Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/30/2026 in all areas
-
Um... once again, you're the most worthless poster on this forum.3 points
-
HUGE BLOW to Democrats as this was how they snuck extra representives to red states. I forsee a lot of redistricting coming up to dismantle those unconstitutional districts. In other news it looks like the Virginia insane gerrymander plan is going to be smacked down by the Virginia Supreme Court. https://www.12onyourside.com/2026/04/28/virginia-supreme-court-upholds-block-redistricting-certification/ https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-limits-use-race-redistricting-win-republicans-rcna2458562 points
-
I can, but that generally doesn't include do-your-own-research Karens regurgitating their social media feeds. I'm not too worried if that bugs you, and I'll continue to make fun of you for your garbage posting. Feel free to ignore me. I won't mind not hearing back from you. 🙃 There are lots of bigger problems to worry about, but that doesn't make Goddess puking her social media feeds and dumping "links" everywhere any less ridiculous.2 points
-
LMAO... it was an anomaly and not Harpers fault!!! But no covid anomaly for Trudeau was there, or Carney and anomaly of US tariff attacks is there....because they're liberals 😂. Obviously facts elude you when they don't flatter your hero or right wing logic. What didn't you understand of the Stats Canada data?2 points
-
I'm talking about 2015 clown, and yes I'm aware of the covid years and how affordability here and elsewhere became more pronounced as economies worked back from the pandemic.2 points
-
That was what all Donnie Diapersniper's bellowing lies about Biden's weaponizing of Justice and witch hunts was all about. To get the suckers to believe it and therefore think it's normal when he takes it to the limit himself. Kindergsrten behaviour from a corrupt, petty scumbag in the White House.2 points
-
Another politically motivated SHAM persecution by the most corrupt president in US history. Just as the Dictator On Day One promised he would do.2 points
-
Laura Ingram said likely around 19 seats will flip Republican.2 points
-
Putin wants to protect Russians. Americans want to be first. We Canadians want to get along.1 point
-
1 point
-
Do you realize what your actually saying? That racist Democrats won't vote for black people unless we give them special districts. Republicans aren't going to vote for them because their Democrats not because their black. If they are soooooo qualified why do they need a special district when there are plenty of Democrat districts out there. You all keep telling on yourselves and you don't even know it.1 point
-
All those that are on social media literally encouraging it and praying for it. God help us if Trump is assassinated in office they would probably have a parade, not realizing that the VP is far more conservative than Trump is and will pretty much be unbeatable in the next election.1 point
-
Wait… how does that stop a black candidate? OMG, how did Obama ever become President?!1 point
-
1 point
-
No, they won't. It will be thrown out just like the last time. You're the FOOL who doesn't know this is just Blanche's application for the AG job full time. LMAO ^Says the pathetic gnat girl with BUPKIS.1 point
-
Sure Kid... you've provided nothing and can't provide nothing, because it doesn't exist. Interesting how you say you've provided 'tonnes' but can't find a single one to prove your defence of your political hero. There's no question that your little mind is incredibly complicated, which is a job for a psychologist. In this realm, you're just a simple minded political hack who can only see contempt for anything left, liberal, and hope for Canada faltering. 🤡1 point
-
YOU'RE LYING. When ALL districts are white majority, THEY stop the black candidate from getting elected. Of course you KNOW that and pretend you don't and that's what makes it YOUR LIE.1 point
-
It's to STOP the LONG HISTORY of black voter suppression; esp in the South. Of course you IGNORANT Canucks KNOW NOTHING about that. LMAO Voter suppression is Jim Crow. Duh RepubliCON RACIAL gerrymander is Jim Crow. Duh1 point
-
A cat with diabetes has a limited lifespan. A small sized dog can live 15+ years. We Canadians love ice cream.1 point
-
Jealousy. They hated Justin for being smarter, more popular, better looking and slightly wealthier than them. They hate Carney for being way more educated, trusted by others and far wealthier than them and having more hair and no potbelly at his age. That's why they have to make up bullshit allegations1 point
-
Nice lies and propaganda. He clearly said the fund would be independent and arms length not under the control of politicians and definitely not “him personally” as you dishonesty claim. We alteady have of arms length independent bodies such as CPP for there’s a model to follow. People have been calling for a sovereign wealth fund for a long time. Must you people really invent fake news in order to have something to criticize?1 point
