THE WIKILEAKS

[bush_cheney2004]

I wonder if the same people who applaud such leaks "in the public interest" are the same ones who cry foul when their privacy is threatened by government spying and disclosures in the public interest (e.g. NSA, Five Eyes, FBI/RCMP, etc.).

[eyeball]

20 hours ago, cybercoma said:

 

My point there is not that they support Trump; they're supporting civil unrest and political discord. This is a tactic the Kremlin has used in the past to destabilize nations.

It's a tactic the U.S. uses too.  Super-powers...if you've seen one you've seen them all.

[cybercoma]

Breitbart coordinated with liberal activist and organizer who disrupted GOP primary campaign events

Black coordinated with Breitbart via email, phone and in person, including when he dressed up as a robot and trolled Marco Rubio’s events. The relationship was described as very friendly. 

"He worked directly with Breitbart’s political team on the ground in the primary states to sabotage Marco Rubio & Ted Cruz, and elect Trump as nominee of [the Republican] party,” the source told POLITICO. “[Black] was coordinating with [Breitbart’s] top staff to rabble rouse against Rubio at rallies."

Though Black is featured in the recent Project Veritas videos, none of the Breitbart write-ups on those videos — which were brought up in the last debate by Trump as evidence the DNC was coordinating disruptions at Republican campaign events — mention him by name. 

Black: "We engaged the media from across the political spectrum. When we organized events aimed at a Trump opponent, Breitbart was more than happy to spread the word. When we organized events against Mr. Trump, Breitbart amplified the Trump Foundation-funded con artist James O’Keefe, who attacked our firm and coalition."

http://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/10/breitbart-liberal-activist-230255#ixzz4O3KlZGxq

Soooo.... about that video.....

Edited October 25, 2016 by cybercoma

[sharkman]

23 hours ago, eyeball said:

It's a tactic the U.S. uses too.  Super-powers...if you've seen one you've seen them all.

Yes, that's a popular conspiracy theory too, though you claimed not to follow them in your above post.  

Edited October 25, 2016 by sharkman

[eyeball]

Yes, regime change does seem to have a lot of popular support.

[betsy]

For those interested, here's the Wikileaks Hillary Clinton email archive.

 

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/

[taxme]

On 10/16/2016 at 1:07 PM, WestCoastRunner said:

Russia has been implicated in hacking of emails to influence the outcome of the election. Here are some reasons why he'd prefer trump to Hillary:

Hillary stands in defiance to Putins  vision of a sphere of influence that includes the former soviet union

She will have a stronger more aggressive stance than Obama ever did  to deter Russia's aggression in Europe and beyond

Clinton wants to impose a no-fly zone in Syria, greatly affecting Russia  

Why Putin fears a Clinton presidency http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/15/opinions/putin-clinton-hate-affair-ghitis/index.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

Russia has not been implicated in any hacking of emails. Just more lies from the fake establishment corporate media. Why Putin prefers Trump and fears Hillary is because Putin already knows that Hillary wants to start a war with Russia. 

America is the country that has visions of wanting to have a sphere of influence all over the world. It is the aim of the globalist elite that Hillary works for and takes her orders from.

Thank gawd that it is Putin who is standing in the way of Americas aggression in Europe and around the world. 

Russia will not allow a no-fly zone over Syria. The Russians are in Syria trying to destroy ISIS. Putin won't allow America to topple the government of Assad which is the aim of the globalist elite.

It should be more like the globalist elite and their puppet Hillary that are in fear of Putin.

Trump does not fear Putin at all. Instead Trump would like to have better relations with Putin rather than start a war with Russia. And how can anybody be against that, eh?  

[taxme]

On 10/25/2016 at 8:59 AM, eyeball said:

Yes, regime change does seem to have a lot of popular support.

A regime change indeed does appear to have a lot of popular support. And that regime change is going to happen on Nov. 8th with a Trump victory. It will be a great day for America and the rest of the world because as America goes so does the rest of the world goes. With a Trump victory the globalist elite cabal will have seen it's last destructive corrupt days come to an end. That should make the world great again.   

[betsy]

59 minutes ago, taxme said:

Trump does not fear Putin at all. Instead Trump would like to have better relations with Putin rather than start a war with Russia. And how can anybody be against that, eh?  

 

Why would you want to start another war? 

Isn't war with Isis and terrorism, threat from North Korea, tensions with China......bad enough? 

 

Hey yo............ what happened to diplomacy?

 

 

See?  It's Hillary Clinton's temperament that has issues. 

She's latching on to raking the fear of Russia - the good old cold war with Soviet Union, just to distract from her email issues.......the same way  Bill Clinton bombed Iraq to distract from the Lewinski scandal.   

Same old memo.

Edited November 1, 2016 by betsy

[eyeball]

On 10/25/2016 at 8:03 AM, sharkman said:

Yes, that's a popular conspiracy theory too, though you claimed not to follow them in your above post.  

