Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/15/2025 in all areas
-
Have you ever admitted that the jabs were nothing like we were told they'd be? Canadians snitched on each other and supported the gov't forcing young adults to take the jab, because they honestly thought that they'd stop or greatly slow the spread of covid, while knowing full-well that those young people didn't need it. Now we know that the jabs injured/killed people, and they were absolutely nothing like we were promised. Can you have a moment of humanity/humility eyeball, or do you still just have to pretend that the jabs's efficacy made all the fascism worthwhile?4 points
-
Another example of a Trump appointee who we all knew was wildly unqualified for the job proving that she's wildly unqualified for the job. I mean, she didn't text classified combat plans to a journalist and she didn't crash the stock market, so she's doing relatively well for this clown car administration, but still pretty alarming. News anywhere McMahon, 76, is the former CEO of World Wrestling Entertainment. She has been placed in charge of the Department of Education, which President Donald Trump has stated publicly he wants to disband. Speaking on a panel discussion about AI, she repeatedly referred to the technology as “A1.” “I heard, think it was in a letter or report that I heard this morning, I wish I could remember the source, but that there’s a school system that’s going to start making sure that first-graders, and even pre-K have A1 teaching in every year,” McMahon told the panel. “Kids are sponges,” she continued. “They just absorb everything. It wasn’t all that long ago that it was, ‘We’re going to have internet in our schools!’ Now let’s see A1 and how that can be helpful.” At least social media marketers can have some fun at our expense.3 points
-
I remember it was almost his very first day in parliament and the gallery was full including with his family and during question. Someone from the liberal bench made a comment about how he dishonestly seduced the electorate. He stood up and replied "that is absolutely nonsense! My wife is here in the gallery today and can confirm that i've never had the skills to seduce anyone in my whole life!" LOL. He was "reserved" for sure, but he knew it and owned it3 points
-
I watched an hour-long interview with Pierre & Anaida and it was really good. I didn't know their daughter is non-verbal. They've never mentioned it before. In the interview he talked about how he worries who will look after her after they're gone. He talked about how his parents lost their house in the 80's when the interest rates went way up and how much they struggled as a family. It was a side of him I don't think many people know.2 points
-
They had to stop sharing CBC and CTV articles because they were getting exposed as propagandists in the comments section. Then they tried to post articles with the comments turned off for a while but that didn't last long. "Sunlight is the best disinfectant" = CBC articles can't survive on social media.2 points
-
His campaign manager has been outspoken against Pierre. Slammed him for blowing the lead they had over the Liberals, though it was probably more that the other parties lost support. A lot of people are thinking he wants Pierre to crash and burn so he can become the leader of the party.2 points
-
To clarify, the Liberal guys with the fake badges should have been fired, pure and simple, not reassigned.2 points
-
Liberal's high immigration policy created housing crisis: report | Toronto Sun Has anyone with half a brain has known all along, immigration or rather population growth in excess of our housing growth has caused the housing crisis. There is no other factor that is relevant at this point. Now after 10 years of causing the problem they want to fix the problem We make the problem, we fix the problem. This is basically the equivalent of a glass company throwing bricks through people's windows with their business card attached.1 point
-
Canada Proud is dominating Facebook ahead of the election - The Logic Canada Proud is dominating Facebook ahead of the election By James Temperton Mar 31, 2025 | 1:55 PM ET Conservative advocacy group Canada Proud is dominating the discussion of the federal election on Facebook and Instagram as the Meta-owned platforms continue to block the sharing of all news content in Canada. Did the liberals shoot themselves in the foot? By banning canadian news on the american platform The liberals may very well have opened the door to Canada proud, which is a strong conservative group, to dominate Facebook as the official news source so to speak of the Canadian election. According to the article canada proud and it's comments and content are vastly out trending other sources on Facebook It will be absolutely hilarious if the liberal policy that Justin Trudeau demanded was necessary turns out to play a significant role in the destruction of the liberals1 point
-
They changed the time to accommodate the game. The debate will now be held earlier1 point
-
Get his way? You mean... NOT letting murderers out to murder again? That way? That's what he's getting? Yeah what a dick.1 point
-
Occasionally they do by accident, but it's rare that they drink that much1 point
-
I honestly don't know what honest polling would come up with. Neither do you. What I do know for sure is that CTV and CBC require polls that suit their narrative, period. They wouldn't print the truth unless it suited their needs.1 point
-
