Leaderboard

The question remains, what is it about this that you find so outrageous? Not much of an answer I'm afraid. If you were actually concerned about the behavior rather than just the partisan angle, you'd have also brought up shameless Putin-shill and authoritarian Viktor Orban, who's "attacked" the Biden administration, openly endorsed Trump (who subsequently lavished him with farcical praise during the last Debate) and who wined and dined him at Mar-a-Lago. The "visuals" for that don't look so hot either. I think you may actually believe what you're saying, but it's just blind partisanship. The whole reason for remaining neutral regarding foreign elections is to not pre-emptively antagonize the other side (who may end up winning). If JD Vance hadn't spent the last year undermining the Ukrainian war effort and making it clear he'd throw them under the bus, Zelensky would have nothing to say about him. Had Zelensky spoken out against the Democrats, we'd not hear a peep out of you over it. What bothers you about this is the angle.

I'm Canadian you pants pissing m0ron. Christ, you're dumb. A woman is someone who crosses to the other side of the street when they see you.

The GOP invites Netanyahu, he delivers a clearly partisan speech, dines at Mar-a-Lago with Trump, and this is OKAY. Viktor Orban attacks Biden and his administration, pals up with Putin, hangs out with Trump at Mar-a-Lago and endorses Trump, this is also OKAY. Zelensky gives an interview where he says Vance (who's been arguing for some time that Ukraine should roll over and make concessions to Putin, and who's also been claiming Haitians are kidnapping and eating pets) is too radical...and this is NOT OKAY. Interesting logic there mister. The line in the sand is...what? That it was Pennsylvania?

I am all about supporting Ukraine and funding their war efforts against Russia... what I am not for is this administration flying him to a battleground state during the election in what amounts to using him for their campaign. This administration used military assets to fly him to America, to a battleground state, where he is engaged in politics against their rival. Zelensky calls Vance ‘too radical,’ suggests he study WWII https://thehill.com/policy/defense/4895400-volodymyr-zelensky-jd-vance-too-radical/ "Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a new interview with The New Yorker that Ohio Sen. JD Vance (R), the Republican nominee for vice president, “is too radical.”

That's who I meant by The Magnificent 51.

Some of these idi ots were also on the list that said the Hunter Biden laptop had all the earmarks of Russian disinformation. Go figure.

I popped that post into a blender and out came Floccinaucinihilipilification.

She's said nothing about her economic plans. But she did say the economy has the lowest unemployment rate but also that people are wanting jobs to come back. And she just declared a national right to vacation. That should be fun.

That sure is some articulate criticism you have there. 😐

There is no question. Feel free to read the first comment. You have not provided much of anything here either. *shrug* As is your approach here. *shrug*

Copemoji fest. Which is wild that you couldn't provide a link in the exchange I mentioned. Kinda hard to pretend it's about you not wanting to waste your time when you will spend ten times as much time whining about how unfair it is to be asked for a link than it would take to post a link in the first place. It's not reasonable to assume that someone has seen every single post or thread on the board when literally dozens of new threads pop up every day. I never said it wasn't evidence, I said it wasn't proof you id!ot. And it's not. We haven't seen the posts in question, it's literally hearsay. lol this absolutely does not preclude including an account of a conversation that is relevant to the claims being made since that would fall under "what you saw or heard." (eg. "On x date at x time I witnessed so-and-so from ABC telling so-and-so from the Harris campaign 'we will only fact check Trump'") This is my entire point you dimwit: the "whistleblower: claims to have detailed information based on conversations they witnessed (and recorded) first hand but no actual details are included. This Twitter post also doesn't have an attachment of a transcription of the alleged recordings either so that's out the window as well.

Provincial statues don't spell out rights. Here's a refresher for you below. Guide to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Canada.ca Provincial statues spell out restrictions. They say what must be done and what can't be done. They don't impart rights. I know you don't understand how the constitution works or what the charter is... Do we need to have another talk about what the constitution and charter is? Here's a rule of thumb. Anything that has a penalty associated with it is probably not a right.

1. Like Joe Biden, whom you also would've voted for. lol 2. A woman is a human being that identifies as a woman. -- Braindead Dog

Biden is senile, not Trump. We'd better kick the old degenerate out and give the rest of this term and the next four years to Trump.

