Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Yes.

You dont like federal police. You steal federal funds. So you get none.

Enjoy.

There is no proof the average person needing medical care is "stealing federal funds".   Lot of BS.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Barquentine said:

What does that mean?

Comfort as a vice. A world that elevates the sins of gluttony and sloth to virtues. 

 

 

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted
On 1/8/2026 at 10:11 PM, TreeBeard said:

Yes, they could definitely be described as Trump’s brown shirts.  Violent. Loyal to a person, not to the constitution. Racist.  
 

Definitely lots of parallels. 

Eventually there will be another Democrat in the White House and when that day comes, the entire premise of your statement falls apart. The next Democrat president will, on day one, re-open the southern border and cease deportations of illegals, including violent criminals.

ICE will be out of sight, out of mind.

Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...

Posted
21 hours ago, User said:

She was shot because she turned her vehicle into a deadly weapon in driving towards the officer as she did. 

Why did he step in front of the vehicle if it was moving slowly?  So he could shoot her of course.

Posted
11 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Eventually there will be another Democrat in the White House and when that day comes, the entire premise of your statement falls apart. The next Democrat president will, on day one, re-open the southern border and cease deportations of illegals, including violent criminals.

ICE will be out of sight, out of mind.

Obama made more deportations than Trump. 
 

https://factchequeado.com/teexplicamos/20250820/obama-deportations-trump-biden-numbers/

Posted
22 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Obama made more deportations than Trump. 

I am aware of that. Did you also notice that there was virtually not a peep of protest from the left when he was doing it?

Beware the Brookfield industrial complex...

Posted
2 hours ago, blackbird said:

You don't know where he was when he shot her.  The video doesn't show that.

Yes it does. Multiple videos and angles show he was still positioned in front of the vehicle about the time he was getting hit when he fired the first shot. 

2 hours ago, blackbird said:

One fact is clear.  The bullet hole in the windshield was right by the front edge of the windshield.  That seems to show he shot from near the front corner of the vehicle, not from directly in front. 

See how pathetically dishonest you are? The argument was never "directly in front" of the vehcile. You have to play these stupid dishonest word games to try to make your point. He was in fact in front of the vehicle when she began accelerating towards him and he was still hit by the vehicle.

2 hours ago, blackbird said:

However you and I are speculating. 

No, you are dishonestly trying to spin this and making dishonest comments. I am commenting on observable facts on video. 

2 hours ago, blackbird said:

It doesn't look like self defence.  Shooting her from where he was standing, inches from the vehicle, would not and did not stop the motion of the vehicle.  So what was the point of shooting her?

This is textbook self-defense. She drove her car towards him, weaponizing her vehicle, which is deadly force. It doesn't matter if she meant to do that or not, she did it. The officer was struck. It is 100% self-defense to shoot someone in this situation. 

Yes, shooting someone will stop the vehicle. Guess what happened? After she was shot the vehicle came to a stop. This Officer was literally dragged by a vehicle months before this in another incident. So yeah, you have no idea how things might play out, as he could have gotten hung up on the front of the car and dragged to his death, or he had no idea if she was turning and she could have kept going more straight into him. 

She was the threat, he shot until that threat was stopped. 

34 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

This is such a stupid dishonest comment and you are too much of a coward to face me. 

46 minutes ago, blackbird said:

Why did he step in front of the vehicle if it was moving slowly?  So he could shoot her of course.

So, now you resort to making up crap about his motives. 

He was not in front of the vehicle until she backed up turning the vehicle his direction. If you watched the videos, you can deduce he turned to go walk towards helping his fellow agent with the arrest. 

 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Barquentine said:

What about when a citizen kills or rapes a citizen. It only upsets you when it's an immigrant?

What is upsetting is that folks like you let the illegal immigrants go, even after catching them committing crimes, rather than working with ICE to deport them, because you want this lawlessness, even if it results in murdered and raped citizens. 

 

 

Posted
49 minutes ago, blackbird said:

Why did he step in front of the vehicle if it was moving slowly?  So he could shoot her of course.

The officer was filming as this is what they are TRAINED TO DO when either a) their life is being threatened or b) they are being impeded in their investigation. 

The fact he was filming shows that the agitators had escalated the situation at hand. 

  • Like 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, User said:

See how pathetically dishonest you are?

That's all you ever have.  Endless claims of dishonesty.  You have no rational arguments so that's all  you've got.

Posted
17 minutes ago, West said:

The officer was filming as this is what they are TRAINED TO DO when either a) their life is being threatened or b) they are being impeded in their investigation. 

The fact he was filming shows that the agitators had escalated the situation at hand. 

Any fool would know if one is working in law enforcement and dealing with a car/driver, he doesn't deliberately step in front of the vehicle.  To take video??   Or to shoot the woman?  I think the latter.

Posted
9 minutes ago, blackbird said:

That's all you ever have.  Endless claims of dishonesty.  You have no rational arguments so that's all  you've got.

