Derek 2.0 Posted October 8, 2016 Report Posted October 8, 2016 16 hours ago, dialamah said: Much better for my tablet, which I use a lot. I kinda like the cleaner look of it, but don't like that I get taken to profiles to read full statuses and replies. Like that it's easier to post media, like the option of reading all new content, including status updates, with one click. Not sure about other features yet. I agree, the status update feature seems a little confusing, but I feel its outweighed by everything else....I like the quoting feature via highlighting the text to be quoted, Another forum I go to has that and I find it really handy, namely when responding to specific snippets of a post.All in all, I give the upgrade two thumbs up and commend the team on how fast they brought it in...hardly noticed any downtime.
Forum Admin Greg Posted October 8, 2016 Forum Admin Report Posted October 8, 2016 45 minutes ago, BC_chick said: Bummer about the updates though. I can look into implementing this feature in the future (there is probably a mod that I can use to force this feature). At first I didn't realize what you were describing, but I think I do now. Just to be clear, in the original forum format, you were able to post a reply to a status update directly from the status widget; rather than having to go to a separate page (in this case, the individuals profile page) to post a reply. Is that correct? I believe the reason this feature was removed by the developers is to encourage people to visit each other's profile - which in this new version are drastically improved. Have any issues, problems using the forum? Post a message in the Support and Questions section of the forums.
BC_chick Posted October 8, 2016 Report Posted October 8, 2016 4 minutes ago, Greg said: I can look into implementing this feature in the future (there is probably a mod that I can use to force this feature). At first I didn't realize what you were describing, but I think I do now. Just to be clear, in the original forum format, you were able to post a reply to a status update directly from the status widget; rather than having to go to a separate page (in this case, the individuals profile page) to post a reply. Is that correct? I believe the reason this feature was removed by the developers is to encourage people to visit each other's profile - which in this new version are drastically improved. That's correct, you could post replies on the widget; but also equally important, you could read the other replies on the widget as well. Since my last post I realized that we can post replies to status updates on the activity feed as well, but that still leaves the issue of not being able to see the responses without going to the specific profile. It's kind of the worst thing that any humans could be doing at this time in human history. Other than that, it's fine." Bill Nye on Alberta Oil Sands
dialamah Posted October 8, 2016 Report Posted October 8, 2016 (edited) 33 minutes ago, Greg said: encourage people to visit each other's profile - which in this new version are drastically improved. Why? If I want to visit someone's profile, I can do so just by clicking on their avatars. Don't need to be 'encouraged' into it via status updates. ** Never mind, I see that it's now on the sidebar. ** Just saw in the Post Preview mode that I can check out what my post will look like on a phone or tablet. Edited October 8, 2016 by dialamah
Vega Posted October 8, 2016 Report Posted October 8, 2016 Like it a lot, personally. Status Updates are overrated.
Topaz Posted October 9, 2016 Report Posted October 9, 2016 It seems okay but I have to ask, was for us, users or for governments to monitor?
Bryan Posted October 9, 2016 Report Posted October 9, 2016 2 hours ago, Greg said: I believe the reason this feature was removed by the developers is to encourage people to visit each other's profile - which in this new version are drastically improved. I'm sure I'll eventually get used to it, but so far I'm not seeing anything that I would even remotely call an improvement from a user perspective. The profile pages are a mess, most of the "options" don't appear to work or make any difference.
Michael Hardner Posted October 9, 2016 Report Posted October 9, 2016 What options don't work ? Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Forum Admin Greg Posted October 9, 2016 Forum Admin Report Posted October 9, 2016 1 hour ago, Bryan said: The profile pages are a mess, most of the "options" don't appear to work or make any difference. Examples? Have any issues, problems using the forum? Post a message in the Support and Questions section of the forums.
bush_cheney2004 Posted October 9, 2016 Report Posted October 9, 2016 So did we lose/change the graphics resizer and embedded photo & attribution policy after the upgrade ? Example: http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums/topic/25455-donald-vs-hillary/?do=findComment&comment=1191554 Economics trumps Virtue.
kimmy Posted October 9, 2016 Report Posted October 9, 2016 Yesterday I was finding the message editing interface to be laggy and jerky, like there was broken code running in the background or something. I tried closing my browser and starting fresh a few times, but it didn't change. Today it seems completely smooth! Maybe the problem was at my end all along. -k (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ Friendly forum facilitator! ┬──┬◡ノ(° -°ノ)
jbg Posted October 9, 2016 Report Posted October 9, 2016 The new software is really not good. From an email you used to be brouight to the first unread post in a thread; now it's to the post quoted in the e-mail Basically a worsening, not an improvement. Free speech: "You can say what you want, but I don't have to lend you my megaphone." Always remember that when you are in the right you can afford to keep your temper, and when you are in the wrong you cannot afford to lose it. - J.J. Reynolds. Will the steps anyone is proposing to fight "climate change" reduce a single temperature, by a single degree, at a single location? The mantra of "world opinion" or the views of the "international community" betrays flabby and weak reasoning (link).
