If the Democrats continue down this path, they will continue to lose.
    2 points
  7. Cringe: Bussed them in and they still won't chant for her.
    2 points
  8. No one said ^this to Trump you liar.
    2 points
  9. Your meme is so stupid that even Kamala would be ashamed.
    2 points
  10. The NATO thing is a fig leaf to cover for Putin's STEALING Ukraine's huge gas reserves.
    2 points
  11. https://www.counterpunch.org/2024/11/01/the-ukraine-war-is-lost-three-options-remain/ I've never heard of counterpunch before, but this article is brilliant. I started listening to George Beebe a few years ago when he was warning about tensions in Ukraine, the real risk of escalation to nuclear war and the dangers of groupthink. Back in 2021 he assessed that Russia was likely to invade Ukraine given the combination of the US’s determination to bring the country into NATO and the fact that it was a “now-or-never moment” for Moscow to stop this happening. Beebe says the West has an erroneous idea as to the very nature of the conflict. The US and the Europeans defined the Russian invasion as a “deterrence model problem” rather than a “spiral model problem”. In the former, the adversary is a kind of Hitler that must be stopped at all costs. No one actually believed that was the case, it's just propaganda. In reality, Beebe says, the conflict conforms to what Robert Jervis defined back in the 1970s as a “spiral model problem” – where you have one state that attempts to enhance its own security by taking measures (for example, Ukraine joining NATO) that another state (Russia) believes are threatening. You get into a dynamic of action and reaction that can spiral to the point where you get into a conflict. US triumphalism after the fall of the Berlin Wall led, he says, to the US feeling it could abandon statecraft. “We no longer felt that we had to engage in normal diplomatic give-and-take, attempting to balance interests as well as balance power – the kinds of things that statecraft has involved for thousands of years. We thought that wasn’t necessary. Number one: we know we’re right. And number two: US power was just so disproportionately greater than any other country’s power, we could simply impose our views, whether they liked it or not.” That moment – the Unipolar Moment – has passed and we are now in a multipolar world. There is no sharper confirmation of this altered geopolitical landscape than the fact that Russia, by force of arms, has almost certainly defeated US plans to extend NATO into Ukraine. the Ukrainian army, which has put up an astonishingly stout and courageous resistance, is increasingly unable to hold the line. This week the fortress city of Selydove fell with scarcely a mention in the mainstream media. A couple of weeks ago Vuhledar, another key in Ukraine’s defenses, fell after months of pressure from the Russians. Every day villages and towns are tumbling at a quickening tempo. Chasiv Yar, one of the toughest nuts for the Russians to crack, is close to collapse. The Russians are closing in on Pokrovsk, a key logistical hub in Donetsk. The Ukrainians face a terrible dilemma. Most seem to realize the war is lost. Any attempt at negotiation with the Russians, however, would unleash internal pressures inside Ukraine that could lead to a coup, assassinations or other upheaval. The US won’t want the war to end before President Biden leaves office in January 2025 – and may prolong the agony, loss of life and the ceding of yet more territory to Russia for US domestic reasons rather than the best interests of Ukraine. Where is all this leading? Wait for it.... This is a CRAZY indictment of the west if it's true... The third option, and clearly the preferable one for Beebe, is that the West changes course and “picks up the phone”, ending its refusal to negotiate. "The west" is who's refusing to negotiate? All the f-tards here were saying that it's "a Russian war of aggression against Ukraine", why would "the west" be the ones stopping the war from ending? How does 'the west' even have a say in how or when the war ends if it's not a proxy war?
    1 point
  12. First Putin asks Musk to deny Starlink to Taiwan, and so far he has. Putin Reportedly Asked Elon Musk Not to Activate Starlink ... Newsweek https://www.newsweek.com › putin-reportedly-asked-el... Oct 24, 2024 — ... Putin had asked Musk not to activate his Starlink satellites over Taiwan as a "favor" to Chinese leader Xi Jinping. The report arrives as Meanwhile Musk is providing Starlink Internet to Russian in Ukraine while cutting it off to Ukraine at critical junctures . What to know about Elon Musk's reported phone calls with ... PBS https://www.pbs.org › newshour › politics › what-to-kn... Oct 25, 2024 — In 2023, Musk then refused to allow Ukraine to use Starlink for a surprise attack on Russian soldiers in Crimea. Both Trump and Musk have been having secret (to the public) phone calls with Putin while backing Trump's campaign to the hilt with over $100M contributions and promoting foreign disinformation on X. Elon Musk ordered Starlink to be turned off during Ukraine ... The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com › technology › sep › elon... Sep 7, 2023 — Biography alleges Musk told engineers to turn off communications network to hobble Ukraine drone attack on Russian warships. Elon Musk's Secret Conversations With Vladimir Putin WSJ https://www.wsj.com › World › Russia Oct 25, 2024 — Regular contacts between world's richest man and America's chief antagonist raise security concerns; topics include geopolitics, ... Trump had as many as 7 private calls with Putin since ... PBS https://www.pbs.org › newshour › politics › trump-had-... Oct 8, 2024 — Bob Woodward writes in his new book “War” that Donald Trump has had as many as seven private phone calls with Vladimir Putin since leaving ...
    1 point
  13. Of course - his dog is just typing away, @Nationalist knows that a good writer writes for his audience so he has to dumb it down a little more
    1 point
  14. What on Earth are you talking about? The Russian goal was to conquer the whole of Ukraine, and install a puppet Government. Maybe you have me mixed up with someone else. Is your source Douglas MacGregor? Seems unlikely Ukraine will run out of men, considering the country has lost only 1% of it's population over the last 3 years.