I sincerely hope this conversation is not a true representation of our Confederation. The hate and name calling is ridiculous. I feel sorry for any who think putting one person down raises you up. It doesn't. Thinking it does is a problem. I am ashamed to be part of this forum. We will see how the vote goes on the 28th. Good luck Canada.1 point
-
Have you forgotten what the title of this is, let me alliterate for you. Conservatives have taken the lead in the polls. Which is another misinformation from the right. Polls the whole topic is about the polls.1 point
-
I couldn't agree more. Now he is planning to limit what seniors can do in the guise of protecting them from scams. Do for everyone or don't do it at all. Promising to use the Notwithstanding clause to limit the rights of criminals. A very serious precedent. Who and what is next. If it sounds like a duck, quacks like a duck, walks like a duck and looks like a duck, its a duck.1 point
-
We make the problem so that we can fix it by funneling money into companies of our choosing. That is the Liberal way.1 point
-
The thing is, people have seen the legacy media report things that were provably untrue. To some extent that is ok, because of course media can make mistakes. But there so many cases over the past decade or so where it seems obvious to people that these were not just mistakes. In order to advance a certain narrative they had to edit things a certain way or omit reporting on relevant facts that any qualified journalist would normally do. Cases where the most logical assumption is that the media is willfully being dishonest. This was easily observable during the Freedom Convoy because the media would be reporting on something awful that was happening, while at the same time tons of people right there were live streaming that exact thing. Now independent media is usually very biased. But they generally make no secret about that. People have seen them report on things that the regular media would not or report on certain stories more truthfully than the legacy media. They have seen them report things they know are true. In many cases those are things people in the legacy media are ignoring or being untruthful about. That is why more and more people are turning to independent media sources.1 point
-
In the last couple of days, Poilevre has been sounding more like Trump than ever: "Defund the CBC" = "Defund PBS", "three strikes you're out = "send American criminals to other countries". Keep journalists off the plane = Kick journalists out of the pool. It's like they've got the same playbook.1 point
-
Right. She might be. I don't know her. So? How is that relevant?1 point
-
I suppose you think the CBC does their own polling. They don't do any polling. They take all the other polls into account. Its an average of all the reliable polls based on past performance. Again a personal attack on me. You are consistent, I will give you that.1 point
-
So? What does that have to do with the topic at hand. She deserves it? CdnFox provided a much better counter-response. Yeah, I understand that. That's why I posted 'she says'. I know there are a lot of facts missing, but it's certainly a story worth paying attention to.1 point
-
I wonder if they spent campaign funds on those.1 point
-
On the face of it that's pretty bad, but there are a lot of reasons why that could happen that have nothing to do with politics. Provincial governments at least freeze people's bank accounts literally every day usually for non-payment of provincial taxes in one form or another such as property tax. Without knowing more details about why the bank account was frozen, which level of government froze it, etc it's impossible to say whether or not this is something worth being outraged over. It may very well be but we can't say from the facts presented here1 point
-
The very fact that you don't know is making @WestCanMans point. Of the six major pollsters two have been thoroughly discredited this election cycle, one out and out admitted earlier that they would do anything they could to get rid of Poilievre so that's no surprise, and two have had the conservatives credibly in the lead, one does right now. Legitimate shows like vassey kapelos's show Will mention that. rosie barton does not, and in fact only barely reluctantly acknowledges the lib lead is shrinking before screaming out again "BUT CARNEY IS STILL WAY AHEAD!!!" The CBC does the bare minimum amount necessary to make it look like they're not entirely 100% completely biased against the conservatives. But taken as a whole it is painfully obvious that they are biased and extremely so.1 point
-
They are not doing anything other than showing you the statistics. What math? You have offered none to justify your number.1 point
-
That makes no sense at all Dave 😂 I didn't "change my mind and start following Ontario politics", I just listened to what two people said about Doug Ford ... FYI that's not "following Ontario politics". Did you know that Tonya Harding got her boyfriend to hit Nancy Kerrigan on the knee with a pipe before a competition? Does that mean that "you follow women's figure skating"? 😂😂😂 Guess what, Dave? Cdn and Couch Potato answered my questions about Ford and I took them at their word because unlike you, I have no problem vouching for the knowledge and credibility of people/organizations I trust. I have no problem stating unequivocally that Cdn Fox has more integrity than the CBC any day of the week. Period. I don't know couch potato as well but I've never caught them being dishonest so again, CP is ahead of the CBC by leaps and bounds. A man on the street instantly starts off with more credibility than CBC because I have no proof that his credibility is at zero.1 point
