Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What happened to all the conservatives here who extolled the peace president?  Do I just have them all on ignore and am missing their posts?  Or did they suddenly flip to pro-war?  
 

@Shady?   Where are you?  Didn’t you go on and on about Trump not starting wars?  

Posted
12 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

What happened to all the conservatives here who extolled the peace president?  Do I just have them all on ignore and am missing their posts?  Or did they suddenly flip to pro-war?  
 

@Shady?   Where are you?  Didn’t you go on and on about Trump not starting wars?  

You gonna come back to any of the other threads you start that you post BS in and then run from?

Like the thread you started claiming that the Border Patrol killed a refugee? 

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, TreeBeard said:

Maybe it’s this….   Maybe @User is a good anti war Catholic and I’m just not seeing it. 
 

image.thumb.png.f7071ef5f2269d361c6f27b10e741345.png

What does your cowardly ignoring me have to with your running away from a BS thread you created and then sit here complaining about where others are at here?

I’m not an anti-war anything nor have I ever praised Trump for being some kind of absolute anti-war pacifist either. 

 

 

Posted
39 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

What happened to all the conservatives here who extolled the peace president?   

As I said... Earlier there didn't seem to be any Trump supporters overjoyed with this, even though they're celebrating some of the good news that has manifested so far...

  • Confused 1

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted

The only thing that could be better here is the 6 soldiers that are dead. Besides that, we have absolutely dominated. The war part is over. Now we are just leveling every apparatus that might be used by terrorists later. 

 

 

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
On 3/1/2026 at 8:46 PM, CdnFox said:

The ability and freedom to earn money is completely dependent on the existence of and defense of a structure of laws and systems that allow the business to operate with stability.

Of course you can have a structure of laws and systems without a nation, a planet will work just fine.

There are nations whose primary purpose is to provide business the ability and freedom to earn money without any accountability to the planet and more honest better ethically minded nations trying to do right by it.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
4 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Of course you can have a structure of laws and systems without a nation,

Nope. 

Quote

a planet will work just fine.

Never has in the history of creation so not much chance now.

Quote

There are nations whose primary purpose is to provide business the ability and freedom to earn money without any accountability to the planet and more honest better ethically minded nations trying to do right by it.

Who. Go ahead and name a few. 

 

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
15 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Nope.

Why not?

15 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Never has in the history of creation so not much chance now.

We were off to a good start up until recently but then the right-wing started losing its shit over it.

19 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Who. Go ahead and name a few.

The Bahamas

 (Caribbean)

Bermuda

 (Atlantic Territory)

British Virgin Islands

 (Caribbean Territory)

Cayman Islands

 (Caribbean Territory)

Monaco

 (Europe)

United Arab Emirates (UAE)

 (Middle East)

Bahrain

 (Middle East)

Kuwait

 (Middle East)

Qatar

 (Middle East)

Oman

 (Middle East)

Saint Kitts and Nevis

 (Caribbean)

Vanuatu

 (Oceania)

Turks and Caicos Islands

 (Caribbean Territory)

Anguilla

 (Caribbean Territory)

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
42 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Why not?

Because it simply can't exist without structure and that's what a sovereign nation provides in a free or mostly free environment.  I mean, if you have abject slavery you can get away with it i suppose. 

Quote

 

The Bahamas

 (Caribbean)

Bermuda

 (Atlantic Territory)

British Virgin Islands

 (Caribbean Territory)

Cayman Islands

 (Caribbean Territory)

Monaco

 (Europe)

United Arab Emirates (UAE)

 (Middle East)

Bahrain

 (Middle East)

Kuwait

 (Middle East)

Qatar

 (Middle East)

Oman

 (Middle East)

Saint Kitts and Nevis

 (Caribbean)

Vanuatu

 (Oceania)

Turks and Caicos Islands

 (Caribbean Territory)

Anguilla

 (Caribbean Territory)

 

Nope, not  a single one of those.   And you knew that, you just randomly copied a list.  Otherwise you wouldn't have labelled "Middle east" etc as a country. 

