West Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 (edited) 6 minutes ago, robosmith said: You obviously don't understand what the videos show and need to watch them 10 more times before you will. I think you quoted the wrong post. West is LYING The national debate in your country already happened about allowing undocumented pedophiles to stay in your country and you lost the debate in the last election. People voted, both through the populate vote and electoral college, to enforce immigration laws as written. If you think pedophiles from Honduras should be able to roam free in your country, make your case and win an election. Until then, STFU and stop interfering in laws of the land. Duh Edited January 25 by West Quote
ironstone Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 Apparently even Alex Pretti's own parents had warned him 'not to engage, basically not do anything stupid' if he was determined to protest against ICE. Interestingly, Pretti's own family was aware that he owned a handgun and has a license to carry...but had never known him to carry the firearm. So on the day that he decides to protest against ICE, that's when he suddenly thought it's a good idea to carry a handgun? https://thepostmillennial.com/alex-prettis-parents-speak-out-after-sons-death-say-they-told-him-not-to-engage-with-feds 1 Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
robosmith Posted January 25 Author Report Posted January 25 27 minutes ago, West said: The national debate in your country already happened about allowing undocumented pedophiles to stay in your country and you lost the debate in the last election. People voted, both through the populate vote and electoral college, to enforce immigration laws as written. If you think pedophiles from Honduras should be able to roam free in your country, make your case and win an election. Until then, STFU and stop interfering in laws of the land. Duh YOU'RE LYING AGAIN. NO ONE was debating "about allowing undocumented pedophiles to stay in." Why do you KEEP LYING? Quote
robosmith Posted January 25 Author Report Posted January 25 19 minutes ago, ironstone said: Apparently even Alex Pretti's own parents had warned him 'not to engage, basically not do anything stupid' if he was determined to protest against ICE. Interestingly, Pretti's own family was aware that he owned a handgun and has a license to carry...but had never known him to carry the firearm. So on the day that he decides to protest against ICE, that's when he suddenly thought it's a good idea to carry a handgun? https://thepostmillennial.com/alex-prettis-parents-speak-out-after-sons-death-say-they-told-him-not-to-engage-with-feds If I was determined to protest against ICE I would want to be armed as well, after what they did to Good. Some people are so angry about that, they are determined to NOT BACK DOWN. 💡 1 Quote
ironstone Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 2 minutes ago, robosmith said: If I was determined to protest against ICE I would want to be armed as well, after what they did to Good. Some people are so angry about that, they are determined to NOT BACK DOWN. 💡 Lot's of people on the left need anger management. Especially in blue cities. It's incredibly foolish for a protester to want to bring a gun to protest against law enforcement upholding the law. It hurts their already shaky narrative when certain nutjobs decide to up the ante by using a vehicle as a weapon or bring firearms to protests. They had no intention of protesting peacefully. Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
Moonlight Graham Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 3 hours ago, User said: Once the officers began grabbing him, he resisted. He fought. He was grabbing onto another girl there, trying to keep from being grabbed. He continued to struggle as they were taking him to the ground. How did he resist? 1 hour ago, West said: He wasn't legally carrying his gun. He did not have ID on him which is required in Minnesota. And ICE knew this how? Lol Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
User Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 3 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said: How did he resist? I offered several examples in the comment you just quoted. Quote
paxamericana Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 (edited) This was a bad shoot with the possibility of manslaughter charges. But given the short reaction time between when the gun was removed, the officer could also be acquitted under reasonable circumstances. It’s really up to jury now. Edited January 26 by paxamericana Quote
Hodad Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 15 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said: How did he resist? These are people who would argue that Gandhi had it coming. Comply with any authoritarian order or you'll get the beating you deserve. 1 Quote
User Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 7 minutes ago, Hodad said: These are people who would argue that Gandhi had it coming. Comply with any authoritarian order or you'll get the beating you deserve. You are a cowardly person who can't face me. Quote
Deluge Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 6 minutes ago, Hodad said: These are people who would argue that Gandhi had it coming. Comply with any authoritarian order or you'll get the beating you deserve. wokedad is pumped so full of shit that he thinks immigration enforcement is evil and should be outlawed. 1 Quote
Moonlight Graham Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 34 minutes ago, User said: I offered several examples in the comment you just quoted. You said "he struggled" lol. Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
