Devon Archer Transcript proves Joe had the Ukrainian prosecutor fired to help end the investigation into his son's energy firm Burisma

[myata]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

C'mon myata. You know by now that the FBI committed crimes to get warrants to spy n the Trump campaign.

Typical troll thing: allude to an allegation or even invented supposition as a common knowledge. Where has it been investigated, recorded, proven? Not interested today.

[Hodad]

34 minutes ago, West said:

Archer clearly stated in an interview that Hunter Biden got on the phone with his dad at the request of burisma. 

Five days later his dad scheduled a meeting to discuss "justice reform". 

These are FACTS.

What a pathetic attempt at gaslighting.

Again, no surprise, you fail to produce the citation when challenged. Because it does not support you claim. Archer clarified his statement when pressed:

Mr. Schwartz. He told you expressly he called his father or that he called D.C.?

Mr. Archer. D.C., D.C.

 

Which is exactly why Jim Jordan says he doesn't know who Hunter called.

And it's all a bit of a moot point, isn't it? We know Joe's Ukraine trip, and the purpose, we're publicly announced weeks before any hypothetical phone call.

And again, Archer testified that his understanding of the situation is that Shokin was under Mykola's control and that Burisma did not want him fired--that it was a bad thing, against their interests.

Stop being a sucker. Don't just repeat what you heard on Fox. Read the transcript for yourself. The Archer testimony was great for Joe Biden. 

 

 

[West]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Read the Independent article. The Shokin "investigation" into Burisma was LONG DEAD by the time Joe showed up to threaten the loan.

Wonder why Hunter still had a job there?

?.. 

I've read your pathetic spin articles and they are void of fact. 

The hero is not the vice president who's son is collecting 80k monthly for selling access to his dad. 

Hunters macaroni art isn't worth 500k a piece either. 

Only the brainwashed think otherwise. 

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, myata said:

Typical troll thing: allude to an allegation or even invented supposition as a common knowledge. Where has it been investigated, recorded, proven? Not interested today.

Are you admitting that you're chiming in on all of this and you don't even know if the FBI committed actual crimes? You're even being snotty, yet you don't have the foggiest clue...

It's not even like you're just a guy who does his thing without paying much attention to the news - you're a regular here so you obviously have quite an interest. Otherwise you'd be on a sports forum or an entertainment forum or just out doing other things. You're a person who feels like they're informed but for some reason your trusted "sources" haven't even gotten you to the point where you can participate in the most basic adult discussion on this topic. 

You should be mad, but I'm gonna go ahead and guess that you're not gonna change a thing. You will choose to remain ignorant, just like every other leftard here. 

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, Hodad said:

You claimed: "a lawyer who was protecting the Bidens' family interests in Ukraine is now a judge presiding over a case against Trump?"

She was a PARTNER. She had input in the decision-making process regarding everything that happened at that firm.

Biden came and worked there while she was a partner.

Have you ever worked at a plant/military base/office, etc with 200 people? 

It's actually not a lot. You know everyone there, especially the people who run it and someone as notable as the son of the VPOTUS. 

To say that Hunter and Judge Dipshit knew each other very well is an understatement. There's no way that she should be presiding over a case that his family is so deeply involved in. 

Quote

It's not related to her expertise even.

Huh?

She specialized in white-collar defence. How is it unrelated to what her law firm was doing there? Do you think there weren't some people there who needed a lawyer? Maybe even the CEO of Burisma himself? And remember, she was a partner at the firm. Of course she dealt with or had oversight over high-profile clients. 

Also, it's not related to Hunter's expertise either, remember? A country where he doesn't speak the language, an industry that he never worked in before... And despite all that they paid him $83K/mo to work there. 

Quote

I called you on your lie.

No, you made another juvenile accusation and as usual you were 100% wrong. 

Quote

Produce any evidence that Chutkan did work for Burisma or Biden. 

She was a PARTNER there. 

If HER FIRM was working there, she was involved.

Even if it happened after she left the firm, she's still a close associate of Hunter's and he's heavily implicated in the Hunter, Joe, Trump saga. There's no way that she should be involved in the prosecution of Donald Trump.

[Hodad]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

She was a PARTNER. She had input in the decision-making process regarding everything that happened at that firm.

Biden came and worked there while she was a partner.

Have you ever worked at a plant/military base/office, etc with 200 people? 

