Leaderboard

Yes, you will live a long life filled with much running away. Congratulations.

That's not true!!!! We've only eaten vegitables, that's why all those cave man drawings show pictures of ancient man chasing down broccoli stalks with hoes!! oh... wait a minute..... now that i look more closely....... ANCIENT MAN HUTNING ASPARAGUS (History according to RoboChef)

His Cali government told him so. So he repeats it. I think they've also listed clean water and air as carcinogenic.

Small minds really believe this has something to do with DEI, the enemy created. If institutions in the US are limited by what the government approves of as "proper ideology" it is the Chinese cultural revolution of the 1960s, and more lately Putinism, all over again. The US is no longer the land of the free. “Who are our enemies? Who are our friends? This is a question of the first importance for the revolution.” Mao Zedong, 1926 “[The play] Hai Rui Dismissed from Office is not a fragrant flower but a poisonous weed… Its influence is great and its poison widespread. If we do not clean it up, it will be harmful to the affairs of the people.” Yao Wenyuan, 1965 “I was Chairman Mao’s dog. What he said to bite, I bit.” Jiang Qing on her role in the Cultural Revolution https://alphahistory.com/chineserevolution/quotations-cultural-revolution/

Carney’s position is a response to Trump. It can’t be considered in isolation.

Borrowing from the playbook of yet another successful dictator, Trump is attempting to purge history, art and science of ideas he doesn't like. We've seen it at NIH, we've seen it at the Kennedy center, and now it's coming for the Smithsonian. Politico (and everywhere else) Vice President JD Vance has a new job: erasing what the White House considers “improper ideology” from the Smithsonian, a task that allows him to cast aside the progressive ideas he has decried since long before he was elected to public office. The vice president, who sits on the museum network’s board, has been tasked with slashing funding for exhibits or programs that promote “ideologies inconsistent with Federal law and policy,” including those that recognize trans people, “degrade shared American values,” or “divide Americans based on race,” according to an executive order President Donald Trump signed behind closed doors on Thursday. I have no doubt that this aggressive, ham-handed attempt to use political office to dictate culture will be celebrated by so-called conservatives (who clearly aren't), but it should be recognized for the sinister, cynical scheme that it is.

Wow, that is bad for the cpc. Carney is focused entirey on the east. He's using the age old liberal strategy of "forget the west, we'll take the rest" and securing ontario and quebec and the maritimes according to the polling numbers That gives him a very high efficiency in his vote, if he pulls it off. The east doesn't care about the west so they won't be particularly worried about it. ITs worth noting that the CPC hasn't actually fallen much. For the last year they've been polling around 43 percent. They're still doing well, but the ndp is set to be almost completely wiped out, the bloc is about to be wiped out as well. Carney isn't beating the cpc, carney is beating everyone else and only trying to win ontario and quebec. THe good news for Conservatives is there's a lot of election left and carney is building on a house of cards. IF that slips even a bit it comes crashing down. There's no depth to it. But to see the other 'recognized parties' be decimated like that is really weird. i mean the ndp won't even come close to recognized status if this happens.

The Vances went to Greenland but no one wanted to see them. They spent 4 hours at the US base at Pituffik, made a speech to US service people and flew home. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3y3vdvdggo

??????? Honestly if you and myata aren't dating you really need to start.

The people of Greenland enjoying a luxury we don't have in America. Sigh.

I look 20 years younger than I am and I love a nice grilled steak.

The zucchini stys here if it's fresh.

Yeah but he's winning at the moment. SO he may be a thief and a goof and a liar but hes' an effective one. We'll see. Still 4 weeks left and that's a long time in poiltics. I just have a tough time believing quebecers want someone who's already insulted them that badly and that leftist want someone who's the very example of a rich person they wanted to eat just last year.

They think 'orangemanbad', and then are set to elect a guy who's a rich international banker and who gave musk 250 million to buy twitter and who gave Jarad Kushner hundreds of millions to help him bail out his country by moving his offices to the states and leasing his building. It's the final proof there must be a god because there's no way THAT level of stupid could happen accidentally.