It's a Canadian board numbnuts. Not a mindreader? You can't even read words. A woman is a person whose touch you will never know.

You're on a U.S. thread, you braindead psychopath. I'm not a mind reader. Now, what is a woman? Don't be a b*tch, just answer the question.

And then he'll call the Hillary Hotline and b*tch about the 1st and 2nd Amendments. lol

When it come to actual voting many Canadians will think twice before giving a blank cheque to Conservatives. Many remember the dark days of Harper majority government. Besides there are a number of months till the election day and the economy is rapidly recovering with inflation below 2% on election day and interest and mortgage rate down again close to historic lows by mid next year and rapid employment gains. Liberals already taken concrete steps to curb student visa and temporary workers which was of deep concern to many Canadians and much more is needed.

It's cute how you deny reality...but you do deny reality. Then you try to call those who live in reality, of being parrots of some nefarious ideology. Yes...in your little Libbie mind, reality is on a moving scale that you odd little freaks move as necessary. This is one of the major contributing factors to why you get laughed at and are not trusted at all. You should find a different method. Lying repeatedly doesn't appear to be working for ya.

lol what do you know, you live under your bed because you're terrified of the world. "TDS isn't real, I know what a woman is and I'm not voting Harris, but keep trying, dipshit. I'd get better insights and more lucid thoughts from conversing with a bunch of grapes. The only possible way anyone would find you clever or insightful is if they slammed their head in a car door a few dozen times. You are completely useless a waste of space, oxygen and genetic material. You won't even make good fertilizer.

LOL From the article: "Scientists have found evidence that some face masks which are on sale and being used by members of the general public are laced with toxic chemicals." From the article your article references: "Top German scientists have found that wearing certain types of face masks for long periods of time could result in potentially hazardous chemicals and harmful microplastics being inhaled deep into human lungs." So not masks in general, specific shitty made in China fabric masks.

He was flown to Pennsylvania on our military aircraft. He was there with Democrats. There are other munitions factories... why is he giving interviews to American journalists attacking Vance? The GOP Invited him to talk to Congress, where everyone is at, both Democrats and Republicans, not a major campaign state. Hosting him in a battleground state as he makes public appearances with the major Democrats in major races there, as he gives interviews attacking Republicans. All using the American military to make it happen.

It's non CONFIDENCE. I would agree but it will be a majority government.

When you have to work that much longer you can never achieve a comparable standard of living. Unless one believes that standard of living is expressed only by what one can buy. Who are those people? They must speak on behalf of the billionaires. The more billionaires, the sicker the society is.

What?!?! You didn't hire a consultant? Are you some kind of genius?

Margaret Atwood wrongly called this "Survival". Russians - Bulgarians - survive. We Canadians get along. Malgré tout, on réussit à s'entendre.

We already know that western countries have become more racist in significant part due to woke (diversity, equity, inclusion) discrimination. We have literally created a racial hierarchy in western society and are now actioning it. Anyone who agrees with the agenda is either a racist or a guilt-ridden self-hating loser or both. Either way, they support racial discrimination.

Maybe Conservative Progressives would get better traction and respect than the other way around did. Canada's right has called itself just about everything else under the sun trying to fit in - even Liberals FFS. Who do they think they're trying to fool?

I was recently in Pusan. ===== America won the Cold War. Koreans are weird.

You sure spend an awful lot of time talking about something you don't care about

Let's out it this way: I bet he's a shitty poker player.

So you interpret that as "woke" do you? Nice try. As you have absolutely no idea of why the other person was there, you have no idea of why he got ahead of you. So just toss shit into the wind to justify your complaint. Black Dog beat me by mere seconds....

Meh...people like Hodad make up history and truth to suit their purposes. That's why they have to lie so much.

lol so you have no idea why he was there what his condition might be (or maybe he was just seeing someone who was already in the treatment area) but you're 100% sure it was wokeism because he was native. You are deranged.

No, the democrats are the biggest liars and it's not even close. Trump just exaggerates once in a while.

You think and write like a caveman and call other people stupid? Man you need to evolve some self-awareness already.

Just man up...it's not to much to ask for...