It's actually not a lot. You know everyone there, especially the people who run it and someone as notable as the son of the VPOTUS. 

To say that Hunter and Judge Dipshit knew each other very well is an understatement. There's no way that she should be presiding over a case that his family is so deeply involved in. 

Huh?

She specialized in white-collar defence. How is it unrelated to what her law firm was doing there? Do you think there weren't some people there who needed a lawyer? Maybe even the CEO of Burisma himself? And remember, she was a partner at the firm. Of course she dealt with or had oversight over high-profile clients. 

Also, it's not related to Hunter's expertise either, remember? A country where he doesn't speak the language, an industry that he never worked in before... And despite all that they paid him $83K/mo to work there. 

No, you made another juvenile accusation and as usual you were 100% wrong. 

She was a PARTNER there. 

If HER FIRM was working there, she was involved.

Even if it happened after she left the firm, she's still a close associate of Hunter's and he's heavily implicated in the Hunter, Joe, Trump saga. There's no way that she should be involved in the prosecution of Donald Trump.

Lol "But, but but... she must have! She had to!" -- And all the other language of wild speculation when one leans too far over their skis, makes a bullshit claim, and falls flat on their face. 

Not to bury the lead, but it's 100% clear you have no evidence whatsoever to back up your lie. Your standard M.O.

Oh, and you're just talking out of your ass again. Hunter hired his old firm to do some work at his new company. That is just life--a daily occurrence. Chutkan was a Partner, not a Managing Partner. You know how many of those there are at a firm of that size? 89 currently. They don't have oversight over anything and Burisma was not a high profile client. And it's an international firm. They may not have even worked in the same state or country, but you're sure "they knew each other very well." Jeebus, what a jackass. -- Just stop lying and this kind of thing will stop happening to you. Seriously.

WestCanMan: "Buddy, I'd never post with this username again if I got busted on even one of your lies." 

But I'll assume that too was yet another of your lies, and you'll be you'll continue your bloviating, lie-filled rants under the same name as always.

 

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, West said:

?.. 

I've read your pathetic spin articles and they are void of fact. 

 

So you say, but you have NO CREDIBILITY, like major newspapers have.

Unlike you, they have professional journalistic ethical standards and HAVE to have credibility to stay in business.

Edited August 4, 2023 by robosmith

[robosmith]

41 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

She was a PARTNER. She had input in the decision-making process regarding everything that happened at that firm.

Biden came and worked there while she was a partner.

Have you ever worked at a plant/military base/office, etc with 200 people? 

It's actually not a lot. You know everyone there, especially the people who run it and someone as notable as the son of the VPOTUS. 

To say that Hunter and Judge Dipshit knew each other very well is an understatement. There's no way that she should be presiding over a case that his family is so deeply involved in. 

Huh?

She specialized in white-collar defence. How is it unrelated to what her law firm was doing there? Do you think there weren't some people there who needed a lawyer? Maybe even the CEO of Burisma himself? And remember, she was a partner at the firm. Of course she dealt with or had oversight over high-profile clients. 

Also, it's not related to Hunter's expertise either, remember? A country where he doesn't speak the language, an industry that he never worked in before... And despite all that they paid him $83K/mo to work there. 

No, you made another juvenile accusation and as usual you were 100% wrong. 

She was a PARTNER there. 

If HER FIRM was working there, she was involved.

Even if it happened after she left the firm, she's still a close associate of Hunter's and he's heavily implicated in the Hunter, Joe, Trump saga. There's no way that she should be involved in the prosecution of Donald Trump.

Trump APPOINTED Judge Cannon but I don't see you complaining about that conflict of interest.

Because you're a partisan HACK. duh

[WestCanMan]

7 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Lol "But, but but... she must have! She had to!" -- And all the other language of wild speculation when one leans too far over their skis, makes a bullshit claim, and falls flat on their face. 

 

Wrong. She DID. She was a partner.

What's bullshit is the indictment saying that "Trump lied because he KNEW that what he was saying was false."

They said that about the recorded convo with the Georgian fellow, but he was asking questions, which would clearly indicate that he did not know. He wasn't saying things like "I know this claim is BS but who can prove it?"

Quote

Not to bury the lead, but it's 100% clear you have no evidence whatsoever to back up your lie. Your standard M.O.