Altai Posted October 9, 2016 Report Posted October 9, 2016 Can you please add numbers for the posts ? It was easy to refer a post with its number when you dont want to quote it. "You cant ask people about their belief, its none of your business, its between them and their God but you have to ask them whether or not they need something or they have a problem to be solved." Ottoman Sultan, Mehmed The Conqueror"We are not intended to conquer someone's lands but we want to conquer hearts." Ottoman Sultan, Mehmed The Conqueror
Argus Posted October 9, 2016 Report Posted October 9, 2016 I'm used to using italics to distinguish quoted material but it doesn't appear as if this is working. I've done it a number of times and the quoted text doesn't seem to look like italics. Like this quoted text which should be in italics. And is. That's weird. Yet I did it in the Canada and Provincial forums and I see no italics displayed. "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
GostHacked Posted October 9, 2016 Report Posted October 9, 2016 21 hours ago, BC_chick said: It's growing on me. I haven't spent much time on the desktop but on my phone its definitely better. It's ok, but the page is still bulky as shit...... on a desktop. It looks nice, but very bulky.
BC_chick Posted October 9, 2016 Report Posted October 9, 2016 1 hour ago, Altai said: Can you please add numbers for the posts ? It was easy to refer a post with its number when you dont want to quote it. I concur on this. It's kind of the worst thing that any humans could be doing at this time in human history. Other than that, it's fine." Bill Nye on Alberta Oil Sands
betsy Posted October 9, 2016 Report Posted October 9, 2016 (edited) They don't show how many guests are online, only the members? Yes, the numbers for the posts, too. It's easier to find it when one wants to go back at it. Edited October 9, 2016 by betsy
Forum Admin Greg Posted October 9, 2016 Forum Admin Report Posted October 9, 2016 6 hours ago, jbg said: The new software is really not good. Some of you might not want to hear this, but I don't care if you don't like the new forum format. I had no choice but to upgrade, so lets all stop complaining. I will entertain suggestions on how to improve, because there are plenty of changes I can try to implement. As I said earlier, nothing is set in stone. However, telling me over and over again that you don't like the upgrade is beginning to annoy the hell out of me. Have any issues, problems using the forum? Post a message in the Support and Questions section of the forums.
Forum Admin Greg Posted October 9, 2016 Forum Admin Report Posted October 9, 2016 4 hours ago, betsy said: They don't show how many guests are online, only the members? This page shows both: http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums/online/ Have any issues, problems using the forum? Post a message in the Support and Questions section of the forums.
Forum Admin Greg Posted October 9, 2016 Forum Admin Report Posted October 9, 2016 5 hours ago, Altai said: Can you please add numbers for the posts ? It was easy to refer a post with its number when you dont want to quote it. I'll look into this feature. Have any issues, problems using the forum? Post a message in the Support and Questions section of the forums.
cybercoma Posted October 9, 2016 Author Report Posted October 9, 2016 I'll revisit this poll in a few weeks to see how opinions have changed. Seems more than half the regulars at least like the upgrade.
Forum Admin Greg Posted October 9, 2016 Forum Admin Report Posted October 9, 2016 6 hours ago, Altai said: Can you please add numbers for the posts ? It was easy to refer a post with its number when you dont want to quote it. The post count feature has been implemented. Enjoy! Have any issues, problems using the forum? Post a message in the Support and Questions section of the forums.
Forum Admin Greg Posted October 9, 2016 Forum Admin Report Posted October 9, 2016 5 hours ago, Argus said: I'm used to using italics to distinguish quoted material but it doesn't appear as if this is working. I've done it a number of times and the quoted text doesn't seem to look like italics. I would recommend you use the actual quoting feature when quoting an piece of text. However, the WYSIWYG editor requires JS to operate, so if things are not working properly, it's likely the the JS hasn't properly loaded. I would simply refresh your browser and let everything completely download before attempting to use the editor. Have any issues, problems using the forum? Post a message in the Support and Questions section of the forums.
bush_cheney2004 Posted October 10, 2016 Report Posted October 10, 2016 2 hours ago, Greg said: Some of you might not want to hear this, but I don't care if you don't like the new forum format. I had no choice but to upgrade, so lets all stop complaining. Makes sense to me...the forum can't run on an outdated and unsupported version forever. Good work ! Economics trumps Virtue.
Charles Anthony Posted October 10, 2016 Report Posted October 10, 2016 10 hours ago, jbg said: ....you used to be brouight to the first unread post in a thread; Now, the forum displays a blue horizontal line demarking the last post you have loaded. We do not have time for a meeting of the flat earth society. << Où sont mes amis ? Ils sont ici, ils sont ici... >>
Recommended Posts