Lol...ya well...I suspect Mike knows I'm right. I'm perfectly willing to concede that 8 billion people, can generate warmth. Just look at Toronto. Buffalo gets snow and rain...Barrie gets it...Toronto doesn't. Toronto has a "heat sheild". We did that. But noooo... No cost will satisfy these greenies. Yet they're so enthralled that they dint realize Orangemanbad is the result of their own childishness. Ya gits wut ya pays fer.

Well he's got to get his cardio workout somehow!

Someone put this together to simplify it a bit: Paul Chaing's team. Does this look like Canada? Or China?

Yes yes...the age old question...Do you want to live? Doodles...enjoy your salad.

I think they do deep down. I literally believe that their logic chain goes like this: "We know that the CBC is lying about the conservatives and Poilievre, but we believe that that is justified because of what terrible people conservatives and Poilievre are. So we insist that the CBC is not bias because it's worth any lie to get rid of those people. If you don't believe how terrible they are just read the CBC" The ultimate circular logic where not only do the ends justify the means the ends are also used as the reason for the beginning. Once you have mastered the art of self-delusion, all things are rational if you believe them hard enough

Yeah. and there's NO indication it's impaired your thinking ability at all!!! 🙄😏

We've been over this - that's the opposite of the truth.

Prior to Carney running, the Conservatives had a large lead. But everyone knew that some die-hard Liberal supporters would go back to the party if they changed the leader. Which they did. Carney quickly called an election to capitalize on Lib supporters coming back to the party when the leader changed.

A Liberal gov't could lead to more than financial collapse for Canada. This Liberal candidate just publicly called for people to claim the $1 million bounty China has on Conservative candidate, Joe Tay, by turning him in to the Chinese Consulate. This guy, Paul Chaing, was a former cop in Ontario, he should know better. He is apologizing for it now but he should be removed by the Liberal party. I doubt he will, though. I think if the Libs get in again, being turned in for bounties for China will be the least of any opposing party's worries. GTA Liberal candidate apologizes for suggesting people claim China's bounty on Conservative

You don't have any credibility, so this isn't even a discussion. Everything you f*ckers write, say or scream, is either automatically suspect or a flat-out lie.

Well robo...I encourage you to never eat meat.

Obviously carney gave him something. I suspect it was basically "I can give you what you want if you reduce the pressure a little and make me look good during the election. after i win we can sort out the details. Is that ok with you Mr Trump? Sounds exactly like he always does when someone flatters him relentlessly and strokes his ego and promises to give him what he wants. Which means one of two things. Either carney intends to sell us out and give trump a bunch of concessions which will slowly cripple our economy but will allow him to personally benefit financially, or he has lied to trump and will not deliver when he becomes prime minister in which case you can bet trump is going to become furious and will retaliate against Canada. Kearney will pretend that he's shocked that trump who was behaving himself has suddenly for no reason whatsoever turned on Canada yet again but you know, that's trump. The election it's going to make a big difference in Canada's future for quite some time. Elections matter and this one is going to matter a great deal. Hopefully carney won't win. I myself still have trouble believing the polls are 100% accurate the way that they're presented and believe a Poilievre majority is still completely possible. But when you look at everything that's just happened in week one and remember that we've got four more to go with tariffs supposedly starting next week but who knows and trump is the wild card, there is just no way to predict how this is going to end

So provide the research. We both know you're reading this. You'll pretend that you're not because you can't provide any science that actually backs up your claims.. Which means you probably haven't read any, you're just repeating what other people told you without verifying like a good drone. but you'll claim that others are 'denying the science' that you yourself have never seen.

Your comment about authoritarianism, writings and obliviousness in general.

Oh great... You are some crazy vegetarian now? Humans have been eating and surviving on "animal flesh" for all of their existence, but sure... you have the magic formula and special knowledge to know its toxic. ROFL

Trump says people won't need to vote again next election. Here it is right from the horses ass himself if you don't believe me https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-tells-christians-they-wont-have-vote-after-this-election-2024-07-27/ You got anything like that on record for Carney?