-
Sigh. Liberals: "We propose a plan that will tear down a lot of homes which might not be replaced!" Conservatives: " we will be voting against that plan." @Dave L "THE CPC VOTED AGAINST THE LIBERAL HOUSING INITITIVE, WHY ARE THEY AGAINST HOUSING?!?!"1 point
-
1 point
-
I haven't seen that kind of unjustified optimism since the last time people thought the canucks might win the cup well i remember eyeball saying he was hungry once. I have no reason to believe that was inaccurate. Other than he's the one who said it and that calls it into question just based on that. In all seriousness and fairness rare tho it might be, i've seen Ex flyer on occasion make posts that had some sense to them. Unfortunately i'll respond with something like 'you're 99 percent correct but i'd possibly maybe think about questioning that 1 percent.... " And then it's 5 pages of childish freak outs and ass porn, which kind of nullifies the good points he made earlier1 point
-
LOL Well he's arguably the best option for ontario currently on the table, as is often the case sometimes you have to pick between less than ideal choices. But yeah, i'd work pretty hard to avoid letting this guy win the leadership and if he did i'd probably stay home voting day1 point
-
He sent his campaign manager out to basically attack the hell out of PP, saying in all of the papers and everywhere he could possibly get attention that Poilievre is utterly incompetent, and that he blew such a big lead because of campaign malpractice of the highest order and he's absolutely useless as a leader. He's claiming his recent Ontario win as proof that he's really great at politics and he knows a loser when he sees one and he thinks Poilievre is one. He's a little careful how he couches things but not much Now it would be one thing for a conservative like Doug Ford to allow that kind of talk after an election. And in fact this guy has spoken up in the past after Erin's election and scheer's, the guy's been around a long time. But to do it in the middle of a campaign? To do it while they still have a chance at victory? That's a deliberate attempt to sabotage a campaign. But maybe he's acting alone, maybe he doesn't have ford's blessing right? So ford came out today and was asked about this guy's comments and basically said Poilievre should suck it up because the truth hurts. When his own ministers were working with the CPC and door knocking he was fairly derivative about it. When it was pointed out that one of his people supported Poilievre he replied "Well good for her" in a dismissive way. They're just isn't a lot of doubt. And insiders within his group who don't really approve of this have been leaking a little of the information. He went from city councilor to premier, and now he wants to go from premier to prime minister1 point
-
Justin Trudeau a bunch of them you'll have to look it up yourself, and it's over 3 million a year at this point although those are just the ones we know about and they don't kick in till he's officially out of office. That is how these things work for the libs and the left wing in various gov'ts (Clinton). If you are in charge you funnel money into either charities if you want someone to bribe you, you know like how the Chinese government suddenly poured a ton of money into Justin Trudeau's family charity which he will be director of again, or you hire companies or support other charities through single sourcing And then when you step away from politics they put you on their board of directors the big fat salary for doing nothing and introducing you to some of the contacts that you made while you were prime minister. Let's get real. You don't really care. I could put down a note from god saying exactly how much and from who along with notes from all of those organizations saying the only reason they're doing this is he funneled money to them when they were in power and you would still excuse it and vote for it. Any level of corruption is to be tolerated as long as the conservatives get powned. Carney will even be worse. He just said he was going to spend $25 billion on creating modular home building in Canada. And his company owns a major modular home construction wing. What do you think a lot of that $25 billion is going to end up? He did an interview just a couple years ago on how he makes money by talking governments into policies that he and his business happen to have already invested in so that they can step in and pick up the cash even if it's not good for the country. It's not like he's hiding this. He gave examples for god's sake That's who you are. You're a person that will take corruption And watch Canadians suffer and the poor gets starved for resources based on your ideology.1 point
-
It didn't occur to genius that part of maintaining security clearance is not sharing information with people who don't have security clearance. LOL.1 point
-
Because the USD was seen as the world reserve currency and the refuge in a storm, the US has been able to finance massive deficits and enjoy cheap stuff with an over valued dollar without facing the consequences. As countries and investors de dollarize and shun US treasury bonds because they see the US as unreliable, reality will start to hit home. Just about every country has seen its currency rise against the USD since March including the CAD as they are being seen as more reliable. Devaluation of the USD will do more to reduce US imports than tariffs.1 point
