Leaderboard

What scholars up until this point in this topic you've presented 3 opinions of 3 generals on what they thought of the use of the atomic wpn on Japan...are these the scholars you talk about.....perhaps you'd like to let us in on your sources or the supposed scholars..... You have yet to prove your original statement....USA war crimes - atomic bombs....what you have produced is 3 opinions from 3 US generals.....nothing more.....So they all agree that the atomic bomb was not needed.....big deal.....the last time i checked the US was engaged in a total war with Japan....meaning pretty much everything went, including fire bombing cities.....full of civilians.... My question is what is the difference of fire bombing japanese cities with large formations of bombers.....killing thousands, even 100K in one raid.....than lets say dropping one atomic wpn.....was there at the time a war convention about atomic wpns, was there a war convention about dropping fire bombs on paper japanese cities....What law is it they broke , i mean you make the claim but don't support it.....maybe on pages 3 or 4 nope..... From all the posts i have read from you, trust me i don't read alot of yours....i get the feeling that your 19 years old , in collage, perhaps university, got the world by the bag, you smoke a little weed do a little drinking, probably live in the dorm so you don't have to obey moms rules.....and like most university students you get a hard on with the way the US and Canada runs, or conducts itself.....to the point you spend most of your waking hours on forums arguing the same thing....every time you learn a new thing in school you have to preach it to the world.... Here is the thing, the west has never said it was perfect, but we really do like apple pie, and jager shooters and yet all those bad things you accuse them of doing i mean on and on and on , .....you are living under the consequences of those actions, you take advantage of everything they have won in our names daily.....freedom of speech, freedom of thought , freedom of expression etc etc and yet you seem to enjoy the fruit of those labors........never once have you said i am one of you....i can not stand the things you have done in my name....i am moving...i can not live with your standards anymore.....hopefully to one of those peaceful nations you like so much in the middle east ....It is not that i don't want you to use and enjoy all your freedoms because i do .....but even a baby's cry can be annoying as hell after awhile and right now your annoying as f***.. i hope you come back when you grow up.... Signed your number 2 fan......

He may not need to use the military book's way to deliver a nuclear warhead. NK has built many underground tunnels deep into SK. What if Kim uses these tunnels to deliver nuke? I remember during the Gulf War, Saddam managed to delivery the warheads of ballistic missiles on to Saudi Arabia and Israel almost through the war, and American air superiority could not stop them. Fortunately Saddam didn't have nuke but Kim does.

Hilarious. It should be noted that poor Don did not die of old age, he died of congestive outrage failure. His death marks the end of an era.

https://www.yahoo.com/tv/don-rickles-legendary-comedian-actor-183100940.html The last of the politically incorrect! WARNING: His jokes are not for the faint of hearts.

Are you sure that no Chemical wpns were found in Iraq......because the above sources say different ....0f course your sources may trump mine, but you did'nt list one.....I could get more if you like......And i don't recall saying that the mass production facility was in operation today.....what i said was they found one , shown in the video below.....according to the last source provided 412.5 tons of chemical agents were destroyed by UN teams, and that 1.5 tons were unaccounted for.....thats tons......20 liters of water wieghs in at 62 lbs.....so 1.5 tons is alot of VX agent....the worlds deadliest chemical agent in the world....considering all it takes to kill a human is less than a pin heads worth..... Of course the above amounts do not reflect what was discovered by US coalition forces after the combat began for the first time......the above numbers only include UN inspection teams numbers before combat broke out..... http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/gunning/etc/arsenal.html

That tells us more about society these days than about Rickles. Watching that clip makes me remember back to when people were allowed to laugh.

I know, but never waste an opportunity to highlight Obama and Trudeau weakness.

Why ? Do you think the U.S. government needs your support that demands "proof" ?

Agreed. Putting Saudi Arabia on the UN Human Rights Council was just insane. https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/06/29/un-suspend-saudi-arabia-human-rights-council

Judge Gorsuch confirmed...another bigly win for President Trump.

Chemical wpns are classified as wpns of mass destruction....And the US coalition found thousands of chemical devices, mass production sites.....

Some religions refuse to adapt or accomodate others, yet demand others adapt and accomodate them.

The new documentary A Stroy Of Us is amjor load of bullshit, lies and false historal facts. Severe critics of historians from both english and french sides. Trudeau introduces that self called documentary (the most approprate designation should be mockumentary) and hereby endorses those lies. If he is not yet the worst PM ever, he is really working hard to become the one. I think the worst about him is yet to come.

If Westmorland Fisheries can't get people to work for them, they should try the Free Market approach-- increase their wages. -k

We have some brilliant minds in Ottawa, nobody thought to insert a caveat requiring the money stay within our borders?

The silence is like gold...

I think him, like his father and the father's father has already taken the message from previous US presidents: If he didn't have nuke, like Saddam, Gaddafi, Milosevic...., he would be a dead man already. What is happening in Syria is another example. US even doesn't want to consider and investigate Syria government's explanation---the traditional bomb hits the rebel's chemical weapon workshop---before bombing Bashar al-Assad, just because President Trump needs an action to keep his face after many failure in US domestic politics. Syrian government's explanation sounds reasonable because what is the goal of Syria government to use chemical weapons? Their tradition weapons outnumbers rebel's and their military is achieving victory. It is illogical that they used chemical weapon under current circumstances.