I think the fact that CBC is even considered Canadian culture is a problem of it's own. The government's effort to protect Canadian culture inevitably leads to the government defining what Canadian culture is. It's very phony. Culture comes from the people. I would argue against the statement that American culture is supplanting Canadian culture, but only because I would say Canadians have always consumed American culture more than Canadian culture. Talented Canadian artists have always made their money in America. Even the 'elbows up' movement was started on an American television show by a Canadian who made his career in the US. I think an honest assessment would be that Canadian culture and American culture are very similar. They have always been related. We were both largely colonized by Brits. We are neighbors. There are, of course, things which are distinctly Canadian. But I would also say the fact that Canadians have always consumed American culture is reflective of Canadian culture. I mean this is what actual Canadian people decide to do, as opposed to what the CRTC tries to promote that we do. The government puts too much effort into being Canadian. If you are something, you don't have to try very hard to be it. Also, I think so much of that effort is focused on the idea of not being American.

Only if you're on LSD. His writings tell what kind of leader he will be. Authoritarian. That is the difference between Liberals on the left and conservatives on right. Conservatives believe in freedom and free enterprise. Liberals don't. That is why the country is in such a mess after ten years of Liberal Trudeau rule. Carney will be a continuation of the liberal mess. Canadians have a choice. They could choose the path toward increased prosperity, increased resource development, and vastly increased jobs working in the resource industry and building homes. Better paying jobs and reduced taxes. They must vote Conservative to do that.

So why did you respond. My post was aimed at you because you refuse to accept any argument which refutes your ingrained perception of climate mechanics.

Only if you're on LSD.

It’s an open race and Poilievre has many advantages here as I think I have tried to point out. One of many: his support is more deeply committed and should turn out to vote in greater numbers. Here the lesson for any crazed fan: just because you support a team doesn’t mean you can’t see and suggest ‘opportunities for improvement ’. Denying the obvious failings on your side is a type of loyalty that isn’t useful.

Well, I don’t know anything about Kearney. You know, I don’t think we can. It’s pretty clear that PP is disappointing a lot of people in his own camp. There will always be a few who are unhappy but most fair observers can see it’s far more than that. You know far better than I do that criticism of Poilievre’s campaign is not confined to people like me. It’s a pity you can’t admit that. With all the advantages he has he should be winning easily.

I have a Canadian government issued certificate that refers to me as the Master - the word Master is more often that not capitalized to emphasize the importance of the title. I'm even put in charge of coloured people and women. It defies explanation in this day and age don't you think?

You know that Adam Shitforbrains colluded with Russians to get naked pictures of Trump? And don't forget that the DOJ has stated that Schiff lied about the Russian hoax. They have evidence of that:

I mean, how would you know? You post lies, I call you out, then you run away.