CrakHoBarbie Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 1 hour ago, robosmith said: You obviously don't understand what the videos show and need to watch them 10 more times before you will. I think you quoted the wrong post. West is LYING Hence the word "dishonest". Thats all the majority of the posters here know how to do. Pivot Lie Whataboutisms Red hat propaganda. Not a singular individual though from the entire braindead lot of them. Its fascinating, and malevolently sinister at the same time. Because, these freaks are dangerous. Anybody with as much hate in their hearts, is a dangerous piece of shit. Quote
User Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 16 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said: You said "he struggled" lol. "Once the officers began grabbing him, he resisted. He fought. He was grabbing onto another girl there, trying to keep from being grabbed. He continued to struggle as they were taking him to the ground. " 5 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Hence the word "dishonest". Thats all the majority of the posters here know how to do. Pivot Lie Whataboutisms Red hat propaganda. Not a singular individual though from the entire braindead lot of them. Its fascinating, and malevolently sinister at the same time. Because, these freaks are dangerous. Anybody with as much hate in their hearts, is a dangerous piece of shit. LOL, and you have to hide like a coward. Quote
Nationalist Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 (edited) 2 hours ago, robosmith said: Much more likely you're JUST LYING. You can't possibly "saw" where the bullets went as detailed in the autopsy, FOOL. No robo. I saw Good drive her SUV at a cop. Edited January 26 by Nationalist Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted January 26 Author Report Posted January 26 3 hours ago, ironstone said: Lot's of people on the left need anger management. Especially in blue cities. It's incredibly foolish for a protester to want to bring a gun to protest against law enforcement upholding the law. It hurts their already shaky narrative when certain nutjobs decide to up the ante by using a vehicle as a weapon or bring firearms to protests. They had no intention of protesting peacefully. Problem is, you believe parking in the street is "using a vehicle as a weapon," which is ridiculously PASSIVE. And you don't even know the reason people have ideas about using/possessing weapons in public is because of right wingers who continually claim they need weapons to fight government tyranny. 2 hours ago, paxamericana said: This was a bad shoot with the possibility of manslaughter charges. But given the short reaction time between when the gun was removed, the officer could also be acquitted under reasonable circumstances. It’s really up to jury now. Where did you get your law degree and practice law? Quote
robosmith Posted January 26 Author Report Posted January 26 (edited) 4 hours ago, Nationalist said: No robo. I saw Good drive her SUV at a cop. And completely missed the FACT that she had turned the wheel full chock right to get away, which was SHOWN in the Ross cell phone video. Thanks for proving your powers of observation are wholly DEFECTIVE. Edited January 26 by robosmith Quote
CdnFox Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 5 hours ago, robosmith said: If I was determined to protest against ICE I would want to be armed as well, after what they did to Good. Some people are so angry about that, they are determined to NOT BACK DOWN. 💡 So how's that kind of thinking working out for this guy Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
CdnFox Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 This one is a little bit harder than good. Good was pretty cut and dry, even before all of the angles were out I could see she drove at the cop and hit him and that really is the end of that story. Drive your car at a cop, hit the cop, get shot. This one the video footage isn't quite as clear and it's not quite as clear exactly what was happening or triggered the shooting I think we're going to probably have to wait for more video to come out but from what I can tell and from the facts that seem undisputed the guy had a gun, the interacted with the cops and at first it was relatively peaceful but then he decided to get physically involved and he was taken to the ground and he was trying to resist when one of the officers discovered he had a gun. It looks like that officer removed that gun but as he was doing so another officer yelled gun gun gun and a different officer believed there was a threat and shot him. Now the really sad part is from what I can tell it sounds like he had already been disarmed but that was apparently unclear to the officer who fired. This appears to be legitimate, there was a gun, the guy was resisting, you can see him in one part of the video reaching behind his back for where the gun was just before the cop took it and in a split second you can have a miscommunication like that where the gun is secured but the other officers don't think it is That is why it is insanely dangerous to get involved in its one altercation with a police officer while you're wearing a gun. When they reached out for him he should have laid down on the ground and announce there was a gun in his back pocket we're back belt or wherever you carried it and let them arrest him without any fighting back or resisting. It's also been mentioned that he was carrying the gun unlawfully but I don't really honestly believe that's particularly relevant. Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
John Stone Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 (edited) Although most DHS / ICE agents likely and honestly believe they're actions are patriotic they are also likely overlooking the extent of political hacks to exploit issues to their advantage. A concern for any ICE/DHS agent is the threat of charges being brought against them in the future - investigations reopened, reexamined - indictments. The grunts on the ground likely have no idea the extent of fickleness when it comes to political hacks. Immunity? .........for now, yes! ............... politically, this woman is a disaster, hands in the air, back away from the mic! ............ the shooters (?) .......... my advice if the Right is defeated, go far and stay long. ............ Edited January 26 by John Stone Quote
