Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/12/2025 in all areas
-
Nothing at all for affordability or the like. This is carney's gov't. Standing up for Canadians by standing on their necks.2 points
-
Sure, who was actually president over the FBI is just a technicality. Lol And Wray was a Trump appointee, but secretly following Biden's orders. Probably Patel too. That's the only possible explanation. Definitely not gullible MAGA fools blindly following a pathological liar--no matter how unmoored he is from reality.2 points
-
Soon we’ll be arresting people for memes and arresting comedians for jokes like in the UK. And the people “horrified” by Jimmy Kimmel’s suspension will be cheering it on.2 points
-
2 points
-
How stupid does he think his followers are that he assumes they don't even remember who was president on Jan. 6?2 points
-
The crime she went after Trump for was novel and had never been done before...2 points
-
2 points
-
1 point
-
“THE BIDEN FBI PLACED 274 AGENTS INTO THE CROWD ON JANUARY 6. If this is so, which it is, a lot of very good people will be owed big apologies. What a SCAM - DO SOMETHING!!!" Truth social Do something? To whom is he writing? What does he want them to do?1 point
-
He had better moor himself to the reality of global economics.1 point
-
1 point
-
Conservatives demand an end to the billion-dollar boondoggle of the Liberal government's DEI. https://www.westernstandard.news/canadian/conservatives-target-liberal-dei-hiring-with-new-petition/681831 point
-
At least Fake Flyer, the 12-year-old fart joke loving boy in mommy's basement, loves your posts. 🤣 You got that going for you.1 point
-
I keep responding to you, thinking maybe you really do want to know the truth about things, but no. You wallow in your stupidity like a fly in cow 💩.1 point
-
Here's the difference, my far-left friend - when honest journalists get things wrong, they retract and correct. I understand this is a foreign concept to you, because you worship the CBC, who rarely retracts when they're wrong and when they do, they put a tiny retraction on page 87, so you never see it. Which is why you so often keep repeating lies you heard on CBC. And why you have to be shown over and over and over and over and over the truth and still don't accept it. Sam Cooper is not discredited because he made a mistake. He has testified regarding his investigations in front of both the US and Canadian governments. You want to disregard anything Cooper investigates because of one mistake and correction. Yet you swallow CBC and Liberals lies whole over and over and over. You eat their sh!t every day and smile and say, "This sh!t tastes great, I want more of it." You are the biggest hypocrite. Canada has been captured by the Chinese Communist Party. One whole province has been taken over by it. BC has been taken over by it, too. The CCP has captured the Liberal party (and certain other party's individual politicians) and you're totally fine with it. And here you are - totally OK with all of this this. Because Sam Cooper, who has been working on this issue for like a decade or more, made one mistake in reporting. One more thing - when I was in college, we were not allowed to use WIki as a source, it was not considered credible enough for investigaitons. Yet, I see that Wiki is often your "go-to" source. You're lucky I respond to your hypocritical, Liberal adoring, misinformed ravings at all, old man. Grow the fuque up.1 point
-
No one has so far stood up to the oaf, so his lies can become even more disconnected from reality. His followers are like dogs, no matter how beaten, humiliated and abused they stay loyal to their owner and master1 point
-
Your entire argument is that one statement means there is a grand conspiracy. We don't know if this threat was legitimate, perceived, imaginary or a lie. Yet, you have a multi-step, grand conspiracy concocted in your head with no supporting evidence. This is the perfect example of a leftist living in fantasy land. Everything in her argument is fabricated and believed because it fits a narrative that matches her feelings.1 point
-
It could be that Carney was referring to many of Canada's pension plans. As of June 30, 2025, our CPP fund was worth $731.7 billion, 47% of which was invested in the U.S. Then there's the Quebec pension plan with $473 billion in total holdings, public sector pension plans, things like the Ontario teacher's union pension plan, and it goes on and on and on with huge amounts of money invested in the U.S. Consider that while the CPP invests 47% of its fund into the U.S., it sinks only 13% in Canada and 18% into Europe. It's likely those running these plans are doing terrific jobs and doing exactly what they were instructed to do, but with the situation today that's not the point.1 point
-
1 point
-
I’m pretty sure that there are tax implications as well. Regardless, she swore it would be her primary residence, and then immediately started renting the home. She knew that by law she was required to live in New York but swore she’d live in the Virginia home as a primary residence: She committed mortgage fraud.1 point
-
Completely not relevant. No government believes the Hamas numbers are even remotely accurate.1 point
-