    1 point
  15. Nationalist has wanted Russia to win, from day 1. His "I want peace" BS, is hysterical.
    1 point
  16. They had a commercial for folks like you back in the day: Here is why Taiwan does not have Starlink: "Starlink is not available in Taiwan after negotiations reportedly fell apart over Taiwan’s requirement that a local entity have a majority share of any joint venture established." https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/oct/15/taiwan-to-have-satellite-internet-service-as-protection-in-case-of-chinese-attack
    1 point
  17. So, are you making a "practical and moral" argument or a legal one? Mitch McConnell doesn't control the enforcement of federal laws.
    1 point
  18. YOU are LYING because you cannot prove any of that stuff due to LACK OF EVIDENCE>
    1 point
  19. I sure hope you folks take your country back today. All the best to you
    1 point
  20. I'm shocked. Are you shocked? I'm totally shocked.
    1 point
  21. Prove it. You are arguing in bad faith. They are helping protect Eastern Europe from Russian aggression. If NATO did not exist, I have every reason to believe Russia would have invaded Poland, the Baltic Countries, and even Finland by now. Can you provide sources that support your claims about James Baker. Prove it. How is NATO lying? What promises? You are a fool. The Russian invasion was not justified at all. I would not blame the US for invading us, if we joined an alliance with their enemies (and our enemies). However, that has not stopped from Pierre and the Conservatives, and members of the GOP to try to form alliances with Russia. No, you are stupid for buying into Russian propaganda.
    1 point
  22. That's an easy promise, cause it'd never happen. The REAL hope, of course, is that you psychopaths don't get completely unhinged.
    1 point
  23. When Trump loses, can you promise not to shoot up any public place?
    1 point
  24. There's zero chance Trump wins the popular vote this time. You guys are so deep in your bubble you have no idea how much of the country is sick of his shit.
    1 point
  25. One could argue that she implied as much in a roundabout way. But again, the specific claim in question was she said those every words out loud, which is bullshit.
    1 point
  26. It doesn't matter who wins or loses, but that the war continues. -- The Left
    1 point
  27. LOl Open white identity politics are the OG identity politics, read a book, racist dipshit. cry more.
    1 point
  28. Landslide for the Republicans.
    1 point
  29. First, you asked a loaded question. There was never a "threat" to join NATO. I have repeatedly called you out on this BS argument of yours. NATO is a defensive alliance for GOOD in this world. The only "threat" they pose to Russia is in opposing Russian aggression and harmful acts around the world. Second, you keep pushing this lie about not moving past Germany. You have already ran away from several threads on this where you have been called out before. No such formal agreement was ever made and NATO has been moving past Germany long before Ukraine. Third, there was never any formal agreement with Ukraine not ever joining NATO. None of this garbage is in my head because I am an honest person not engaged in pushing Russian propaganda to defend Russia like you are. You are the one who justifies this war for Russia, lies, and pushes Russian propaganda. You are the war monger.
    1 point
  30. Here you go again... you don't engage directly with what I say or ask. You play these dishonest games. Yeah, Ukraine has caused a lot of Russian casualties WITH the help from NATO you oppose. You say you want peace, with a lack of war, but you justify Russian invasion and push Russian propaganda to lie about their war in the Donbas before the full scale invasion. You do care who wins, you want Russia to win. If you care about lies, then why do you continue to engage in them and push them?
    1 point
  31. This post has been approved by the Kremlin.
    1 point
  32. Do you think anyone is stupid enough to still believe you? If she actually said it, you would have cited it ages ago. The fact that you can't indicates you're lying again It's hilarious how you're programmed to have the last word, even if you have nothing, so you default to restating the unsubstantiated claim or ignoring the question altogether. It reminds me of when I asked you why you believe Clinton is a rapist but don't believe Trump is one. That totally broke you.
    1 point
  33. LARPing. It's nothing to do with gender.
    1 point
  34. Zelenskyy could have surrendered, and let Russian tanks march into Kyiv, but he stood up to Russia. Most people would consider that admirable, but for some reason, you cheer for Russia to win. The amount of people killed in combat on both sides, is nowhere remotely close to 1,000,000 people. Where do you get that fictitious number from? Did you just make it up?
    1 point
  35. Did you just do the year called and wants something back thing? Yeah, that fits.
    1 point
  36. I'm saying that your english teacher was a joke Where as you personally are more of a derisive snicker at best.
    1 point
  37. They tried their best but unfortunately for them the judges turned out to be real people and not just the voices in their heads. They were completely unprepared for that
    1 point
  38. 1 point
  39. Yes, it would make everything easier and less expensive for everyone. Man cannot control the climate so why try to control it and harm the economy for everyone? Just try to mitigate the effects of changing climate. Prepare for forest fires and floods, which we should be doing anyway.
    1 point
  40. You just said it was communist, now you're saying far left.... Just what are you confessing to here? Why does Zelenski need permission to end it?
    1 point
  41. I don't want to "own" anyone, I just don't understand why people don't take a couple of minutes to fact check something before shooting off their mouths. I guess it's the X generation.
    1 point
  42. He didn't just say they violated the rules, he was very upset and said something like [if we don't enforce the rules, then what is the point of having them]. So SNL is in for a violation.
    1 point
  43. I hate the stupid Republican base for making this so close and for a situation that no matter who wins America and the world loses. They could have run away with this election by putting up almost any sane, reasonable person, be it Desantis, Romney, Haley, or whoever. The Democrats deserve to lose. But not to that retarded ass monkey Trump.
    1 point
  44. BTW this is the Canada/Provincial politics sub forum Transexuals played zero part in the BC, Nova Scotia or Saskatchewan election and will zero in the upcoming federal election. Should it play a significant issue in the US election it will only lower our respect for American voters even more.
    1 point
  45. I do not care either way. I just do not understand why it is such a huge political issue. If anything, it distracts from the real issues. Can you provide evidence of Transgender people "grooming" children?
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...