Jump to content

America under President Trump


Recommended Posts

In New Hampshire having 94% of the state white, the lowest unemployment in the USA and the lowest murder-rate in the USA and that is a problem, at least some decision-makers in NH think so. There must be more diversity.
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/1/2018 at 10:45 AM, -TSS- said:
In New Hampshire having 94% of the state white, the lowest unemployment in the USA and the lowest murder-rate in the USA and that is a problem, at least some decision-makers in NH think so. There must be more diversity.
 

More diversity will mean more crime and more poverty. It is hard to understand as to why NH politicians are willing to suck up to the left wing liberals and democrats and the fake and lying liberal media that is now telling the politicians and the people of NH that they need to diversify themselves. If they allow their politicians to change the game plan that the lefties want to do to NH then they will suffer down the road big time. Sadly, I believe that their politicians will win over the people and the people of NH will eventually lose and will pay a big price for their foolishness of allowing their state to become more diversified. California has already diversified and look as to what is happening in that state. Crime is a big time business in California thanks to diversity. Black and Latino gangs run that states big time crime statistics. They will do the same to NH if they are allowed to start to flood and start to diversify the state. 

Diversity is no country's strength, but on the contrary, diversity destroys the country that introduces it. NH be warned. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/5/2016 at 5:36 AM, betsy said:

His first 100 days will be a flurry of activities to implement most of the policies he'd promised. Here's an excerpt from a lengthy article how he says it would look:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/05/us/politics/donald-trump-president.html?_r=0

"I know people aren’t sure right now what a President Trump will be like,” he said. “But things will be fine.

I’m not running for president to make things unstable for the country.”

....and I think he will indeed do things that'll be best for the USA.

Well I mean, when he becomes President, this guy will practically have everything - including the prestige of

being President, right?

If he's an egoist (as they say he is)........of course he'd want to go down in history not just as another US President........

..........but as, the best President the USA had ever had!

He'll most likely work on that. That will be his ultimate goal!

1. Under Clinton missiles built with American technology were sold to China. 

2. Under Obama billions of tax dollars were handed over to Iran. 

3.Under Hillary warheads of American uranium sold to Russia. 

4. But somehow Trump is the traitor and the one that should be charged with treason. Anyone here see something wrong with this picture? I am pretty sure that the Trump haters here see nothing wrong with that picture. Aw well. What more can be said. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Under Hilary? When was she president? I see a Derangement Syndrome happening. 

Anyone want to comment on the irony of Melania having her parents made citizens using the nasty Chain Migration Trump wants banned? 

Hypocrisy is common in politics but Trump makes it a garden industry. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Boges said:

Anyone want to comment on the irony of Melania having her parents made citizens using the nasty Chain Migration Trump wants banned?

 

Sure...it reminds me of pothead and drug smuggler Maggie Trudeau while her husband Pierre enforced drug prohibition and failed at decriminalization.

Is that the kind of hypocrisy you're talking about ?    Or is it just a difference of opinion....Trump doesn't own Melania.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

But this isn't ???

Just point out that the only reason she's with him is the money. If she was really in it for "Love" then adultery with a Porn Star should be grounds for divorce. 

You can be smart and in it for the money. Some would say that's the smartest thing to do. 

You just have to endure being married to a cartoon villain until he dies. Cost benefit analysis considering Prez's lifestyle. 

Edited by Boges
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Boges said:

Just point out that the only reason she's with him is the money. 

You can be smart and in it for the money. Some would say that's the smartest thing to do. 

You just have to endure being married to a cartoon villain until he dies. Cost benefit analysis considering Prez's lifestyle. 

 

Is that why your wife sticks with you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Boges said:

Just point out that the only reason she's with him is the money. If she was really in it for "Love" then adultery with a Porn Star should be grounds for divorce. 

You can be smart and in it for the money. Some would say that's the smartest thing to do. 

You just have to endure being married to a cartoon villain until he dies. Cost benefit analysis considering Prez's lifestyle. 

 

How would you know ?    They also have a child together, like many other couples in the world.

Why are you attacking "porn stars" on top of it.....very sexist !