If you have the time, you should create a thread specifically for that. It'll help a lot of folks who are interested to read the Bible.

Just to clarify, the Bible Study Bible I use is KJV. But I also quote from NIV or NKJ (posting them here - they are easier to read), or read from the Bible they got at church' pews (I can't remember what version). But thank you for that. I have found this and I'm appalled. I'll never quote from NIV again! http://christianitybeliefs.org/the-most-accurate-bible-translation-comparison-and-deception/

Here is a website with some information about why the King James Version is the only version to use: http://www.deanburgonsociety.org/PDF/Defending_The_KJB.pdf This website has links to countless other websites on the subject of the KJV 1611: http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/1611_authorized_king_james.htm

This is political-correctness's dad---book correctness. Thousands Americans have been killed by suicide attackers since the 9/11 terrorist attacks. These a few attackers are far more successful than Saddam's 1 million army just because they even didn't expect to survive. Not everyone in the world would act according to the doctrines of American military books. I think Kim's military has some credibility and reliability if they want to make a huge mess on SK and even Japan. I bet these were what Tillerson heard from the leaders of East Asia three during his recent visit tour: Tokyo Tillerson: President Trump is considering military option... Japanese PM(pissed in his pants): No. we are within the range of Kim's missiles. You should ask China to do something to stop NK and don't count me in... Seoul Tillerson: President Trump is considering military option... SK President(shit in pants):No. we are within the range of not only Kim's missiles, but also his artillery. You should ask China to do something to stop NK and don't count me in... Beijing Tillerson: President Trump is considering military option... Chinese Chairman: Good. When will you begin? Tillerson: What? You are OK with this? Chinese Chairman: Yes. Just tell me when it will happen so I will have my military ready to take over Taiwan....and don't forget to inform President Trump's and my mutual friend President Putin, I believe he will also need to get something ready to do

Trump attacks Syrian airfield....new sheriff in town...Obama gone. http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/u-s-blasts-syria-airbase-with-60-cruise-missiles-1.4059761

Beijing and Ottawa are not in the video.

Sorry to differ with you betsy, but there are major differences between modern versions such as the NIV and the King James Authorized Version (KJV 1611). You probably are not aware of the problem because most churches use the modern versions and promote them. I may have to post some of the changes brought in with the modern (new age) versions such as the NIV, which is particularly bad. There is a smaller part of christianity that believe the KJV (1611) is the only 100% accurate version for a number of reasons. There is so much to it I can't go into it all here. Get the book called "New Age Bible Versions" by Gail Riplinger. There are strong advocates for the KJV 1611 and strong opponents who make their cases in books as well. I read and studied the book I mentioned. Also belonged to the Trinitarian Bible Society for over 30 years. The have pamphlets on the subject. There is also a KJV website with tons of articles. Not trying to throw in a diversion to your discussion but just wanted to answer a point you made. Blessings.

I should mention that I'm glad you are so concerned about the well-being of the Syrians. I'm sure the next time Canada decides to bring in refugees from there, you will fully support the decision.

It's your opinion that Israel's systematic abuse of the Palestinians and human rights violations for the past 6+ decades is equivalent to hungry cats. First of all, you are quick to point fingers at Syrians + Russians, without any proof. Because that's how you roll. You lack the sophistication and judgement to look outside of the box and instead, you have chosen to "pick a team" and echo whatever that you are told to repeat. So your whole premise of your argument starts clumsily. Regardless of "who done it", the horrifying scenes we have been witnessing from Syria is just that. It is some of the most brutal things I have seen in my lifetime. I can at least say that my country has very little involvement in the cluster fuck which Syria has turned into. They have not supported any of the sides involved (yet), including the Syrian government, the Russians, the rebels, the Wahabi mercenaries, like ISIS. and other terrorist groups. I speak against the situation in Syria when I can and would pressure on my government if they supported any side that has created the situation. On the other hand, the situation in Palestine has been going on for decades. Many decades before Syria. Not only that, but we are able to see only one side of who people are on this forum. If someone comes into this forum and starts excusing any of these horrific acts being committed in Syria, I would be more than happy to speak out. Thankfully, there aren't any idiots who are defending the crimes against the people in Syria. On the other hand, there are a handful of people who try to defend the horrific treatment of Palestinians by the "Zionists" on this forum. Your comparison and attempt to create a connection between the situations in Syria and Palestine is illogical. and irrational. It;s a weak attempt at shutting down conversation that will not work.

Did Clinton torpedo her own campaign by deleting tens of thousands of E-Mails? How is it OK to delete 33,000 Emails yet not OK for the FBI to announce they were investigating it?

For me, it's simple. Whatever restaurant I enter, be it family or fine dining. When I arrive, I pan the establishment and if I so much as see one kid looking like under the age of 12, I turn back. I refuse to drop good bucks and be subjected to crying, belligerent children acting up simply to infuriate their parents or get their own way. Sometimes, to hear parents disciplining their kids is just as annoying.