That's the thing that really bugged me about trump's case. You know who ELSE was just fine with bank fraud? THE BANK!!! They said they didn't care, they had their own assement and would have leant him the money anyway, got paid back in a timely fashion and had no complaints! There was NO VICTIM there. But the dems.... OHHhhhhh this is FRAUD (well civil fraud which is nothing like fraud but whateves) And FRAUD must be punished no matter HOW insignificant!! One guy here argued with me for days that trump's fraud drove up insurance costs for everybody!!! It was Terrible even if there was no victim!!! (not kidding either, this was his whole argument, insurance goes up even tho there was no problem at the bank. Unbelievable.) Now it's all "well there's no victim and it's not REAL fraud". If hypocrisy could produce energy the lefties could power the world.1 point
-
1 point
-
That's right, he's a discredited journalist who's been forced to retract his fabrications when questioned. In September 2024, Cooper published a report in The Bureau claiming to show video evidence of Bill Majcher, a former RCMP undercover operative accused of assisting Chinese intelligence, meeting with drug trafficker Tse Chi Lop in a Macau casino. Journalist Nury Vittachi noted that the purported video footage actually was from the 2014 action-comedy movie From Vegas to Macau, starring Chow Yun-fat.[13] The article was subsequently retracted by Cooper.[14] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Cooper_(journalist)1 point
-
You have yet to show where I have lied or any hypocrisy on my part. I just keep asking you to explain what this threat was. Where is the police report. What evidence is there. You can’t answer so you have to squirm and try to attack me instead.1 point
-
So you have no idea what a cuppa is? LMAO Duh OMLA Hud, and a Merry Christmas. Confucious1 point
-
Oh look - didn't take me long to be right this time did it Alberta Premier Smith says Ottawa is dodging responsibility for pipeline decision | Business News | thecanadianpressnews.ca She doesn't care about the pipeline. This is theatre for her to claim canada is broken and carney is justin 2 and whip up separation sentiment. Which she will leverage to get stuff for alberta. But it's a dangerous game.1 point
-
It's not a team if only one partner benefits and the other is harmed. And that's the problem. For better or worse the first nations and eby view this as a horrible risk to bc and the coast, with virtually no benefit. And smith says "too bad now bend over" as a reply, which tells me she does not expect this to go through and that is not her goal. "Fighting global warming is a benefit to everyone so alberta has to give up it's oil industry. (we'll find something else for them to do i promise)" .... i seem to recall that smith didn't LIKE the 'team canada' message when THAT was the fed's posiiton. And i seem to recall she was off side pretty hard at the beginning of the tariff war demanding that oil NEVER be considered in any retaliation plan even if it benefitted canada. Sorry but she doesn't get to sing the "oh canada" tune now and waive the flag. And her target obviosly isn't the pipeline or 'canada' but carney and stirring up anti canada sentiment. She's already said 'if we don't get this pipeline it's proof canada is broken" Sorry but her fairy tale is suitable for children at bedtime or if she's trying to be the next disney evil step mom but otherwise iit's all ridiculous. What SHOULD happen is removal of the tanker ban and removal of the anti pipeline law and negotiation with the first nations and bc for pipelines with the firm understanding that we're discussing HOW it's going to happen and benefit them, not "IS" it going to and alberta should be out there talking about how they're willinlg to work and not proceed until everyone sees a benefit, and that the concerns of the first nations must be respected. NONE of that is happening. This is theatrics.1 point
-
A multi-billion dollar company overstating it's assets to secure more favourable loans is a bit different than someone benefitting $18,933 IF in fact they're even guilty. The appeals court just recinded the fine but still said he was liable. He's s a shyster.1 point
-
You'll have to excuse our leftist friend, he is confused, he wanted to grow up and be a conservative, but his parents beat him into submission....now he is just an entitled leftist that thinks conservatives are people beneath him.... maybe he is just hungry....give him a snickers bar it works for me...and it will keep him busy for a couple minutes and the best part is they don't talk much so it can be blissful...1 point
-
1 point
-
Locating people in an emergency can be a challenge at the best of times. Why is this always about racism, Hitler, or some minority rights issue? If street signs are written in one of the nation's official languages, all you need to do is shout a couple of names at the dispatcher and then wave at the pretty lights... we'll find you. But.... if you look at the intersecting street signs and see: ポーテージ and メイン it becomes a bit more time consuming and problematic for most people. Big picture now, you play dispatcher.... what province is that intersection in Herb? Here, I'll help ya. And it's not just indecipherable names either, people get rattled and if you have a Maple St, Maple Ave, and Maple Lane in the same town I'd say exactly the same thing for the same reason. Never know though, I may be prejudiced against all 10 species of Maple tree's that grow in Canada... right Herb? How about some "Acer Saccharum" syrup on those pancakes?1 point
-
The court just complied with the wishes of a bitter and twisted Letitia James alongside a bent judge, on a singularly made up charge. So....once again put on your big boy pants and prove the assertions you made. No rush, after your cuppa will be OK.1 point
