Leaderboard

Even when found guilty in a court, he's NOT guilty. Even when he admits he signed the papers and claims he knows nothing on them. Even when he admits if he signs a contract today he doesn't have to honour it tomorrow. From his own f*cking mouth. Even after doing in court and during proceedings what anyone else in the whole world would be locked up for Contempt of Court, he still didn't do any of those things.... you firmly believe in the I'm not lying, the whole rest of the world is lying just to 'get' me excuse

My goodness, when can we expect what was in the training manual or Floyd's past behavior to overwrite the 9 minutes of history during which Chauvin kneeled on top of a man who was begging for air until the detainee was not struggling, then completely limp, then unconscious, and then dead--and then kept kneeling on him still, practicing restraint technique on a dead man? Because that's what happened. Surrounded by witnesses and captures on video. If only the jury who watched video of a man murdered over the course of 9 minutes had known about the training manual...

You said ONLY conservatives have been charged. Hunter PROVES YOU were WRONG. LMAO. Trump changed the definition to SUPPORTING HIM and you BOUGHT IT. ? They support the CONSTITUTION. Loyalty to the CONSTITUTION DEMANDS testifying against Trump's CRIMES. You MAGA CULT types have been thoroughly CONNED.

Learn some respect, hollow man.

You are so f'd. Floyd resisted arrest. In that situation only Floyd knew he had health issues. Therefore Floyd is responsible for his own death

That depends on how the meeting is being run. If it's run according to Robert's Rules of Order time can certainly be allocated for the discussion of anything but there is a process to follow. If you're suggesting trying to shoehorn your issue into EVERY issue under discussion is appropriate for a public meeting you're endorsing a chaotic aimless meeting that won't accomplish much if anything. It usually comes down to having an experienced effective chairperson keeping things on track. The effectiveness of your board usually reflects that fairly quickly.

Of course I read it and that is pretty much exactly what you said.

It'll be easy for him. Just an Executive Order reinstating the Stay In Mexico doctrine and most of those animals will stay in their home countries.

Any kind of discrimination on the basis of race or claim to supremacy on the basis of race is wrong. Sadly, new forms of discrimination have arisen from unexpected places. Ibrahim Kendi, for example, says that we need to discriminate against whites now. Of course this line of thinking sows division, but this is now the dominant narrative in “anti-black racism” and EDI training. MLk has been replaced with judging people once again on the basis of race. We’re told to interpret the world through race and see colour first when looking at individuals. What a sad form of dehumanization, reducing everyone to racial identity and a collection of intersectionalities. Gloss over nuance by categorizing people according to superficial markers. It’s simplistic and regressive.

IF they REAAAAAALLY feel that strongly, they should ALL do it at the same time! Well they burn babies to death, they burn themselves to death. At least they're equal-opportunity psychopaths. They may be absolutely bat crap crazy but at least they're consistent.

“Human rights!” has become yet another slogan to silence, dismiss, and categorize someone as bigoted while eliminating one of the most fundamental human rights of all: free speech. When school boards arrogate the authority to discern which discussions are admissible when such presentations contain no slurs against any groups and no slander against individuals, we find ourselves back in front of a Maoist/Stalinist committee for the discernment of counter-revolutionary thoughts and behaviour. The whole purpose of school board meetings, parliaments, city councils, and town halls is to discuss and debate. Any time that discussion is squelched, the organization opens itself up to accusations of pushing through an agenda without due process. It undermines public confidence in the organization and creates conditions for backlash. When governments fund special interest groups like Egale, which then uses our tax dollars to propagandize, influence, and sue organizations, it’s very hard not to feel like an agenda has been pushed on the public without a public mandate or consent. The government funded Human Rights Tribunal is similarly run by radical activists. Our current federal government has made this mistake too many times, kowtowing to special interests at the expense of the public, both figuratively and literally. It’s the grandstanding, “Look, I’m progressive. I’m sending a big delegation to the climate conference (in private jets). I’m funding Indigenous activists (who are going to sue our governments and denounce Canada as settler colonial). I’m welcoming millions from all different cultures into Canada (who will need housing and some will denounce Canada as settler colonialist and commit terrorist acts).” Canada has shot itself in the foot on constitutional rights and Canadian traditions. This attack on free speech is just one example among many of anti-Canadian forces in our institutions.

