Leaderboard

Is this suppose to impress anyone? The noble prize has become nothing more than a bauble. They gave Obama one for doing shlt so who "nobel prize winning economists" endorse is meaningless to people with brains.

People who think high gas prices are the end of the world have no idea. This tarrif plan is insane.

20:00 Trump clearly calling Harris supporters GARBAGE. But you never even mention THAT. Because you are nothing but a partisan hypocritical HACK.

Economists typically don't like to get involved in politics, but for experts in the field, the threat Trump poses is simply too great to ignore. “While each of us has different views on the particulars of various economic policies, we believe that, overall, Harris’s economic agenda will improve our nation’s health, investment, sustainability, resilience, employment opportunities, and fairness and be vastly superior to the counterproductive economic agenda of Donald Trump,” they wrote, in the letter obtained first by CNN. **The total count was actually 82 Nobel science laureates, but 23 of them were economists speaking on the economy. The know-nothings will no doubt dismiss the definitive experts in the field (based on their feelings) Instead, rather than taking to heart the warnings of those (almost certainly) smarter and vastly more knowledgeable.

Big deal. Reporters at WAPO and NYT got awards for lying. Those Nobel prizes have been reduced to a bad joke.

Funny that, starving yet lots of cash for rockets and such.

Imagine having to be governed by a guy who literally thinks you are trash because you don't support him politically. Just like the Nazi party of Germany Biden's supporters just nod along in obedience as he demonizes their family members, their coworkers, their neighbors. So much joy He's a vile one, that's for sure.

US election forecaster Donald Trump’s predicted margin of victory is widening as the race approaches its final days, The Telegraph’s election forecaster now predicts. Using years of election results, demographic trends and both current and historical polling, our model forecasts that Trump is on track to win 289 Electoral College votes to Kamala Harris’s 249 votes. The model suggests that the Republicans are the most likely to win tightly fought races in Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina and Wisconsin. As of Wednesaday, he is also predicted to win Pennsylvania with its 19 Electoral College votes. Well i guess we'll see if they're right on tuesday but more and more are giving trump the edge.

US should go back to hanging the chads.

Yes, the economic analysis of Nobel laureate economists is an "appeal to authority." When we all know everyone's opinion on economic policy is equally valuable.

First it's the media & Hollywood, then it's political lawfare, then it's assassination attempts, and now it's these clowns. My God, have the industrial complexes been busy! lol

What reality? If people with XX chromosomes aren't women then reality is impossible. You people just talk out of your a$$es for a narrative.

WSJ: The Next President Inherits a Remarkable Economy Even Murdoch's WSJ says US doing GREAT. So eat shit gnat girl.

And yet you're shocked they would call you garbage. I guess they should have called you pathetic, weak victims who are always easily outsmarted.

Trump paid hookers to pee on a bed, was a spy for Russia and beholden to China you believe. But, Pelosi, who has acces to federal investigations, just happens to make a perfectly timed trade just before it was made public that there was an investigation and that is incrediulous?

Nobel? Pfft... JUNK 😂 When the tariff plan pops the economy like a balloon, the one thing we know is that it won't be Trump's fault... The Postmodern president...

No, you are not being genuine here. This is a percentage game you are playing, only looking at the percentage of total deaths. If Russia expends 5 million shells to kill 70 Ukrainians out of 100. Is that effective? That is the game you are playing. This is the same argument that was made pointing this out to you before that you are now trying to gloss over. Perhaps you should have done a bit more math, logic, and reason from your time in the military.

You're confused. But I ain't surprised.

What do you expect idi0t? Nobel? Pfft...junk. Ur a liar and an id1ot.

The democrats "removed" Brandon from the ticket...under rather dubious circumstances...and anointed kamala. A twit as useless as Brandon.

In a few years when the pendulum swings back I'm asking for reparations.

That was the Nobel Peace Prize. You're welcome to debate whether he deserved it or not. However, that is an entirely different beast than a prize in the sciences.

Well, you can't say I didn't predict this reaction.