No, that is all you chose to respond to. I tore apart your dishonest comments piece by piece. You ignored all that. 

 

 

Posted
8 minutes ago, blackbird said:

Any fool would know if one is working in law enforcement and dealing with a car/driver, he doesn't deliberately step in front of the vehicle.  To take video??   Or to shoot the woman?  I think the latter.

Once again, he was moving to help his partner effect an arrest, and he was not in front of the vehicle until the lady backed up, turning it towards him. He only fired on her after she began accelerating towards him. 

What you think is clearly biased and built on your repeated lies here, not what is clearly observed on video. 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, blackbird said:

There is no proof the average person needing medical care is "stealing federal funds".   Lot of BS.

 

Fck your "proof".

Don't like it? Don't live in Minnesota. 

And always remember this...it was you Libbies who took the gloves off first.

Enjoy.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, ironstone said:

I am aware of that. Did you also notice that there was virtually not a peep of protest from the left when he was doing it?

Who protests deportations??   No one.  Because when it’s done like Obama did it, entire neighbourhoods aren’t terrorized and moms weren’t being shot!  😂 

Posted
9 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Who protests deportations??   No one.  Because when it’s done like Obama did it, entire neighbourhoods aren’t terrorized and moms weren’t being shot!  😂 

And now you, you reveal the dishonesty behind your bragging about Obama... because he really wasn't deporting people once they made it past the border. 

When you clowns cheer on and encourage millions to come here illegally, then don't enforce the laws once they are in the country... it is dishonest to brag about how many you turned away at the border as if you were really doing anything about it. 

Entire neighborhoods are only terrorized in as much as you people force them to be. ICE would be in and out and gone if not for these "moms" there slowing them down honking their horns and making it a specticle and if local law enforcement would actually cooperate with ICE at the jails. 

When you support letting these people go back into the neighborhoods instead of cooperating with ICE at the jail, then it is YOU who forces ICE to go into the neighborhoods. 

 

  • Like 2

 

 

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, User said:

What is upsetting is that folks like you let the illegal immigrants go, even after catching them committing crimes, rather than working with ICE to deport them, because you want this lawlessness, even if it results in murdered and raped citizens. 

If this is what you folks want, presumably you mean lefties, why wouldn't we just go rape and murder citizens ourselves?

Especially if we know we'll just be set free?

Edited by eyeball
  • Like 1

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

If this is what folks want, presumably you mean lefties, why wouldn't they just go rape and murder citizens themselves?

If people want ketchup on their steak, why wouldn't they go make other people eat ketchup on their steak instead of doing it themselves?

I swear, you practice being as stupid as you are. 

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, User said:

I swear, you practice being as stupid as you are.

Yes I know you do.

So riddle me this instead.

8 minutes ago, eyeball said:

...because you want this lawlessness

Where or how on Earth did you ever get the notion lefties want rape and murder?

And I'm the stupid one, seriously?

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
11 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Where or how on Earth did you ever get the notion lefties want rape and murder?

And I'm the stupid one, seriously?

" because you want this lawlessness, even if it results in murdered and raped citizens. "

 

 

Posted (edited)

Here is the list of some highly violent offenders picked up in the latest ICE raids. Why are Democrats fighting so hard to keep whack jobs, child molesters, and other violent criminals in the country?

 

Edited by West
  • Like 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Where or how on Earth did you ever get the notion lefties want rape and murder?

They support enacting of laws that allow rapists and pedophiles out on the street immediately.

They oppose the repealing of those laws.

They support importing people from countries that have no respect for women and girls, with little to no vetting.

They oppose and call "racist" anyone who doesn't.

They support judges giving house arrest and low sentences to immigrants who rape and molest.

They oppose tightening up immigration laws and vetting of immigrants.

15 minutes ago, eyeball said:

And I'm the stupid one, seriously?

Yes.

"There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe."

~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~

Posted
18 minutes ago, User said:

" because you want this lawlessness, even if it results in murdered and raped citizens. "

Who the fùck told you that and why the fùck would you believe it? WTF is wrong with you?

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted

Found the brown shirts:

shooting-still-3.jpg?ve=1%26tl=1&f=1&ipt

shooting-still-2.jpg?ve=1%26tl=1&f=1&ipt

If you are looking for people trying to create the impression of chaos and the need for a change in leadership, these are your people. 

  • Like 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Goddess said:

They support enacting of laws that allow rapists and pedophiles out on the street immediately.

So again I ask, why don't us lefties just go rape and murder people ourselves, especially if we know we'll be allowed to go and rape and murder more people immediately?

Why do we need immigrants? It makes no sense...there wouldn't be enough victims to go around.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,025
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    Jameslive
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • maro ay earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • maro ay earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Longley earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • ashtonfennescey earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • ashtonfennescey earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...