Jump to content

New Moderator!


Greg

Recommended Posts

regardless of his, or his mommys thoughts, Steve is I'm sure an acceptable name to be used on this board.

Even if it was meant with some pepper, there is nothing wrong with it and it should not have been changed

"They muddy the water, to make it seem deep." - Friedrich Nietzsche

Link to comment
Share on other sites

regardless of his, or his mommys thoughts, Steve is I'm sure an acceptable name to be used on this board.

Even if it was meant with some pepper, there is nothing wrong with it and it should not have been changed

If that's acceptable to call Harper, Steve,then "Stephie" would be acceptable to call Dion. yes?

"Any man under 30 who is not a liberal has no heart, and any man over 30 who is not a conservative has no brains."

— Winston Churchill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On reflection, I have to acknowledge that there is a silver lining to having Charles Anthony run around making changes to threads. It means that forum members will have to log on constantly and watch dilligently to see what was really said before the mod got busy. That is, of course, unless the person whose post was changed actually makes a point of bringing it up to demand an explanation. Apparently verboten. Sort of reminds me of .... well, nevermind. In any case, the point is that moderators should indicate when they have changed threads and provide their reasons. The arbitrary and mysterious exercise of power is particularly odious in a politicial forum. I am not surprised that JBG and geoffrey would be so tolerant of this, but I am disappointed in you, kimmy.

I received a warning from Greg for my posts on this issue, which he described as "beyond contempt". Those of you who want to know where the bar for "beyond contempt" is set, can now get a clue.

Don't expect me to refer to Steve by any other name - at least until such time as I might be banned. Yes, I do it out of a lack of respect. That's the point. You want a measure of the man, just look at his friends. Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas, as the saying goes.

Edited by Higgly

"We have seen the enemy and he is us!". Pogo (Walt Kelly).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know many francophone men named Stéphane. Friends call them "Steph" (pronounced Stef). If one wanted to slur them, Steffie wouldn't cut it. Way too tame. We have some pretty juicy names to call those we dislike. They're difficult to translate. :lol:

"We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that's acceptable to call Harper, Steve,then "Stephie" would be acceptable to call Dion. yes?

Certain posters here find it acceptable to call him Stephanie. Others prefer to call him Celine...

Almost three thousand people died needlessly and tragically at the World Trade Center on September 11; ten thousand Africans die needlessly and tragically every single day-and have died every single day since September 11-of AIDS, TB, and malaria. We need to keep September 11 in perspective, especially because the ten thousand daily deaths are preventable.

- Jeffrey Sachs (from his book "The End of Poverty")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On reflection, I have to acknowledge that there is a silver lining to having Charles Anthony run around making changes to threads. It means that forum members will have to log on constantly and watch dilligently to see what was really said before the mod got busy. That is, of course, unless the person whose post was changed actually makes a point of bringing it up to demand an explanation. Apparently verboten. Sort of reminds me of .... well, nevermind. In any case, the point is that moderators should indicate when they have changed threads and provide their reasons. The arbitrary and mysterious exercise of power is particularly odious in a politicial forum. I am not surprised that JBG and geoffrey would be so tolerant of this, but I am disappointed in you, kimmy.

I received a warning from Greg for my posts on this issue, which he described as "beyond contempt". Those of you who want to know where the bar for "beyond contempt" is set, can now get a clue.

Don't expect me to refer to Steve by any other name - at least until such time as I might be banned. Yes, I do it out of a lack of respect. That's the point. You want a measure of the man, just look at his friends. Lie down with dogs, get up with fleas, as the saying goes.

Then I expect your remaining time here will be short.

When you joined this forum, there were simple rules that you agreed to abide by. One of them is name calling. Since you have now decided to willingly break that rule whenever you feel like it, I find it surprising you can't put two and two together regarding the moderator's response. Get a clue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When such rulings come from the moderator, as I was finally able to elicit from Charles Anthony after considerable prodding, then it has weight. When it comes from a third party like yourself second-guessing what a second party may or may not have had in mind, it has considerably less weight. Charles Anthony made the comment that he edited for accuracy. He is going to be a busy guy.

As for the rules I agreed to, my understading was and still is that it applies to name-calling of other members, such as a name that I might call you, Sharkman, for example.

My position remains that moderator editing of posts should be flagged in some manner and explained.

Edited by Higgly

"We have seen the enemy and he is us!". Pogo (Walt Kelly).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Certain posters here find it acceptable to call him Stephanie. Others prefer to call him Celine...

I think, like the Teen Idol Dion, Liberal Idol Dion should simply be "Dion"

RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS

If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm.... a couple days have passed and I see this post hasn't been edited by the moderator...

Grow up. That's not offensive at all. He saying Dion should be refered to as Dion. What up?

P.S. Did you ever report it?

Edited by geoffrey

RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game")

--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I don't think threads should be modified so that it changes the origional post. I would like to see a edit footnote at the bottom of the edited post to show the new edited post. Keeping the origional intact. Or provide a link to the old unedited post.

Context is important. And changing that context alters the posters origional thought. It could be missinterpreted. If a mod changes it, then 100% there should be a footnote with the Mod's new edited post of that person. I will give them the benifit of the doubt that the Mods are trying to do some good. But I also beleive that the Mod should be held accountable for editing the post if it changes the context or meaning or the idea the person was getting across.

Google : Webster Griffin Tarpley, Gerald Celente, Max Keiser

ohm on soundcloud.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 years later...
On 1/30/2017 at 2:08 PM, Smallc said:

Big anniversary coming up....

What I note, somewhat unhappily, from this thread, is all the old familiar names which are no longer here.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I want to be new moderator ^_^

  • Downvote 2

"You cant ask people about their belief, its none of your business, its between them and their God but you have to ask them whether or not they need something or they have a problem to be solved." Ottoman Sultan, Mehmed The Conqueror

"We are not intended to conquer someone's lands but we want to conquer hearts." Ottoman Sultan, Mehmed The Conqueror

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Altai said:

I want to be new moderator ^_^

I think that's a great idea.  As we're all on your ignore list, we can get away with murder!

Edited by bcsapper
Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it when no-one is watching - Not Blaise Pascal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, bcsapper said:

I think that's a great idea.  As we're all on your ignore list, we can get away with murder!

I think she noticed that she was losing too much audience, as some of us have been unignored; I lasted a total of two posts before I managed to trip the ignore button again!   You would think a nasty defender of Islam such as myself would do better, eh?   :)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,796
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    RobMichael
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • zzbulls earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Old Guy went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Jeffrey Weinstein earned a badge
      First Post
    • Old Guy earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Old Guy went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...