-
1 point
-
Again, if this is the politics you want. It will be hard to cry and play the victim when the Dems are in power again. I guess you're counting on being dead by then, being 90 years old and all. Lol1 point
-
They pull this shìt out all the time. It is like a rotation of Russia collusion, J6, fascism, Hatch Act, Epstein and a handful of others. They probably have D&D dice they use to pick this week's argument.1 point
-
All you did is prove you don't care that that investigation was politically motivated. If what you said was their logic, then it is clearly politically motivated. As we have known all along, and apparently you did as well.1 point
-
Show me where the Hatch Act says this. Go on, make your big legal argument. The simple fact is that Democrats blocked the spending bill. Telling people this is not a violation. Just the other day you were crying because Trump put his name on the signs and took Bidens down when bragging about what Government was doing.1 point
-
Poilievre is the leader of the opposition and a conservative. Eby is a socialist and his impacable opponent in all things. No engagement between them is possible as they operate on two entirely different realities. Eby wants the government to run everything. Poilievre believes in private enterprise and Capitalism. Eby loves borrowing, while Poilevre wants to stop borrowing. Like you, Eby will oppose everything and anything Poilievre supports. No credible scientist thinks fossil fuel threatens human prosperity or survival.1 point
-
They didn't make ANY death threats. Which is why she had no fear of coming forward .... TWICE. And that's AFTER apperently epstien threatened her You'd have to be 48 flavours of stupid to believe she was actually threatened and did all that just to cave TWICE and never provide a drop of proof or file a police report. You're literally baskn robins stupid, There were no death threats. This was all a publicity stunt and they were able to verify that I was being the most likely circumstance when they caught the guy behind it. But you can't cope with reality. You live in a weird little fantasy world of your own design with 'facts' you made up and change as necessary. You are like many females on the left who, according to research, experience MUCH higher mental health issues than people on the right.1 point
-
Nothing political about it. Democrats refuse to fund the government. This is a factual statement.1 point
-
It's not easy to find people when they look and sound like Americans, when they can move quite easily on your roads and highways, through your cities, without anyone noticing. Special forces are not an investigative organization. And there aren't enough of them to be used to guard every bridge, refinery, pumping station, electricity substation, power plant, airport, and military base in America, PLUS every Republican senator, congressman, and cabinet official against, say, a ten-man unit of JTF2. A couple of dozen such 10-man units would wreak havoc across America. Although if I were in charge, I'd have them go to Washington and simultaneously attack a bunch of Republican senators and congressmen while they were sleeping with either no security or just a one or two-man unit. Just like that, Trump loses his majority in the senate, and maybe congress. That's assuming they can't just take out the prez and his VP. Neither has the security meant to stand up against a large group of special forces people.1 point
-
There was no victim in Trump’s “crime”. He borrowed money from the bank, and paid it back in full on time. James on the other hand, defrauded the government by avoiding taxes.1 point
-
I'm good with justice. That fat b*tch tried to throw Trump in the slammer. This goes way, WAY beyond petty retribution. Letitia James is a f*cking menace. She belongs behind bars.1 point
-
Convicted or not, like I said before, Comey dragged people through the mud, now it's his turn.1 point
-
The reality is you don't know if her claims of being threatened are false, but you're comfortable calling her a liar anyway. That's low even for a Trumper.1 point
-
1 point
-
I'm inclined to agree. With Hamas left intact and bolstered by prison releases from Israel we simply enter into another period of consolidation... which will be followed (in the fullness of time) by another period of fighting themselves to a standstill. There are short term benefits here for all but the ideology remains. Hopefully I'm wrong, but I see this is a pause and not an end state. I was going write something a bit longer but this article pretty much captures what I was going to say in a more articulate manner than I could muster. Here's a quote (that resonates with me) for anyone disinclined to read it: "The West, and too often Israel herself, has convinced itself that terror is a grievance to be addressed rather than an ideology to be destroyed." https://nationalpost.com/opinion/trumps-mideast-peace-deal-will-only-lead-to-more-bloodshed?itm_source=index There's an African proverb that says: "he who forgives ends the quarrel." Hamas has religious objectives instead of political ones... there is no room for forgiveness and no negotiating with the remnants of it, or any of the prisoners being released for that matter. Here's another proverb..."a bird does not change its feathers because the weather has turned bad."1 point
-
A little respect. How hard can it be?1 point
-
1 point