What are you talking about exactly...what claim? Show me.

[Wilber]

6 hours ago, betsy said:

 

Why would you want to start another war? 

Isn't war with Isis and terrorism, threat from North Korea, tensions with China......bad enough? 

 

Hey yo............ what happened to diplomacy?

 

 

See?  It's Hillary Clinton's temperament that has issues. 

She's latching on to raking the fear of Russia - the good old cold war with Soviet Union, just to distract from her email issues.......the same way  Bill Clinton bombed Iraq to distract from the Lewinski scandal.   

Same old memo.

Trump's idea of diplomacy is litigation. 

[?Impact]

3 hours ago, Wilber said:

Trump's idea of diplomacy is litigation. 

and even if he loses, he claims victory just like he did for the '73 housing lawsuit and more recently in the debates

[taxme]

On 10/16/2016 at 1:07 PM, WestCoastRunner said:

Russia has been implicated in hacking of emails to influence the outcome of the election. Here are some reasons why he'd prefer trump to Hillary:

Hillary stands in defiance to Putins  vision of a sphere of influence that includes the former soviet union

She will have a stronger more aggressive stance than Obama ever did  to deter Russia's aggression in Europe and beyond

Clinton wants to impose a no-fly zone in Syria, greatly affecting Russia  

Why Putin fears a Clinton presidency http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/15/opinions/putin-clinton-hate-affair-ghitis/index.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

Russia has not been implicated in any hacking of emails. Just more lies from the fake establishment corporate media. Why Putin prefers Trump and fears Hillary is because Putin already knows that Hillary wants to start a war with Russia. 

America is the country that has visions of wanting to have a sphere of influence all over the world. It is the aim of the globalist elite that Hillary works for and takes her orders from.

Thank gawd that it is Putin who is standing in the way of Americas aggression in Europe and around the world. 

Russia will not allow a no-fly zone over Syria. The Russians are in Syria trying to destroy ISIS. Putin won't allow America to topple the government of Assad which is the aim of the globalist elite.

It should be more like the globalist elite and their puppet Hillary that are in fear of Putin.

Trump does not fear Putin at all. Instead Trump would like to have better relations with Putin rather than start a war with Russia. And how can anybody be against that, eh?  

[?Impact]

4 minutes ago, taxme said:

The Russians are in Syria trying to destroy ISIS.

 

... by dropping bombs on Kurdish groups hundred of miles away from any ISIS factions. 

[taxme]

2 hours ago, ?Impact said:

and even if he loses, he claims victory just like he did for the '73 housing lawsuit and more recently in the debates

What lawsuits are you talking about? Mind showing me some of them? Or is just more anti-Trump trash talk that has become so common place around here? I like how these anti-Trump people always try to find fault with Trump but never point out anything that Hillary has been involved with criminally which is widely posted on the internet. When Trump started to run for President the fake corporate media loved him, and had nothing bad to say about him. But after he won the nominee for President and started to attack the political system and calling it a rigged game and attack Hillary he suddenly became the enemy of the fake corporate media. And so all the bs and lies started coming up and out about Trump like probably about all of those lawsuits. Anyway I would like to see all those lawsuits that Trump was involved with. . Thx.    

[taxme]

4 minutes ago, ?Impact said:

 

... by dropping bombs on Kurdish groups hundred of miles away from any ISIS factions. 

Or it is the fake corporate media that likes to tell us that this is so. I don't believe anything anymore what the fake corporate media says. They have been shown many times to be spreading the bull around and trying to blame Russia for everything. Website Global Research alternative media would be a good place for you to try and get the other side of the story for a change. 

[?Impact]

30 minutes ago, taxme said:

What lawsuits are you talking about? Mind showing me some of them? Or is just more anti-Trump trash talk that has become so common place around here?

 

Obviously you haven't been paying attention. I suggest a google on "trump housing discrimination lawsuit", that should turn up a lot of information on them. These are the ones where he instructed his staff to put the 'c' beside colored people so he wound't have to rent to them.

[Charles Anthony]

Folks,

Avoid thread drift.

[Topaz]

People have short memories of what went on when the Clintons were in the W.H. and how they trashed the W.H. after they lost and all the activities with China, Foster being found dead, and the sorry people that went to jail because they wouldn't testify against the Clinton  relating to White Water. The US voters have to get rid long standing politicians, including the Bushs and the Clintons with all their secrets and wanting a New World Order world. \it's time for new faces in DC and then maybe the world will see more peace which we haven't had for a long long time!

[Wilber]

8 minutes ago, Topaz said:

People have short memories of what went on when the Clintons were in the W.H. and how they trashed the W.H. after they lost and all the activities with China, Foster being found dead, and the sorry people that went to jail because they wouldn't testify against the Clinton  relating to White Water. The US voters have to get rid long standing politicians, including the Bushs and the Clintons with all their secrets and wanting a New World Order world. \it's time for new faces in DC and then maybe the world will see more peace which we haven't had for a long long time!