Not a lie stupid. You wanted proof that she was involved with Bursima, I gave it to you. Oh, and you're just talking out of

Quote

your ass again. Hunter hired his old firm to do some work at his new company. That is just life--a daily occurrence. Chutkan was a Partner, not a Managing Partner. You know how many of those there are at a firm of that size? 89 currently. They don't have oversight over anything and Burisma was not a high profile client. And it's an international firm.

They may not have even worked in the same state or country, but you're sure "they knew each other very well." Jeebus, what a jackass. -- Just stop lying and this kind of thing will stop happening to you. Seriously.

It's a company of 200 people. That's not a lot - they definitely all knew each other. 

How do you know who has insight over what? You're clearly lying, just like you did when you said that what they were doing for Burisma was outside of her area of expertise. It was right in her wheelhouse. 

Quote

 

WestCanMan: "Buddy, I'd never post with this username again if I got busted on even one of your lies." 

But I'll assume that too was yet another of your lies, and you'll be you'll continue your bloviating, lie-filled rants under the same name as always.

 

Dude, all you do is lie here.

Even now you're trying desperately to pretend you know that this woman, who was a partner in a law firm that worked for Burisma, didn't know Hunter Biden and had no involvement with Burisma. 

It's a fact that her ties to Hunter and Burisma are way too close for her to be involved in Trump's case, let alone presiding over it. 

[Aristides]

Why isn't Trump's legal team weighing in on this? If she actually did act for Biden or Burisma you would think they would be asking for her removal or to recuse herself. But they aren't.

Maybe the Dailycaller is just full of shit, again.

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Why isn't Trump's legal team weighing in on this? If she actually did act for Biden or Burisma you would think they would be asking for her removal or to recuse herself. But they aren't.

Maybe the Dailycaller is just full of shit, again.

The truth is, Burisma and Hunter Biden's case have NOTHING to do with the conspiracies with which Trump is charged IN THIS CASE. And Judge Chutkan has a LOT OF EXPERIENCE with the Jan 6th cases.

That would be a reason Trump's team would WANT her recused. But NOT a valid reason for her recusal.

[myata]

35 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

It's a company of 200 people.

A bullshit assumption, no probably a boldface lie. A law firm is not your regular manufacturing "company". There's no way different lawyers would have to know every single client of all other lawyers. Anybody with a cubic inch of intelligence and honesty would get that.

Look, you talk and write like a prolific pathological l-r. Is it any surprise that you would worship an idol that is patently better, possibly world's best, at boldface lying? Makes sense, no?

[WestCanMan]

10 minutes ago, myata said:

A bullshit assumption, no probably a boldface lie. A law firm is not your regular manufacturing "company". There's no way different lawyers would have to know every single client of all other lawyers. Anybody with a cubic inch of intelligence and honesty would get that.

Look, you talk and write like a prolific pathological l-r. Is it any surprise that you would worship an idol that is patently better, possibly world's best, at boldface lying? Makes sense, no?

They all know each other. Hunter knows the partners, they all know the VPOTUS's kid. 

There's a chance that he was just on the books there and they were paying him gobs of money even though he never showed up, just to keep the FBI off their backs or something. It's a definite possibility. But if he actually worked there then they all knew each other. There would be meetings, parties, corporate events, courses, etc. 

[Caswell Thomas]

Try posting a  non pro Trump, pro Republican view .  Am so tired of hearing Trump related dogma, its all  hearsay , with no actual, traceable facts, no  reliable independent sources. Surely the Party hasn't sunken to this as our only position?

[Rebound]

6 hours ago, West said:

Archer clearly stated in an interview that Hunter Biden got on the phone with his dad at the request of burisma. 

Five days later his dad scheduled a meeting to discuss "justice reform". 

These are FACTS.

What a pathetic attempt at gaslighting.

Here is a link showing that Biden’s trip to Ukrainian was announced three weeks before he arrived. So the “five day” story doesn’t hold up. 
 

https://ua.usembassy.gov/vice-president-biden-travel-ukraine/

 

Look, if the GOP finds actual evidence, instead of this “connect the dots” nonsense, the Dems will vote to impeach him. But just because right wing media prints it every day, it doesn’t make it true.  

Edited August 5, 2023 by Rebound

[Hodad]

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Wrong. She DID. She was a partner.

What's bullshit is the indictment saying that "Trump lied because he KNEW that what he was saying was false."