Meanwhile back at clown headquarters even the Mad King’s advisors have no idea what Dictator On Day One will decree on his “liberation day” Trump officials, allies grow anxious about April 2 tariffs The president continues to throw curveballs at businesses — and even his own team. Just days out from Trump’s April 2 announcement of global tariffs, which he has hailed as “Liberation Day,” even those closest to the president — from Vice President JD Vance to his chief of staff Susie Wiles and his own Cabinet officials — have privately indicated that they’re unsure exactly what the boss will do, according to three people who have spoken with them. While some details of the administration’s plan for what Trump has dubbed “reciprocal tariffs” on global trading partners are starting to trickle out, the president has at times upended them or floated contradictory policies that are keeping everyone — even his inner circle — guessing. “No one knows what the f-ck is going on,” said one White House ally close to Trump’s inner circle, granted anonymity to speak freely. “What are they going to tariff? Who are they gonna tariff and at what rates? Like, the very basic questions haven’t been answered yet.” Indeed, while the White House is projecting confidence publicly, multiple administration officials, as well as top allies on the outside, are privately concerned that next week’s roll-out could be as rocky as when he imposed tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China on March 4, worsening a rout on stocks that began in mid-February. Though the S&P 500 has since regained some ground, all of its previous gains since Election Day have been erased. Part of that is because Trump continues to threaten to plow ahead with an expansive tariff rollout, siding with the trade protectionists in his administration despite warnings from other advisers of the negative economic impacts. Inflation rose at a higher-than-expected rate last month, the Commerce Department disclosed on Friday, even before the potential onslaught of higher prices from the sweeping tariffs. But it’s also because the president continues to throw curveballs at businesses — and even his own team. Case in point: Wednesday’s decision to slap the auto industry with 25 percent tariffs. While expected in some fashion in the near future, the announcement came together so last minute that the White House wasn’t fully prepared and had to delay afternoon programming as they sought to finalize the plan, according to two people familiar with the roll-out. The White House also didn’t brief industry stakeholders in the U.S. or abroad beforehand — though a White House official argued that if they were “smart” they would have known it was coming, since Trump himself issued a public warning. Part of the uncertainty stems from the president seeming to undermine his own team at times. After Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trump economic adviser Kevin Hassett said in recent weeks that only about 10 or 15 countries — or the “dirty 15,” as Bessent put it — would face reciprocal tariffs, Trump said Wednesday that actually every country will be hit with a tariff. The president similarly undercut Lutnick earlier this month, after the Commerce secretary suggested Canada and Mexico might avoid the full 25 percent Trump had threatened over border security and fentanyl — though two people close to the president said Lutnick was freelancing and has since been told to stay on message. Trump went ahead and slapped that duty on the two North American neighbors on March 4, but then paused much of it a day later and exempted certain goods — a rollercoaster of announcements that left many businesses and investors unsure about how the new tariffs would work. Indeed, Trump has continued to shift the scope, targets and timeline of his tariffs at a whiplash-inducing pace. The duties he promised, pre-inauguration, to levy on Canada and Mexico his first day in office shifted to Feb. 1, then Feb. 4, then March 4, before being largely rolled back until April 2. There is little clarity about what parts of those tariffs — which could hit more than $1 trillion worth of trade — will go into effect next week. …. Needless to say, the president’s shifting desires have made it difficult to plan, as Cabinet officials have indicated in private. In recent days, Lutnick told U.S. trading partners seeking clarity that he would try to give them a heads up the day before April 2, telling them that the details are too fluid at the moment to preview. Bessent has also admitted to people that the final tariff regime remains a moving target, according to a person who has spoken to him. The internal uncertainty also stems in part from an ongoing administration divide on the tariff strategy and the tug of war to influence Trump in recent weeks. All of the president’s aides have vociferously defended his tariff drive, which has at times surprised Wall Street. But there are still differences of opinion over approach; Bessent, Wiles and even Vance — who has aspirations to run for president himself in 2028 — have been pushing for either a narrower tariffs regime, or for the president to make final decisions quickly and in an orderly way so that businesses can plan. On the other hand, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Navarro are said to be encouraging Trump’s long-standing tariff fixation. The divisions have caused tensions. While Navarro is a genuine tariff believer, Lutnick — who has a close relationship with Trump and enjoys influence that others in the Cabinet do not, as of yet — is widely seen as supporting whatever Trump wants to ingratiate himself with the president, a dynamic that has infuriated others in the administration. “He goes into the Oval and tells the president whatever he wants to hear,” said the first White House ally, who called Lutnick a “f-cking nightmare” and argued he does so without consideration of the economic consequences. Over the past few weeks, the more tariff-cautious faction in the administration has tried gently to pull Trump back from blanket, indiscriminate tariffs. … https://www.politico.com/news/2025/03/29/trump-aides-tariffs-liberation-day-fears-00259081

Like most MAGA CULT, he has an Trump denigration filter. Can't penetrate that.

Have you been living under a rock since January?

I said it when he took control of the Conservatives, but Poilievre was pretty much the only guy who could lose the next election for the Conservatives. If they win the election, it'll be in spite of him and because of the Liberals' shitty record. If the Liberals win, it'll because of Carney, and in spite of the Liberal's shitty record. Weird contrast.

^MAKE BIGOTRY GREAT AGAIN 🤮 You were born 100 years too late. How do you even survive in the modern world? LMAO

Trumps have discovered social engineering. Openness and acceptance of LGBTQ is regarded by them as social engineering, not a common value. Did liberals make a mistake on that one ? Objectively, how much does the government get to decide what is a 'common value' ? Or, furthermore, to interpret recognized value-words like 'Freedom' ? Freedom seems to mean you can buy a message and broadcast it whether or not it is true. Nobody would argue that. But it doesn't mean freedom of equal access to education or health. Postmodern Republicanism truly is a wonder to behold. It will lead back to a kind of 19th century pastoralism, I suspect. Maybe with a monarchy though.

The only reason they're getting away with it is because Jim Flaherty is dead.