Nationalist Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 14 hours ago, robosmith said: YOU'RE LYING AGAIN. NO ONE was debating "about allowing undocumented pedophiles to stay in." Why do you KEEP LYING? No. YOU'RE lying. As usual. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Nationalist Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 (edited) 9 hours ago, CdnFox said: This one is a little bit harder than good. Good was pretty cut and dry, even before all of the angles were out I could see she drove at the cop and hit him and that really is the end of that story. Drive your car at a cop, hit the cop, get shot. This one the video footage isn't quite as clear and it's not quite as clear exactly what was happening or triggered the shooting I think we're going to probably have to wait for more video to come out but from what I can tell and from the facts that seem undisputed the guy had a gun, the interacted with the cops and at first it was relatively peaceful but then he decided to get physically involved and he was taken to the ground and he was trying to resist when one of the officers discovered he had a gun. It looks like that officer removed that gun but as he was doing so another officer yelled gun gun gun and a different officer believed there was a threat and shot him. Now the really sad part is from what I can tell it sounds like he had already been disarmed but that was apparently unclear to the officer who fired. This appears to be legitimate, there was a gun, the guy was resisting, you can see him in one part of the video reaching behind his back for where the gun was just before the cop took it and in a split second you can have a miscommunication like that where the gun is secured but the other officers don't think it is That is why it is insanely dangerous to get involved in its one altercation with a police officer while you're wearing a gun. When they reached out for him he should have laid down on the ground and announce there was a gun in his back pocket we're back belt or wherever you carried it and let them arrest him without any fighting back or resisting. It's also been mentioned that he was carrying the gun unlawfully but I don't really honestly believe that's particularly relevant. Yup. But none of that changes the facts on the ground. 1. Tampon Tim and his lackies, think this will distract from the fraud investigation. It will not. 2. Tampon Tim and his lackies refuse to cooperate with federal authorities. In fact, they actually encourage the public to obstruct federal law enforcement. However...do you see the menstruating fat fck, or any of his lackies, out obstructing justice? Hell no! 3. The public has been whipped into a frenzy by Tampon Tim and his lackies, to do their dirty work for them. They are as it sounds...dupes. Now...to all you sopping wet Libbies...You are MOST CERTAINLY protecting rapists, murderers and all flavors of criminals, just so you can go out and express your hatred for Trump. That's both irrational and completely undemocratic. But it's clear now that you just dont care. OK...the USA can thrive without you. No nation really needs an abundance of stupidity and traitorous biatches. You obviously do not want to be "Americans" anymore...if you ever did. So I think the federal government should encircle Minnesota. Throw up border facilities. No Tweenkies in...or out. No more federal funding. No more trade. No more FBI. No more statehood. Cut the dumb fembots lose. Let them starve. Let them rot. Have a warm and fuzzy day...Fembots. Edited January 26 by Nationalist Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
West Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 (edited) 2 hours ago, John Stone said: Although most DHS / ICE agents likely and honestly believe they're actions are patriotic they are also likely overlooking the extent of political hacks to exploit issues to their advantage. A concern for any ICE/DHS agent is the threat of charges being brought against them in the future - investigations reopened, reexamined - indictments. The grunts on the ground likely have no idea the extent of fickleness when it comes to political hacks. Immunity? .........for now, yes! ............... politically, this woman is a disaster, hands in the air, back away from the mic! ............ the shooters (?) .......... my advice if the Right is defeated, go far and stay long. ............ If Minneapolis chooses to politicize this issue and arrest ICE that would signal an escalation which likely ends up with Walz, Ellison, Frey and other leftist agitators up on conspiracy charges. Not to mention any red state will put them up on state charges as well Edited January 26 by West Quote
Nationalist Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 15 hours ago, paxamericana said: This was a bad shoot with the possibility of manslaughter charges. But given the short reaction time between when the gun was removed, the officer could also be acquitted under reasonable circumstances. It’s really up to jury now. I doubt any jury will ever hear the case. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Deluge Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 50 minutes ago, West said: If Minneapolis chooses to politicize this issue and arrest ICE that would signal an escalation which likely ends up with Walz, Ellison, Frey and other leftist agitators up on conspiracy charges. Not to mention any red state will put them up on state charges as well And they are that stupid, so I expect to see unprecedented arrests in the future. It's time to make leftism a felony in this country. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.