Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

And actually I didn't say she was right. Dishonest to say that.

Who claimed that you said she was right? You dishonestly characterized the statement she made and I pointed that out but I don't recall saying that you believe she was right. Did someone else say that? I hope you're not being dishonest again

25 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

The post you quoted said that.

No it didn't Mike. Lying again I see. Point out where it said that you believed she was right.

Seriously, if you didn't have dishonesty you'd have no honesty 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
24 minutes ago, User said:

This sums up my thoughts well:
 

 

That is the socialist or left wing way.  "equality" means everyone is equally at the bottom. 

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
2 hours ago, Politics1990 said:

my bad :P

No your bad was voting liberal 3 times in a row, can't wash that one away...

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
4 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

No worries mate...

And still lying about it.

What's funny is you will then cry like a baby about people calling you a liar. When you very clearly just lied. The quote he referenced did not say that you agreed with the person at all and it says that nowhere in there.

But as a far lefty dishonesty seems to be your stock and trade you can't even admit your dishonesty

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
25 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And still lying about it.

What's funny is you will then cry like a baby about people calling you a liar. When you very clearly just lied. The quote he referenced did not say that you agreed with the person at all and it says that nowhere in there.

But as a far lefty dishonesty seems to be your stock and trade you can't even admit your dishonesty

_88591529_hyena-top.jpg.webp

 

A photo of @CdnFox in his current state, calling everyone liars.

Posted
12 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

_88591529_hyena-top.jpg.webp

 

A photo of @CdnFox in his current state, calling everyone liars.

For the last time keep your family photos out of this, nobody cares what your mom looks like.

  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)

Thirty million people viewed the interview so far. 

Elite's heads explode :)  LOLOL

 

The real reason some of those elites mentioned are furious is that interviews like this, such as the joe rogan interview in the states, are becoming far more relevant and reaching a wider audience than even interviews with the established media and the left is losing (or has lost) control of the ability to control the narrative and the discussion.

this kind of thing wins elections and there's no doubt the rogan interview played a big part of trump's final push, and the left sucks at it currently.  Worse, the left politicians don't know how to deal with difficult or non scripted interviews   Polievre Is used to unscripted difficult questions and hostile reporters so it's easy for him to just sit down and talk for a couple of hours and look comfortable doing it. But Trudeau? No chance. It would have to be a friendly and cooperative interviewer.  

I have no doubt that Peterson would be willing to sit down with Trudeau in the same format and I have no doubt that while he would ask difficult questions he wouldn't be overtly hostile or anything and would probably ask more or less the same questions. But there is no chance Trudeau will ever ask to sit down with him or accept an interview if offered

 

The times are changing in the left has not figured out how to change with it

Edited by CdnFox

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
19 hours ago, Politics1990 said:

go vote for  whichever party has the best chance in my riding vs  his at this point.

I understand your sentiment but unfortunately in a binary political system this is only a placebo without any real effect (clean pure zero effect who you're "voting" for if it's not for one of the duo). The duo will rule and only one in the duo can, ever. This is how it works and it has no plans of changing anything about it. Obviously.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted

Poilievre sitting down with Jordan Peterson= millions of views

Trudeau sitting down with This Hour has 22 minutes= comparatively speaking, a relative handful of views

If Trudeau wants to appeal to more Canadians by doing interviews on platforms that reach a vastly bigger audience, he can do it. But he won't.

"Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Thomas Sowell

Posted
3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

You know what? Stuff this boring can't be dramatic by definition...

Drama? It's comedy by definition.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Politics1990 said:

nah it was a good decision actually :)     but thanks for your concern 

So what you're saying is you hate Canada :) 

3 hours ago, ironstone said:

Poilievre sitting down with Jordan Peterson= millions of views

Trudeau sitting down with This Hour has 22 minutes= comparatively speaking, a relative handful of views

If Trudeau wants to appeal to more Canadians by doing interviews on platforms that reach a vastly bigger audience, he can do it. But he won't.