New film provides truth in the face of George Floyd lies (nypost.com) The original autopsy report, the day after Floyd died: The original autopsy report by Hennepin County Medical Examiner Dr. Andrew Baker the day after Floyd died found there was “no physical evidence suggesting that Mr. Floyd died of asphyxiation. “Mr. Floyd did not exhibit signs of petechiae, damage to his airways or thyroid, brain bleeding, bone injuries, or internal bruising.” Sweasy claims that Baker also told her that day that “there were no medical findings that showed any injury to the vital structures of Mr. Floyd’s neck. There were no medical indications of asphyxia or strangulation.” In sworn testimony, prosecutors told of the “insane … extreme premium pressure” they were under to throw the book at Chauvin and charge the other cops because “the city was burning down.” Floyd also had COVID and severe “arteriosclerotic heart disease,” with one artery 75% obstructed, and “hypertensive heart disease.” But Ben Crump, the ambulance-chasing attorney who represented the Floyd family and secured them a $27 million payout from the Minneapolis City Council, told the media: “George Floyd was a healthy young man.” The private forensic pathologist he hired, Dr. Michael Baden, declared, without seeing Floyd’s body or slides of the autopsy, that “there was no underlying medical problem that caused or contributed to his death.” The documentary says the FBI met with Baker after Baden’s review and soon after the official autopsy report was changed to find Chauvin was to blame. Floyd’s cause of death had become “cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression.”

Both are true. But also vague. From what I've read almost everyone who is truly suffering from gender dysmorphia realizes it quite early in life. Well before puberty, in fact. The current environment, in which adults in their thirties and forties are suddenly 'trans' is nonsensically unscientific. As for teens, they're subject to fads. How many of those teenagers questioning their gender are doing so because of how fashionable it is and because of encouragement from various quarters? Except we're not allowed to ask. The rote response from authorities is to support their own belief, whatever it is, despite the human brain not being fully developed yet and teens being famously unable to really grasp future consequences.

A groomer...making gross accusations to cover his intentions. How very obvious. Now where's that list?

Yeah, you're repeating yourself. You know that right? The person who thinks they're smarter than academics, economists, anyone accuses someone else of being arrogant. I guess that's it right?

?The verdict was a foregone conclusion because there was video evidence of the murder and the jury watched it happen. Because what Chauvin did offends every conscience. Well, almost every... And two separate medical examiners identified the death as homicide due to cardiopulmonary compression. "Is the defendant the man you see on video crushing the air out of the victim until he died?" You people are too much. Video evidence isn't even enough for you anymore. Thank goodness the jury was still sane.

As you can see from the replies - it's because our left up here saves it's stupidity, bitterness, hatred and childishness for the actual thread instead of wasting it on the headlines LOL

What's that going to do? Shooting him in the head is pointless, it's not like he's got any brains.

You supported the decision but not for her sake at all. You said it was because it 'showes the system balances rights'. But then your further statements disparaged her position at times and other times were ambiguous. And this is the hard part talking to you - you make statements, then attempt to re write their meanings later. That has come up a number of times in this conversation alone. And again you're wrong. They dismiss her becasue they consider her a Chud. You agree. Yet you claim that she should have been allowed to speak and should not have been denied. Those two statements are in conflict. Followed by "we don't have to let them into every discussion" - and given we're discussing the school board and it's actions you are once again supporting silencing people you don't like such as what happened to her. And you're wrong. You DO have to let them into EVERY discussion a public group like the school board has. They have EVERY RIGHT to discuss their concerns the same as everyone else. So while you try to pretend you don't support the school boards decision to violate her rights and toss her - your words make it clear that you do . I'm sure you'll attempt yet again to vigourously redefine what you meant but either you're an 1diot who cannot express himself clearly on numerous occasions OR you simply aren't being honest about your stance, flipping back and forth as it suits. I tend to favour the latter as the most likely answer. It's never right. And passing off your own hatred and bigotry towards others who you would silence and whos rights you would violate as "i'm wrong sometimes too" is simply a joke. Followed by "the rights of everyone to speak isn't disputed, but not everyone should have the right to speak, i should get to assign caveates as i see fit". Do you know why you have to go back and "creatively reinterpret" what you said previously so often? Its for the simple reason that your thoughts and beliefs conflict with what you want people to think you believe. You don't believe in free speech. You don't believe people should be allowed to express their ideas even if different than yours, You don't believe anyone who you don't personally approve of should be given a voice. But you want people to think you do. So you walk this weird line between "Everyone should speak - but not everyone should speak". You're no conservative. You're a totalitarian left wing socialist who believes that personal rights come second to your vision of what a 'proper' society should be. You're the farthest thing in the world from being conservative (I know, i know)

Yes he did need the help of Montgomery Scott when the interlocutor broke.