And for gods sake, most of those should have been OBVIOUSLY wrong.  Kuwait?   One of the most oil per capita producing states is an example of a country trying to "do better" by the planet? You have to be beyond stupid to think that 

Complete fail on your part.  once again your degree from the university of facebook lets you down

  • Haha 1

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
8 hours ago, TreeBeard said:

What happened to all the conservatives here who extolled the peace president?  Do I just have them all on ignore and am missing their posts?  Or did they suddenly flip to pro-war?  
 

@Shady?   Where are you?  Didn’t you go on and on about Trump not starting wars?  

Trump didnt start this one. It's been going on since 1979. Think of it more like ending it.

Posted
10 hours ago, TreeBeard said:

What happened to all the conservatives here who extolled the peace president?  Do I just have them all on ignore and am missing their posts?  Or did they suddenly flip to pro-war?  
 

@Shady?   Where are you?  Didn’t you go on and on about Trump not starting wars?  

I believe they're off spooning with the guys who were outraged Obama for joining a NATO coalition to give air cover to the Libyan protestors trying to topple a brutal dictator. 

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Hodad said:

I believe they're off spooning with the guys who were outraged Obama for joining a NATO coalition to give air cover to the Libyan protestors trying to topple a brutal dictator. 

 

So, you supported that military action, but not this one?

 

 

 

Posted
17 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Because it simply can't exist without structure and that's what a sovereign nation provides in a free or mostly free environment

It's like you're saying a planet can't exist without sovereign nations, its ridiculous. People could provide it just fine without belonging to a nation. 

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

It's like you're saying a planet can't exist without sovereign nations,

This is always fun, the part where you Realize you're wrong so you try and change the channel.

The planet can exist just fine. Planets don't even need humans.

But that's not what I said or what we were discussing. We were discussing the existence of a structure of laws etc

And no that can't exist without a nation. By its very definition a nation is what creates and powers and structures such laws

. If all you have is a planet with no people then there is no structure. If you have a planet with people but there's no nation then there's also no structure it's just anarchy.

This isn't complicated or even controversial

So what it's really like is you're saying you're stupid and you'd like to change your previous answer to something that you might be able to defend better

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

 

1. And no that can't exist without a nation. By its very definition a nation is what creates and powers and structures such laws

 

2. This isn't complicated or even controversial

3. So what it's really like is you're saying you're stupid ..

1. Lots of entities create laws, and laws predated Nations too.  If you want to accuse me of nitpicking, then that's fair... But look up a guy named Hammurabi. Also see 'International Law'...

2. Said the man who has never smoked weed with an anarchist at 3 am.

3. Yaaaaaaaawn... Somebody give Insult man a bowl of Capn Crunch...

Edited by Michael Hardner

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
6 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. Lots of entities create laws, and laws predated Nations too. 

That is untrue. I think you've not read your history very well.  But perhaps i'm wrong, give a couple of examples. 

Quote

If you want to accuse me of nitpicking, then that's fair... But look up a guy named Hammurabi. Also see 'International Law'...

Hammurabi also spelled Hammurapi, was the sixth Amorite king of the Old Babylonian Empire, reigning from c. 1792 to c. 1750 BC. 

Sigh. Not just a nation but a nation that ruled over other nations.  Well that was a pretty horrible example 

And inter....what? inter.. NATIONAL law? Inter NATIONAL law says there's law without nations? literally anything it procaims as law derrives from the powers given to it by nations. 

C',mon mike. 

Quote

2. Said the man who has never smoked weed with an anarchist at 3 am.

I mean.... not untrue but i'm questioning it's relevance :) 

Quote

3. Yaaaaaaaawn... Somebody give Insult man a bowl of Capn Crunch...

Here's your bowl captian :)  

Insulting someone to say that insulting people is bad is.. well... dumb.  You're not having your best day today. 

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...