-
Uh no the Trump administration’s mismanagement of this issue outclasses Trudeau and the worst administrations of any western democracy by a country mile. As I already said this economic disaster isn’t simply a case of bad policy, poor planning, or poor policy implementation, all of which could be said about things Trudeau and other governments have done. Trump is unique in that his followers have anointed him to sit on a throne and make shit up as he goes day by day despite the fact that he clearly has no knowledge or understanding of what he’s doing and his actions contradict all understanding of economics and geopolitics. Even his own cabinet members don’t support what is happening have no idea what he’s doing or why and what will happen next, it’s government by whim of the emperor and it changes daily Trudeau tried novel policies some of which didn’t work out as expected or were poorly executed but it wasn’t due to Trudeau alone making shit up every morning and changing his mind then changing it back again day after day because he’s in a bad mood. And the fact that you try to downplay this completely self-inflicted economic and geopolitical disaster that has cost the economy trillions of dollars and the US its position as trusted global leader as some easily reversed minor misstep or hiccup is laughable. By all measures the economy was “firing on all cylinders” in 2024 under Biden and Trump has erased all of that. You have no basis to say it would have been worse under Kamala other than your own deep bias. It hurt US agriculture badly and Trump provided bailouts That was another of Trump’s unsubstantiated claims which resulted in Canada imposing counter-tariffs. Ultimately while it created a few thousand new US steel jobs, up to 75,000 US manufacturing jobs were lost as steel prices soared and certain specialized types of steel not made in the US but still tariffed by Trump became expensive and scarce. Like what exactly? Be specific1 point
-
Well this is certainly bullshit. All widely accepted economic theories have failed Beave. The USA can no longer carry all those nations on its back. Besides Beave...we all know the saying "New Normal". It was tried...it failed miserably...its out. You go "cake" and "pie" mixed up. I said they want cake. Meh...I'm not surprised that you got it a55-backwards. It appears you do that a lot.1 point
-
"Oh dear sweet baby Jesus, I pray to you, please let me catch someone trying to plant a liberal sign on my lawn."1 point
-
I think that we would both agree that CBC and CTV have a dog in this fight, it's clear who that is, and the only weapon in their arsenal is "polling data". Carney has NO popular policies aside from the ones he stole from PP - which went completely against everything that the LPOC stood for, he's not the one with the dominating exchanges with the media, he can't talk about any lies or scandals because they're all his, all of his MPs are Trudeau sycophants who Canadians are clearly quite sick of, the main thing that he likes to to brag about is a blatant lie (2008), his most recent job title in Canada was "the Economic Advisor to Causing our Homeless Crisis", he's clearly tied with China who's in a trade war with us, he just moved hundreds of high-paying jobs to the US who we're also in a trade war with... "But a random dude donated to Poilievre's campaign". CBC has to start and end every story about the election with "❤️BUT ❤️CARNEY❤️ IS STILL AHEAD IN THE POLLS❤️". When you look at the news on CBC, it's an awful lot like this: Carney has NO popular policies aside from the ones he stole from PP - which went completely against everything that the LPOC stood" ❤️BUT ❤️CARNEY❤️ IS STILL AHEAD IN THE POLLS❤️" he's not the one with the dominating exchanges with the media "❤️BUT ❤️CARNEY❤️ IS STILL AHEAD IN THE POLLS❤️" he can't talk about any lies or scandals because they're all his"... "❤️BUT ❤️CARNEY❤️ IS STILL AHEAD IN THE POLLS❤️" all of his MPs are Trudeau sycophants who Canadians are clearly quite sick of "❤️BUT ❤️CARNEY❤️ IS STILL AHEAD IN THE POLLS❤️" the main thing that he likes to to brag about is a blatant lie (2008)" "❤️BUT ❤️CARNEY❤️ IS STILL AHEAD IN THE POLLS❤️" his most recent job title in Canada was "the Economic Advisor to Causing our Homeless Crisis" "❤️BUT ❤️CARNEY❤️ IS STILL AHEAD IN THE POLLS❤️" he's clearly tied with China who's in a trade war with us, "❤️BUT ❤️CARNEY❤️ IS STILL AHEAD IN THE POLLS❤️" he just moved hundreds of high-paying jobs to the US who we're also in a trade war with... "❤️BUT ❤️CARNEY❤️ IS STILL AHEAD IN THE POLLS❤️" They have one other story: "but a random dude donated to Poilievre's campaign", and that also ends with ""❤️Thank God ❤️CARNEY❤️ IS STILL AHEAD IN THE POLLS❤️". If you take "❤️BUT ❤️CARNEY❤️ IS STILL AHEAD IN THE POLLS❤️" out of the CBC's repertoire, you get a completely different picture of what's going on in this election cycle. It's 100% bleak from the Carney camp aside from the "polling data". Scan through your memory banks and piece together all of the pro-Carney evidence that's real... what have you got? Can you write it all down here? What has Carney done well aside from help companies scam the system? He worked from the inside of the system and helped outsiders scam us. He's literally been the inside guy on bank-job for the past ten years. If he has a claim to fame, that's it.1 point