-
Responding to you is a small part of my activity on this forum, but most of my responses to you are probably attacking your sources. That's because your sources aren't usually just bad, but often absurdly, comically bad. Telling us Michael Ma met with Chinese agents before crossing the floor was the best recent example, with an anonymous social media post claiming it as your only evidence. You have no credibility after seriously and unironically offering that sort of garbage, so spare me the tears when we continue to attack and question your sources. That's the bed you've made. This is coming from someone who outright dismisses the mainstream media whenever it suits her, and considers copy-pasting her social media feeds the superior alternative. 🫠1 point
-
Are you confused about when '2015' was? Yes, covid had a profound effect on affordability here in Canada and most world economies that is still lingering today.1 point
-
1 point
-
Oh I see....So in another thread, at another time, you gave me a link...supposedly. Since you supposedly did this, you don't have to provide cites for anything you claim from committees anymore? That's some pretty comfy reasoning there.1 point
-
We have seen a few flipping to Red, so that's been nice.1 point
-
Fortunately for America, these are the golden years. The rest of the world having to manage the economic blows this war has and will continue to cause every country.... not so golden.1 point
-
Interesting that you noted the names shown on universities original research/publications. An indicator that China is leading the world on the innovation front are the names on scientific publications throughout critical technological fields. As you noted, there seems little doubt that within the not too distant future they will be the world's dominant economy. https://itif.org/publications/2025/09/23/how-china-is-outperforming-the-united-states-in-critical-technologies/ This is concerning as it threatens to erode U.S. leadership across the innovation landscape. ITIF conducted a comprehensive analysis of China’s innovation capabilities last year, and that research concluded that China’s strategic, state-backed scientific advancement across advanced sectors—driven by bold industrial policy, generous government subsidies, and ecosystem integration—has resulted in a surge of global patents, indicating it has transitioned to become a global innovation leader. China is demonstrating dominance in robotics, leading in battery supply, innovating public health by doubling clinical biotech trials, outpacing in quantum communication with a 1,200-mile QKD corridor, experiencing near-peer achievement in AI output, and narrowing gaps in semiconductors and chemicals.1 point
-
Lol. Racial gerrymandering to inflated seats is how the Democrats keep it close1 point
-
Well this is what the left is like these days. An intelligent person can hear views they disagree with and cope, but those on the left feel the need to lock out any dissenting views. Plus mike reads my stuff all the time anyway and frequently comments on it, but when i ask a tough question or the like he claims "oh sorry you were on ignore" LOL Moon box is no better. He's just cranky right now because instead of picking a fight with me which he usually does he picked one with Goddess and she cleaned his clock and made him look bad every bit as fast as i usually do. If that guy were half as smart as he thinks he is he'd still be twice as smart as he actually is. So you get the two of them derailing a thread while railing about how SOME People derail threads. Gosh if only there was some way of finding these people (holds up mirror for them) They're both pretty dishonest, and dishonest people HAVE to limit their exposure to honest people if they're going to maintain the illusion that they're relevant.1 point
-
CBC's slant? IMHO, this is an American political issue. The CBC & Radio-Canada should report like the BBC objectively around the globe - but in both federal official languages.1 point
-
1 point
-
I saw this illustration today. It makes sense. See what you think. Elon Musk said something that really stuck with me about resource allocation. In essence: beyond a certain level of wealth, money is no longer about consumption—it's about capital allocation. That sentence changes everything. Economics, at its core, is just an allocation problem. You have finite resources and infinite uses. Who decides where what goes? Imagine a school playground. 