Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/29/2024 in Posts
-
MAGA is one person, his name is Donald. Everything he says, MAGA shall comply, even when its an obvious lie about people stealing elections from him because his ego can't handle losing. MAGA (Donald Trump) is too stupid too consider the complexities of something like the economic impact of work visas or tarrifs. Don-Don has the attention-span of a 2-year old and certainly won't read anything about those subjects. He prefers TV, which is why his cabinet is filled with people he saw on cable TV.5 points
-
3 points
-
Anyone remember 5-7 years ago when Elon seemed like a mostly normal person? This is what twitter addiction does to people lol.2 points
-
Caps tell us everything and you're really stupid to use them. Mind you you're not exactly bright when you don't. Back in your hole little whack-a-mole2 points
-
The people who told us "Biden is mentally healthy" for the last 4 years are busy telling us what's wrong with us lol. This sh1t is way beyond crazy now.2 points
-
Mississippi Valley State University have been invited to play at the inauguration parade and Democrats are mad because they accepted the invitation. https://www.yahoo.com/news/mississippi-hbcu-slammed-over-donald-131034534.html1 point
-
MAGA is a cult and Donald is their leader. Given that you aren't a "Trump supporter" you should realize this. It's very cultish of you to assume that anyone who doesn't suck Donald's testicle is a leftwinger. Yes I am dehumanizing MAGA folks because i'm calling them stupid gullible sheep, and a sheep isn't a human. Baaaaaah.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
So clearly you're one of those brain dead that thinks sexual identity is a political issue of the left as are clean parks, bike lanes, recycling and green spaces. Limited mind looking at the world thru a toilet paper tube no doubt?1 point
-
Well whether we like it or not there are biggest trading partner. If a difficult customer walks into your store but they spend a ton of money with you, sometimes you have to smile and bite your tongue and find a way to make them happy. Every business person knows that. So you do what you can. That doesn't mean you just cave to their every whim or sell your goods at a loss but it does mean that you look for ways to work with them and resolve issues and keep them spending money with you.1 point
-
I agree. It's time to smooth things over. There's an old saying about cutting off one's nose to spite one's face.1 point
-
I see you're back to your usual game of trying to change the channel. My point was I wasn't talking about your typos or my typos. And here you are talking about typos. I use voice dictation and I don't always get the time to proofread before I move on to something else so occasionally I make errors and I assume that you do too. Nobody said anything different. Which is why i said i didn't have a problem with your typos or my typos, the problem was your argument. But unfortunately you're either too stupid or too dishonest to understand that very simple concept. Not surprising. And i see you're back to spamming the board with 100's of replies rather than just doing so once per person. I'll deal with your mess here in one reply: The united states is still not the entire rest of the world which is what you tried to drag into the conversation. Nobody cares enough about you to care where you were born or where you're living now. And you were responding to my post not the original post so it's not really relevant what the original post said is it. Nice try it deflection though. Trans have their rights in Canada in the US, every bit as much as everyone else and they are certainly able to refer to themselves however they like so your attempts to pretend otherwise are a joke. And your dishonesty is factual, not derogatory. However the end of the day you have been insulting in many ways. But you think it's okay to be insulting as long as you feel the insult is acceptable. But if somebody insults you then well that's terrible. You're being insulted because you are being an insufferable and insulting twit. Do better and you'll get insulted less. But don't be insulting jerk and then complain about other people being insulting Your dismissal of people's argument as transphobic just because you cannot come up with a counter argument is both pathetic and a great example of how you like to insult people but somehow when you do it it's not an insult! Magic! And if you want to refer to the fact that nobody is buying you or complete and utter bullshit which you cannot make a rationed argument about as having reached an impasse then sure. Why not. The simple fact of the matter is you don't get to explain anything. If you want to make a statement you need to be able to defend that with logic and reason and you have utterly failed to do so. You seem to want us to agree that you are right just because you said you were right while at the same time completely ignoring the arguments that are made demonstrating that you are not right. If you can't address other people's points and simply insist that you're right and stomp your foot when others don't agree then I'm afraid you're going to have to learn to live with impasses in your life. The fault there is on you for not being able to make a good argument, not with others for not agreeing with your lack of argument. And of course I know that tranny is a word that is often thought of as derogatory. CIS is often thought of as derogatory and it's certainly used in that way. Yet for some reason you are deeply offended if somebody says tranny, but if somebody suggests that you shouldn't be using the word cis You laugh and blow them off and tell them that their opinions and feelings are not relevant. Dude. You are a dishonest person making a dishonest argument and you are a complete and utter hypocrite. That and that alone is why you are getting nowhere in your discussions with other people. Of course people who actually think are going to hold you in contempt I look down on you and your arguments. I don't know what your goal in coming here was, but if it was to severely torpedo the transgender movement and convince a bunch of people that sympathy and empathy towards the transgender community is misplaced because this is a hostile relationship and trannies will never respect your rights, then well done. Because that is indeed what you have achieved1 point