You're so dumb that you don't even know that you're still lying 🤣 F'king m0r0n. It's like you're here just to prove that you actually are a cultist.

"Compromised" .... don't make the mistake of slippery sloping this. In a world where nothing is perfect, we can still have everything being great. It IS possible.

Your audience is yourself, and nobody else...so I guess you're right in a way. 🤡

This has never happened before.

Well we had 40 years of wealth redistribution under Reagan/Thatcher’s neoliberal economics that introduced a new form of predatory capitalism that never existed before. It still governs how our economies operate. Corporations and the ultra rich have seen their fortunes increase by orders of magnitude, all at the expense of the middle and working classes. Tax cuts aren’t the magic solution conservatives claim they are. Just look how Liz Truss and Sam Brownback devastated their respective economies with tax cuts that simply drove up public debt but didn’t bring in new business. Kansas literally had to close public schools on Fridays because Brownback’s tax cuts left the state too broke to even operate schools 5 days per week. In turn parents had to quit their jobs, switch to part-time or spend big bucks on day care making people’s financial situation worse. Liz Truss caused the British pound to drop like a rock and was forced to resign so quickly her 3-week term famously couldn’t even outlast a head of lettuce. Businesses aren’t gypsy hobos who will relocate at the drop of hat chasing whoever happens to have the lowest tax rate at any point in time. Relocation costs millions, tens of millions or even hundreds of millions of dollars up front and is often the result of extensive multi-year planning and corporate strategy, in which tax rates aren’t usually the primary consideration. Neoliberal austerity also gives you social and urban decay like streets that are gridlocked and public transit and airports that are unreliable and overcrowded. That drives businesses and talent away too.. It should be noted that both the poverty rate and child poverty rate drastically reduced under the Trudeau government. At last count, 2 million Canadians including 650,000 children were lifted out of poverty since 2016. And when stay at home parents are able to afford daycare and return to the workforce that is good for the economy too, conservatives talk about it like childcare money is simply shot into outer space or something. I posted this same article as the OP in the “economy” topic, the gist of the article is business and government alike notoriously squander resources amd advantages on non-innovative endeavours

I very highly recommend EVERYONE watch the Green Slush Fund (SDTC) whistleblower testimony from Committee this last week. There is no way you can come away from that thinking anything other than this is the most corrupt government Canada has ever seen. I like the Northern Perspective channel, because while they do have a Conservative slant, they call out BS on all sides. They also use their channel to inform on how government works. (1036) Northern Perspective - YouTube Their coverage of the SDTC scandal has been outstanding. The whistleblower testimony is......seriously, this is THE scandal Canadians should be paying attention to. Hundreds of millions handed over to Liberal insiders and he names names. He has audio recordings and provided 300 pages of what he's seen, of which the Liberals redacted all but 7 pages.

I have lost track of how many threads you have run away from now... Hodad is a coward that blocked me, Black Dog isn't much better at this point in cowardly running away... But yeah, sure, talk about not having any balls. You certainly are the expert at that and in good company here already.

This is so easy.... She said that more than two weeks after the bodycam footage of Floyd's arrest was leaked. I.e., she didn't say that until after the G Floyd riots were over AND after she was named Biden's running mate. It's basically a revisionist history speech, dummy. She waited until the 3 years of BLM rioting under Obama were over, and the 4 months of G Floyd rioting were over, and then she suddenly made a distinction between supporting rioters and supporting protesters. So the Dems changed from their pro-riot stance of the past 8 years to a "We want to get elected, so riots have to go on pause for a while" stance and guess what? The riots went away. All it took was for the Dems to stop inciting them and supporting them and they went away for the last 4 years. long before she said what you quoted there, she pimped a bail fund to help the rioters out of jail so that they could get back on the streets. Or do you think she was bailing out peaceful protesters? Actions speak louder than words, dummy. Were you honestly dumb enough to fall for what she did there? Don't be afraid to admit it, almost all Demi supporters were. I'm pretty sure that everything I just said there just bounced off of your confirmation bias's Iron Dome, so just ruminate on this: by your logic, Trump could come out right now and say "There should be no rioting at capitol hill, ever", and it would count as if he said that to prevent the J6th almost entirely peaceful and joyous celebration of democracy. Do you get it, you stupid piece of crap?