100 kids, packs of Pokémon cards handed out at random. You let it play out. Very quickly, an order emerges. The good players accumulate rare cards, the collectors sort, the negotiators strike deals. No one planned it. And yet every card ends up in the hands of the one who gets the most value from it. The system maximizes the total happiness of the playground. That's the invisible hand. Now bring in the teacher. She finds it unfair. Leo has 50 cards, Tom has 3. She confiscates, redistributes, enforces equality. Three immediate effects: The good players stop playing—what's the point. The bad ones have no reason to improve; they'll get their share anyway. Trades collapse. The playground is equal. And dead. She maximized equality, and she destroyed happiness. The teacher's problem is that she doesn't have the information the playground had, collectively. That's Mises' economic calculation problem, formulated in 1920. The USSR tried to solve it for 70 years with the Gosplan. Result: shortages, lines, collapse. Not because the Soviets were stupid, because the problem is mathematically unsolvable in centralized mode. When Musk has 200 billion, he doesn't consume it—he allocates it. SpaceX, Starlink, Neuralink, xAI. Every dollar is a bet on the future. And he has a track record. PayPal, Tesla, SpaceX. He's demonstrated he knows how to spot massive problems and allocate resources to them with spectacular returns. The state has a track record too. Hospitals collapsing, education declining, debt exploding, public services degrading despite constantly rising budgets. The market identifies good allocators; politics identifies good communicators. Profit isn't an end goal—it's a signal. It says: you've allocated scarce resources to a use that people value enough to pay for. The bigger the profit, the greater the value created. When Starlink turns profitable, it means millions of people in rural areas finally have internet. When a ministry runs a deficit, it means it's consuming more than it produces. One creates, the other destroys, and we call that redistribution. In our societies, there are two categories of actors. Entrepreneurs and bureaucrats. The entrepreneur takes personal risk to spot a problem, mobilize resources, create a solution. If he's wrong, he loses. If he's right, his customers win, his employees win, his suppliers win, the state collects taxes. He's the basic cell of human progress. The bureaucrat takes no personal risk. His salary is guaranteed. At best, he maintains an existing system. At worst, he destroys it through overregulation, forced bad allocation, perverse incentives that discourage those who produce. But in no case does he create anything. Look at the last 50 years. iPhone, civilian internet, SpaceX, Tesla, Google, Amazon, Stripe, mRNA, ChatGPT. All private inventions, driven by entrepreneurs, funded by venture capital. Not a single government ministry has invented anything that's changed your daily life. France has become the world's laboratory for bureaucratic drift. 57% of GDP in public spending, an absolute record. A sprawling administration, a tax system that penalizes wealth creation. Result: falling behind the United States, Germany, Switzerland. Brain drain. Deindustrialization. Exploding debt. And the worst part is that bad allocation self-reinforces. The more the state takes, the less entrepreneurs create. The less they create, the less tax base there is. The less tax base there is, he more the state borrows and taxes. Perfect negative feedback loop. The teacher thinks she's helping, and every year the playground produces less. In our societies, it's always the entrepreneurs who advance civilization. Bureaucrats, at best, maintain a system; at worst, they destroy it. No society has ever progressed by taxing its creators to subsidize its managers. The question is never "Who has how much?". It's who allocates the next unit of resource best to maximize humanity's future. The answer hasn't changed in 200 years. It's not the civil servants.1 point
-
Race based redistricting is gonzo. The party of slavery and Jim Crowe howls loudly1 point
-
Lots of things and places have special status, meaning no one can target them deliberately, Schools are one of those places....how ever the Geneva convention is very clear on this If the enemy is using your example to operate in then Yes it is a legitimate military target...there are many other considerations that take place as well, Such as is their students in the school, then your options would need to be table topped to see different courses of action....They will pick the best option that offer the best results....ie dead terrorist, children safe...If the target is a high value target they "may" target the school regardless of who is in there....It is up to the commander in charge....keep in mind if the order is illegal then the entire kill chain could face charges. Most soldiers are trained before they go over seas on the rules of engagement, over and over and over again....and when in doubt ask...in a lot of cases you do need permission to engage a target... I just want to add this, Civilians regards of what conflict, always pay the highest price....and while tragic...it is war...most decisions are made on the fly, with no time to think and the outcome is not always a good one...Murphy's law rules what can go wrong normally does...1 point