-
You're doing more than that. You're trying to convince others to believe what you believe. You've taken a simple declatarion and turned into an argument for trannies. You're a soldier, Scott75, a soldier for the trans community. Don't try and hide that fact, just be honest about it.1 point
-
Look at your own post from right above this one, dummy. You're trying to portray yourself as an educated, driven professional and yet the best retort that you can come up with is ghetto-slander like "That’s why you got nothing to say but insults." 😂 Your whole post there^ is just a bunch of snotty, out-of-touch insults in pidgin English. We both know that it's the leftists among us who are known for letting their emotions overwhelm their logical thought processes. Look at the M brown riots, and the G Floyd riots... Two prime examples of dumb, violent criminals being the architects of their own demise, and then CNN and the Dems using those tragedies to lead hundreds of thousands of emotionally charged imbeciles around by the nose. Those angry imbeciles are your fellow Demi voters, Beave. In fact, they're the ones driving your short bus. They said and did all the really stupid things, and then it was people like you that were stupid enough to believe in their "mostly peaceful protests" BS. 😂 Buddy, you're just a low-IQ, low-income laugh track and nothing that you say is clever, insightful, poignant, intelligent or honest. You're sad, insipid and intellectually inferior by any reasonable measure. Go cling to your mama's skirt now little boy. I'm done with you.1 point
-
Wrong. You're just a male. And after your extensive research in the woke rabbit hole, It's fair to say that you are now a confused male. You really need to get help.1 point
-
The truth? Is that honestly what you call the truth you f'ing idjit? Just for the sake of clarity, you're willing to say that Russian collusin, Biden's mental acuity and the safe & healthy "covid vaccines" are all still real for you? You're just a cultist zero, Beave. An absolutely brainwashed nothing. No matter how long I live I will never see anything more twisted than you saying "fake news bubble" right there 😂1 point
-
1 point
-
Simplest fact is the leaders of the three opposition parties now say they do not have confidence in the government. That means when a vote is held, the government will be defeated in a non-confidence motion. However, since the three parties now have no confidence in the government, the fact remains that the government no longer has the confidence of Parliament because they are a minority and the three parties are the majority. The government should do the decent thing and face it by recalling Parliament and accepting the outcome.1 point
-
I sure hope so but I wonder if it's too early to assert that in terms of a longterm view. I get the short term one but fear it's mostly driven by economic concerns and thus transient as a result. The woke crowd are only beginning to feel the impact of the policies they previously voted for and maybe it's just too early for that pain to translate into an appropriate cause and effect aversion. Lot's of economic and safety related examples but my favourite (and the most glaring one of all IMO) is that it took years and far too many deaths for them to realize that it isn't duck hunters shooting up their streets and grand fathers with pocket knives stabbing them on the bus. Good Lord, this took sooooooo much longer to hoist aboard than I thought it would and it's the reason I wonder if there's been a lasting change of heart or if the woke virus will simply mutate and return in full force 5 years from now. In short, I'd rather see the pain last another four years, create an indelible aversion and be completely done with it than usher in an era of ruinous oscillations of cyclical madness. I'd love to be wrong, but I fear people aren't truly over it yet... not that this forum is relevant in any way, but clearly Herb and a few others here still want more... what if they set up a breeding program? And not that it actually translates to seats, but some 40% (or so) of the popular vote will still go to Liberals, NDP, and the Bloc... it makes me wonder just what it will take. These guys haven't had a change of heart: They will ride a horse until it dies... then they'll eat it.1 point
-
LOL they didn't abandon anything in the slightest And of course it's about trudeau. If he was doing his job and actually dealing with this then others wouldn't feel compelled to try and salvage what they can. Smith's very clearly sided with Canada. The other two you're just lying about. I had hoped that once the trump election was over you might regain your senses in some degree and stop being a complete delusional tard. Sadly that does not seem to have been the case.1 point
-
I was going to point this out. Sometimes it's hard to determine whether or not @robosmith Thinks we're too stupid to see through that crap and catch his lies, or if he's just so stupid that he didn't realize he was being lied to in the first place.1 point
-
A ship at sea has often been used as an analog to a society, especially one in distress and especially when things really start going sideways. In addition to the social contract I guess you've never heard of The Ship of State either. You don't get out much do you?1 point
-
Ah yes, notice how you dishonestly change the argument. You claimed mass shootings declined when they were illegal... they did not. They increased for several years and your big response now is that lower "average" rates and you ignore the deadliest mass shooting by averaging it out. Sure, when you ignore the continued increase for several years and then average it out with the lower rates in the early 2000's and then ignore the deadliest mass shooting in Columbine... Gun violence was at its peak in 1993 and continued to trend down after that. The assault weapons ban had next to nothing to do with anything, as violence was already trending down with the tough on crime policies of the early 90's. It is not my opinion, these are facts.1 point
-
All your proving is that there is no merit to your attempt to try and change the meaning of words. It's being done to suit a whim and for propaganda purposes. You're hardly the first person to want to change words for propaganda purposes but most people recognize that as being a pretty disgusting thing to do. Gobels is not well loved in history1 point