Does this place look like it has moderators to you lol

Trump said it was $83 billion. Maybe you suck at math but 7 is much less than 83.

But Trump says “he only hires the best people “ Are you calling your cult leader a liar and saying he can’t be trusted to hire qualified people for the most important jobs in the country? Also few of these 111 people wrote books and they weren’t all fired. Many quit in disgust or frustration or actually managed to last until the end of Trump’s term.

I'll give you an example: annual flu shots. Public health experts have long assumed flu shots were effective in the elderly. But, paradoxically, all the studies done failed to demonstrate an acceptable benefit. Instead of considering that they, the experts, could be wrong – instead of believing the scientific data – the public health experts assumed the studies were wrong. After all, flu shots have to work, right? An important and definitive “mainstream” government study done nearly a decade ago got little attention because the science came down on the wrong side of the narrative Big Pharma was promoting. It found that after decades and billions of dollars spent promoting flu shots for the elderly, the mass vaccination program did not result in saving lives. In fact, the death rate among the elderly increased substantially. So the NIH launched an effort to do “the” definitive study that would actually prove, for the first time, once and for all, that flu shots were beneficial to the elderly. The government would gather some of the brightest scientific minds for the research, and adjust for all kinds of factors that could be masking that presumed benefit. But when they finished, no matter how they crunched the numbers, the data kept telling the same story: flu shots were of no benefit to the elderly. Quite the opposite. The death rate had increased markedly since widespread flu vaccination among older Americans. The lead author of the study, Lone Simonsen, had agreed to do an on camera interview with the media on her study results, which she felt were very important. However, her bosses at the National Institutes of Health blocked the interview. However, here is her commentary on her study: Commentary: Benefits of influenza vaccine in US elderly—new studies raise questions | International Journal of Epidemiology | Oxford Academic (oup.com) Dr. Walter Orenstein was among the first to notice the problem when he headed up the Centers for Disease Control’s national immunization program. Below is a transcript of his 2006 interview with Sharyl Attkisson of CBS News: In that interview, this part was quite prophetic: So what’s an older person to do? The CDC says they should still get their flu shots. That it could make the flu less severe or prevent problems not reflected in the total numbers. But watch for CDC to likely shift in the near future more toward protecting the elderly in a roundabout way by pushing to vaccinate more children and others around them who could give them the flu. And here's the study: Impact of Influenza Vaccination on Seasonal Mortality in the US Elderly Population | Geriatrics | JAMA Internal Medicine | JAMA Network In our study, however, we examined influenza-related deaths in the entire US elderly population by estimating seasonal numbers of excess all-cause deaths. These estimates, which provide the best available national estimates of the fraction of all winter deaths that are specifically attributable to influenza,5,28 show that the observational studies must overstate the mortality benefits of the vaccine. For the 33 seasons studied, influenza-related mortality (excess all-cause mortality) was always less than 10% of the total number of winter deaths among the elderly (Table 1). This period included the 1968 pandemic and the severe 1997-1998 season29 during which the mismatched vaccine formulation provided little protection30; for both of these seasons, the estimated influenza-related mortality was probably very close to what would have occurred had no vaccine been available. We conclude, therefore, that there are not enough influenza-related deaths to support the conclusion that vaccination can reduce total winter mortality among the US elderly population by as much as half. Our findings indicate that the mortality benefits of influenza vaccination may be substantially less than previously thought but for different reasons among different age groups. Here is an Italian study showing the same results as the other countries: Influenza-related mortality in the Italian elderly: No decline associated with increasing vaccination coverage - ScienceDirect I work in healthcare during H1N1 and asked the doc I worked for if I should get that shot or other flu shots and he told me NO. He said he saw no benefit in annual flu shots to his elderly patients and that in many cases, he saw their health went downhill because of them. He would give them the shot if they wanted it, but he never pushed it on his patients. The doc I worked for was one of the VERY FEW I saw who actually kept up with medical studies. Most docs get their info from MSM, just like you do. And from Pharma reps who visit them regularly and give incentives for prescribing their drugs. This is also worth a read: Education: Flu Vaccine - Physicians for Informed Consent So, yes. I think all vaccines should be independently re-evaluated.