If you had them on ignore, how do you know they "keep trolling around." FYI, I don't think members are complaining because he's "trolling." How do you define a troll, anyway? We're complaining because he's SPAMMING! He's posting the same propaganda in every thread! And he's trying to derail the discussions. At least that's what I'm complaining about. And yes, he's a whiny spammer, to boot - just look at this thread he created.

Israel didn't use them in '67 or '73...and by golly, it must have been tempting.

Why is it a U.S. responsibility to control North Korea ? What has China or Canada done ?

Hopefully, the following link will make clearer what is going on in D.C. for years and it needs to bring it out in the open and show Trump knows what he's talking about. http://www.newsmax.com/LarryKlayman/dennis-montgomery-judge-leon-nsa-trump-wiretap/2017/03/05/id/777015/

Yes!

This is a forum full of right wing nuts... hating Trudeau Sr. is a religion to them.

That everyone has fled, that there are no people able to point out the "rock solid evidence" for the US official conspiracy theory tells it all. 911 is one huge lie from start to finish and those who so strongly believed are in a state of shock, wondering how they could have believed such utter nonsense. Those would be the mildly honest ones. There are others, who also know that the jig is up, who still express this irrational denial you see here.

Another dead B_C link. Typical. Why do you seek to embarrass yourself so? Why?

They are hereby mentioned. And it is further noted just how long and how hard you homophobic, racist christians have hated and lobbied against allowing such people to have a place in society. Dog almighty, such flaming hypocrites!

You really have to get up to speed, Argus. And when this great christian wasn't advocating war crimes he was supporting those war crimes in Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Nicaragua, Guatemala, ... . When Billy Graham Urged Nixon to Kill a Million People http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/11/01/when-billy-graham-urged-nixon-to-kill-a-million-people/

How long will it take before Trump commits his first war crime, his first terrorist act? Oops, too late, he has already done that - keeping the terrorism against Cuba going. He hasn't brought home all the CIA terrorists operating in myriad countries around the world. He has kept the Iraq and Afghanistan war crimes in gear. I withdraw my question.

Are you talking about DogOnPorch and his obsession with Muslims?

Ofcourse no, I believe that someones are planning to shot some countries with nukes using the name of North Korea. So North Korea is just a tool.

Do you think Israel having nukes is much safer than ISIS having nukes ?

http://www.msn.com/en-ca/foodanddrink/restaurantsandnews/mum-outraged-after-diner-gives-her-children-should-be-seen-not-heard-note-after-kids-play-and-baby-cries-in-restaurant/ar-BBzurN1?li=AAggsmr My views on this will likely be unpopular, but.....here goes. When I eat at a McDonald's I accept that it is a restaurant primarily focused on families and children. I expect there to be children running around, playing loudly. If I am at McD's, it is usually a quick "grabbing a bite to eat" thing and I don't spend a lot of time hanging around the place. A restaurant which is not primarily focused on children is different, IMO. Adults go there to dine, not just "grab a bite to eat". Adults go there to socialize and visit with freinds. If you want a place for your children to "play together", a restaurant is a poor choice. Find a playground. Pack a picnic lunch. Or go to McDonald's. I doubt the woman would have gotten so angry that she wrote that note, just because a baby woke up and cried a little. There was enough action going on with these 2 mothers and 3 children, that they filmed a video of their children playing. In a restaurant. I also think that children need to be taught how to behave and WHY they need to behave in certain situations. Yes, I took my children to restaurants when they were little. No, they were not allowed to run around the restaurant, playing, shouting or yelling. On a couple of occasions when my daughter was small and being uncooperative in a restaurant, hubby took her out to the car and talked to her until she calmed down and was able to sit nicely. We also realized that for those few short years when they are little, we could avoid the nicer adult restaurants or go without the children. The woman that left the note was rude. There were other ways of handling it - maybe speaking privately to the manager. The manager could have talked to the 2 mothers, stating the dangers of letting the children run around in the restaurant (they could run into someone, they could run into a table edge and lose an eye, etc.) Then the young mothers could decide if they wanted to stay and keep their children in tow, or leave and go somewhere else where the children could "play". This would let the young mothers know that the children's behaviour is unacceptable, while at the same time allowing everyone to keep their dignity.

I'm not a believer in "Children should be seen and not heard" but I do believe children need to be taught social behaviour. When I was growing up, (Oh dear, those words just came out of my mouth....am I old??) and my parents had friends over to play cards, all us kids knew that it was "Adult time". We played downstairs and we didn't bother them - that was a sure way to get sent to bed. LOL Nowadays, it seems any time we're invited over to someone's house with children, the children are the focus of the entire evening. They dominate the conversations and interrupt the adults. Last time I was with my boyfriend's family, we all had to listen to various stories, including a 20 minute story from a 9 year old about how another boy at school lost his orange that day. (He never found it, in case you were wondering if there was a point to the story - there was not.)

Yes they are, when a troll gets banned, it wont post anything anymore, therefore there wont be a need to reply it. When a troll get ignored, it will still post but wont receieve any reply. So both ways go out the same place. There are trolls because they dont control their own post behavior. Then we should control it for them.