They said that about the recorded convo with the Georgian fellow, but he was asking questions, which would clearly indicate that he did not know. He wasn't saying things like "I know this claim is BS but who can prove it?"

Not a lie stupid. You wanted proof that she was involved with Bursima, I gave it to you. Oh, and you're just talking out of

It's a company of 200 people. That's not a lot - they definitely all knew each other. 

How do you know who has insight over what? You're clearly lying, just like you did when you said that what they were doing for Burisma was outside of her area of expertise. It was right in her wheelhouse. 

Dude, all you do is lie here.

Even now you're trying desperately to pretend you know that this woman, who was a partner in a law firm that worked for Burisma, didn't know Hunter Biden and had no involvement with Burisma. 

It's a fact that her ties to Hunter and Burisma are way too close for her to be involved in Trump's case, let alone presiding over it. 

Jeebus. In a few posts you've gone from saying that she was the lawyer representing the Bidens overseas interests to, "Well, they might have seen each other at office parties," without batting an eye. 

And again, Burisma did not retain The firm for criminal defense or litigation. The work wasn't even in her practice. 

I'd tell you to stop embarrassing yourself, but pathological liars don't feel shame or embarrassment about their fabrications.

Edited August 5, 2023 by Hodad

[West]

8 hours ago, Hodad said:

Again, no surprise, you fail to produce the citation when challenged. Because it does not support you claim. Archer clarified his statement when pressed:

Mr. Schwartz. He told you expressly he called his father or that he called D.C.?

Mr. Archer. D.C., D.C.

 

Which is exactly why Jim Jordan says he doesn't know who Hunter called.

And it's all a bit of a moot point, isn't it? We know Joe's Ukraine trip, and the purpose, we're publicly announced weeks before any hypothetical phone call.

And again, Archer testified that his understanding of the situation is that Shokin was under Mykola's control and that Burisma did not want him fired--that it was a bad thing, against their interests.

Stop being a sucker. Don't just repeat what you heard on Fox. Read the transcript for yourself. The Archer testimony was great for Joe Biden. 

 

 

 

3 hours ago, Rebound said:

Here is a link showing that Biden’s trip to Ukrainian was announced three weeks before he arrived. So the “five day” story doesn’t hold up. 
 

https://ua.usembassy.gov/vice-president-biden-travel-ukraine/

 

Look, if the GOP finds actual evidence, instead of this “connect the dots” nonsense, the Dems will vote to impeach him. But just because right wing media prints it every day, it doesn’t make it true.  

Lol.. 

Democrats are a crooked party. Chasing nonsense with Donnie while allowing Joe to accept bribes through his son. 

[West]

2 hours ago, Hodad said:

Jeebus. In a few posts you've gone from saying that she was the lawyer representing the Bidens overseas interests to, "Well, they might have seen each other at office parties," without batting an eye. 

And again, Burisma did not retain The firm for criminal defense or litigation. The work wasn't even in her practice. 

I'd tell you to stop embarrassing yourself, but pathological liars don't feel shame or embarrassment about their fabrications.

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1686799149109256192/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1686799149109256192&currentTweetUser=TuckerCarlson

 

"Obviously the brand of Biden adds alot when your dad is vice president". 

"They were going to deal with regulatory issues"

"He was an expert in knowing the guy"

"Understanding the regulatory climate means selling access at the end of the day"

How many times would Joe Biden call in when business associated were on the phone "about 20"

"At particular dinners or meetings he knew there were business associates" (Joe lied)

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1687436522625159168/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1687436522625159168&currentTweetUser=TuckerCarlson

In speaking about Burisma

"I brought hunter on board so that there would be a firm looking out for Burismas interests in Washington"

"We've got the former president of Poland on board for regulatory reasons, we've got a few Ukrainians and now we can get the vice presidents son on board"

Burisma to Hunter "we urgently need your advice on how you can use your influence"

Re SHOKIN:

"Issues with a visa... issues with money being tied up in London... this is what "strategic advisory" firms were hired for"

"Big push by the European Union and the Atlantic council to fire shokin because he's corrupt... it's hard to decipher who was actually corrupt"

"Shokin was considered a threat to the business (Burisma)"

"Shokin was fired and Burisma was let off the hook"

"Joe Biden was involved in the firing of Shokin"

"Looking back at the rear view it looks like there was something there... I was told shokin was taken care of"

Re Burisma

"At one point the bursima guys told Hunter to call his dad?" "Yes... there was constant pressure to 'send signals' to leverage his dad, the Biden brand to help burisma survive"

"He brought The ability to keep burisma out of trouble on the geopolitical stage.. keep them out of investigations, unfreeze assets.."