Well into top it off Jordan Peterson isn't actually a serious interviewer asking serious questions and addressing serious issues on his podcast

This hour has 22 minutes is a comedy show. If you want to be taken seriously, maybe don't make your only interviews at a comedy show

1 hour ago, Legato said:

Drama? It's comedy by definition.

@Michael Hardner Doesn't actually have a sense of humor, most on the left don't. I don't think he got your joke either :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

@Michael Hardner Doesn't actually have a sense of humor, most on the left don't. I don't think he got your joke either :) 

You are right, enlightenment is beyond chud heaven.

  • Haha 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Legato said:

enlightenment is beyond chud heaven

Remember, they just worshiped a bombastic liar and convicted petty criminal as the source of purest ultimate wisdom. OMG. Nowhere is safe anymore. Reason, the endangered trait in this intelligent species.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
27 minutes ago, myata said:

Remember, they just worshiped a bombastic liar and convicted petty criminal as the source of purest ultimate wisdom. OMG. Nowhere is safe anymore. Reason, the endangered trait in this intelligent species.

I did not know Rea's son was in danger. Which intelligent species is posing the threat?

Posted
On 1/4/2025 at 2:10 PM, herbie said:

Mr. I.M. Notaracist at it again.

Be happy that WalMart is ditching DEI. That means they'll never be forced to hire another white person again. Enjoy.

Mr, anti-white hater is at it again. It is quite obvious to me that you are a racist and you hate white people. On the contrary, this means that white people will now not be ignored and denied jobs by anti-white woke racists like you. DEI was anti-white, racist. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Shady said:

Hey Michael, you ever post a critique of a Trudeau interview?

I think this is the first thread he's ever started that I'm aware of.  Mike generally doesn't contribute much to the conversation, he just shows up to complain about how crappy everybody else's contributions are. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
On 1/4/2025 at 12:42 PM, Michael Hardner said:

 Summary of her opposition:

- everyman Poilievre uses economic statistics. Deceptively in the interview 

- Peterson makes money from pro-life ads that feature during the interview 

- Poilievre makes false claims about housing in the interview 

- The claim that present policy imported racism into Canada is ridiculous 

---+++

The one thing I found intriguing is the claim about increasing inequity, I.e the rich getting richer.  

I feel that that is only going to continue under Poilievre, but if a rising tide lifts all boats, maybe it won't matter? 

What do you think?

 

 

 

The economic and other stats are accurate.  Prove otherwise.  The left has reinstated racism through DEI hiring and admissions, still blossoming in Canada as our Supreme Court is stupid compared to America’s   

 I like the pro life ads.  It’s about time.

——-

Poilievre is as good as it gets to reverse Canada’s radical left downfall.  However, he has a steep hill to climb.  I think ushering in 51st state is the better long term strategy.  We pay a lot to have all the duplication of standards and institutions just so we can distinguish ourselves from the Yanks.  It’s not worth it.  If 51st state isn’t popular in Canada, we should at least seek an economic union with right to live and work in each other’s countries.  Ax the tax and other Poilievre ideas are good but may not be enough to reverse our fortunes in a lasting way.  

Posted (edited)
On 1/4/2025 at 2:00 PM, Politics1990 said:

oh please you don't think the harper government didn't so shady stuff before the trudeau one? every government does shady  things cry me a river lol. i already said i won't be voting liberal in the upcoming election  if jt is the leader anyway.

No Gov has been this shady, corrupt and incompetent. And once we get them out of there, what we will really find out how bad they really were. It's going to be ugly what we will find out.

Edited by PIK
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, PIK said:

No Gov has been this shady, corrupt and incompetent. And once we get them out of there, what we will really find out how bad they really were. It's going to be ugly what we will find out.

Shouldn't there be tons of evidence of corruption and incompetence available here already?

https://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/admin_e_41.html#wb-cont

I often get the sense the it'll-be-worse-than-we-imagined sentiment is like an advance on the apologies we can expect in the face of little to no progress on the same important issues during Poilievre's term. 

He'll be able to lean on this sentiment for about half a term after which everything will start being his fault.

Edited by eyeball
  • Thanks 1

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,898
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Flora smith
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Politics1990 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Akalupenn earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...