-
https://cbs12.com/news/local/secret-service-fbi-and-pbso-to-discuss-overnight-investigation-that-at-mar-a-lago PALM BEACH, Fla. (CBS12) — A 21-year-old man carrying a gas can and a shotgun was shot and killed early Sunday after breaching the perimeter of Mar-a-Lago, authorities said. ********** Trump wasn't there at the time but the móron thought he was going ro do something.1 point
-
Let me break this down for you into the smallest possible pieces of information--which I still expect will overwhelm you. HODAD: Cheney, McCain, Romney, Pence or the hundreds of other high-profile Republicans who saw and denounced the fundamental harm Trump is doing to the Republic... They follow longstanding principles. POOR DUMB NATIONALIST: Longstanding principles like...defunding and attacking law enforcement? Like inviting tens of millions to flood into the country? HODAD: Do you think you can find any instance of any of those people supporting those positions? POOR DUMB NATIONALIST: *Posts videos of some protestors and of Biden.* I hope you have one of those bracelets that helps first responders get you back to the home when they find you wandering naked in a field.1 point
-
The chance of his name being "JS or JJs" are also very low. There's a far better chance that his/her name is non-western: most likely the kind of name that you'd associate with Iran, China or Russia. When you imagine that people like eyeball, exflyer, gaetan, herbie, etc, are islamic nutjobs or Russian/Chinese snakes, suddenly their posts and their history of lying make far more sense. Even their lies make more sense. Eg, Herbie never would have tried to make us believe that he "used his CC to make renos on his house, thereby tripling its value" if he had any clue whatsoever about the value of real estate. That's like saying "I just changed the carb on my '67 Beetle, then I wasted a Hellcat off the line." Only a person who has never driven a car would say such a thing.1 point
-
Has any Trump supporter acknowledged that the joke is about gold diggers?1 point
-
I posted this clip of John Brassard, Chair of the Ethics Committee giving his review of the latest committee findings in the HoC. The account, Ryan Gerritson, always posts committee clips, HoC clips, news clips & articles including from the legacy media. If you want to call this account "Anonymous" fine. But the only reason you do it, is because you don't want to talk about what John Brassard said in his speech. If you don't like this source, then go find the same clip and post it from a source you approve of.1 point
-
The exchange is posted clearly here. Anyone can just scroll up and read it. It doesn't really matter if you have a make-believe version of it compiled in your little head. The funniest thing about all of this is that despite all your protests otherwise, you've been asked the same question now like 3 or 4 times, directly, and you still won't answer it: Did the October 7th attack give Israel carte-blanche to do whatever they want in the region, and make them immune to criticism? Being the intellectual coward that you are, you'll squeal and complain and do everything you can to change the subject. The bottom line is that you don't like the question and can't address it, so instead you RUN AWAY. 🤡👍1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
You quoted my question and responded directly to it, with a retarded question of your own. I subsequently repeated my question, directly to you, and I even bolded it for you. In what batshit fantasy world do imagine the question wasn't redirected to you? You're embarrassing yourself...again.🤡1 point
-
I asked Army Guy, and you responded for him, with a question of your own - and a non-sequitur at that. If you don't want the question redirected to you, then don't respond to it? 🤡1 point
-
They have. The Conservative "base" in Canada (ie. the die-hards) are amongst the least-educated people in the country. https://abacusdata.ca/who-is-in-the-conservative-party-base-and-how-does-it-differ-from-other-canadians/ The Conservative base represents 23 percent of Canadians. These voters would only consider voting Conservative and are deeply anchored in Conservative identity. Over 40% of the screeching monkeys in the base have high school or less levels of education. These are folks we hear the most from on this forum. Less than 1/4 of them even a bachelor's degree.1 point
-
I'm not interested in sitting around watching committees debate for countless hours. I'm interested in the material you keep telling us you've seen, but can't actually cite. It's not my job to back up your claims. It's yours. 🙃1 point
-
Ah yes, the committee meetings you can't reference, post or source for us. 🫠1 point
-
Juan Juanston is still under the misguided notion that a border erasing pronoun slut was the better choice.1 point