"When asked to call his dad did he" "Vadim met with his dad at Cafe Milano" "I wasn't privied to the conversation". 

Hunters wages: 

"83,000 per month"

"The second his father left the vps office his wage went down"

Play dumb if you'd like. There's far more evidence that hunter sold access to his father than any of the dozens of conspiracy theories you've put out about Donnie. 

 

Edited August 5, 2023 by West

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, West said:

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1686799149109256192/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1686799149109256192&currentTweetUser=TuckerCarlson

 

"Obviously the brand of Biden adds alot when your dad is vice president". 

"They were going to deal with regulatory issues"

"He was an expert in knowing the guy"

"Understanding the regulatory climate means selling access at the end of the day"

How many times would Joe Biden call in when business associated were on the phone "about 20"

"At particular dinners or meetings he knew there were business associates" (Joe lied)

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1687436522625159168/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1687436522625159168&currentTweetUser=TuckerCarlson

In speaking about Burisma

"I brought hunter on board so that there would be a firm looking out for Burismas interests in Washington"

"We've got the former president of Poland on board for regulatory reasons, we've got a few Ukrainians and now we can get the vice presidents son on board"

Burisma to Hunter "we urgently need your advice on how you can use your influence"

Re SHOKIN:

"Issues with a visa... issues with money being tied up in London... this is what "strategic advisory" firms were hired for"

"Big push by the European Union and the Atlantic council to fire shokin because he's corrupt... it's hard to decipher who was actually corrupt"

"Shokin was considered a threat to the business (Burisma)"

"Shokin was fired and Burisma was let off the hook"

"Joe Biden was involved in the firing of Shokin"

"Looking back at the rear view it looks like there was something there... I was told shokin was taken care of"

Re Burisma

"At one point the bursima guys told Hunter to call his dad?" "Yes... there was constant pressure to 'send signals' to leverage his dad, the Biden brand to help burisma survive"

"He brought The ability to keep burisma out of trouble on the geopolitical stage.. keep them out of investigations, unfreeze assets.."

"When asked to call his dad did he" "Vadim met with his dad at Cafe Milano" "I wasn't privied to the conversation". 

Hunters wages: 

"83,000 per month"

"The second his father left the vps office his wage went down"

Play dumb if you'd like. There's far more evidence that hunter sold access to his father than any of the dozens of conspiracy theories you've put out about Donnie. 

 

"Selling" access is not illegal. Trump sold access to anyone who would pay the Mar-a-Lago membership fee (which he DOUBLED upon his election to POTUS).

You've been CONNED.

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, West said:

 

Lol.. 

Democrats are a crooked party. Chasing nonsense with Donnie while allowing Joe to accept bribes through his son. 

 

30 minutes ago, West said:

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1686799149109256192/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1686799149109256192&currentTweetUser=TuckerCarlson

 

"Obviously the brand of Biden adds alot when your dad is vice president". 

"They were going to deal with regulatory issues"

"He was an expert in knowing the guy"

"Understanding the regulatory climate means selling access at the end of the day"

How many times would Joe Biden call in when business associated were on the phone "about 20"

"At particular dinners or meetings he knew there were business associates" (Joe lied)

https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1687436522625159168/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1687436522625159168&currentTweetUser=TuckerCarlson

In speaking about Burisma

"I brought hunter on board so that there would be a firm looking out for Burismas interests in Washington"

"We've got the former president of Poland on board for regulatory reasons, we've got a few Ukrainians and now we can get the vice presidents son on board"

Burisma to Hunter "we urgently need your advice on how you can use your influence"

Re SHOKIN:

"Issues with a visa... issues with money being tied up in London... this is what "strategic advisory" firms were hired for"

"Big push by the European Union and the Atlantic council to fire shokin because he's corrupt... it's hard to decipher who was actually corrupt"

"Shokin was considered a threat to the business (Burisma)"

"Shokin was fired and Burisma was let off the hook"

"Joe Biden was involved in the firing of Shokin"

"Looking back at the rear view it looks like there was something there... I was told shokin was taken care of"

Re Burisma

"At one point the bursima guys told Hunter to call his dad?" "Yes... there was constant pressure to 'send signals' to leverage his dad, the Biden brand to help burisma survive"

"He brought The ability to keep burisma out of trouble on the geopolitical stage.. keep them out of investigations, unfreeze assets.."