-
Oopsie, no bait and switches please The lack of progression of achievements on an established path does not mean that there aren't still recognizable qualifications. It just means that there may be different collections of qualifications which could result in the same thing. Those qualifications may be direct or even indirect. Kamala had no qualifications with whatsoever. And you know who else didn't think so? Democrats, when they shot her down for her run for the presidency in 2019 Each of trump's appointees has the experience and background to give him belief that they will be able to do the job he wants them to do. That is very different than Kamala1 point
-
There doesn’t have to be progression of achievements on an established path. Lots of jobs don’t have that. There isn’t one for VP or President either but that didn’t stop you from squealing about Kamala qualifications. Someone in charge of a budget in the billions of dollars and a department with hundreds of thousands of employees, whose decisions can directly affect tens of millions of Americans is expected to have a combination of knowledge and experience commensurate with that level of responsibility, not some random boob who got the job because he had the most ass-kissing tweets.1 point
-
1 point
-
Agree with it or not it wasn’t a power grab but what governments of all political stripes around the world thought was right based on the advice of non-political experts and those restrictions ended once they felt they were no longer needed Conservatives OTOH force ideology down others throats. I mentioned a long list already. Let’s add Doug Ford’s attempt to use the notwithstanding clause just for some minor tinkering with Toronto city hall composition based on some personal pet theory of his that turned out to be a failure. Another example of the willingness to use the constitutional nuclear option for trivial matters. Wah wah conservatives pass laws too. Republicans came up withe Patriot Act amd had people abducted and flown to torture sites all over the world, spied on people who rightly criticized their bogus lies on invading Iraq. Republicans passed laws to prevent milk producers saying “hormone free” and subjected others to compelled speech forcing them to say there’s nothing wrong with with having artificial hormones in milk. Republicans repeal laws that prevent financial advisors from ripping off their clients and allow polluters to poison citizens with impunity. Republicans have regulated everything from banning baggy pants to the books in libraries. They tried to make it an act of of terrorism to film animal abuse in slaughterhouses. And you have Ron De Santis weaponing the state against Disney because they dared to publicly criticize him, ripping up Reedy Creek and threatening to surround Disney with toll roads and prisons. Snitch lines for teachers, forced religious education, forcing schools to out up religious signage, Republicans are heavy handed. What about Chris Christie Fort Lee bridge scandal? He shut down a town’s main thoroughfare for days without warning for no reason but to cause major traffic jams as punishment voting Democrat in a recent election. People couldn’t get to work or school or the hospital emergency services were screwed You mention citizens United as if that’s a good thing. A corporatist Republican backed court ruling that gave corporations the right to make unlimited campaign control to politicians on the basis the corporations are people and their campaign contributions are protected free speech. That is the biggest monster in the swamp and a direct threat to democracy. When Republicans say they oppose laws and regulations they only oppose barriers to unfettered corporate rule. For decades the Republicans have operated ALEC, where republicans from every level of government across the country literally meet with corporations that dictate legislation to them. The corporations literally ghostwrite the bills for them. One republican stupidly introduced a bill into his stat legislature written on the corporate letterhead And then of course you have Trump trying to outright steal the 2020 election that’s about as authoritarian as it gets1 point
-
Don't forget 10% of Canadians would be fine with joining. I'd be more concerned about the strain US pressure on Canada might put on separatist and of course ideological divisions within our borders.1 point
-
If Mr Wonderful and Stockwell think being a US citizen would be better than being Canadian they yeah they're traitors and can go eff themselves.1 point
-
I suspect you're playing games now. You replied to me instead of Deluge for some dumb reason1 point
-
It is amazing how you guys have no memory for the recent past. Hello Pandemic. Some of the most gross abuse of power we have witnessed in this generation by those on the left. Lets review all the other ways you guys on the left support leftist authoritarianism when it comes to government controls over every aspect of our lives with more regulations, bigger government, more meddling government, controls over speech, pushing more restrictions on speech from citizens united to so-called hate speech and how those on the left abused government power to pressure private business to silence people.1 point
-
1 point
-
Tuff man, eh? Anyone who supports law & order over outright fascism is a wimp. Another Mr Freedumb that desires an actual dictator,1 point
-
An AR is no faster than a semi-automatic pistol. They are the same speed1 point
-
This guy comes across as extremely unlikable. PP confrontational and condescending. The less PP talks to the media, the better the Conservatives will do.1 point
-
It actually said that in FCC documents? Bullshit. Stop making things up. Nope, care to go through it word by word so we can try to clear up your comprehension issues?1 point
-
The one's who owned most of the broadcasting capacity wanted the doctrine gone so they could dominate public discourse on a range of issues with their views and goals in mind - usually to accumulate more power, wealth and influence.1 point
-
Yup, it's those lying democrats and their red carpet agenda, but that will be rectified once the true President enters the WH.1 point
-
Uh oh someone has an emotional boo boo. I love how agitated you low intelligence creatures get.1 point
-
Why did you just admit to being a pedophile AGAIN? OMG. I have once again reported you for harassment.1 point
