Politics1990 Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: Now why would a "peaceful protestor" be armed for a gun fight? That seems a little dangerous...no? Then the twit starts a fight with federal officers? Can you say... STUPID? You Libbies have completely lost your minds and are traitors. HE WAS A LEGAL GUN HOLDER. jesus you cons are dumb. was no reason to even tackle the guy .just officals with badges being clowns 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 1 minute ago, Politics1990 said: HE WAS A LEGAL GUN HOLDER. jesus you cons are dumb. was no reason to even tackle the guy .just officals with badges being clowns He got what he begged for.! 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Politics1990 Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 11 minutes ago, Nationalist said: He got what he begged for.! glad you ain't a cop . foolish Quote
ironstone Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 2 hours ago, Politics1990 said: HE WAS A LEGAL GUN HOLDER. jesus you cons are dumb. was no reason to even tackle the guy .just officals with badges being clowns I see you finally found the Caps Lock key. Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
ironstone Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 This is a pretty reasonable breakdown from what we know so far. Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
West Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 9 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said: I saw nothing in any footage so far that justified the shooting. He was disarmed before the agent started shooting. It's pretty hard to tell whether he was even resisting or not. It was a very stupid idea to bring even a legal firearm to the protest, but that's not an excuse to shoot him. He wasn't threatening anyone with it. So you wanted the officer to just stand there with an aggressive man with a fire arm so they get shot in the head? You people are mental Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 12 hours ago, robosmith said: You're LYING as USUAL. Pretti's gun was stolen from him out of his holster by ICE. Jesus, robo. I dont know how you post in this forum every day. The avalanche of stu pid red hats here is overwhelming. Have you ever tried debatepolitics.com Love to see you there. 1 Quote
CrakHoBarbie Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 7 minutes ago, West said: So you wanted the officer to just stand there with an aggressive man with a fire arm so they get shot in the head? You people are mental They shot him 9 times while he was prone on his belly, red hat. And, they'd already disarmed him. You'd of noticed that after watching the multiple videos circulating. If you weren't such a halfwit. 1 1 Quote
robosmith Posted January 25 Author Report Posted January 25 5 hours ago, paxamericana said: It’s a dangerous situation, resisting arrest while armed is going to be problematic as that create cause for the officer to legitimately fear for their lives. The condition for use of lethal force. If armed you are expected to peacefully surrender. Wether he reached for the gun or had his gun in the holster is most likely irrelevant now. Pretti wasn't ARMED after the agent stole his gun from his holster. And you have no idea what is "irrelevant now." Just like you demonstrated you have no idea what happened. 1 Quote
robosmith Posted January 25 Author Report Posted January 25 (edited) 4 hours ago, Nationalist said: Now why would a "peaceful protestor" be armed for a gun fight? That seems a little dangerous...no? Then the twit starts a fight with federal officers? Can you say... STUPID? You Libbies have completely lost your minds and are traitors. Clearly from PAST EVIDENCE, he KNEW he would face ILLEGAL armed aggression against himself. Duh. Pretti didn't start the fight like YOU LIE. He came to the aid of a woman who was PUSHED TO THE GROUND by ICE and was then attacked by AGENTS. Thanks for demonstrating you have no idea what happened. Edited January 25 by robosmith Quote
West Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 (edited) 8 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: They shot him 9 times while he was prone on his belly, red hat. And, they'd already disarmed him. You'd of noticed that after watching the multiple videos circulating. If you weren't such a halfwit. Don't attack law enforcement with a firearm. The fact that leftists are trying to politicize this point and are actively encouraging violent encounters with law enforcement shows they are vile pieces of shit Edited January 25 by West Quote
robosmith Posted January 25 Author Report Posted January 25 1 hour ago, ironstone said: This is a pretty reasonable breakdown from what we know so far. Any RANDO can post a ^fake youtube. Reputable NYT video shows an ICE AGENT retrieving the gun from Pretti's HOLSTER. Desperate much? 21 minutes ago, West said: So you wanted the officer to just stand there with an aggressive man with a fire arm so they get shot in the head? You people are mental He wasn't "aggressive man," he was attacked by ICE OFFICERS. Are you BLIND? Quote
User Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 10 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said: I saw nothing in any footage so far that justified the shooting. He was disarmed before the agent started shooting. It's pretty hard to tell whether he was even resisting or not. It was a very stupid idea to bring even a legal firearm to the protest, but that's not an excuse to shoot him. He wasn't threatening anyone with it. I am on the fence in calling it "justified" inasmuch as the guy should have been shot, but a tragic mistake perpetrated by his unlawful actions, yes. I am waiting to see if the facts bear out that he was disarmed, but as I have pointed out, we are all watching this from cell phone videos for hours long after this happened, going frame by frame. The officers who were not doing that, but were instead fighting with the man on the ground, did not have that luxury. 18 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Jesus, robo. I dont know how you post in this forum every day. The avalanche of stu pid red hats here is overwhelming. Have you ever tried debatepolitics.com Love to see you there. Do you hide like a coward from people there, too? Quote
West Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 I remember the wokesters on here actively celebrating the brutal execution of J6 protesters Ashli Babbit who was, in fact, unarmed. Yet a man who was armed and fighting for their cause is now a martyr. Hypocrisy Quote
paxamericana Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 26 minutes ago, robosmith said: Pretti wasn't ARMED after the agent stole his gun from his holster. And you have no idea what is "irrelevant now." Just like you demonstrated you have no idea what happened. Robo if you want to support the 2nd A, do so. I’m encouraging you infact. Quote
ironstone Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 Leftists🙄 1 Quote Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...