"When asked to call his dad did he" "Vadim met with his dad at Cafe Milano" "I wasn't privied to the conversation". 

Hunters wages: 

"83,000 per month"

"The second his father left the vps office his wage went down"

Play dumb if you'd like. There's far more evidence that hunter sold access to his father than any of the dozens of conspiracy theories you've put out about Donnie. 

 

QQ: Are you literate? If so, you don't have to listen to take Tucker Carlson's sloppy seconds. He's on record admitting that he lies to you--a lot. You can actually go read for yourself.

Archer spoke at length about all those things. He said multiple times that Joe Biden, to his knowledge, never did anything to help Hunter's business interests. That when he called, it was farther-son small talk.

Seriously, read the transcript.

[Rebound]

6 hours ago, West said:

 

Lol.. 

Democrats are a crooked party. Chasing nonsense with Donnie while allowing Joe to accept bribes through his son. 

For the umpteenth time: If you or the GOP dig up any actual evidence of this, instead of this vague horseshlt about “Biden-linked companies” (whatever that means), then I’ll agree with his impeachment. 
 

I stand behind the ideas and the policies, not the people. If there’s a crime, prosecute it. But there’s no evidence yet, just a lot of BS.

[myata]

12 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

They all know each other. Hunter knows the partners, they all know the VPOTUS's kid. 

Just because you repeated it for the 1000th time it somehow transformed from your unsubstantiated belief into an unquestionable, absolute truth? Good pupil.

[Nationalist]

I read these exchanges and must acknowledge that partisan politics and social upheaval is at an epic level. What makes a normally rational human, become blinded to the blatantly obvious? And the only reasonable answer seems to be...hatred.

We all know what has transpired between the Bidens and the Ukrainians. 

Now...ladies and germs...this happens to be what was once known as "obvious" nepotism. Something that happens to be illegal for politicians to engage in.

The only thing that could worsen this...in your face abuse of power...would be if Joe received funds for doing this sort of thing...which it appears obvious he did. But this is just the tip of the iceberg. 

Your local Libbie will argue, "There is no evidence that blah blah blah. Or...No court has decided that blah blah blah." And although dead wrong about the "evidence", the Libbies are right in that the justice system refuses to prosecute Democrats...in particular...Ol' Joe and his family. However, it's equally apparent that the justice system is itching to prosecute Conservatives...in particular...Donald Trump.

So why am I wasting a nice Saturday morning with this diatribe? Two reasons.

1. I still hold hope...perhaps misguided...that common sense and morality will win out eventually. 

2. Failing number one...then I want the whole world watch and chronicle for posterity, the utter filth that is controlling Libbies. The acceptance of a crooked POTUS and his dullard of a VP. The acceptance of a government made recession. The acceptance of a wide open border. The acceptance of open racism. The acceptance of genital mutilation being encouraged for minors without parental concent.

In short...if our Libbie fellow planet inhabitants will warp the justice system and wave lack of convictions and of course The Rona, around like a skirt to hide behind and laugh in the face of decency...

I WANT REVENGE!

Yes and I am sorry it's come to this, but you leave humanity no choice but to destroy your leaders and ideals in public for the whole world to see...forever.

Now...I've said my piece and feel better for it. Think I'll have another coffee.

Do enjoy the destruction...

Edited August 5, 2023 by Nationalist

[reason10]

On 8/3/2023 at 12:49 PM, robosmith said:

Too bad the text of your cite is NOT evidence to substantiate your POST TITLE.

Of course, that is the reason you cited NO QUOTE from the article; as USUAL. LMAO.

All you've got is ARCHER'S BELIEF and saying "correct" when PROMPTED by Jim Jordan's ALLEGATION. AKA, no solid evidence.

1. Biden ADMITTED TO A CRIME doing this.

2. The post WAS PROOF OF THAT, but it didn't fit your goose stepping narrative, Adolf.

3. Biden is a criminal. He was not legally elected president.

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, myata said:

Just because you repeated it for the 1000th time it somehow transformed from your unsubstantiated belief into an unquestionable, absolute truth? Good pupil.

Nope. It's just obvious and you have your head up your ass.