gatomontes99 Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 13 minutes ago, Hodad said: No you did not. You may be seeing him drop his phone. You may be seeing someone else drop something, but incontrovertibly the agent in the gray jacket took Pretti's gun from the holster and carried it away. Plain as day. Exactly at I said, you're entrenched now. You'll say the sky is neon green before you admit the plain truth that everyone can see. This is exactly like when people tried to pretend that it didn't rain during Trump's inauguration just because he said it didn't rain. Don't believe your eyes. Believe Trump! 🙄 Do you see the gun now? 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
West Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 9 minutes ago, User said: No, you are a coward hiding from me. Even if the facts bear this out, expecting the other agents to see that and know that and then accusing them of executing the person is YOU being entrenched in your own stupid, disgusting bias. Left wingers feel that cops should just stand there and get shot in the face. Disgraceful people 2 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 16 minutes ago, Hodad said: You'll say the sky is neon green before you admit the plain truth that everyone can see. Funny thing: Sky looked pretty neon green that night. Lol That's a real, unedited pic I took. So strange you said neon green. lol Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
gatomontes99 Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 Occam's razor: all things being equal, the simplest answer that requires the fewest assumptions tends to be the right answer. This guy impeded ICE, assaulted a woman then assaulted ICE before it was revealed that he had a gun. This is his fault. 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Politics1990 Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 (edited) fed agent walking away with gun and anothe one putting 8-9 shots into him is unexcusable.. murder plain and simple dude was orginally recording with phone shouldn't of even went after him.. hope the guy who shot him 8-9 times name comes out and he enjoys time hiding in protective custody.beyond stupid by these clowns in badges. get officals who are properly trained Edited January 25 by Politics1990 Quote
Hodad Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 13 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Do you see the gun now? You have a very vivid imagination. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 Just now, Hodad said: You have a very vivid imagination. Lmao...it's right there! You clearly don't want to see it. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Hodad Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Occam's razor: all things being equal, the simplest answer that requires the fewest assumptions tends to be the right answer. This guy impeded ICE, assaulted a woman then assaulted ICE before it was revealed that he had a gun. This is his fault. WTF? He didn't assault anyone. It's one of the fascist thugs that comes over and violently shoves that woman to the ground. Because she had the audacity to film them. 1 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 1 minute ago, Hodad said: WTF? He didn't assault anyone. It's one of the fascist thugs that comes over and violently shoves that woman to the ground. Because she had the audacity to film them. Yes, ICE pushed her. But then this guy jumped on her and ICE had to pull him off. He wouldn't let go either. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Hodad Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 (edited) 13 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Lmao...it's right there! You clearly don't want to see it. What about from this angle. 🙄 Watch the goddamn video. It requires no imagination whatsoever. The agent in the gray jacket takes the gun from the holster and leaves. Then they shoot him. Crystal clear. No need to interpret it in the least. Edited January 25 by Hodad 1 Quote
Hodad Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 5 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Yes, ICE pushed her. But then this guy jumped on her and ICE had to pull him off. He wouldn't let go either. WTF, man. That's a completely insane and inverted hunk of bullshit. They were both filming ICE. Why would he attack her? He didn't. He was literally using his body as a human shield. He didn't attack ICE. He didn't attack her. He was trying to help her after ICE attacked her. He intervened in about as pacifistic a way as possible, literally just putting himself in harms way. 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 5 minutes ago, Hodad said: What about from this angle. 🙄 Watch the goddamn video. It requires no imagination whatsoever. The agent in the great jacket takes the gun from the holster and leaves. Then they shoot him. Crystal clear. No need to interpret it in the least. You keep saying that. But what is that? Doesn't look like the phone you claimed it was. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
West Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 23 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Occam's razor: all things being equal, the simplest answer that requires the fewest assumptions tends to be the right answer. This guy impeded ICE, assaulted a woman then assaulted ICE before it was revealed that he had a gun. This is his fault. Of course Democrats are going to try and target them for acting in self defense. They are looting the public coffers and need a distraction Quote
gatomontes99 Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 2 minutes ago, West said: Of course Democrats are going to try and target them for acting in self defense. They are looting the public coffers and need a distraction It is not a coincidence. California was burning and Newsome needed a distraction...BOOM...LA riots Walz is caught red handed...BOOM...MN riots. 1 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Hodad Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 10 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: You keep saying that. But what is that? Doesn't look like the phone you claimed it was. I have no idea, because it's a pixelated, contrast blasted mess. But what it is not is Pritty's gun. Because we can watch the agent in the gray jacket remove it from Pritty's holster and carry it away. You can literally watch him pull it out with your own eyes. No speculation required. invvestigationsloopv1.mp4 1 Quote
West Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 26 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: It is not a coincidence. California was burning and Newsome needed a distraction...BOOM...LA riots Walz is caught red handed...BOOM...MN riots. So sad what these crazy people are doing down there. We are keeping watch on Carney here as well. Cut from the same corrupt cloth 1 1 Quote
robosmith Posted January 25 Author Report Posted January 25 1 hour ago, West said: Left wingers feel that cops should just stand there and get shot in the face. Disgraceful people You're LYING as USUAL. Pretti's gun was stolen from him out of his holster by ICE. Quote
User Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 Just now, robosmith said: You're LYING as USUAL. Pretti's gun was stolen from him out of his holster by ICE. If the facts bear out that is what actually happened, it is not "stealing" to be disarmed while be arrested. Quote
robosmith Posted January 25 Author Report Posted January 25 1 hour ago, West said: Of course Democrats are going to try and target them for acting in self defense. They are looting the public coffers and need a distraction You've gone back to your old DELUSIONAL ways. So sad. Quote
robosmith Posted January 25 Author Report Posted January 25 38 minutes ago, West said: So sad what these crazy people are doing down there. We are keeping watch on Carney here as well. Cut from the same corrupt cloth LA wasn't "burning." What you saw was a loop tape of the same couple of Waymo cars burning over and over. LMAO Gawd you are easily fooled; just like Obi One Kenobi "these are not the droids you're looking for" Quote
User Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 2 minutes ago, robosmith said: LA wasn't "burning." What you saw was a loop tape of the same couple of Waymo cars burning over and over. LMAO Gawd you are easily fooled; just like Obi One Kenobi "these are not the droids you're looking for" And you were totally cool with that? Quote
Moonlight Graham Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 9 hours ago, User said: Shows a man who assaulted an Officer WHILE ARMED, then fighting to resist arrest WHILE ARMED, and in doing so, officers feared for their lives, shooting him in self-defense. This is common sense stuff Robo and I can't stress this enough: If you are going to fight Law Enforcement, don't do it while armed. If you plan to fight Law Enforcement and obstruct them and otherwise be an agitator, do not do it while armed. I saw nothing in any footage so far that justified the shooting. He was disarmed before the agent started shooting. It's pretty hard to tell whether he was even resisting or not. It was a very stupid idea to bring even a legal firearm to the protest, but that's not an excuse to shoot him. He wasn't threatening anyone with it. 1 1 Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
paxamericana Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 It’s a dangerous situation, resisting arrest while armed is going to be problematic as that create cause for the officer to legitimately fear for their lives. The condition for use of lethal force. If armed you are expected to peacefully surrender. Wether he reached for the gun or had his gun in the holster is most likely irrelevant now. 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 Now why would a "peaceful protestor" be armed for a gun fight? That seems a little dangerous...no? Then the twit starts a fight with federal officers? Can you say... STUPID? You Libbies have completely lost your minds and are traitors. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.