Nationalist Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Clearly from PAST EVIDENCE, he KNEW he would face ILLEGAL armed aggression against himself. Duh. Pretti didn't start the fight like YOU LIE. He came to the aid of a woman who was PUSHED TO THE GROUND by ICE and was then attacked by AGENTS. Thanks for demonstrating you have no idea what happened. Illegal aggression? Hardly... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted January 25 Author Report Posted January 25 1 hour ago, West said: I remember the wokesters on here actively celebrating the brutal execution of J6 protesters Ashli Babbit who was, in fact, unarmed. Yet a man who was armed and fighting for their cause is now a martyr. Hypocrisy You're a LIAR. Nobody was "celebrating" Babbit's death and it was NOT an "execution." She was ARMED with a MOB trying to kill legislators, and repeatedly told to STOP trying to BREAK IN. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Quote
robosmith Posted January 25 Author Report Posted January 25 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Illegal aggression? Hardly... It is NOT permissible to continue firing a weapon AFTER the THREAT has PASSED HIM. Ross was clearly on the side of the vehicle when made the kill shot and hit her in the left temple, according to the autopsy. IOW you don't know what you're talking about AGAIN, dropout. Edited January 25 by robosmith Quote
Nationalist Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 1 minute ago, robosmith said: It is NOT permissible to continue firing a weapon AFTER the THREAT has PASSED HIM. Ross was clearly on the side of the vehicle when made the kill shot and hit her in the left temple, according to the autopsy. IOW you don't know what you're talking about AGAIN, dropout. I know what I've seen...and actually believe my own sense more that you...or Donna LeMon... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Deluge Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 21 hours ago, robosmith said: Video shows man beaten and restrained on the ground by 6 agents https://www.facebook.com/reel/1385105983295875 There should have been more. We need ZERO tolerance for open borders sluts. Quote
Moonlight Graham Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 2 hours ago, West said: So you wanted the officer to just stand there with an aggressive man with a fire arm so they get shot in the head? You people are mental So you wanted them to shoot the guy? The guy who was just disarmed and was legally carrying that gun he wasn't threatening them with? Simply having a gun is a license for cops to shoot someone because they're "scared"? Define "aggressive"? What was he doing to the cops exactly? 1 Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
Moonlight Graham Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 1 hour ago, User said: I am on the fence in calling it "justified" inasmuch as the guy should have been shot, but a tragic mistake perpetrated by his unlawful actions, yes. I am waiting to see if the facts bear out that he was disarmed, but as I have pointed out, we are all watching this from cell phone videos for hours long after this happened, going frame by frame. The officers who were not doing that, but were instead fighting with the man on the ground, did not have that luxury. What were the guy's "unlawful actions"? 1 Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
eyeball Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 4 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said: Define "aggressive"? What was he doing to the cops exactly? Not complying with their authoritah. They must have been terrified out of their minds. Quote I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh fanatical criminal
Deluge Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 2 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said: Jesus, robo. I dont know how you post in this forum every day. The avalanche of stu pid red hats here is overwhelming. Have you ever tried debatepolitics.com Love to see you there. yes, robomarx, go to debatepolitics.com - speech control there is tight as a communist drum. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.