That economy is 100% reliant on government spending. Remember that the people also inherited remarkable inflation as a result. But that spending is unsustainable. You can't just keep spending more and more money forever, even as an anchor economy and currency the US will eventually suffer from that. So the challenge for the next government will be to pull back on the throttle of government spending while at the same time looking for a soft landing for the economy. It will be no easy task

However what you said later is that "we" can "choose ". And i was pointing out and establishing that it's not just a 'choice' that 'we' can make collectively or the like, if it's a 'right' for society then it must be a 'right' for the individual. As far as the workplace scenarios you brought up, it does get tricky. Would I as an employer want each of my employees to have a different pronoun that all of my customers and suppliers were supposed to remember and use when dealing with them personally? Should I get in trouble if I don't enforce thatstop doing business with customers that won't use the correct pronoun for the person? Likewise I don't think it's appropriate or an example of freedom of speech to be demeaning to somebody at the workplace. People shouldn't have to suffer dehumanizing Behavior just cuz they need to earn money and being an employer doesn't mean you have the right to mistreat people. I think at the end of the day however, in both cases you have to accept that if what somebody says is true then you have to accept their rights to speak the truth. If you are a biological male and you are currently presenting as a female and identify as such, it is still true to refer to you as a biological male. And to use language appropriate to a biological male. And I don't think people should be penalized for that one way or another. I think if something is objectively true then you shouldn't be penalized for it Unless you can prove that it is being said with deliberate malicious intent to harm. Our defamation laws already operate on this principle. Basically if something is objectively true it's very very hard to sue somebody for defamation for saying it. Almost impossible in fact. This should be the same. It may make somebody uncomfortable but they should have the right to speak the truth. Having said that if someone appears to be female or advises me that they consider themselves a female I'm using female pronouns and female language to describe them. On the other hand if they turn Around and start calling me a white sis male settler, that might just go out the window We need to learn common decency and mutual respect again rather than trying to force it by law

it was quite obvious that was what you were talking about. @Chrissy1979 realized she was losing that one so she tried to pretend you were talking about trump so that she could change the subject. It's something she does pretty regular. It's kind of cute actually, like watching a 4 year old change their story when htey're trying to explain something

And then what? I wouldn't redo adolescents for all the tea in China. And I had it easy. These vulchers belong in jail.!

I agree that peace prizes are often questionable but it wasn't a prize for science.

LOL, when your very first line is a lie...

Well...in all honesty...Israel will never completely escape the way they took Palestine. There may always be those who despise Israel.

And no more global support for Israel. THEN the Arab nations would get involved.

You make a good point but in all the flying garbage it was lost. Your observation is really the root of the problem. As Socrates said, democracy doesn't work unless voters are knowledgeable. Today elections have become popularity and pandering contests and so when you elect a drama teacher you get drama. Saying (pretending?) you're woke has compassionate appeal to the voters but then you get elected and the fact that you know very little causes chaos. Also, your lack of knowledge and integrity (you've lied to get elected) makes you vulnerable to corruption.

They are attempting to "normalize" extremely unnatural and confusing sexual kinks with children. That is completely unacceptable.

No surprise. What you're suggesting is simply genocide.

Yep, Hamas is bad. There isn't any debate about that. But it's a weak-ass deflection from your position that people who overwhelmingly did NOT vote for Hamas can be justly killed because a small minority of living Gazans voted for Hamas almost 20 years ago. Instead of admitting that your position is morally untenable, you simply try to deflect. Gross.

You are a shameless liar and libeler. With the endless stream of appalling and absurd things you say, I can't begin to imagine how you got so broken inside. That's some deep farking trauma. You should seek professional help.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-denigrates-harris-as-lazy-invoking-a-racist-trope-against-black-people/ar-AA1sJtMf https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-denigrates-harris-as-lazy-invoking-a-racist-trope-against-black-people/ar-AA1sJtMf https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/seven-shocking-remarks-made-at-donald-trump-s-madison-square-garden-rally/ar-AA1t3AAm You are such a snowflake. Trump can dish out all the abuse he likes and you still make excuses. BTW. Harris has never called Trump a Nazi but JD Vance has. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/fact-check-yes-jd-vance-once-called-trump-americas-hitler/ar-BB1qeFTu

Somebody thought he looked smart. I think they found him in the soup line.

Man, is it just me or does that guy look like before he became a political pundit he made his living standing in fields scaring crows?

Sounds like you're worried about competition......

Do you think kowtowing to a handful of anti-SOGI blockheads played a determining role in one single riding in the BC election? Perhaps in Rustad's own riding of Jesus freaks and antivaxxers it was a significant issue, though NDP got more votes than ever even there, so it would appear not. I mean, if you're such a dupe you think tolerance is grooming, then you simply can't be helped by any gpvt.

No need to anymore, Kamala got the nomination without a single person voting for her.

And how did you respond to him?

if there was no mental disorder there'd be no need for the surgery. Surgery is one of the treatments for it, there can't be a pathology without an illness. Or are you claiming that it really is a choice?

Then he's an Ausie.

I'll be a lot less pain than kamales practices. Tax on unrealized capital gains? hat would devastate America by itself. The inflation from giving everybody $25,000 to buy their first home we create an inflationary nightmare of epic proportions