Why do you resort to ^these lDIOTIC posts? You can just admit your IGNORANCE about the Blue wall of silence Maybe it's not a Canadian thing, but your posting in the US forum, so you're over the line with your ridiculous mocking when its YOU that's the IGNORANT TROLL.

So you think the lifelong Republicans are RINOs, and the newcomer carpetbagger who decided to run as a Republican is the "real" Republican? And all these people, who are intimately familiar with the administration and who spoke up about bad behavior, are traitors? But the one guy is right when he criticizes the large group of critics he once relied upon? That makes sense to you? I guess at least you're consistently bumfuzzled.

Ha yes a negative pejorative usually caused by stage 4 TDS.

Let's not get carried away. Only half of them voted to expel Santos. -- Long overdue, but I'm still surprised it happened. I didn't expect it because they just ejected a guy because he has an ethics problem and is facing 23 felony charges. Seems like it will lead to some very awkward questions when they have to turn around and campaign for a man with an ethics problem and 90+ felony charges. I figured no one would want to deal with that contrast and those questions.

So that's a yes? IT's starting to get easy to see what your "tells" are. When you know you're wrong you simply throw out an insult or fecal reference and then cower in the corner. Mike is a dishonest poster and not very smart. I thought initially he seemed intelligent as well but when i started reading his stuff - it's not. In fact, it's pretty low brow. He uses a series of debate tricks to come across as smart but in reality it's just obfuscation, misdirection avoidance and minimization with a healthy dollop of dehumanization thrown in of course. The fact you're impressed by that suggests you're dumber than a slug. but your posts really had given that away Already. You're really going to have to step up your game if you're going to hang around here or you're just going to wind up being a punching bag. Make better arguments. Be less stupid. Read carefully to make sure you know what you're replying to. Make strong arguments and avoid cheap tricks. Or not - i can always use another good laugh and emotional scratching post

This guy was just irrational and spewing complete nonsense and it was hard to understand what he was trying to say. Gaetan isn't that articulate

Maybe because we don'/t actually vote for the PM, we vote for a choice of parties. On the other hand when it comes to support for Trudeau and Biden, beats the alternatives any day.

Ahhh yes - as originally set out by the renowned 'Nowyou Seeme' institute of "asymmetrical' validation requirements and creative facts. A go to learning institute for many of their kind They are a little like having a trap door on your septic tank. "If you have a question, stand here and pull this lever...."

"Alberta was polling close to wanting to split before harper got elected and believe it or not BC was polling even higher for it. " And I can post the sky is orange and hope some people believe it's true.

LOL! "Someone set themselves on fire outside the Israeli consulate in Atlanta on Friday in what was likely "an extreme act of political protest," the city's police chief said. A Palestinian flag was recovered at the scene and was "part of the protest," Chief Darin Schierbaum said at a news conference in response to a question about unconfirmed reports that the individual had been wearing a flag. Authorities did not offer any details about the individual, including gender or age." https://www.newsmax.com/us/atlanta-israel/2023/12/01/id/1144461/

Floyd didn't put an officers knee on his neck for over 9 minutes, including after he was unconscious. You probably think these guys are heroes as well. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/08/04/mississippi-police-torture-goon-squad-racist/

Don't procreate please.

I can't be bothered replying to all of your lies, because for the most part they're blatantly obvious. As far as covid deaths are concerned, I can only speak for Canada because I don't track stats and vax rates for every country. We had 19,000+ covid deaths here in 2022 and only 15k, 14k in 2020 and 2021. You'd never know it because the media stopped talking about covid deaths after Biden declared the pandemic was over, but yeah, 2022 was worse here.