You started down this "sexist" path on your own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

Sure...it reminds me of pothead and drug smuggler Maggie Trudeau while her husband Pierre enforced drug prohibition and failed at decriminalization.

Is that the kind of hypocrisy you're talking about ?    Or is it just a difference of opinion....Trump doesn't own Melania.

 

If you wanna talk drug running.. Clinton when they were in Arkansas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Boges said:

I'm curious which whataboutisms are chosen to hand-wave a Sitting US President calling a black woman a dog. 

Whatabout Trudeau, who characterizes basically everyone who reasonably or otherwise disagrees with his government's immigration and refugee policies as "racist"? Many progressives seem to applaud slurs consistent with their agenda. I guess "racist" is considered a polite slur in these crass times.

Okay, but we're talking about Trump here. He has a history of lambasting opponents, real and perceived, with rude insults. According to a Washington Post piece, he's used the word "dog" in insults hurled at Mitt Romney and Ted Cruz, neither one a woman and neither one black (see link below). And he once called Rosie O'Donnell a "fat pig," a slur consistent with his often derogatory treatment of women he seems threatened by. So it seems that Trump's propensity for generally bad behavior might in fact excuse his insult against Omarosa Manigault Newman. At the very least it's a stretch to construe it as explicitly racist. He seems unable to abandon his reality show persona despite the office he currently holds and many seem willing to tolerate this. On the other hand, people might not be so forgiving if it's verified that he's used the "N"-word in the past. That will be much more difficult to explain away. 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-calls-manigault-newman-that-dog-as-she-continues-publicity-tour/2018/08/14/d0956e2c-9fb1-11e8-93e3-24d1703d2a7a_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.938f1f78ed95

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Boges said:

So basically anyone he insults deserve it? Gotcha!

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/401634-omarosa-book-trump-called-trump-jr-a-f-k-up-for-releasing-trump-tower

Quote

Omarosa claims president called Trump Jr. a 'f--- up' for releasing Trump Tower emails

Does that include his f--- up son ?  I suppose it now does.  The next steps will be for some evangelical to state that insulting and demeaning your son is a sign of high moral fibre.  We all need fibre now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/401634-omarosa-book-trump-called-trump-jr-a-f-k-up-for-releasing-trump-tower

Does that include his f--- up son ?  I suppose it now does.  The next steps will be for some evangelical to state that insulting and demeaning your son is a sign of high moral fibre.  We all need fibre now.

Isaac was willing to kill his son. So anything is fair game I suppose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/13/2018 at 6:04 AM, Boges said:

Under Hilary? When was she president? I see a Derangement Syndrome happening. 

Anyone want to comment on the irony of Melania having her parents made citizens using the nasty Chain Migration Trump wants banned? 

Hypocrisy is common in politics but Trump makes it a garden industry. 

So, why do you give a chit as to what Trump does for his in-laws. It does not affect me. Does it affect you? What business is that of yours anyway? Let's hear more from you about your conservative party leader as to what he is going to do for Canada instead. Is Scheer going to back Maxine Bernier or can him over his comments about multiculturalism? I say that Scheer will do the latter and be politically correct because here in Canada multiculturalism is a taboo and sacred subject which must never be allowed to be discussed, and I am pretty sure that Scheer will abide by that policy by him keeping his mouth shut on the subject. Care to comment? Over. 

Trudeau is full of hypocrisy also. So, what's your point here? Probably there is none at all as usual. 

Obviously the fake and phony liberal leftist media in America did not have to say much about it or we would have heard about it for many days and nights. Even our own CBC did not have to much to squawk about on it. So, I must assume that all the paper work was correct and their was no chain migration being applied here at all. Maybe Trump just helped them jump the line. But that is nothing new. Here in Canada we have many people jumping the line who will pay off some Canadian politician to get them into Canada sooner rather than later. 

Are you sure that you are a conservative or are you a liberal in conservative clothing/ Just wondering, that's all.  C'mon, spit it out.  :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,723
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    DACHSHUND
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronaldo_ earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • babetteteets went up a rank
      Rookie
    • paradox34 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • paradox34 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...