What the hell are you talking about? Bill served his full two terms as President.

[Derek 2.0]

This is interesting:

 

Quote

On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:57 PM, John Podesta <[email protected]> wrote: > On another matter....and not to sound like Lanny, but we are going to have > to dump all those emails so better to do so sooner than later

 

What makes this interesting is that two days later, 03/04/2015, Congress subpoenaed Clinton's emails..........that sounds like intent to obstruct a Federal investigation. 

 

[Hal 9000]

8 hours ago, Derek 2.0 said:

This is interesting:

 

 

What makes this interesting is that two days later, 03/04/2015, Congress subpoenaed Clinton's emails..........that sounds like intent to obstruct a Federal investigation. 

 

Now were gonna have to listen to the media and democrats tell us that "dump" actually means release.  I've looked at Thesaurus.com for the verb "dump".  I don't see release in the list, but i'm sure all democrats will be absolutely sure he meant "release".

• depositstar
• discardstar
• dischargestar
• dispose ofstar
• ditchstar
• drainstar

• emptystar
• get rid ofstar
• jettisonstar
• leavestar
• scrapstar
• unloadstar

• caststar
• chuckstar
• deep-sixstar
• ejectstar
• evacuatestar
• expelstar

• exudestar
• flingstar
• junkstar
• tipstar
• unpackstar
• clear outstar

• fling downstar
• let fallstar
• throw downstar
• throw outstar
• throw overboard
   

Edited November 2, 2016 by Hal 9000

[Topaz]

Hillary has more problems I've been told that a hacker hacked the NAS, which was keeping the 33000 missing e-mails and the hacker apparently has turned him over to WikiLeaks, which is going to release them.  Having said that I don't know if this is true but most of the info. I've been told has been true and  been heard on certain  main stream news.

[betsy]

Here's the latest Wikileaks:

 

Peter Kadzic - the DOJ that's been assigned to handle the latest FBI/Hillary emails - is a friend of Podesta. 

 

The cover-up begins!

 

Quote

WikiLeaks: Peter Kadzik Leaked Email Investigation Intel to Hillary Clinton Campaign

 

“There is a HJC oversight hearing today where the head of our Civil Division will testify. Likely to get questions on State Department emails,” he flagged in an email to Podesta on May 19, 2015, with the subject line, “Heads up.”

Kadzik also updated Podesta on a FOIA case on Clinton’s emails.

“Another filing in the FOIA case went in last night or will go in this am that indicates it will be awhile (2016) before the State Department posts the emails,” he said.

Podesta forwarded the information to several campaign aides.

“Additional chances for mischief,” he warned.

As reported, Kadzik is close to Podesta, as he “kept him out of jail” during President Bill Clinton’s administration.

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/11/02/wikileaks-peter-kadzik-leaked-email-investigation-intel-hillary-clinton-campaign/

 

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/43150

 

 

Edited November 2, 2016 by betsy

[betsy]

6 hours ago, Topaz said:

Hillary has more problems I've been told that a hacker hacked the NAS, which was keeping the 33000 missing e-mails and the hacker apparently has turned him over to WikiLeaks, which is going to release them.  Having said that I don't know if this is true but most of the info. I've been told has been true and  been heard on certain  main stream news.

 

 

There's this very interesting article from Paul Sperry.  It's quite long, and very much detailed.   It traced and stated what the FBI "neglected" to do despite having information from various witnesses. 

 

 

 

Hillary’s 33,000 emails might not be ‘missing’ after all

 

“The Clinton residences and other locations should have been treated like any other criminal investigation — with federal grand jury subpoenas or search warrants issued by judges and served in the middle of the night,” said veteran FBI special agent Michael M. Biasello, who worked criminal cases out of New York and other field offices for 27 years.

“Never — I repeat, never — in my career have I or any FBI agent known to me investigated a criminal case without the use of a federal grand jury, grand jury subpoenas or search warrants,” he said. “It’s disgraceful they weren’t used in this case.”

The most damning evidence against Clinton may never have been actually destroyed. It was simply left untouched by the FBI."

http://nypost.com/2016/10/25/hillarys-33000-emails-might-not-be-missing-after-all/

 

 

I suspect Comey knows something's about to blow up, he's desperately trying to save his own skin now - and trying to look clean.  The latest Wikileaks showing the corrupt DOJ Kazic might just be the beginning.  Maybe, Wikileaks will reveal a corrupt Comey, too.

  Either that, or there's a big fall-out between him and Hillary Clinton.....and this latest FBI revelation is a payback to Hillary. 

 

 

Gosh....one thing clear though.....Hillary is never far from corruption!

Edited November 2, 2016 by betsy